Antidepressants: Where ketamine and dopamine collide
Ketamine strengthens connections between two brain regions that are involved in the production and regulation of dopamine, which may explain how the drug can alleviate depression.
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Center for Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, University of Washington, United States
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Center for Neurobiology of Addiction, Pain, and Emotion, and Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington, United States
1987 was a watershed year in the history of antidepressants, with Prozac being the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor drug to be approved for use in the US. Prozac and other drugs that limit the reuptake of neurotransmitters such as serotonin, norepinephrine and dopamine would dominate the market for the next three decades. These treatments were marked improvements over their predecessors, but it has become clear that they are not the silver bullet they were once touted to be: moderate efficacy, insensitive populations, and untenable side effects have all limited their clinical utility (Warden et al., 2007).
Enter Ketamine. First synthesized over 75 years ago, this small, unassuming compound had so far been relegated to veterinary clinics as a pet anesthetic, while also doubling as a club drug that could induce dissociation and euphoria. In the early 2000s, however, reports started to emerge suggesting that a single dose of ketamine could have profound and lasting antidepressant effects (Berman et al., 2000). After over a decade of research, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) finally approved ketamine, in the form of ‘esketamine’, for the treatment of depression (Carboni et al., 2021). However, the mechanisms that drive the antidepressant effects of ketamine are poorly understood: this is unusual for an FDA-approved drug, although not unheard of for molecules used to treat affective disorders such as depression. How can a compound used to anesthetize cats or induce a psychedelic-like high have clinical utility?
Dopamine, the so-called ‘pleasure or reward neuromodulator’, is indispensable for regulating responses to rewards such as delicious foods, sex or addictive substances; however, it has also been implicated in certain mood disorders (Berridge, 2018). In fact, the emergence of depression has been linked to disruption in the activity of the dopamine-producing neurons present in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) of the brain, but few studies have examined whether ketamine elicits its antidepressant effects by altering the activity of these cells (Hamon and Blier, 2013). Now, in eLife, Yevgenia Kozorovitskiy and colleagues at Northwestern University – including Mingzheng Wu as first author – report how ketamine can strengthen brain circuits that include the VTA (Wu et al., 2021).
The researchers used a ‘learned helplessness’ experimental mouse model which mimics the blunted behavioral or emotional reactions that are one of the hallmarks of depression (Bylsma et al., 2008). The rodents were repeatedly exposed to mild electric shocks to the foot that were impossible to escape: over time, they learn that it was pointless to try to avoid this stressor, and they froze rather than try to escape. Antidepressants – including ketamine, as Wu et al. now show – alleviate this helplessness and restore escape behaviors. The researchers had also genetically manipulated the rodents to introduce a bioengineered molecule that emits light when neurons become activated, with the change in fluorescence being used as a proxy for neuronal activity (Inoue, 2020). The experiments revealed that in mice with learned helplessness, the activity pattern of VTA neurons was abnormal: however, ketamine treatment could reverse this disruption (Figure 1).
Figure 1
A new mechanism for the antidepressant effects of ketamine.
Over time, mice that are exposed to repeated mild electric shocks from which it is not possible to escape stop trying to avoid this stressor; instead, they develop learned helplessness and ‘freeze’ rather than attempt to escape, a behavior reminiscent of the reduced behavioral responses observed in depression (top). This exposure to stress disrupts the activity of a circuit formed by dopamine-producing projections (blue lines) and glutamate-producing projections (red lines) that connect the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Receiving ketamine (bottom), however, has an antidepressant effect. The drug alleviates learned helplessness and allows the mice to display active coping behaviors such as trying to escape the stimuli, while also reversing the disruption in the circuits between VTA and mPFC.
These data clearly demonstrated that VTA dopamine neurons are involved in responding to stressors, but whether ketamine acts by changing the activity of the neurons themselves remained unresolved. To test for a causal link, Wu et al. selectively inhibited VTA neurons by using another bioengineered molecule, a receptor called DREADD that can only be selectively activated by a synthetic molecule (Dobrzanski and Kossut, 2017). Ketamine had no effect when the VTA neurons were inhibited, demonstrating that VTA dopamine neuron activity is necessary for the drug to have an antidepressant effect.
Further physiology experiments were then conducted in the VTA to determine how ketamine could impact neuronal activity, with, somewhat unexpectedly, few noticeable effects emerging. This suggested that rather than acting locally, ketamine most likely worked by modulating the activity of an upstream brain region that influences VTA activity. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC for short) represented an attractive target because it sends dense projections to the VTA, and because it mediates, in part, the antidepressant effects of katamine (Vertes, 2004; Moda-Sava et al., 2019).
