MCPH1 inhibits condensin II during interphase by regulating its SMC2-kleisin interface
Abstract
The dramatic change in morphology of chromosomal DNAs between interphase and mitosis is one of the defining features of the eukaryotic cell cycle. Two types of enzymes, namely cohesin and condensin confer the topology of chromosomal DNA by extruding DNA loops. While condensin normally configures chromosomes exclusively during mitosis, cohesin does so during interphase. The processivity of cohesin’s loop extrusion during interphase is limited by a regulatory factor called WAPL, which induces cohesin to dissociate from chromosomes via a mechanism that requires dissociation of its kleisin from the neck of SMC3. We show here that a related mechanism may be responsible for blocking condensin II from acting during interphase. Cells derived from patients affected by microcephaly caused by mutations in the MCPH1 gene undergo premature chromosome condensation but it has never been established for certain whether MCPH1 regulates condensin II directly. We show that deletion of Mcph1 in mouse embryonic stem cells unleashes an activity of condensin II that triggers formation of compact chromosomes in G1 and G2 phases, which is accompanied by enhanced mixing of A and B chromatin compartments, and that this occurs even in the absence of CDK1 activity. Crucially, inhibition of condensin II by MCPH1 depends on the binding of a short linear motif within MCPH1 to condensin II's NCAPG2 subunit. We show that the activities of both Cohesin and Condensin II may be restricted during interphase by similar types of mechanisms as MCPH1's ability to block condensin II's association with chromatin is abrogated by the fusion of SMC2 with NCAPH2. Remarkably, in the absence of both WAPL and MCPH1, cohesin and condensin II transform chromosomal DNAs of G2 cells into chromosomes with a solenoidal axis showing that both cohesin and condensin must be tightly regulated to adjust the structure of chromatids for their successful segregation.
Data availability
HiC sequencing data has been deposited in GEO. (accession number: GSE188988)
-
MCPH1 inhibits condensin II during interphase by regulating its SMC2-kleisin interfaceNCBI Gene Expression Omnibus, GSE188988.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
Wellcome Trust (107935/Z/15/Z)
- Martin Houlard
- Jonathan Godwin
- Kim Nasmyth
McNair Medical Institute Scholar Award
- Muhammad S Shamim
- David Weisz
- Aviva Presser Aiden
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
NIH Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Mapping Center Award (UM1HG009375)
- Muhammad S Shamim
- David Weisz
- Aviva Presser Aiden
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
US-Israel Binational Science Foundation Award (2019276)
- Muhammad S Shamim
- David Weisz
- Aviva Presser Aiden
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
Behavioral Plasticity Research Institute (NSF DBI-2021795)
- Muhammad S Shamim
- David Weisz
- Aviva Presser Aiden
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
NSF Physics Frontiers Center Award (NSF PHY-2019745)
- Muhammad S Shamim
- Aviva Presser Aiden
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
- Lothar Schermelleh
NIH CEGS Award (RM1HG011016-01A1)
- Muhammad S Shamim
- David Weisz
- Aviva Presser Aiden
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
European Research Council (294401)
- Martin Houlard
- Jonathan Godwin
- Kim Nasmyth
Cancer Research UK (26747)
- Martin Houlard
- Jonathan Godwin
- Kim Nasmyth
Wellcome Trust (107457/Z/15/Z)
- Lothar Schermelleh
Wellcome Trust (091911)
- Lothar Schermelleh
Paul and Daisy Soros Foundation
- Muhammad S Shamim
Cancer Research UK (CR-UK C47547/A21536)
- Erin E Cutts
- Alessandro Vannini
Wellcome Trust (200818/Z/16/Z)
- Erin E Cutts
- Alessandro Vannini
Welch Foundation (Q-1866)
- Muhammad S Shamim
- David Weisz
- Aviva Presser Aiden
- Erez Lieberman-Aiden
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#08-133) of the University of Arizona. The protocol was approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the University of Minnesota (Permit Number: 27-2956). All surgery was performed under sodium pentobarbital anesthesia, and every effort was made to minimize suffering.
Copyright
© 2021, Houlard et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,036
- views
-
- 441
- downloads
-
- 35
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Computational and Systems Biology
Protein–protein interactions are fundamental to understanding the molecular functions and regulation of proteins. Despite the availability of extensive databases, many interactions remain uncharacterized due to the labor-intensive nature of experimental validation. In this study, we utilized the AlphaFold2 program to predict interactions among proteins localized in the nuage, a germline-specific non-membrane organelle essential for piRNA biogenesis in Drosophila. We screened 20 nuage proteins for 1:1 interactions and predicted dimer structures. Among these, five represented novel interaction candidates. Three pairs, including Spn-E_Squ, were verified by co-immunoprecipitation. Disruption of the salt bridges at the Spn-E_Squ interface confirmed their functional importance, underscoring the predictive model’s accuracy. We extended our analysis to include interactions between three representative nuage components—Vas, Squ, and Tej—and approximately 430 oogenesis-related proteins. Co-immunoprecipitation verified interactions for three pairs: Mei-W68_Squ, CSN3_Squ, and Pka-C1_Tej. Furthermore, we screened the majority of Drosophila proteins (~12,000) for potential interaction with the Piwi protein, a central player in the piRNA pathway, identifying 164 pairs as potential binding partners. This in silico approach not only efficiently identifies potential interaction partners but also significantly bridges the gap by facilitating the integration of bioinformatics and experimental biology.
-
- Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
- Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.