Epigenetic scores for the circulating proteome as tools for disease prediction
- University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Virginia Tech, United States
- University of Oxford, United Kingdom
- The University of Texas at Austin, United States
- Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany
- Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Germany
- University of Queensland, Australia
- The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, Qatar
Abstract
Protein biomarkers have been identified across many age-related morbidities. However, characterising epigenetic influences could further inform disease predictions. Here, we leverage epigenome-wide data to study links between the DNAm signatures of the circulating proteome and incident diseases. Using data from four cohorts, we trained and tested epigenetic scores (EpiScores) for 953 plasma proteins, identifying 109 scores that explained between 1% and 58% of the variance in protein levels after adjusting for known protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) genetic effects. By projecting these EpiScores into an independent sample, (Generation Scotland; n=9,537) and relating them to incident morbidities over a follow-up of 14 years, we uncovered 137 EpiScore – disease associations. These associations were largely independent of immune cell proportions, common lifestyle and health factors and biological aging. Notably, we found that our diabetes-associated EpiScores highlighted previous top biomarker associations from proteome-wide assessments of diabetes. These EpiScores for protein levels can therefore be a valuable resource for disease prediction and risk stratification.
Data availability
Datasets generated in this study are made available in Supplementary file 1; this file includes the protein EpiScore weights for the 109 EpiScores we provide for future studies to use. All datasets used to create figures are included in Supplementary file 1 and specific locations for these are noted in figure legends.All code used in the analyses is available with open access at the following Gitlab repository: https://github.com/DanniGadd/EpiScores-for-protein-levels.The source datasets analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to them containing information that could compromise participant consent and confidentiality. Data can be obtained from the data owners. Instructions for Lothian Birth Cohort data access can be found here: https://www.lothianbirthcohort.ed.ac.uk/content/collaboration. Dr Simon Cox must be contacted to obtain a Lothian Birth Cohort 'Data Request Form' by email: simon.cox@ed.ac.uk. Instructions for accessing Generation Scotland data can be found here: https://www.ed.ac.uk/generation-scotland/for-researchers/access; the 'GS Access Request Form' can be downloaded from this site. Completed request forms must be sent to access@generationscotland.org to be approved by the Generation Scotland access committee. Data from the KORA study can be requested from KORA-gen: http://epi.helmholtz-muenchen.de/kora-gen. Requests are submitted online and are subject to approval by the KORA board.
Article and author information
Author details
Riccardo E Marioni
Funding
Wellcome Trust (108890/Z/15/Z)
- Danni A Gadd
- Robert F Hillary
Dementias Platform UK (MR/L023784/2)
- Liu Shi
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00007/10)
- Caroline Hayward
Wellcome Trust (104036/Z/14/Z)
- Ian J Deary
- David J Porteous
- Andrew M McIntosh
Wellcome Trust (220857/Z/20/Z)
- Andrew M McIntosh
Wellcome Trust (216767/Z/19/Z)
- Chloe Fawns-Ritchie
- Cliff Nangle
- Archie Campbell
- Robin Flaig
- Ian J Deary
- David J Porteous
- Caroline Hayward
- Andrew M McIntosh
- Riccardo E Marioni
Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Directorates (CZD/16/6)
- David J Porteous
Scottish Funding Council (HR03006)
- David J Porteous
Australian Research Council Fellowship (FT200100837)
- Allan F McRae
Australian Research Council (DP160102400,FL180100072)
- Peter M Visscher
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (1113400,1010374)
- Peter M Visscher
Wellcome Trust (203771/Z/16/Z)
- Anna J Stevenson
Medical Research Council and Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (MR/K026992/1)
- Ian J Deary
UK's Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
- Ian J Deary
Royal Society-Wolfson Research Merit Award
- Ian J Deary
Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government's Health Directorates
- Ian J Deary
Age UK ((Disconnected Mind project))
- Sarah E Harris
- Ian J Deary
- Simon R Cox
Medical Research Council (G0701120,G1001245,MR/M013111/1,MR/R024065/1)
