Charting brain growth and aging at high spatial precision
- Radboud University Medical Center, Netherlands
- University of Oslo, Norway
- King's College London, United Kingdom
- University College London, United Kingdom
- University of California, Davis, United States
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Netherlands
- University of Melbourne, Australia
- University of Michigan, United States
- Michigan State University, United States
Abstract
Defining reference models for population variation, and the ability to study individual deviations is essential for understanding inter-individual variability and its relation to the onset and progression of medical conditions. In this work, we assembled a reference cohort of neuroimaging data from 82 sites (N=58,836; ages 2-100) and use normative modeling to characterize lifespan trajectories of cortical thickness and subcortical volume. Models are validated against a manually quality checked subset (N=24,354) and we provide an interface for transferring to new data sources. We showcase the clinical value by applying the models to a transdiagnostic psychiatric sample (N=1,985), showing they can be used to quantify variability underlying multiple disorders whilst also refining case-control inferences. These models will be augmented with additional samples and imaging modalities as they become available. This provides a common reference platform to bind results from different studies and ultimately paves the way for personalized clinical decision making.
Data availability
All pre-trained models and code for transferring to new sites are shared online via GitHub (https://github.com/predictive-clinical-neuroscience/braincharts). We have also shared the models on Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/record/5535467#.YVRECmYzZhF).
-
ABIDEhttp://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/abide/.
-
ADHD200https://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/adhd200/.
-
CAMCANhttps://camcan-archive.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/dataaccess/.
-
CMI-HBNhttp://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/cmi_healthy_brain_network/About.html.
-
HCP-Aginghttps://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=featured-datasets:HCP%20Aging%20and%20Development.
-
HCP-Developmenthttps://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=featured-datasets:HCP%20Aging%20and%20Development.
-
HCP-Early Psychosishttps://nda.nih.gov/general-query.html?q=query=featured-datasets:Connectomes%20Related%20to%20Human%20Disease.
-
NKI-RShttp://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/enhanced/access.html.
-
Oasishttps://direct.mit.edu/jocn/article/19/9/1498/4427/Open-Access-Series-of-Imaging-Studies-OASIS-Cross.
-
Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohorthttps://www.med.upenn.edu/bbl/philadelphianeurodevelopmentalcohort.html.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
H2020 European Research Council (10100118)
- Andre F Marquand
Medical Research Council (G0902304)
- Roland Zahn
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH108823)
- Ivy F Tso
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC011277)
- Soo-Eun Chang
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH107741)
- Chandra Sripada
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (UL1TR002240)
- Elizabeth R Duval
National Institute of Mental Health (UG3MH114249)
- S Alexandra Burt
- Luke Hyde
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD093334)
- S Alexandra Burt
- Luke Hyde
H2020 European Research Council (802998)
- Lars T Westlye
Wellcome Trust (215698/Z/19/Z)
- Andre F Marquand
Wellcome Trust (098369/Z/12/Z)
- Christian Beckmann
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VIDI grant 016.156.415)
- Andre F Marquand
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH104438)
- David Amaral
- Christine Wu Nordahl
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH103371)
- David Amaral
- Christine Wu Nordahl
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50 HD093079)
- David Amaral
- Christine Wu Nordahl
H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (895011)
- Thomas Wolfers
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Reviewing Editor
- Chris I Baker, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, United States
Ethics
Human subjects: Ethical approval for the public data were provided by the relevant local research authorities for the studies contributing data. For full details see the main study publications given in the main text. For all clinical studies, approval was obtained via the local ethical review authorities, i.e.: TOP: Regional Committee for Medical & Health Research Ethics South East Norway. Approval number: 2009/2485- C, KCL: South Manchester NHS National Research Ethics Service. Approval number: 07/H1003/194. Delta: The local ethics committee of the Academic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam (AMC-METC) Nr.:11/050, UMich_IMPS: University of Michigan Institution Review Board HUM00088188, UMich_SZG: University of Michigan Institution Review Board HUM00080457, UMich_MLS: University of Michigan Institution Review Board HUM00040642, UMich_CWS: MSU Biomedical and Health Institutional Review Board (BIIRB) IRB#09-810, UMich_MTWiNS: University of Michigan Institution Review HUM00163965, UCDavis: University of California Davis Institutional Review Board IRB ID: 220915, 592866, 1097084.
Version history
- Preprint posted: August 8, 2021 (view preprint)
- Received: August 19, 2021
- Accepted: January 26, 2022
- Accepted Manuscript published: February 1, 2022 (version 1)
- Version of Record published: February 9, 2022 (version 2)
Copyright
© 2022, Rutherford et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 6,324
- views
-
- 1,000
- downloads
-
- 61
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Charting brain growth and aging at high spatial precision
eLife 11:e72904.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72904
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a prevalent sleep-related breathing disorder that results in multiple bouts of intermittent hypoxia. OSA has many neurological and systemic comorbidities, including dysphagia, or disordered swallow, and discoordination with breathing. However, the mechanism in which chronic intermittent hypoxia (CIH) causes dysphagia is unknown. Recently, we showed the postinspiratory complex (PiCo) acts as an interface between the swallow pattern generator (SPG) and the inspiratory rhythm generator, the preBötzinger complex, to regulate proper swallow-breathing coordination (Huff et al., 2023). PiCo is characterized by interneurons co-expressing transporters for glutamate (Vglut2) and acetylcholine (ChAT). Here we show that optogenetic stimulation of ChATcre:Ai32, Vglut2cre:Ai32, and ChATcre:Vglut2FlpO:ChR2 mice exposed to CIH does not alter swallow-breathing coordination, but unexpectedly disrupts swallow behavior via triggering variable swallow motor patterns. This suggests that glutamatergic–cholinergic neurons in PiCo are not only critical for the regulation of swallow-breathing coordination, but also play an important role in the modulation of swallow motor patterning. Our study also suggests that swallow disruption, as seen in OSA, involves central nervous mechanisms interfering with swallow motor patterning and laryngeal activation. These findings are crucial for understanding the mechanisms underlying dysphagia, both in OSA and other breathing and neurological disorders.
-
- Neuroscience
The central tendency bias, or contraction bias, is a phenomenon where the judgment of the magnitude of items held in working memory appears to be biased toward the average of past observations. It is assumed to be an optimal strategy by the brain and commonly thought of as an expression of the brain’s ability to learn the statistical structure of sensory input. On the other hand, recency biases such as serial dependence are also commonly observed and are thought to reflect the content of working memory. Recent results from an auditory delayed comparison task in rats suggest that both biases may be more related than previously thought: when the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) was silenced, both short-term and contraction biases were reduced. By proposing a model of the circuit that may be involved in generating the behavior, we show that a volatile working memory content susceptible to shifting to the past sensory experience – producing short-term sensory history biases – naturally leads to contraction bias. The errors, occurring at the level of individual trials, are sampled from the full distribution of the stimuli and are not due to a gradual shift of the memory toward the sensory distribution’s mean. Our results are consistent with a broad set of behavioral findings and provide predictions of performance across different stimulus distributions and timings, delay intervals, as well as neuronal dynamics in putative working memory areas. Finally, we validate our model by performing a set of human psychophysics experiments of an auditory parametric working memory task.
