Purified EDEM3 or EDEM1 alone produces determinant oligosaccharide structures from M8B in mammalian glycoprotein ERAD

  1. Ginto George
  2. Satoshi Ninagawa
  3. Hirokazu Yagi
  4. Jun-ichi Furukawa
  5. Noritaka Hashii
  6. Akiko Ishii-Watabe
  7. Ying Deng
  8. Kazutoshi Matsushita
  9. Tokiro Ishikawa
  10. Yugoviandi P Mamahit
  11. Yuta Maki
  12. Yasuhiro Kajihara
  13. Koichi Kato
  14. Tetsuya Okada  Is a corresponding author
  15. Kazutoshi Mori  Is a corresponding author
  1. Kyoto University, Japan
  2. Nagoya City University, Japan
  3. Hokkaido University, Japan
  4. National Institute of Health Sciences, Japan
  5. Osaka University, Japan

Abstract

Sequential mannose trimming of N-glycan, from M9 to M8B and then to oligosaccharides exposing the a1,6-linked mannosyl residue (M7A, M6 and M5), facilitates endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation of misfolded glycoproteins (gpERAD). We previously showed that EDEM2 stably disulfide-bonded to the thioredoxin domain-containing protein TXNDC11 is responsible for the first step (George et al., 2020). Here, we show that EDEM3 and EDEM1 are responsible for the second step. Incubation of pyridylamine-labeled M8B with purified EDEM3 alone produced M7 (M7A and M7C), M6 and M5. EDEM1 showed a similar tendency, although much lower amounts of M6 and M5 were produced. Thus, EDEM3 is a major a1,2-mannosidase for the second step from M8B. Both EDEM3 and EDEM1 trimmed M8B from a glycoprotein efficiently. Our confirmation of the Golgi localization of MAN1B indicates that no other a1,2-mannosidase is required for gpERAD. Accordingly, we have established the entire route of oligosaccharide processing and the enzymes responsible.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figures 1, 1S1, 2, 2S1, 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ginto George

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Satoshi Ninagawa

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8005-4716
  3. Hirokazu Yagi

    Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9296-0225
  4. Jun-ichi Furukawa

    Hokkaido University, Sappora, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Noritaka Hashii

    National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Akiko Ishii-Watabe

    National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ying Deng

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Kazutoshi Matsushita

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Tokiro Ishikawa

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1718-6764
  10. Yugoviandi P Mamahit

    Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Yuta Maki

    Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yasuhiro Kajihara

    Osaka University, Toyonaka, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Koichi Kato

    Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya City University, Nagoya, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7187-9612
  14. Tetsuya Okada

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    For correspondence
    tokada@upr.biophys.kyoto-u.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2513-1301
  15. Kazutoshi Mori

    Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
    For correspondence
    mori@upr.biophys.kyoto-u.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7378-4019

Funding

MEXT, Japan (18K06216)

  • Satoshi Ninagawa

Kobayashi Foundation

  • Satoshi Ninagawa

MEXT, Japa (17H06414)

  • Hirokazu Yagi

MEXT, Japan (21H02625)

  • Hirokazu Yagi

MEXT, Japan (19K06658)

  • Tokiro Ishikawa

MEXT, Japan (20K21495)

  • Koichi Kato

MEXT, Japan (18K06110)

  • Tetsuya Okada

MEXT, Japan (17H01432)

  • Kazutoshi Mori

MEXT, Japan (17H06419)

  • Kazutoshi Mori

Takeda Science Foundation

  • Satoshi Ninagawa

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Adam Linstedt, Carnegie Mellon University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: May 29, 2021
  2. Accepted: October 7, 2021
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 26, 2021 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: November 5, 2021 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2021, George et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,819
    views
  • 262
    downloads
  • 11
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ginto George
  2. Satoshi Ninagawa
  3. Hirokazu Yagi
  4. Jun-ichi Furukawa
  5. Noritaka Hashii
  6. Akiko Ishii-Watabe
  7. Ying Deng
  8. Kazutoshi Matsushita
  9. Tokiro Ishikawa
  10. Yugoviandi P Mamahit
  11. Yuta Maki
  12. Yasuhiro Kajihara
  13. Koichi Kato
  14. Tetsuya Okada
  15. Kazutoshi Mori
(2021)
Purified EDEM3 or EDEM1 alone produces determinant oligosaccharide structures from M8B in mammalian glycoprotein ERAD
eLife 10:e70357.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70357

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70357

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    Pattama Wiriyasermkul, Satomi Moriyama ... Shushi Nagamori
    Research Article

    Transporter research primarily relies on the canonical substrates of well-established transporters. This approach has limitations when studying transporters for the low-abundant micromolecules, such as micronutrients, and may not reveal physiological functions of the transporters. While d-serine, a trace enantiomer of serine in the circulation, was discovered as an emerging biomarker of kidney function, its transport mechanisms in the periphery remain unknown. Here, using a multi-hierarchical approach from body fluids to molecules, combining multi-omics, cell-free synthetic biochemistry, and ex vivo transport analyses, we have identified two types of renal d-serine transport systems. We revealed that the small amino acid transporter ASCT2 serves as a d-serine transporter previously uncharacterized in the kidney and discovered d-serine as a non-canonical substrate of the sodium-coupled monocarboxylate transporters (SMCTs). These two systems are physiologically complementary, but ASCT2 dominates the role in the pathological condition. Our findings not only shed light on renal d-serine transport, but also clarify the importance of non-canonical substrate transport. This study provides a framework for investigating multiple transport systems of various trace micromolecules under physiological conditions and in multifactorial diseases.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.