A mechano-osmotic feedback couples cell volume to the rate of cell deformation

  1. Larisa Venkova
  2. Amit Singh Vishen
  3. Sergio Lembo
  4. Nishit Srivastava
  5. Baptiste Duchamp
  6. Artur Ruppel
  7. Alice Williart
  8. Stéphane Vassilopoulos
  9. Alexandre Deslys
  10. Juan-Manuel Garcia Arcos
  11. Alba Diz-Muñoz
  12. Martial Balland
  13. Jean-François Joanny
  14. Damien Cuvelier
  15. Pierre Sens  Is a corresponding author
  16. Matthieu Piel  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, France
  2. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany
  3. Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique, France
  4. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, France
  5. Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, France

Abstract

Mechanics has been a central focus of physical biology in the past decade. In comparison, how cells manage their size is less understood. Here we show that a parameter central to both the physics and the physiology of the cell, its volume, depends on a mechano-osmotic coupling. We found that cells change their volume depending on the rate at which they change shape, when they spontaneously spread are externally deformed. Cells undergo slow deformation at constant volume, while fast deformation leads to volume loss. We propose a mechano-sensitive pump and leak model to explain this phenomenon. Our model and experiments suggest that volume modulation depends on the state of the actin cortex and the coupling of ion fluxes to membrane tension. This mechano-osmotic coupling defines a membrane tension homeostasis module constantly at work in cells, causing volume fluctuations associated with fast cell shape changes, with potential consequences on cellular physiology.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in themanuscript and supporting file; all the raw analysed data shown in thefigure panels in the article are available in the accompanying SourceData files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Larisa Venkova

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5721-7962
  2. Amit Singh Vishen

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sergio Lembo

    Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2253-8771
  4. Nishit Srivastava

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4177-6123
  5. Baptiste Duchamp

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Artur Ruppel

    Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Alice Williart

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Stéphane Vassilopoulos

    Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0172-330X
  9. Alexandre Deslys

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Juan-Manuel Garcia Arcos

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Alba Diz-Muñoz

    Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6864-8901
  12. Martial Balland

    Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jean-François Joanny

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6966-3222
  14. Damien Cuvelier

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Pierre Sens

    Laboratoire Physico Chimie Curie, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    pierre.sens@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    Pierre Sens, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4523-3791
  16. Matthieu Piel

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    matthieu.piel@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2848-177X

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-CE13-0030)

  • Matthieu Piel

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-EQPX-34)

  • Matthieu Piel

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL)

  • Matthieu Piel

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-31)

  • Matthieu Piel

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT201805005592)

  • Larisa Venkova

Human Frontier Science Program (LT000305/2018-L)

  • Nishit Srivastava

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐17‐CE13‐0020‐02)

  • Amit Singh Vishen

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 641639)

  • Larisa Venkova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Venkova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,999
    views
  • 1,163
    downloads
  • 59
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Larisa Venkova
  2. Amit Singh Vishen
  3. Sergio Lembo
  4. Nishit Srivastava
  5. Baptiste Duchamp
  6. Artur Ruppel
  7. Alice Williart
  8. Stéphane Vassilopoulos
  9. Alexandre Deslys
  10. Juan-Manuel Garcia Arcos
  11. Alba Diz-Muñoz
  12. Martial Balland
  13. Jean-François Joanny
  14. Damien Cuvelier
  15. Pierre Sens
  16. Matthieu Piel
(2022)
A mechano-osmotic feedback couples cell volume to the rate of cell deformation
eLife 11:e72381.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72381

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72381

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Qian Wang, Hongge Li ... Xin Zhang
    Research Article

    Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling elicits multiple downstream pathways, most notably the Ras/MAPK cascade facilitated by the adaptor protein Grb2. However, the mechanism by which Grb2 is recruited to the FGF signaling complex remains unresolved. Here, we showed that genetic ablation of FGF signaling prevented murine lens induction by disrupting transcriptional regulation and actin cytoskeletal arrangements, which could be reproduced by deleting the juxtamembrane region of the FGF receptor and rescued by Kras activation. Conversely, mutations affecting the Frs2-binding site on the FGF receptor or the deletion of Frs2 and Shp2 primarily impact later stages of lens vesicle development involving lens fiber cell differentiation. Our study further revealed that the loss of Grb2 abolished MAPK signaling, resulting in a profound arrest of lens development. However, removing Grb2’s putative Shp2 dephosphorylation site (Y209) neither produced a detectable phenotype nor impaired MAPK signaling during lens development. Furthermore, the catalytically inactive Shp2 mutation (C459S) only modestly impaired FGF signaling, whereas replacing Shp2’s C-terminal phosphorylation sites (Y542/Y580) previously implicated in Grb2 binding only caused placental defects, perinatal lethality, and reduced lacrimal gland branching without impacting lens development, suggesting that Shp2 only partially mediates Grb2 recruitment. In contrast, we observed that FGF signaling is required for the phosphorylation of the Grb2-binding sites on Shc1 and the deletion of Shc1 exacerbates the lens vesicle defect caused by Frs2 and Shp2 deletion. These findings establish Shc1 as a critical collaborator with Frs2 and Shp2 in targeting Grb2 during FGF signaling.

    1. Cell Biology
    Sakshi Shambhavi, Sudipta Mondal ... Rajan Sankaranarayanan
    Research Article

    Diacylglycerols (DAGs) are used for metabolic purposes and are tightly regulated secondary lipid messengers in eukaryotes. DAG subspecies with different fatty-acyl chains are proposed to be involved in the activation of distinct PKC isoforms, resulting in diverse physiological outcomes. However, the molecular players and the regulatory origin for fine-tuning the PKC pathway are unknown. Here, we show that Dip2, a conserved DAG regulator across Fungi and Animalia, has emerged as a modulator of PKC signalling in yeast. Dip2 maintains the level of a specific DAG subpopulation, required for the activation of PKC-mediated cell wall integrity pathway. Interestingly, the canonical DAG-metabolism pathways, being promiscuous, are decoupled from PKC signalling. We demonstrate that these DAG subspecies are sourced from a phosphatidylinositol pool generated by the acyl-chain remodelling pathway. Furthermore, we provide insights into the intimate coevolutionary relationship between the regulator (Dip2) and the effector (PKC) of DAG-based signalling. Hence, our study underscores the establishment of Dip2-PKC axis about 1.2 billion years ago in Opisthokonta, which marks the rooting of the first specific DAG-based signalling module of eukaryotes.