External validation of a mobile clinical decision support system for diarrhea etiology prediction in children: A multicenter study in Bangladesh and Mali

  1. Stephanie Chow Garbern  Is a corresponding author
  2. Eric J Nelson
  3. Sabiha Nasrin
  4. Adama Mamby Keita
  5. Ben J Brintz
  6. Monique Gainey
  7. Henry Badji
  8. Dilruba Nasrin
  9. Joel Howard
  10. Mami Taniuchi
  11. James A Platts-Mills
  12. Karen L Kotloff
  13. Rashidul Haque
  14. Adam C Levine
  15. Samba O Sow
  16. Nur Haque Alam
  17. Daniel T Leung  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, United States
  2. Department of Pediatrics, and Environmental and Global Health, Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, United States
  3. International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh
  4. Centre for Vaccine Development, Mali
  5. Division of Epidemiology, University of Utah, United States
  6. Rhode Island Hospital, United States
  7. Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, United States
  8. Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky Medical School, United States
  9. Division of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, United States
  10. Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland, United States
  11. Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Utah School of Medicine, United States
4 figures, 5 tables and 6 additional files

Figures

App user interface.

(A) Input page after application launch.( B) Output page with an example showing calculated probability of viral-only diarrhea. The ‘^’ symbol represents an open accordion menu with the component probabilities. ‘Current patient’ refers to the present patient model. ‘Weather’ (climate) and ‘recent patients’ (pre-test odds) were not active in this configuration.

Study Flow Diagram.
Sensitivity and specificity of the ‘present patient’ and ‘present patient+ viral seasonality’ models (left) and numbers of false positives and false negatives (i.e, bacteria/protozoal etiologies misidentified as viral and vice versa) at various viral probability thresholds (right).
Figure 4 with 1 supplement
Congruence between the Application prediction of a patient’s viral etiology with the post-hoc prediction after adjusting for changing model development.

Data shown are from the Mali study period alone because the software was updated between the Bangladesh and Mali study periods in response to engineering limitations.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Bland-Altman plots showing agreement between data entered on case report form versus App for mid-upper arm circumference and calculated predicted viral-only etiology risk.

Tables

Table 1
Model terminology definitions and descriptions.
Model nameDescription and features included
Present patientRandom forest variable importance screening was used to screen variables for fitting a logistic regression model from the GEMS data including only five clinical variables (selected from candidate variables which would be accessible to clinicians at the point-of-care) Brintz et al., 2021. The five variables include: age, blood in stool (yes/no), vomiting (yes/no), breastfeeding status (yes/no), and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC; as measured in cm)
Viral seasonalityThis model included the standardized seasonal sine and cosine curves modeling the country-specific seasonal patterns of viral diarrhea
ClimateThis model included rain and temperature averages using a two-week aggregation of the five nearest National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-affiliated weather stations to the hospital sites.
Historical patient (Pre-test odds)Pre-test odds were generated using historical rates of viral diarrhea by site and date using data from the GEMS study.
Recent patient (Pre-test odds)Pre-test odds were generated using data from patients in the prior four weeks.
Table 2
Clinical characteristics of study population.
Diarrhea etiology assignedNo diarrhea etiology assigned
Overall n(%)N = 199Bangladesh n(%)N = 130Mali n(%)N = 69Overall n(%)N = 101Bangladesh n(%)N = 20Mali n(%)N = 81
Age (median, IQR), months12 (8)12 (9)11 (8)8 (7)11.5 (7)8 (7)
Sex
Male123 (61.8)77 (59.2)46 (66.7)63 (62.4)11 (55)52 (64.2)
Female76 (38.2)53 (40.8)23 (33.3)38 (37.6)9 (45)29 (35.8)
Diarrhea Duration (median, IQR), days2 (2)3 (1)0.6 (0.3)1.5 (2.3)3 (1.3)0.7 (0.1)
# Episodes of Diarrhea Past 24 hours (median, IQR)12 (9.5)15 (8)5 (3)6 (4)15 (3.5)5 (3)
Bloody Stool Reported
Yes7 (3.5)2 (1.5)5 (7.2)3 (3)0 (0)3 (3.7)
No192 (96.5)128 (98.5)64 (92.8)98 (97)20 (100)78 (96.3)
Fever Reported
Yes163 (81.9)119 (91.5)44 (63.8)66 (65.3)18 (90)48 (59.3)
No36 (18.1)11 (8.5)25 (36.2)35 (34.7)2 (10)33 (40.7)
Vomiting Reported**
Yes (original question format)73 (36.7)73 (56.2)12 (11.9)12 (60)
Yes (revised question format)81 (40.7)45 (34.6)36 (52.2)21 (20.8)5 (25)16 (19.8)
No45 (22.6)12 (9.2)33 (47.8)68 (67.3)3 (15)65 (80.2)
Breastfeeding
Yes (Partial or Exclusive)155 (77.9)99 (76.2)56 (81.2)89 (88.1)19 (95)70 (86.4)
No44 (22.1)31 (23.8)13 (18.8)12 (11.9)1 (5)11 (13.6)
MUAC (median, IQR), cm13.55 (1.4)13.45 (1.3)13.8 (1.5)13.35 (1.8)13.375 (2.2)13.35 (1.9)
Prior Medications Taken
Yes124 (62.3)109 (83.8)15 (21.7)34 (33.7)17 (85)17 (21)
No75 (37.7)21 (16.2)54 (78.3)67 (66.3)3 (15)64 (79)
Years of Mother’s Education8 (6)8 (5)4 (9)6 (10)8 (4.75)5 (10)
Years of Father’s Education8 (6)8 (5)6 (9)6 (10)10 (4.8)4 (10)
People living at home (median, IQR)6 (4)5 (2)9 (12)9 (10)6 (6)10 (9)
Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; cm, centimeter; MUAC, mid-upper arm circumference** Vomiting question was asked in two different formats at the Bangladesh site
Table 3
Pathogens detected with TaqMan array card by study site.
BangladeshN = 150MaliN = 150
Pathogenn (%)Pathogenn (%)
No Etiology Assigned20 (13)No Etiology Assigned81 (54)
Viral-Only Pathogens94 (63)Viral-Only Pathogens33 (22)
Rotavirus90 (60)Rotavirus24 (16)
Adenovirus 40/411 (0.6)Norovirus GII5 (3.3)
Astrovirus2 (1.3)Astrovirus2 (1.3)
Adenovirus & Astrovirus1 (0.6)Astrovirus & Rotavirus2 (1.3)
Bacterial-Only Pathogens9 (6)Bacterial-Only Pathogens24 (16)
Vibrio cholerae3 (2)Shigella / EIEC13 (8.7)
Shigella / Enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC)1 (0.6)Shiga-toxin Enterotoxigenic E. coli4 (2.7)
Campylobacter jejuni / coli1 (0.6)Campylobacter jejuni / coli2 (1.3)
Multiple Bacterial Pathogens4 (2.7)Salmonella2 (1.3)
Multiple Bacterial Pathogens3 (2)
Parasitic Pathogens1 (0.6)Parasitic Pathogens5 (3.3)
Cryptosporidium1 (0.6)Cryptosporidium4 (2.7)
Entamoeba histolytica1 (0.6)
Mixed Pathogens26 (17)Mixed Pathogens7 (4.7)
Viral+ Bacteria24 (16)Viral+ Bacteria7 (4.7)
Viral+ Bacterial + Parasitic2 (1.3)
Table 4
Model performance using AUC (95% confidence interval), calibration-in-the-large (α), calibration slope (β) for each model considered at both sites.

