Abstract

To fight the Covid-19 pandemic caused by the RNA virus SARS-CoV-2 a global vaccination campaign is in progress to achieve the immunization of billions of people mainly with adenoviral vector- or mRNA-based vaccines, all of which encode the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein. In some rare cases, cerebral venous sinus thromboses (CVST) have been reported as a severe side effect occurring 4 to 14 days after the first vaccination and were often accompanied by thrombocytopenia. Besides CVST, splanchnic vein thromboses (SVT) and other thromboembolic events have been observed. These events only occurred following vaccination with adenoviral vector-based vaccines but not following vaccination with mRNA-based vaccines. Meanwhile, scientists have proposed an immune-based pathomechanism and the condition has been coined Vaccine-induced Immune Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT). Here, we describe an unexpected mechanism that could explain thromboembolic events occurring with DNA-based but not with RNA-based vaccines. We show that DNA-encoded mRNA coding for Spike protein can be spliced in a way that the transmembrane anchor of Spike is lost, so that nearly full-length Spike is secreted from cells. Secreted Spike variants could potentially initiate severe side effects when binding to cells via the ACE2 receptor. Avoiding such splicing events should become part of a rational vaccine design to increase safety of prospective vaccines.

Data availability

The original WUHAN SARS-CoV-2 sequence is available in the NCBI database (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_045512.2); the adenoviral and codon-optimized Spike sequence data have a protected intellectual property by the companies. The primary sequence of Ad5.S, designed and used by the colleagues in Ulm, can be retrieved upon request (contact Prof. Stefan Kochanek).

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Eric Kowarz

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lea Krutzke

    Department of Gene Therapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4092-4131
  3. Marius Külp

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Patrick Streb

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Patrizia Larghero

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jennifer Reis

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Silvia Bracharz

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Tatjana Engler

    Department of Gene Therapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Stefan Kochanek

    Department of Gene Therapy, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Rolf Marschalek

    Institute of Pharmaceutical Biology, Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
    For correspondence
    Rolf.Marschalek@em.uni-frankfurt.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4870-3445

Funding

Goethe University Corona Task Force

  • Rolf Marschalek

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Kowarz et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 10,888
    views
  • 784
    downloads
  • 49
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Eric Kowarz
  2. Lea Krutzke
  3. Marius Külp
  4. Patrick Streb
  5. Patrizia Larghero
  6. Jennifer Reis
  7. Silvia Bracharz
  8. Tatjana Engler
  9. Stefan Kochanek
  10. Rolf Marschalek
(2022)
Vaccine-induced COVID-19 mimicry syndrome
eLife 11:e74974.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74974

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74974

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Adam D Longhurst, Kyle Wang ... David P Toczyski
    Tools and Resources

    Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.