1. Ecology
  2. Plant Biology
Download icon

Plant Ecology: Getting the metabolites right

  1. Arthur Korte  Is a corresponding author
  1. Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology, University of Würzburg, Germany
Insight
  • Cited 0
  • Views 885
  • Annotations
Cite this article as: eLife 2021;10:e70149 doi: 10.7554/eLife.70149

Abstract

A study of almost 800 Arabidopsis thaliana plants from across Europe reveals how the environment and evolutionary pressures shape their metabolites.

Main text

All living organisms look different. Even within a species, individuals can show differences in their shape, size and coloring. This is true both for outward appearances and for physiological traits, such as the concentration of various metabolites. These variations are determined by the underlying genetics of the organism and by the environment it lives in. This results in phenotypic differences that affect the entire organism, allowing it to rapidly respond to changes in its environment. A well-known example of this is the change in color and pattern of butterfly wings under different temperatures, which is regulated by specific hormones (Bhardwaj et al., 2020).

The relationship between genotype and phenotype has been of interest since Mendel postulated the existence of 'internal factors' that are passed on to the next generation (Mendel, 1865), and Bateson originated the term 'genetics' (Bateson, 1909). This link is of major interest in fields ranging from evolutionary biology to molecular biology, and also medicine or agriculture, where untangling genetic effects on phenotypes from environmental effects can lead to beneficial interventions.

The mechanisms by which genetic differences translate into phenotypic differences involve many intermediate steps (Figure 1A); this so-called ‘in-between-ome’ consists of the transcriptome, the proteome and the metabolome. The integration of data from these different levels is necessary to understand how complex phenotypes evolve, and how they are regulated (Subramanian et al., 2020). In plants, the metabolome – all of the small molecules required for an organism to live – is particularly important for adaptation. This is because plants, being immobile, rely on the substances they can absorb from their environment and the derivatives they can produce. However, it is unclear how the variety of metabolites found in plants from different environments arose during evolution. Now, in eLife, Daniel J Kliebenstein, from the University of California Davis, along with colleagues from Austria, the United States and Germany – including Ella Katz as first author – report the factors that drive phenotypic differences in the chemical composition of a specific type of metabolites found in the plant Arabidopsis thaliana (Katz et al., 2021).

The complex interplay between genotype, phenotype and the environment.

(A) The environment of an organism influences its phenotype through natural selection, and its genome, which adapts to distinct environments. The mechanisms by which genetic differences translate into phenotypic variation are mediated by the ‘in-between-ome’. This consists of the transcriptome and the proteome, which are indirectly affected by the environment (shown in grey), and the metabolome, which is directly influenced by the environment (shown in black). (B) Map of Europe showing dots in different colors representing lines of A. thaliana with different glucosinolate profiles (GSL), also known as chemotypes. These chemotypes change depending on the environment, with plants from similar environments exhibiting similar chemotypes.

Katz et al. measured the levels of specialized metabolites called glucosinolates in nearly 800 lines of A. thaliana from different ecosystems in Europe. Glucosinolates are biologically active compounds that protect plants from pests and diseases. They are usually found in the Brassicaceae family (Rask et al., 2000), which includes plants like broccoli, cauliflower or mustard, and provide these plants with their characteristic taste. Additionally, plants use glucosinolates to counteract both biotic stress, caused by other living organisms such as herbivores that try to eat the plants, and abiotic stress, such as drought stress (Del Carmen Martínez-Ballesta et al., 2013). The fact that glucosinolates can protect plants from predators, pests and other stressors make it likely that the mechanisms that regulate the abundance of these compounds in individual plants are under strong selection and evolutionary constraints.

The analysis performed by Katz et al. revealed that plants from different regions in Europe had glucosinolates with different chemical compositions or ‘chemotypes’. The spatial distribution of the different chemotypes throughout Europe exhibits distinctive patterns, both at a local and a global scale (Figure 1B). But how did this trait variation evolve? What is its genetic basis and what phenotypic consequences does it have?

