Principles of mRNA targeting via the Arabidopsis m6A-binding protein ECT2
Abstract
Specific recognition of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) in mRNA by RNA-binding proteins containing a YT521-B homology (YTH) domain is important in eukaryotic gene regulation. The Arabidopsis YTH-domain protein ECT2 is thought to bind to mRNA at URU(m6A)Y sites, yet RR(m6A)CH is the canonical m6A consensus site in all eukaryotes and ECT2 functions require m6A binding activity. Here, we apply iCLIP (individual-nucleotide resolution cross-linking and immunoprecipitation) and HyperTRIBE (targets of RNA-binding proteins identified by editing) to define high-quality target sets of ECT2, and analyze the patterns of enriched sequence motifs around ECT2 crosslink sites. Our analyses show that ECT2 does in fact bind to RR(m6A)CH. Pyrimidine-rich motifs are enriched around, but not at m6A-sites, reflecting a preference for N6-adenosine methylation of RRACH/GGAU islands in pyrimidine-rich regions. Such motifs, particularly oligo-U and UNUNU upstream of m6A sites, are also implicated in ECT2 binding via its intrinsically disordered region (IDR). Finally, URUAY-type motifs are enriched at ECT2 crosslink sites, but their distinct properties suggest function as sites of competition between binding of ECT2 and as yet unidentified RNA-binding proteins. Our study provides coherence between genetic and molecular studies of m6A-YTH function in plants, and reveals new insight into the mode of RNA recognition by YTH-domain-containing proteins.
Data availability
All sequencing data (iCLIP-seq, HyperTRIBE, mRNA-seq, small RNA-seq) have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under accession code PRJEB44359.All code is available at GitHubhttps://github.com/sarah-ku/targets_arabidopsis
-
Principles of mRNA targeting and regulation via Arabidopsis YTHDF proteinsEuropean Nucleotide Archive, PRJEB44359.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
H2020 European Research Council (ERC-2016-COG 726417)
- Peter Brodersen
Independent Research Fund Denmark (9040-00409B)
- Peter Brodersen
European Molecular Biology Organization (STF 7614)
- Laura Arribas-Hernández
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (STA653/14-1)
- Prof. Dr. Dorothee Staiger
H2020 European Research Council (638173)
- Robin Andersson
Independent Research Fund Denmark (6108-00038B)
- Robin Andersson
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Pablo A Manavella, Universidad Nacional del Litoral-CONICET, Argentina
Version history
- Preprint posted: April 18, 2021 (view preprint)
- Received: July 21, 2021
- Accepted: September 25, 2021
- Accepted Manuscript published: September 30, 2021 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: January 25, 2022 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2021, Arribas-Hernández et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,700
- Page views
-
- 504
- Downloads
-
- 33
- Citations
Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Genetics and Genomics
Present-day publications on human genes primarily feature genes that already appeared in many publications prior to completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003. These patterns persist despite the subsequent adoption of high-throughput technologies, which routinely identify novel genes associated with biological processes and disease. Although several hypotheses for bias in the selection of genes as research targets have been proposed, their explanatory powers have not yet been compared. Our analysis suggests that understudied genes are systematically abandoned in favor of better-studied genes between the completion of -omics experiments and the reporting of results. Understudied genes remain abandoned by studies that cite these -omics experiments. Conversely, we find that publications on understudied genes may even accrue a greater number of citations. Among 45 biological and experimental factors previously proposed to affect which genes are being studied, we find that 33 are significantly associated with the choice of hit genes presented in titles and abstracts of -omics studies. To promote the investigation of understudied genes, we condense our insights into a tool, find my understudied genes (FMUG), that allows scientists to engage with potential bias during the selection of hits. We demonstrate the utility of FMUG through the identification of genes that remain understudied in vertebrate aging. FMUG is developed in Flutter and is available for download at fmug.amaral.northwestern.edu as a MacOS/Windows app.
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
- Genetics and Genomics
Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.