Repression of CHROMOMETHYLASE 3 prevents epigenetic collateral damage in Arabidopsis

  1. Ranjith K Papareddy
  2. Katalin Páldi
  3. Anna D Smolka
  4. Patrick Hüther
  5. Claude Becker
  6. Michael D Nodine  Is a corresponding author
  1. Gregor Mendel Institute, Austria
  2. Gregor Mendel Institute; LMU Biocenter, Austria
  3. Gregor Mendel Institute; LMU Biocenter, Germany
  4. Gregor Mendel Institute; Wageningen University, Austria

Abstract

DNA methylation has evolved to silence mutagenic transposable elements (TEs) while typically avoiding the targeting of endogenous genes. Mechanisms that prevent DNA methyltransferases from ectopically methylating genes are expected to be of prime importance during periods of dynamic cell cycle activities including plant embryogenesis. However, virtually nothing is known regarding how DNA methyltransferase activities are precisely regulated during embryogenesis to prevent the induction of potentially deleterious and mitotically stable genic epimutations. Here, we report that microRNA-mediated repression of CHROMOMETHYLASE 3 (CMT3) and the chromatin features that CMT3 prefers help prevent ectopic methylation of thousands of genes during embryogenesis that can persist for weeks afterwards. Our results are also consistent with CMT3-induced ectopic methylation of promoters or bodies of genes undergoing transcriptional activation reducing their expression. Therefore, the repression of CMT3 prevents epigenetic collateral damage on endogenous genes. We also provide a model that may help reconcile conflicting viewpoints regarding the functions of gene-body methylation that occurs in nearly all flowering plants.

Data availability

All sequencing data generated in this study are publicly available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (NCBI GEO, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE171198.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ranjith K Papareddy

    Gregor Mendel Institute, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Katalin Páldi

    Gregor Mendel Institute, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Anna D Smolka

    Gregor Mendel Institute, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Patrick Hüther

    Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter, Gregor Mendel Institute; LMU Biocenter, Vienna, Austria
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Claude Becker

    Genetics, Gregor Mendel Institute; LMU Biocenter, Martinsried, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3406-4670
  6. Michael D Nodine

    Gregor Mendel Institute; Wageningen University, Vienna, Austria
    For correspondence
    michael.nodine@wur.nl
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6204-8857

Funding

H2020 European Research Council (637888)

  • Michael D Nodine

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2021, Papareddy et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,076
    views
  • 329
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ranjith K Papareddy
  2. Katalin Páldi
  3. Anna D Smolka
  4. Patrick Hüther
  5. Claude Becker
  6. Michael D Nodine
(2021)
Repression of CHROMOMETHYLASE 3 prevents epigenetic collateral damage in Arabidopsis
eLife 10:e69396.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69396

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69396

Further reading

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erik Toraason, Alina Salagean ... Diana E Libuda
    Research Article

    The preservation of genome integrity during sperm and egg development is vital for reproductive success. During meiosis, the tumor suppressor BRCA1/BRC-1 and structural maintenance of chromosomes 5/6 (SMC-5/6) complex genetically interact to promote high fidelity DNA double strand break (DSB) repair, but the specific DSB repair outcomes these proteins regulate remain unknown. Using genetic and cytological methods to monitor resolution of DSBs with different repair partners in Caenorhabditis elegans, we demonstrate that both BRC-1 and SMC-5 repress intersister crossover recombination events. Sequencing analysis of conversion tracts from homolog-independent DSB repair events further indicates that BRC-1 regulates intersister/intrachromatid noncrossover conversion tract length. Moreover, we find that BRC-1 specifically inhibits error prone repair of DSBs induced at mid-pachytene. Finally, we reveal functional interactions of BRC-1 and SMC-5/6 in regulating repair pathway engagement: BRC-1 is required for localization of recombinase proteins to DSBs in smc-5 mutants and enhances DSB repair defects in smc-5 mutants by repressing theta-mediated end joining (TMEJ). These results are consistent with a model in which some functions of BRC-1 act upstream of SMC-5/6 to promote recombination and inhibit error-prone DSB repair, while SMC-5/6 acts downstream of BRC-1 to regulate the formation or resolution of recombination intermediates. Taken together, our study illuminates the coordinate interplay of BRC-1 and SMC-5/6 to regulate DSB repair outcomes in the germline.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Philipp H Schiffer, Paschalis Natsidis ... Maximilian J Telford
    Research Article

    The evolutionary origins of Bilateria remain enigmatic. One of the more enduring proposals highlights similarities between a cnidarian-like planula larva and simple acoel-like flatworms. This idea is based in part on the view of the Xenacoelomorpha as an outgroup to all other bilaterians which are themselves designated the Nephrozoa (protostomes and deuterostomes). Genome data can provide important comparative data and help to understand the evolution and biology of enigmatic species better. Here we assemble and analyse the genome of the simple, marine xenacoelomorph Xenoturbella bocki, a key species for our understanding of early bilaterian evolution. Our highly contiguous genome assembly of X. bocki has a size of ~111 Mbp in 18 chromosome like scaffolds, with repeat content and intron, exon and intergenic space comparable to other bilaterian invertebrates. We find X. bocki to have a similar number of genes to other bilaterians and to have retained ancestral metazoan synteny. Key bilaterian signalling pathways are also largely complete and most bilaterian miRNAs are present. Overall, we conclude that X. bocki has a complex genome typical of bilaterians, which does not reflect the apparent simplicity of its body plan that has been so important to proposals that the Xenacoelomorpha are the simple sister group of the rest of the Bilateria.