To answer these questions, Katz et al. used a technique called genome-wide association mapping (GWAS), which scans the genome of each plant for genetic markers that may be associated with the different chemotypes detected. This analysis found only two major sites in the genome that are responsible for variation in glucosinolate content. However, these previously known loci cannot explain all the variation observed, suggesting that additional loci must also be involved. Additionally, Katz et al. discovered previously unknown alleles at these sites and showed that different combinations of these alleles could lead to similar chemotypes in similar environments.

Based on these observations, Katz et al. suggest that these different combinations of alleles emerged through a mixture of evolutionary events. Some arose through parallel evolution, which occurs when mutations in the same gene lead to similar traits. Others are the result of convergent evolution, where independent mutations in different genes give rise to similar features. Apart from the genetic factors, Katz et al. also show how environmental parameters like climate and geography directly affect the chemotype of A. thaliana in different regions. Specifically, they found that specific environmental conditions were associated with certain chemotypes across different geographic locations.

Katz et al. show that many factors, both environmental and genetic, shape the chemotype of glucosinolates in A. thaliana. The findings highlight the complexity of the interplay between genetics and the environment, and how both contribute to the evolution of traits in natural populations. They also underline how complex traits appear in a population that is adapted to distinct environments. Additionally, this work demonstrates the need to correctly design studies that aim to explain and dissect complex traits, given that results can be confounded by individuals from the same species being adapted to distinct environmental conditions. Future work will show whether the findings of Katz et al. findings hold for other traits, and if they shed light on general principles of trait evolution.

References

    1. Mendel G
    (1865)
    Experiments in plant hybridization
    Proceedings of the Natural History Society of Brünn.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Arthur Korte

    Arthur Korte is in the Center for Computational and Theoretical Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

    For correspondence
    arthur.korte@uni-wuerzburg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0831-1463

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: June 15, 2021 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2021, Korte

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 885
    Page views
  • 60
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Download citations (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    Yutao Xiao et al.
    Research Article Updated

    Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops have been widely planted and the effects of Bt-crops on populations of the target and non-target insect pests have been well studied. However, the effects of Bt-crops exposure on microorganisms that interact with crop pests have not previously been quantified. Here, we use laboratory and field data to show that infection of Helicoverpa armigera with a densovirus (HaDV2) is associated with its enhanced growth and tolerance to Bt-cotton. Moreover, field monitoring showed a much higher incidence of cotton bollworm infection with HaDV2 in regions cultivated with Bt-cotton than in regions without it, with the rate of densovirus infection increasing with increasing use of Bt-cotton. RNA-seq suggested tolerance to both baculovirus and Cry1Ac were enhanced via the immune-related pathways. These findings suggest that exposure to Bt-crops has selected for beneficial interactions between the target pest and a mutualistic microorganism that enhances its performance on Bt-crops under field conditions.

    1. Ecology
    Lei Guo et al.
    Research Article Updated

    The Varroa destructor mite is a devastating parasite of Apis mellifera honeybees. They can cause colonies to collapse by spreading viruses and feeding on the fat reserves of adults and larvae. Amitraz is used to control mites due to its low toxicity to bees; however, the mechanism of bee resistance to amitraz remains unknown. In this study, we found that amitraz and its major metabolite potently activated all four mite octopamine receptors. Behavioral assays using Drosophila null mutants of octopamine receptors identified one receptor subtype Octβ2R as the sole target of amitraz in vivo. We found that thermogenetic activation of octβ2R-expressing neurons mimics amitraz poisoning symptoms in target pests. We next confirmed that the mite Octβ2R was more sensitive to amitraz and its metabolite than the bee Octβ2R in pharmacological assays and transgenic flies. Furthermore, replacement of three bee-specific residues with the counterparts in the mite receptor increased amitraz sensitivity of the bee Octβ2R, indicating that the relative insensitivity of their receptor is the major mechanism for honeybees to resist amitraz. The present findings have important implications for resistance management and the design of safer insecticides that selectively target pests while maintaining low toxicity to non-target pollinators.