Estimating the potential to prevent locally acquired HIV infections in a UNAIDS Fast-Track City, Amsterdam

  1. Alexandra Blenkinsop  Is a corresponding author
  2. Mélodie Monod
  3. Ard van Sighem
  4. Nikos Pantazis
  5. Daniela Bezemer
  6. Eline Op de Coul
  7. Thijs van de Laar
  8. Christophe Fraser
  9. Maria Prins
  10. Peter Reiss
  11. Godelieve J de Bree
  12. Oliver Ratmann  Is a corresponding author
  1. Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Netherlands
  2. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  3. Stichting HIV Monitoring, Netherlands
  4. University of Athens, Greece
  5. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Netherlands
  6. Sanquin, Netherlands
  7. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  8. Academic Medical Center, Netherlands
  9. Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Netherlands

Abstract

Background: More than 300 cities including the city of Amsterdam in the Netherlands have joined the UNAIDS Fast-Track Cities initiative, committing to accelerate their HIV response and end the AIDS epidemic in cities by 2030. To support this commitment, we aimed to estimate the number and proportion of Amsterdam HIV infections that originated within the city, from Amsterdam residents. We also aimed to estimate the proportion of recent HIV infections during the 5-year period 2014-2018 in Amsterdam that remained undiagnosed.

Methods: We located diagnosed HIV infections in Amsterdam using postcode data (PC4) at time of registration in the ATHENA observational HIV cohort, and used HIV sequence data to reconstruct phylogeographically distinct, partially observed Amsterdam transmission chains. Individual-level infection times were estimated from biomarker data, and used to date the phylogenetically observed transmission chains as well as to estimate undiagnosed proportions among recent infections. A Bayesian Negative Binomial branching process model was used to estimate the number, size and growth of the unobserved Amsterdam transmission chains from the partially observed phylogenetic data.

Results: Between January 1 2014 and May 1 2019, there were 846 HIV diagnoses in Amsterdam residents, of whom 516 (61%) were estimated to have been infected in 2014-2018. The rate of new Amsterdam diagnoses since 2014 (104 per 100,000) remained higher than the national rates excluding Amsterdam (24 per 100,000), and in this sense Amsterdam remained a HIV hotspot in the Netherlands. An estimated 14% [12-16%] of infections in Amsterdan MSM in 2014-2018 remained undiagnosed by May 1 2019, and 41% [35-48%] in Amsterdam heterosexuals, with variation by region of birth. An estimated 68% [61-74%] of Amsterdam MSM infections in 2014-2018 had an Amsterdam resident as source, and 57% [41-71%] in Amsterdam heterosexuals, with heterogeneity by region of birth. Of the locally acquired infections, an estimated 43% [37-49%] were in foreign-born MSM, 41% [35-47%] in Dutch-born MSM, 10% [6-18%] in foreign-born heterosexuals, and 5% [2-9%] in Dutch-born heterosexuals. We estimate the majority of Amsterdam MSM infections in 2014-2018 originated in transmission chains that pre-existed by 2014.

Conclusions: This combined phylogenetic, epidemiologic, and modelling analysis in the UNAIDS Fast-Track City Amsterdam indicates that there remains considerable potential to prevent HIV infections among Amsterdam residents through city-level interventions. The burden of locally acquired infection remains concentrated in MSM, and both Dutch-born and foreign-born MSM would likely benefit most from intensified city-level interventions.

Funding: This study received funding as part of the H-TEAM initiative from Aidsfonds (project number P29701). The H-TEAM initiative is being supported by Aidsfonds (grant number: 2013169, P29701, P60803), Stichting Amsterdam Dinner Foundation, Bristol-Myers Squibb International Corp. (study number: AI424-541), Gilead Sciences Europe Ltd (grant number: PA-HIV-PREP-16-0024), Gilead Sciences (protocol numbers: CO-NL-276-4222, CO-US-276-1712, CO-NL-985-6195), and M.A.C AIDS Fund.

Data availability

Anonymised data are available in the public Github repository https://github.com/alexblenkinsop/locally.acquired.infections. These include aggregated time-to-diagnosis data, and reconstructed phylogenetic trees labelled by one of the 9 Amsterdam risk groups and year of sequence sample. Statistical information or data for separate research purposes from the ATHENA cohort can be requested by submitting a research proposal (https://www.hiv-monitoring.nl/english/research/research-projects/). HIV physicians can review the data of their own treatment centre and compare these data with the full cohort through an online report builder. For correspondence: hiv.monitoring@amc.uva.nl.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexandra Blenkinsop

    Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    a.blenkinsop@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2328-8671
  2. Mélodie Monod

    Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Ard van Sighem

    Stichting HIV Monitoring, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    Ard van Sighem, Funding for managing the ATHENA cohort is supported by a grant from the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport through the Centre for Infectious Disease Control of the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment.Received grants unrelated to this study from European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control paid to author's institution..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6656-0516
  4. Nikos Pantazis

