Listeria monocytogenes requires cellular respiration for NAD+ regeneration and pathogenesis

  1. Rafael Rivera-Lugo
  2. David Deng
  3. Andrea Anaya-Sanchez
  4. Sara Tejedor-Sanz
  5. Eugene Tang
  6. Valeria M Reyes Ruiz
  7. Hans B Smith
  8. Denis V Titov
  9. John-Demian Sauer
  10. Eric P Skaar
  11. Caroline M Ajo-Franklin
  12. Daniel A Portnoy
  13. Samuel H Light  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States
  2. Graduate Group in Microbiology, University of California, Berkeley, United States
  3. Department of Biosciences, Rice University, United States
  4. The Molecular Foundry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, United States
  5. Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States
  6. Vanderbilt Institute for Infection, Immunology, and Inflammation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, United States
  7. Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  8. Department of Nutritional Sciences and Toxicology, University of California, Berkeley, United States
  9. Center for Computational Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States
  10. Department of Plant and Microbial Biology, University of California, Berkeley, United States
  11. Department of Microbiology, University of Chicago, United States
  12. Duchossois Family Institute, University of Chicago, United States

Decision letter

  1. Sophie Helaine
    Reviewing Editor; Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. Gisela Storz
    Senior Editor; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, United States
  3. Andreas Bäumler
    Reviewer; University of California, Davis, United States
  4. Andrez Vazquez-torres
    Reviewer; University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, United States

Our editorial process produces two outputs: (i) public reviews designed to be posted alongside the preprint for the benefit of readers; (ii) feedback on the manuscript for the authors, including requests for revisions, shown below. We also include an acceptance summary that explains what the editors found interesting or important about the work.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Listeria monocytogenes requires cellular respiration for NAD+ regeneration and pathogenesis" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, and the evaluation has been overseen by a Reviewing Editor and Gisela Storz as the Senior Editor. The following individuals involved in review of your submission have agreed to reveal their identity: Andreas Baumler (Reviewer #1); Andrez Vazquez-torres (Reviewer #3).

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission.

Essential revisions:

(1) Maintaining redox balance was essential in tissue culture assays (Figure 5A and B), but only partially accounted for attenuation of a respiration-deficient mutant during growth in the murine liver and spleen. Seeing the relatively modest effect on the recovery of virulence associated with the heterologous expression of NOX in the liver, oxidative phosphorylation may still play an important role during growth in this tissue. Thus, the claim in the abstract and elsewhere in the paper "that NAD+ regeneration, rather than oxidative phosphorylation, represents the primary role of L. monocytogenes respiration" should be tempered down and authors should consider roles for respiration other than redox balance.

(2) The use of the heterologous NOX system can rescue a series of defects, from acetic acid production, plaque assay and macrophage growth, virulence in murine infection model, to menB complementation including lysis. This suggests dispensability of pmf-dependent processes in all the phenotypes listed above. Please test whether well-known pmf-dependent processes (transport, protein secretion and or motility) remain altered in respiration deficient mutants (menI, ∆QC, ∆QC fmn) expressing the NAD-regenerating NOX system.

3) The primary effect of fmn or QC mutations is to enhance the amount of oxidized (D)MK, which in turn might well impact the pool of NADH. However, one cannot rule out other effects due to imbalanced reduced/oxidized (D)MK per se. Since NADH dehydrogenases are the effectors of NADH oxidation, please test single or double ∆ndh1, ∆ndh2 and/or ndh mutants. Does heterologous expression of NOX rescue the phenotypes of such mutants?

(4) Add statistics for comparisons of wildtype and NOX-complemented ∆QC, ∆QC/fmnB, and ∆menB strains (Figures 4c, 4d, and 5c).

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75424.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

(1) Maintaining redox balance was essential in tissue culture assays (Figure 5A and B), but only partially accounted for attenuation of a respiration-deficient mutant during growth in the murine liver and spleen. Seeing the relatively modest effect on the recovery of virulence associated with the heterologous expression of NOX in the liver, oxidative phosphorylation may still play an important role during growth in this tissue. Thus, the claim in the abstract and elsewhere in the paper "that NAD+ regeneration, rather than oxidative phosphorylation, represents the primary role of L. monocytogenes respiration" should be tempered down and authors should consider roles for respiration other than redox balance.

Good point. We have re-worded the abstract and relevant part of the discussion to state that NAD+ regeneration is “a major role” of respiration.

(2) The use of the heterologous NOX system can rescue a series of defects, from acetic acid production, plaque assay and macrophage growth, virulence in murine infection model, to menB complementation including lysis. This suggests dispensability of pmf-dependent processes in all the phenotypes listed above. Please test whether well-known pmf-dependent processes (transport, protein secretion and or motility) remain altered in respiration deficient mutants (menI, ∆QC, ∆QC fmn) expressing the NAD-regenerating NOX system.

Thanks for the suggested control. We performed additional experiments which confirm that respiration-deficient mutants are less motile and that NOX expression does not impact this phenotype. These results are now presented in Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

3) The primary effect of fmn or QC mutations is to enhance the amount of oxidized (D)MK, which in turn might well impact the pool of NADH. However, one cannot rule out other effects due to imbalanced reduced/oxidized (D)MK per se. Since NADH dehydrogenases are the effectors of NADH oxidation, please test single or double ∆ndh1, ∆ndh2 and/or ndh mutants. Does heterologous expression of NOX rescue the phenotypes of such mutants?

Good point. The revised manuscript includes data in Figure 4A showing that the ∆ndh1/ndh2 mutant exhibits similar, NOX-rescuable, phenotypes in the plaque assay. The effect of NOX on this strain and the menB mutant (which lacks quinones) strongly suggests that NAD redox state and not is the primary driver of observed phenotypes.

4) Add statistics for comparisons of wildtype and NOX-complemented ∆QC, ∆QC/fmnB, and ∆menB strains (Figures 4c, 4d, and 5c).

Added.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75424.sa2

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rafael Rivera-Lugo
  2. David Deng
  3. Andrea Anaya-Sanchez
  4. Sara Tejedor-Sanz
  5. Eugene Tang
  6. Valeria M Reyes Ruiz
  7. Hans B Smith
  8. Denis V Titov
  9. John-Demian Sauer
  10. Eric P Skaar
  11. Caroline M Ajo-Franklin
  12. Daniel A Portnoy
  13. Samuel H Light
(2022)
Listeria monocytogenes requires cellular respiration for NAD+ regeneration and pathogenesis
eLife 11:e75424.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75424

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75424