Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) leukocidin LukED belongs to a family of bicomponent pore forming toxins that play important roles in SA immune evasion and nutrient acquisition. LukED targets specific G protein-coupled chemokine receptors to lyse human erythrocytes (red blood cells) and leukocytes (white blood cells). The first recognition step of receptors is critical for specific cell targeting and lysis. The structural and molecular bases for this mechanism are not well understood but could constitute essential information to guide antibiotic development. Here, we characterized the interaction of LukE with chemokine receptors ACKR1, CCR2 and CCR5 using a combination of structural, pharmacological and computational approaches. First, crystal structures of LukE in complex with a small molecule mimicking sulfotyrosine side chain (p-cresyl sulfate) and with peptides containing sulfotyrosines issued from receptor sequences revealed the location of receptor sulfotyrosine binding sites in the toxins. Then, by combining previous and novel experimental data with protein docking, classical and accelerated weight histogram (AWH) molecular dynamics we propose models of the ACKR1-LukE and CCR5-LukE complexes. This work provides novel insights into chemokine receptor recognition by leukotoxins and suggests that the conserved sulfotyrosine binding pocket could be a target of choice for future drug development.

Data availability

Diffraction data have been deposited in PDB under the accession codes 7P8T, 7P8S, 7P8U, 7P8X and 7P93. Source Data files containing the computational models of the ACKR1-LukE and CCR5-LukE complexes in Figures 6 and 7 have been provided as pdb files. Figure 2 - Source Data 1 contain the numerical data used to generate the figure.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Paul Lambey

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Omolade Otun

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Xiaojing Cong

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. François Hoh

    Centre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048-INSERM 1054- University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Luc Brunel

    Centre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048-INSERM 1054- University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Pascal Verdié

    Centre de Biochimie Structurale, CNRS UMR 5048-INSERM 1054- University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5807-0293
  7. Claire M Grison

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Fanny Peysson

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Sylvain Jeannot

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Thierry Durroux

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Cherine Betara

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Sébastien Granier

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    For correspondence
    sebastien.granier@igf.cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Cédric Leyrat

    Institut de Génomique Fonctionnelle, CNRS, INSERM, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
    For correspondence
    cedric.leyrat@igf.cnrs.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0189-0562

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE15-0002-01)

  • Cédric Leyrat

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Lambey et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,243
    views
  • 220
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Paul Lambey
  2. Omolade Otun
  3. Xiaojing Cong
  4. François Hoh
  5. Luc Brunel
  6. Pascal Verdié
  7. Claire M Grison
  8. Fanny Peysson
  9. Sylvain Jeannot
  10. Thierry Durroux
  11. Cherine Betara
  12. Sébastien Granier
  13. Cédric Leyrat
(2022)
Structural insights into recognition of chemokine receptors by Staphylococcus aureus leukotoxins
eLife 11:e72555.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72555

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72555

Further reading

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Chong Wang, Rikuan Zheng ... Chaomin Sun
    Research Article

    Viruses are ubiquitous in nature and play key roles in various ecosystems. Notably, some viruses (e.g. bacteriophage) exhibit alternative life cycles, such as chronic infections without cell lysis. However, the impact of chronic infections and their interactions with the host organisms remains largely unknown. Here, we found for the first time that polysaccharides induced the production of multiple temperate phages infecting two deep-sea Lentisphaerae strains (WC36 and zth2). Through physiological assays, genomic analysis, and transcriptomics assays, we found these bacteriophages were released via a chronic style without host cell lysis, which might reprogram host polysaccharide metabolism through the potential auxiliary metabolic genes. The findings presented here, together with recent discoveries made on the reprogramming of host energy-generating metabolisms by chronic bacteriophages, shed light on the poorly explored marine virus–host interaction and bring us closer to understanding the potential role of chronic viruses in marine ecosystems.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Mehak Zahoor Khan, Debbie M Hunt ... Vinay Kumar Nandicoori
    Research Article

    Mycobacterium tuberculosis’s (Mtb) autarkic lifestyle within the host involves rewiring its transcriptional networks to combat host-induced stresses. With the help of RNA sequencing performed under various stress conditions, we identified that genes belonging to Mtb sulfur metabolism pathways are significantly upregulated during oxidative stress. Using an integrated approach of microbial genetics, transcriptomics, metabolomics, animal experiments, chemical inhibition, and rescue studies, we investigated the biological role of non-canonical L-cysteine synthases, CysM and CysK2. While transcriptome signatures of RvΔcysM and RvΔcysK2 appear similar under regular growth conditions, we observed unique transcriptional signatures when subjected to oxidative stress. We followed pool size and labelling (34S) of key downstream metabolites, viz. mycothiol and ergothioneine, to monitor L-cysteine biosynthesis and utilization. This revealed the significant role of distinct L-cysteine biosynthetic routes on redox stress and homeostasis. CysM and CysK2 independently facilitate Mtb survival by alleviating host-induced redox stress, suggesting they are not fully redundant during infection. With the help of genetic mutants and chemical inhibitors, we show that CysM and CysK2 serve as unique, attractive targets for adjunct therapy to combat mycobacterial infection.