Each row after ‘Present patient’ includes the Present patient component.

Auc (95% CI)αβ
Present patient0.744 (0.651–0.836)–0.212 (−0.264–-0.16)1.250 (1.171–1.329)
Viral seasonality0.754 (0.665–0.843)–0.393 (−0.455–-0.331)1.287 (1.207–1.367)
Climate0.680 (0.583–0.778)–0.115 (−0.191–-0.038)0.940 (0.840–1.039)
Historical patient0.702 (0.603–0.800)0.036 (−0.031–0.102)1.063 (0.943–1.184)
Recent patient0.737 (0.671–0.793)–0.253 (−0.287–-0.22)1.165 (1.12–1.21)
Table 5
AUC (95% confidence interval) for each model by site.

Each row after ‘Present patient’ includes the Present patient component. The last column includes Bangladesh data in which the vomiting question was asked incorrectly.

MaliBangladeshBangladesh (no date restriction)
Present patient0.763 (0.681–0.844)0.692 (0.572–0.812)0.607 (0.521–0.693)
Viral seasonality0.742 (0.659–0.825)0.71 (0.595–0.825)0.61 (0.523–0.697)
Climate0.701 (0.577–0.825)0.607 (0.427–0.788)0.621 (0.510–0.732)
Historical patient0.741 (0.658–0.824)0.646 (0.516–0.775)0.592 (0.505–0.86)
Recent patient0.783 (0.705–0.86)0.625 (0.5–0.75)0.61 (0.526–0.694)

Additional files

Supplementary file 1

Descriptive data – demographics, predictors and viral-only outcome data from development dataset from GEMS.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/72294/elife-72294-supp1-v2.docx
Supplementary file 2

List of Pathogen Targets for Taqman Array Card Testing.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/72294/elife-72294-supp2-v2.docx
Supplementary file 3

Assessment of reliability and agreement between study nurses’ independent assessments of categorical predictor variables on case report forms.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/72294/elife-72294-supp3-v2.docx
Supplementary file 4

Agreement between study nurse recording on paper case record and input into App of categorical predictor variables.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/72294/elife-72294-supp4-v2.docx
Supplementary file 5

De-identified Dataset.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/72294/elife-72294-supp5-v2.csv
Transparent reporting form
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/72294/elife-72294-transrepform1-v2.docx

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Stephanie Chow Garbern
  2. Eric J Nelson
  3. Sabiha Nasrin
  4. Adama Mamby Keita
  5. Ben J Brintz
  6. Monique Gainey
  7. Henry Badji
  8. Dilruba Nasrin
  9. Joel Howard
  10. Mami Taniuchi
  11. James A Platts-Mills
  12. Karen L Kotloff
  13. Rashidul Haque
  14. Adam C Levine
  15. Samba O Sow
  16. Nur Haque Alam
  17. Daniel T Leung
(2022)
External validation of a mobile clinical decision support system for diarrhea etiology prediction in children: A multicenter study in Bangladesh and Mali
eLife 11:e72294.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72294