- Ian J Deary
- Simon R Cox
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/F019394/1)
- Ian J Deary
Sir Henry Dale Fellowship jointly funded by the Wellcome Trust and the Royal Society (221890/Z/20/Z)
- Simon R Cox
National Institutes of Health (RF1AG073593,P2CHD042849,P30AG066614)
- Elliot M Tucker-Drob
National Institutes of Health (R01AG054628)
- Elliot M Tucker-Drob
- Ian J Deary
- Simon R Cox
Alzheimer's Research UK (ARUK-PG2017B−10)
- Daniel L McCartney
- Riccardo E Marioni
Health Data Research UK (substantive site award)
- Archie Campbell
MRC Human Genetics Unit (MRC core support)
- Caroline Hayward
Qatar Foundation (Biomedical Research Program at Weill Cornell Medicine)
- Shaza B Zaghlool
- Karsten Suhre
Qatar National Research Fund (NPRP11C-0115-180010)
- Shaza B Zaghlool
- Karsten Suhre
German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Helmholtz Zentrum München)
- Christian Gieger
- Annette Peters
- Melanie Waldenberger
- Johannes Graumann
Munich Center of Health Sciences (LMUinnovativ)
- Christian Gieger
- Annette Peters
- Melanie Waldenberger
- Johannes Graumann
Bavarian State Ministry of Health and Care (DigiMed Bayern)
- Christian Gieger
- Annette Peters
- Melanie Waldenberger
- Johannes Graumann
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
- Liu Shi
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Human subjects: All KORA participants have given written informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Bavarian Medical Association.All components of GS received ethical approval from the NHS Tayside Committee on Medical Research Ethics (REC Reference Number: 05/S1401/89). GS has also been granted Research Tissue Bank status by the East of Scotland Research Ethics Service (REC Reference Number: 20/ES/0021), providing generic ethical approval for a wide range of uses within medical research.Ethical approval for the LBC1921 and LBC1936 studies was obtained from the Multi-Centre Research Ethics Committee for Scotland (MREC/01/0/56) and the Lothian Research Ethics committee (LREC/1998/4/183; LREC/2003/2/29). In both studies, all participants provided written informed consent. These studies were performed in accordance with the Helsinki declaration.
Copyright
© 2022, Gadd et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 6,002
- views
-
- 781
- downloads
-
- 56
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Epigenetic scores for the circulating proteome as tools for disease prediction
eLife 11:e71802.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71802
Further reading
-
- Epidemiology and Global Health
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Lack of data on the aetiology of livestock diseases constrains effective interventions to improve livelihoods, food security and public health. Livestock abortion is an important disease syndrome affecting productivity and public health. Several pathogens are associated with livestock abortions but across Africa surveillance data rarely include information from abortions, little is known about aetiology and impacts, and data are not available to inform interventions. This paper describes outcomes from a surveillance platform established in Tanzania spanning pastoral, agropastoral and smallholder systems to investigate causes and impacts of livestock abortion. Abortion events were reported by farmers to livestock field officers (LFO) and on to investigation teams. Events were included if the research team or LFO could attend within 72 hr. If so, samples and questionnaire data were collected to investigate (a) determinants of attribution; (b) patterns of events, including species and breed, previous abortion history, and seasonality; (c) determinants of reporting, investigation and attribution; (d) cases involving zoonotic pathogens. Between 2017–2019, 215 events in cattle (n=71), sheep (n=44), and goats (n=100) were investigated. Attribution, achieved for 19.5% of cases, was significantly affected by delays in obtaining samples. Histopathology proved less useful than PCR due to rapid deterioration of samples. Vaginal swabs provided practical and sensitive material for pathogen detection. Livestock abortion surveillance, even at a small scale, can generate valuable information on causes of disease outbreaks, reproductive losses and can identify pathogens not easily captured through other forms of livestock disease surveillance. This study demonstrated the feasibility of establishing a surveillance system, achieved through engagement of community-based field officers, establishment of practical sample collection and application of molecular diagnostic platforms.
