A proteome-wide genetic investigation identifies several SARS-CoV-2-exploited host targets of clinical relevance

  1. Mohd Anisul  Is a corresponding author
  2. Jarrod Shilts
  3. Jeremy Schwartzentruber
  4. James Hayhurst
  5. Annalisa Buniello
  6. Elmutaz Shaikho
  7. Jie Zheng
  8. Michael Holmes
  9. David Ochoa
  10. Miguel Carmona
  11. Joseph Maranville
  12. Tom R Gaunt
  13. Valur Emilsson
  14. Vilmundur Gudnason
  15. Ellen M McDonagh
  16. Gavin J Wright
  17. Maya Ghoussaini  Is a corresponding author
  18. Ian Dunham  Is a corresponding author
  1. Wellcome Sanger Institute, United Kingdom
  2. EBI-EMBL, United Kingdom
  3. Bristol-Myers Squibb, United States
  4. University of Bristol, United Kingdom
  5. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  6. Icelandic Heart Association, Iceland
  7. Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, United Kingdom
  8. EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background:

The virus SARS-CoV-2 can exploit biological vulnerabilities (e.g. host proteins) in susceptible hosts that predispose to the development of severe COVID-19.

Methods:

To identify host proteins that may contribute to the risk of severe COVID-19, we undertook proteome-wide genetic colocalisation tests, and polygenic (pan) and cis-Mendelian randomisation analyses leveraging publicly available protein and COVID-19 datasets.

Results:

Our analytic approach identified several known targets (e.g. ABO, OAS1), but also nominated new proteins such as soluble Fas (colocalisation probability > 0.9, p = 1 x 10-4), implicating Fas-mediated apoptosis as a potential target for COVID-19 risk. The polygenic (pan) and cis-Mendelian randomisation analyses showed consistent associations of genetically predicted ABO protein with several COVID-19 phenotypes. The ABO signal is highly pleiotropic and a look-up of proteins associated with the ABO signal revealed that the strongest association was with soluble CD209. We demonstrated experimentally that CD209 directly interacts with the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2, suggesting a mechanism that could explain the ABO association with COVID-19.

Conclusions:

Our work provides a prioritised list of host targets potentially exploited by SARS-CoV-2 and is a precursor for further research on CD209 and FAS as therapeutically tractable targets for COVID-19.

Funding:

MAK, JSc, JH, AB, DO, MC, EMM, MG, ID were funded by Open Targets. J.Z. and T.R.G were funded by the UK Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit (MC_UU_00011/4). JSh and GJW were funded by the Wellcome Trust Grant 206194. This research was funded in part by the Wellcome Trust [Grant 206194]. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a CC BY public copyright licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Data availability

Summary data used for genetic analyses are publicly available (Sun et al can be downloaded from GWAS catalog https://www.ebi.ac.uk/gwas/downloads/summary-statistics and COVID-19 HGI summary statistics can be downloaded from their website https://www.covid19hg.org/results/). Data generated from our study are provided in the supplementary tables (pan-MR and cis-MR association results filtered at p < 0.05 and no filters applied to colocalisation results).

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mohd Anisul

    Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    mk31@sanger.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Mohd Anisul, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2960-6017
  2. Jarrod Shilts

    Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Jeremy Schwartzentruber

    Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Jeremy Schwartzentruber, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners..
  4. James Hayhurst

    EBI-EMBL, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    James Hayhurst, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners..
  5. Annalisa Buniello

    EBI-EMBL, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Annalisa Buniello, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners..
  6. Elmutaz Shaikho

    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Elmutaz Shaikho, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners.. ES is also a full-time employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb..
  7. Jie Zheng

    Medical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6623-6839
  8. Michael Holmes

    University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Michael Holmes, Dr Holmes has consulted for Boehringer Ingelheim, and in adherence to the University of Oxford's Clinical Trial Service Unit & Epidemiological Studies Unit (CSTU) staff policy, did not accept personal honoraria or other payments from pharmaceutical companies..
  9. David Ochoa

    EBI-EMBL, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    David Ochoa, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners..
  10. Miguel Carmona

    EBI-EMBL, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Miguel Carmona, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners..
  11. Joseph Maranville

    Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    Joseph Maranville, JM is a full-time employee of Bristol-Myers Squibb and retains stock or stock options in Bristol-Myers Squibb. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  12. Tom R Gaunt

    MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Tom R Gaunt, TG received grants from Biogen and GlaxoSmithKline. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0924-3247
  13. Valur Emilsson

    Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Vilmundur Gudnason

    Icelandic Heart Association, Kopavogur, Iceland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5696-0084
  15. Ellen M McDonagh

    EBI-EMBL, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Ellen M McDonagh, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners..
  16. Gavin J Wright

    Cell Surface Signalling Laboratory, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0537-0863
  17. Maya Ghoussaini

    Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    mg29@sanger.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Maya Ghoussaini, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners..
  18. Ian Dunham

    Open Targets, EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    dunham@ebi.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    Ian Dunham, Open Targets is a pre-competitive partnership currently involving the Wellcome Sanger Institute, EMBL-EBI, BMS, GSK, and Sanofi. Research is funded by financial and in-kind contributions from each of the partners. ID also received travel costs within the last 36 months from Takeda for speaking at their Reverse Translation Symposium. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2525-5598

Funding

Wellcome Trust (Grant 206194)

  • Mohd Anisul
  • Jarrod Shilts
  • Jeremy Schwartzentruber
  • Gavin J Wright
  • Maya Ghoussaini

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All institutions contributing cohorts to the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative and INTERVAL (Sun et al) study for proteomics received ethics approval from their respective research ethics review boards. All participants in the INTERVAL study provided informed consent before joining the INTERVAL study with approval from the National Research Ethics (11/EE/0538). Ethics statements of studies that contributed participant data to the COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative are provided in Supplementary Table 1 of their recently published paper (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03767-x).