    Department of Hygiene, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
    Competing interests
    Nikos Pantazis, Received grants unrelated to this study from ECDC and Gilead Sciences Hellas, paid to author's institution. Received honoraria for presentations unrelated to this study from Gilead Sciences Hellas..
  5. Daniela Bezemer

    Stichting HIV Monitoring, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Eline Op de Coul

    Center for Infectious Diseases Prevention and Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Thijs van de Laar

    Department of Donor Medicine Research, Sanquin, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Christophe Fraser

    Big Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Maria Prins

    Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    Maria Prins, Received unrestricted research grants and speaker/ advisory fees from Gilead Sciences, Abbvie and MSD; all of which were paid to author's institute and were unrelated to this study..
  10. Peter Reiss

    Department of Global Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    Peter Reiss, Has received grants unrelated to this study from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare and Merck, paid to author's institution. Received Honoraria for lecture from Merck paid to institution. Received Honoraria from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare and Merck, paid to institution..
  11. Godelieve J de Bree

    Department of Global Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    Godelieve J de Bree, Received honoraria to her Institution for scientific advisory board participations for Gilead Sciences and speaker fees from Gilead Sciences (2019), Takeda (2018-2022) and ExeVir (2020-current)..
  12. Oliver Ratmann

    Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    oliver.ratmann05@imperial.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Aids Fonds (P29701)

  • Alexandra Blenkinsop
  • Godelieve J de Bree
  • Oliver Ratmann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joshua T Schiffer, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States

Ethics

Human subjects: As from 2002 ATHENA is managed by Stichting HIV Monitoring, the institution appointed by the Dutch Ministry of Public health, Welfare and Sport for the monitoring of people living with HIV in the Netherlands. People entering HIV care receive written material about participation in the ATHENA cohort and are informed by their treating physician on the purpose of data collection, thereafter they can consent verbally or elect to opt-out. Data are pseudonymised before being provided to investigators and may be used for scientific purposes. A designated data protection officer safeguards compliance with the European General Data Protection Regulation (Boender et al. 2018).

Version history

  1. Received: December 17, 2021
  2. Preprint posted: March 15, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: August 1, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: August 3, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: October 7, 2022 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2022, Blenkinsop et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 997
    views
  • 172
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexandra Blenkinsop
  2. Mélodie Monod
  3. Ard van Sighem
  4. Nikos Pantazis
  5. Daniela Bezemer
  6. Eline Op de Coul
  7. Thijs van de Laar
  8. Christophe Fraser
  9. Maria Prins
  10. Peter Reiss
  11. Godelieve J de Bree
  12. Oliver Ratmann
(2022)
Estimating the potential to prevent locally acquired HIV infections in a UNAIDS Fast-Track City, Amsterdam
eLife 11:e76487.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76487

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76487

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Xiaoxin Yu, Roger S Zoh ... David B Allison
    Review Article

    We discuss 12 misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes concerning the use of covariates in observational or nonrandomized research. Additionally, we offer advice to help investigators, editors, reviewers, and readers make more informed decisions about conducting and interpreting research where the influence of covariates may be at issue. We primarily address misperceptions in the context of statistical management of the covariates through various forms of modeling, although we also emphasize design and model or variable selection. Other approaches to addressing the effects of covariates, including matching, have logical extensions from what we discuss here but are not dwelled upon heavily. The misperceptions, misstatements, or mistakes we discuss include accurate representation of covariates, effects of measurement error, overreliance on covariate categorization, underestimation of power loss when controlling for covariates, misinterpretation of significance in statistical models, and misconceptions about confounding variables, selecting on a collider, and p value interpretations in covariate-inclusive analyses. This condensed overview serves to correct common errors and improve research quality in general and in nutrition research specifically.

    1. Ecology
    2. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Emilia Johnson, Reuben Sunil Kumar Sharma ... Kimberly Fornace
    Research Article

    Zoonotic disease dynamics in wildlife hosts are rarely quantified at macroecological scales due to the lack of systematic surveys. Non-human primates (NHPs) host Plasmodium knowlesi, a zoonotic malaria of public health concern and the main barrier to malaria elimination in Southeast Asia. Understanding of regional P. knowlesi infection dynamics in wildlife is limited. Here, we systematically assemble reports of NHP P. knowlesi and investigate geographic determinants of prevalence in reservoir species. Meta-analysis of 6322 NHPs from 148 sites reveals that prevalence is heterogeneous across Southeast Asia, with low overall prevalence and high estimates for Malaysian Borneo. We find that regions exhibiting higher prevalence in NHPs overlap with human infection hotspots. In wildlife and humans, parasite transmission is linked to land conversion and fragmentation. By assembling remote sensing data and fitting statistical models to prevalence at multiple spatial scales, we identify novel relationships between P. knowlesi in NHPs and forest fragmentation. This suggests that higher prevalence may be contingent on habitat complexity, which would begin to explain observed geographic variation in parasite burden. These findings address critical gaps in understanding regional P. knowlesi epidemiology and indicate that prevalence in simian reservoirs may be a key spatial driver of human spillover risk.