Generation of vascularized brain organoids to study neurovascular interactions

  1. Xin-Yao Sun
  2. Xiang-Chun Ju  Is a corresponding author
  3. Yang Li
  4. Peng-Ming Zeng
  5. Jian Wu
  6. Ying-Ying Zhou
  7. Li-Bing Shen
  8. Jian Dong
  9. Yuejun Chen
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo  Is a corresponding author
  1. ShanghaiTech University, China
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences, China

Abstract

Brain organoids have been used to recapitulate the processes of brain development and related diseases. However, the lack of vasculatures, which regulate neurogenesis and brain disorders, limits the utility of brain organoids. In this study, we induced vessel and brain organoids respectively, and then fused two types of organoids together to obtain vascularized brain organoids. The fused brain organoids were engrafted with robust vascular network-like structures, and exhibited increased number of neural progenitors, in line with the possibility that vessels regulate neural development. Fusion organoids also contained functional blood-brain-barrier (BBB)-like structures, as well as microglial cells, a specific population of immune cells in the brain. The incorporated microglia responded actively to immune stimuli to the fused brain organoids and showed ability of engulfing synapses. Thus, the fusion organoids established in this study allow modeling interactions between the neuronal and non-neuronal components in vitro, in particular the vasculature and microglia niche.

Data availability

Single cell RNA sequencing transcriptome data supporting this study have been deposited in NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) with accession number SRP338043 (VOR: SRR15992286; VOR2:SRR15992285).

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Xin-Yao Sun

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Xiang-Chun Ju

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    xiangchun.ju@oist.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yang Li

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Peng-Ming Zeng

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jian Wu

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ying-Ying Zhou

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Li-Bing Shen

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jian Dong

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Yuejun Chen

    Institute of Neuroscience, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo

    School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    luozhg@shanghaitech.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5037-0542

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China (PI,2021ZD0202500)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (PI,32130035)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (PI,92168107)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Natural Science Foundation of China (PI,31871034)

  • Xiang-Chun Ju

Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Project (PI,QYZDJ-SSW-SMC025)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

Shanghai Municipal People's Government (Co-I,2018SHZDZX05)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

Shanghai Municipal People's Government (PI,201409001700)

  • Zhen-Ge Luo

National Key Research and Development Program of China (Co-I,2017YFA0700500)

  • Xiang-Chun Ju

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Sun et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 15,875
    views
  • 3,207
    downloads
  • 163
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Xin-Yao Sun
  2. Xiang-Chun Ju
  3. Yang Li
  4. Peng-Ming Zeng
  5. Jian Wu
  6. Ying-Ying Zhou
  7. Li-Bing Shen
  8. Jian Dong
  9. Yuejun Chen
  10. Zhen-Ge Luo
(2022)
Generation of vascularized brain organoids to study neurovascular interactions
eLife 11:e76707.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76707

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76707

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Moritz F Wurm, Doruk Yiğit Erigüç
    Research Article

    Recognizing goal-directed actions is a computationally challenging task, requiring not only the visual analysis of body movements, but also analysis of how these movements causally impact, and thereby induce a change in, those objects targeted by an action. We tested the hypothesis that the analysis of body movements and the effects they induce relies on distinct neural representations in superior and anterior inferior parietal lobe (SPL and aIPL). In four fMRI sessions, participants observed videos of actions (e.g. breaking stick, squashing plastic bottle) along with corresponding point-light-display (PLD) stick figures, pantomimes, and abstract animations of agent–object interactions (e.g. dividing or compressing a circle). Cross-decoding between actions and animations revealed that aIPL encodes abstract representations of action effect structures independent of motion and object identity. By contrast, cross-decoding between actions and PLDs revealed that SPL is disproportionally tuned to body movements independent of visible interactions with objects. Lateral occipitotemporal cortex (LOTC) was sensitive to both action effects and body movements. These results demonstrate that parietal cortex and LOTC are tuned to physical action features, such as how body parts move in space relative to each other and how body parts interact with objects to induce a change (e.g. in position or shape/configuration). The high level of abstraction revealed by cross-decoding suggests a general neural code supporting mechanical reasoning about how entities interact with, and have effects on, each other.

    1. Neuroscience
    Magdalena Solyga, Georg B Keller
    Research Article

    Our movements result in predictable sensory feedback that is often multimodal. Based on deviations between predictions and actual sensory input, primary sensory areas of cortex have been shown to compute sensorimotor prediction errors. How prediction errors in one sensory modality influence the computation of prediction errors in another modality is still unclear. To investigate multimodal prediction errors in mouse auditory cortex, we used a virtual environment to experimentally couple running to both self-generated auditory and visual feedback. Using two-photon microscopy, we first characterized responses of layer 2/3 (L2/3) neurons to sounds, visual stimuli, and running onsets and found responses to all three stimuli. Probing responses evoked by audiomotor (AM) mismatches, we found that they closely resemble visuomotor (VM) mismatch responses in visual cortex (V1). Finally, testing for cross modal influence on AM mismatch responses by coupling both sound amplitude and visual flow speed to the speed of running, we found that AM mismatch responses were amplified when paired with concurrent VM mismatches. Our results demonstrate that multimodal and non-hierarchical interactions shape prediction error responses in cortical L2/3.