Copyright

© 2021, Anisul et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,863
    views
  • 225
    downloads
  • 27
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mohd Anisul
  2. Jarrod Shilts
  3. Jeremy Schwartzentruber
  4. James Hayhurst
  5. Annalisa Buniello
  6. Elmutaz Shaikho
  7. Jie Zheng
  8. Michael Holmes
  9. David Ochoa
  10. Miguel Carmona
  11. Joseph Maranville
  12. Tom R Gaunt
  13. Valur Emilsson
  14. Vilmundur Gudnason
  15. Ellen M McDonagh
  16. Gavin J Wright
  17. Maya Ghoussaini
  18. Ian Dunham
(2021)
A proteome-wide genetic investigation identifies several SARS-CoV-2-exploited host targets of clinical relevance
eLife 10:e69719.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69719

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69719

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Bo Zheng, Bronner P Gonçalves ... Caoyi Xue
    Research Article

    Background:

    In many settings, a large fraction of the population has both been vaccinated against and infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Hence, quantifying the protection provided by post-infection vaccination has become critical for policy. We aimed to estimate the protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection of an additional vaccine dose after an initial Omicron variant infection.

    Methods:

    We report a retrospective, population-based cohort study performed in Shanghai, China, using electronic databases with information on SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccination history. We compared reinfection incidence by post-infection vaccination status in individuals initially infected during the April–May 2022 Omicron variant surge in Shanghai and who had been vaccinated before that period. Cox models were fit to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).

    Results:

    275,896 individuals were diagnosed with real-time polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in April–May 2022; 199,312/275,896 were included in analyses on the effect of a post-infection vaccine dose. Post-infection vaccination provided protection against reinfection (aHR 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.85). For patients who had received one, two, or three vaccine doses before their first infection, hazard ratios for the post-infection vaccination effect were 0.84 (0.76–0.93), 0.87 (0.83–0.90), and 0.96 (0.74–1.23), respectively. Post-infection vaccination within 30 and 90 days before the second Omicron wave provided different degrees of protection (in aHR): 0.51 (0.44–0.58) and 0.67 (0.61–0.74), respectively. Moreover, for all vaccine types, but to different extents, a post-infection dose given to individuals who were fully vaccinated before first infection was protective.

    Conclusions:

    In previously vaccinated and infected individuals, an additional vaccine dose provided protection against Omicron variant reinfection. These observations will inform future policy decisions on COVID-19 vaccination in China and other countries.

    Funding:

    This study was funded the Key Discipline Program of Pudong New Area Health System (PWZxk2022-25), the Development and Application of Intelligent Epidemic Surveillance and AI Analysis System (21002411400), the Shanghai Public Health System Construction (GWVI-11.2-XD08), the Shanghai Health Commission Key Disciplines (GWVI-11.1-02), the Shanghai Health Commission Clinical Research Program (20214Y0020), the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (22ZR1414600), and the Shanghai Young Health Talents Program (2022YQ076).

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Marina Padilha, Victor Nahuel Keller ... Gilberto Kac
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    The role of circulating metabolites on child development is understudied. We investigated associations between children’s serum metabolome and early childhood development (ECD).

    Methods:

    Untargeted metabolomics was performed on serum samples of 5004 children aged 6–59 months, a subset of participants from the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019). ECD was assessed using the Survey of Well-being of Young Children’s milestones questionnaire. The graded response model was used to estimate developmental age. Developmental quotient (DQ) was calculated as the developmental age divided by chronological age. Partial least square regression selected metabolites with a variable importance projection ≥1. The interaction between significant metabolites and the child’s age was tested.

    Results:

    Twenty-eight top-ranked metabolites were included in linear regression models adjusted for the child’s nutritional status, diet quality, and infant age. Cresol sulfate (β=–0.07; adjusted-p <0.001), hippuric acid (β=–0.06; adjusted-p <0.001), phenylacetylglutamine (β=–0.06; adjusted-p <0.001), and trimethylamine-N-oxide (β=–0.05; adjusted-p=0.002) showed inverse associations with DQ. We observed opposite directions in the association of DQ for creatinine (for children aged –1 SD: β=–0.05; pP=0.01;+1 SD: β=0.05; p=0.02) and methylhistidine (–1 SD: β = - 0.04; p=0.04;+1 SD: β=0.04; p=0.03).

    Conclusions:

    Serum biomarkers, including dietary and microbial-derived metabolites involved in the gut-brain axis, may potentially be used to track children at risk for developmental delays.

    Funding:

    Supported by the Brazilian Ministry of Health and the Brazilian National Research Council.