Purified EDEM3 or EDEM1 alone produces determinant oligosaccharide structures from M8B in mammalian glycoprotein ERAD

  1. Ginto George
  2. Satoshi Ninagawa
  3. Hirokazu Yagi
  4. Jun-ichi Furukawa
  5. Noritaka Hashii
  6. Akiko Ishii-Watabe
  7. Ying Deng
  8. Kazutoshi Matsushita
  9. Tokiro Ishikawa
  10. Yugoviandi P Mamahit
  11. Yuta Maki
  12. Yasuhiro Kajihara
  13. Koichi Kato
  14. Tetsuya Okada  Is a corresponding author
  15. Kazutoshi Mori  Is a corresponding author
  1. Kyoto University, Japan
  2. Nagoya City University, Japan
  3. Hokkaido University, Japan
  4. National Institute of Health Sciences, Japan
  5. Osaka University, Japan

Abstract

Sequential mannose trimming of N-glycan, from M9 to M8B and then to oligosaccharides exposing the a1,6-linked mannosyl residue (M7A, M6 and M5), facilitates endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of misfolded glycoproteins (gpERAD). We previously showed that EDEM2 stably disulfide-bonded to the thioredoxin domain-containing protein TXNDC11 is responsible for the first step (George et al., 2020). Here, we show that EDEM3 and EDEM1 are responsible for the second step. Incubation of pyridylamine-labeled M8B with purified EDEM3 alone produced M7 (M7A and M7C), M6 and M5. EDEM1 showed a similar tendency, although much lower amounts of M6 and M5 were produced. Thus, EDEM3 is a major a1,2-mannosidase for the second step from M8B. Both EDEM3 and EDEM1 trimmed M8B from a glycoprotein efficiently. Our confirmation of the Golgi localization of MAN1B indicates that no other a1,2-mannosidase is required for gpERAD. Accordingly, we have established the entire route of oligosaccharide processing and the enzymes responsible.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1, 1S1, 2, 2S1, 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ginto George

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Satoshi Ninagawa

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8005-4716
  3. Hirokazu Yagi

    Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9296-0225
  4. Jun-ichi Furukawa

    Hokkaido University, Sappora, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Noritaka Hashii

    National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Akiko Ishii-Watabe

    National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ying Deng

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kazutoshi Matsushita

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tokiro Ishikawa

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1718-6764
  10. Yugoviandi P Mamahit

    Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Yuta Maki

    Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yasuhiro Kajihara

    Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Koichi Kato

    Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7187-9612
  14. Tetsuya Okada

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    For correspondence
    tokada@upr.biophys.kyoto-u.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2513-1301
  15. Kazutoshi Mori

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    For correspondence
    mori@upr.biophys.kyoto-u.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7378-4019

Funding

MEXT, Japan (18K06216)

  • Satoshi Ninagawa

Kobayashi Foundation

  • Satoshi Ninagawa

MEXT, Japa (17H06414)

  • Hirokazu Yagi

MEXT, Japan (21H02625)

  • Hirokazu Yagi

MEXT, Japan (19K06658)

  • Tokiro Ishikawa

MEXT, Japan (20K21495)

  • Koichi Kato

MEXT, Japan (18K06110)

  • Tetsuya Okada

MEXT, Japan (17H01432)

  • Kazutoshi Mori

MEXT, Japan (17H06419)

  • Kazutoshi Mori

Takeda Science Foundation

  • Satoshi Ninagawa

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Adam Linstedt, Carnegie Mellon University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: May 29, 2021
  2. Accepted: October 7, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 26, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 5, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, George et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,878
    views
  • 271
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ginto George
  2. Satoshi Ninagawa
  3. Hirokazu Yagi
  4. Jun-ichi Furukawa
  5. Noritaka Hashii
  6. Akiko Ishii-Watabe
  7. Ying Deng
  8. Kazutoshi Matsushita
  9. Tokiro Ishikawa
  10. Yugoviandi P Mamahit
  11. Yuta Maki
  12. Yasuhiro Kajihara
  13. Koichi Kato
  14. Tetsuya Okada
  15. Kazutoshi Mori
(2021)
Purified EDEM3 or EDEM1 alone produces determinant oligosaccharide structures from M8B in mammalian glycoprotein ERAD
eLife 10:e70357.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70357

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70357

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Katarzyna Marta Zoltowska, Utpal Das ... Lucía Chávez-Gutiérrez
    Research Article

    Amyloid β (Aβ) peptides accumulating in the brain are proposed to trigger Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, molecular cascades underlying their toxicity are poorly defined. Here, we explored a novel hypothesis for Aβ42 toxicity that arises from its proven affinity for γ-secretases. We hypothesized that the reported increases in Aβ42, particularly in the endolysosomal compartment, promote the establishment of a product feedback inhibitory mechanism on γ-secretases, and thereby impair downstream signaling events. We conducted kinetic analyses of γ-secretase activity in cell-free systems in the presence of Aβ, as well as cell-based and ex vivo assays in neuronal cell lines, neurons, and brain synaptosomes to assess the impact of Aβ on γ-secretases. We show that human Aβ42 peptides, but neither murine Aβ42 nor human Aβ17–42 (p3), inhibit γ-secretases and trigger accumulation of unprocessed substrates in neurons, including C-terminal fragments (CTFs) of APP, p75, and pan-cadherin. Moreover, Aβ42 treatment dysregulated cellular homeostasis, as shown by the induction of p75-dependent neuronal death in two distinct cellular systems. Our findings raise the possibility that pathological elevations in Aβ42 contribute to cellular toxicity via the γ-secretase inhibition, and provide a novel conceptual framework to address Aβ toxicity in the context of γ-secretase-dependent homeostatic signaling.