CRMP4-mediated fornix development involves semaphorin-3E signaling pathway

  1. Benoît Boulan
  2. Charlotte Ravanello
  3. Amandine Peyrel
  4. Christophe Bosc
  5. Christian Delphin
  6. Florence Appaix
  7. Eric Denarier
  8. Alexandra Kraut
  9. Muriel Jaquier-Sarlin
  10. Alyson Fournier
  11. Annie Andrieux
  12. Sylvie Gory-Fauré  Is a corresponding author
  13. Jean-Christophe Deloulme  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Canada
  2. University Grenoble Alpes, France
  3. Université Grenoble Alpes, France
  4. McGill University, Canada

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental axonal pathfinding plays a central role in correct brain wiring and subsequent cognitive abilities. Within the growth cone, various intracellular effectors transduce axonal guidance signals by remodeling the cytoskeleton. Semaphorin-3E (Sema3E) is a guidance cue implicated in development of the fornix, a neuronal tract connecting the hippocampus to the hypothalamus. Microtubule-Associated Protein 6 (MAP6) has been shown to be involved in the Sema3E growth-promoting signaling pathway. In this study, we identified the Collapsin Response Mediator Protein 4 (CRMP4) as a MAP6 partner and a crucial effector in Sema3E growth-promoting activity. CRMP4-KO mice displayed abnormal fornix development reminiscent of that observed in Sema3E-KO mice. CRMP4 was shown to interact with the Sema3E tripartite receptor complex within Detergent-Resistant Membrane (DRM) domains, and DRM domain integrity was required to transduce Sema3E signaling through the Akt/GSK3 pathway. Finally, we showed that the cytoskeleton-binding domain of CRMP4 is required for Sema3E's growth-promoting activity, suggesting that CRMP4 plays a role at the interface between Sema3E receptors, located in DRM domains, and the cytoskeleton network. As the fornix is affected in many psychiatric diseases, such as schizophrenia, our results provide new insights to better understand the neurodevelopmental components of these diseases.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for Figure 2, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 , Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and supplementary File 1

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Benoît Boulan

    Cellular Neurobiology Research Unit, Institut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6793-5378
  2. Charlotte Ravanello

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Amandine Peyrel

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Christophe Bosc

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christian Delphin

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Florence Appaix

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Eric Denarier

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4169-397X
  8. Alexandra Kraut

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Muriel Jaquier-Sarlin

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8501-7511
  10. Alyson Fournier

    Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Annie Andrieux

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4022-6405
  12. Sylvie Gory-Fauré

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    sylvie.gory-faure@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Jean-Christophe Deloulme

    Inserm, U1216, CEA, Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    Jean-Christophe.deloulme@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2234-5865

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (2010- Blanc-120201 CBioS)

  • Christophe Bosc

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (2017-CE11-0026 MAMAs)

  • Annie Andrieux

The funder had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: The study protocol was approved by the local animal welfare committee (Comité Local GIN, C2EA-04 - APAFIS number 8303-2016060110523424) and complied with EU guidelines (directive 2010/63/EU). Every precaution was taken to minimize the number of animals used and stress to animals during experiments.

Copyright

© 2021, Boulan et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 871
    views
  • 138
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Benoît Boulan
  2. Charlotte Ravanello
  3. Amandine Peyrel
  4. Christophe Bosc
  5. Christian Delphin
  6. Florence Appaix
  7. Eric Denarier
  8. Alexandra Kraut
  9. Muriel Jaquier-Sarlin
  10. Alyson Fournier
  11. Annie Andrieux
  12. Sylvie Gory-Fauré
  13. Jean-Christophe Deloulme
(2021)
CRMP4-mediated fornix development involves semaphorin-3E signaling pathway
eLife 10:e70361.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70361

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.70361

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    Natsuko Emura, Florence DM Wavreil ... Mamiko Yajima
    Research Article

    The evolutionary introduction of asymmetric cell division (ACD) into the developmental program facilitates the formation of a new cell type, contributing to developmental diversity and, eventually, species diversification. The micromere of the sea urchin embryo may serve as one of those examples: an ACD at the 16-cell stage forms micromeres unique to echinoids among echinoderms. We previously reported that a polarity factor, activator of G-protein signaling (AGS), plays a crucial role in micromere formation. However, AGS and its associated ACD factors are present in all echinoderms and across most metazoans. This raises the question of what evolutionary modifications of AGS protein or its surrounding molecular environment contributed to the evolutionary acquisition of micromeres only in echinoids. In this study, we learned that the GoLoco motifs at the AGS C-terminus play critical roles in regulating micromere formation in sea urchin embryos. Further, other echinoderms’ AGS or chimeric AGS that contain the C-terminus of AGS orthologs from various organisms showed varied localization and function in micromere formation. In contrast, the sea star or the pencil urchin orthologs of other ACD factors were consistently localized at the vegetal cortex in the sea urchin embryo, suggesting that AGS may be a unique variable factor that facilitates ACD diversity among echinoderms. Consistently, sea urchin AGS appears to facilitate micromere-like cell formation and accelerate the enrichment timing of the germline factor Vasa during early embryogenesis of the pencil urchin, an ancestral type of sea urchin. Based on these observations, we propose that the molecular evolution of a single polarity factor facilitates ACD diversity while preserving the core ACD machinery among echinoderms and beyond during evolution.

    1. Developmental Biology
    Margaret Hines, Elias Oxman ... Irene Zohn
    Insight

    A new single-cell atlas of gene expression provides insights into the patterning of the neural plate of mice.