Indeed, Wu et al. discovered that injecting ketamine specifically into the mPFC (but not other VTA-projecting brain regions) replicated the improvements observed when the mice were administered the drug systemically. In addition, antidepressant-like effects that mirrored those induced by ketamine emerged when mPFC neurons that express the receptor for dopamine were artificially activated using excitatory DREADDs.
The research presented by Wu et al. provides a unique understanding of the antidepressant effects of ketamine on canonical reward circuits. Specifically, the results suggest that the drug acts by strengthening a recurrent neural circuit between the VTA and the mPFC, which allows ketamine’s antidepressant properties to persist long after the compound has been cleared from the body. The data pave the way for future studies that directly examine how the effects of ketamine are mediated by mPFC projections to the VTA. Ultimately, this knowledge will help to find and design more selective compounds which can target these circuits to treat depression and related disorders.
References
-
Antidepressant effects of ketamine in depressed patientsBiological Psychiatry 47:351–354.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3223(99)00230-9
-
Evolving concepts of emotion and motivationFrontiers in Psychology 9:1647.https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01647
-
A meta-analysis of emotional reactivity in major depressive disorderClinical Psychology Review 28:676–691.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2007.10.001
-
Repurposing ketamine in depression and related disorders: can this enigmatic drug achieve success?Frontiers in Neuroscience 15:657714.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.657714
-
Application of the DREADD technique in biomedical brain researchPharmacological Reports 69:213–221.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharep.2016.10.015
-
Monoamine neurocircuitry in depression and strategies for new treatmentsProgress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry 45:54–63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2013.04.009
-
The STAR*D project results: a comprehensive review of findingsCurrent Psychiatry Reports 9:449–459.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-007-0061-3
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2021, Marcus and Bruchas
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 17,631
- views
-
- 265
- downloads
-
- 7
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Antidepressants: Where ketamine and dopamine collide
eLife 10:e70148.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70148
Further reading
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Neuroscience
Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is caused by mutations in the Survival Motor Neuron 1 (SMN1) gene. While traditionally viewed as a motor neuron disorder, there is involvement of various peripheral organs in SMA. Notably, fatty liver has been observed in SMA mouse models and SMA patients. Nevertheless, it remains unclear whether intrinsic depletion of SMN protein in the liver contributes to pathology in the peripheral or central nervous systems. To address this, we developed a mouse model with a liver-specific depletion of SMN by utilizing an Alb-Cre transgene together with one Smn2B allele and one Smn1 exon 7 allele flanked by loxP sites. Initially, we evaluated phenotypic changes in these mice at postnatal day 19 (P19), when the severe model of SMA, the Smn2B/- mice, exhibit many symptoms of the disease. The liver-specific SMN depletion does not induce motor neuron death, neuromuscular pathology or muscle atrophy, characteristics typically observed in the Smn2B/- mouse at P19. However, mild liver steatosis was observed, although no changes in liver function were detected. Notably, pancreatic alterations resembled that of Smn2B/-mice, with a decrease in insulin-producing β-cells and an increase in glucagon-producingα-cells, accompanied by a reduction in blood glucose and an increase in plasma glucagon and glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1). These changes were transient, as mice at P60 exhibited recovery of liver and pancreatic function. While the mosaic pattern of the Cre-mediated excision precludes definitive conclusions regarding the contribution of liver-specific SMN depletion to overall tissue pathology, our findings highlight an intricate connection between liver function and pancreatic abnormalities in SMA.
-
- Neuroscience
Childhood adversity is a strong predictor of developing psychopathological conditions. Multiple theories on the mechanisms underlying this association have been suggested which, however, differ in the operationalization of ‘exposure.’ Altered (threat) learning mechanisms represent central mechanisms by which environmental inputs shape emotional and cognitive processes and ultimately behavior. 1402 healthy participants underwent a fear conditioning paradigm (acquisition training, generalization), while acquiring skin conductance responses (SCRs) and ratings (arousal, valence, and contingency). Childhood adversity was operationalized as (1) dichotomization, and following (2) the specificity model, (3) the cumulative risk model, and (4) the dimensional model. Individuals exposed to childhood adversity showed blunted physiological reactivity in SCRs, but not ratings, and reduced CS+/CS- discrimination during both phases, mainly driven by attenuated CS+ responding. The latter was evident across different operationalizations of ‘exposure’ following the different theories. None of the theories tested showed clear explanatory superiority. Notably, a remarkably different pattern of increased responding to the CS- is reported in the literature for anxiety patients, suggesting that individuals exposed to childhood adversity may represent a specific sub-sample. We highlight that theories linking childhood adversity to (vulnerability to) psychopathology need refinement.
