Inner membrane complex proteomics reveals a palmitoylation regulation critical for intraerythrocytic development of malaria parasite

Version of Record

Accepted for publication after peer review and revision.

Download
Cite
Share
CommentOpen annotations (there are currently 0 annotations on this page).

Version of Record published: July 18, 2022 (This version)
Accepted Manuscript updated: July 4, 2022 (Go to version)
Accepted Manuscript published: July 1, 2022 (Go to version)
Accepted: June 24, 2022
Received: January 29, 2022
Preprint posted: January 29, 2022 (Go to version)

1. Of interest
Staphylococcus aureus FtsZ and PBP4 bind to the conformationally dynamic N-terminal domain of GpsB

Michael D Sacco, Lauren R Hammond ... Yu Chen

Research Article Apr 19, 2024
Further reading

Abstract
Editor's evaluation
Introduction
Results
Discussion
Materials and methods
Data availability
References
Article and author information
Metrics

Abstract

Malaria is caused by infection of the erythrocytes by the parasites Plasmodium. Inside the erythrocytes, the parasites multiply via schizogony, an unconventional cell division mode. The inner membrane complex (IMC), an organelle located beneath the parasite plasma membrane, serving as the platform for protein anchorage, is essential for schizogony. So far, the complete repertoire of IMC proteins and their localization determinants remain unclear. Here we used biotin ligase (TurboID)-based proximity labeling to compile the proteome of the schizont IMC of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii. In total, 300 TurboID-interacting proteins were identified. 18 of 21 selected candidates were confirmed to localize in the IMC, indicating good reliability. In light of the existing palmitome of Plasmodium falciparum, 83 proteins of the P. yoelii IMC proteome are potentially palmitoylated. We further identified DHHC2 as the major resident palmitoyl-acyl-transferase of the IMC. Depletion of DHHC2 led to defective schizont segmentation and growth arrest both in vitro and in vivo. DHHC2 was found to palmitoylate two critical IMC proteins CDPK1 and GAP45 for their IMC localization. In summary, this study reports an inventory of new IMC proteins and demonstrates a central role of DHHC2 in governing the IMC localization of proteins during the schizont development.

Editor's evaluation

Apicomplexan parasites, including the malaria parasite Plasmodium, possess a characteristic inner membrane complex (IMC), which plays an essential role in maintaining the parasite shape and regulating motility. In this study, the authors used proximity labeling to determine the IMC proteome of erythrocytic stages in the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium yoelii. They identify the palmitoyl-acyl-transferase DHHC2 as a key enzyme that regulates the localization of IMC proteins through palmitoylation. This work provides new insights into the function of the IMC in the erythrocytic stages of the malaria parasite.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77447.sa0

Introduction

Malaria, a human scourge caused by the protozoans of the genus Plasmodium, affects more than 200 million people and is responsible for approximately half a million deaths in 2019 (World Health Organization, 2019). The symptoms of malaria are caused by the intraerythrocytic proliferation of the parasites. After erythrocyte invasion, the parasites replicate via schizogony to produce up to 32 invasive daughter cells called the merozoites. Following their release from the host cell, these merozoites invade other erythrocytes and continue the intraerythrocytic life cycle.

A defining feature of apicomplexan parasites, including the Plasmodium, is the organelle inner membrane complex (IMC) which are flattened membranous vesicles beneath the plasma membrane (PM). In Plasmodium, the IMC is present in the invasive or motile stages such as the merozoites, ookinetes, and sporozoites of all Plasmodium, as well as in the male gametocytes of human pathogen P. falciparum (Morrissette and Sibley, 2002; Kono et al., 2012). In the asexual cycle of the Plasmodium, the biogenesis of the IMC begins at the early schizont stage after organelle duplication in the cytoplasm and several rounds of genome replication within the intact nucleus (Matthews et al., 2018). Allocation and packaging of nuclei and organelles into daughter cells are achieved by cytokinesis, in which the PM and the extending IMC coordinately invaginate and surround each daughter haploid merozoite (Ferreira et al., 2020). As a result, the pellicle of merozoite is composed of a single membrane of PM, closely aligned double membranes of the IMC, and 2–3 subpellicular microtubules (SPMT) associated with the IMC (Kono et al., 2016). After invasion into a new erythrocyte, the IMC dissembles at the early ring stage (Ferreira et al., 2020). The IMC is best recognized as the platform for attaching the actomyosin motor complex-glideosome (occupying the space between PM and IMC) responsible for parasite invasion and motility (Harding and Frischknecht, 2020; Frénal and Soldati-Favre, 2013). It also serves to maintain the cell shape and rigidity of the merozoite (Frénal et al., 2017). The cytoplasmic side of IMC is associated with a rigid meshwork composed of several families of proteins, including alveolins (Gould et al., 2008), which is important for IMC-SPMT interconnection.

To understand the role(s) of the IMC in the parasite development, obtaining the complete list of protein components of the IMC is important. However, systematic proteomic analyses on the IMC protein composition have not been reported due to the difficulty in separating the IMC from other membranes, such as the PM. So far, a limited number of IMC and IMC-associated proteins have been identified, by either candidate gene strategy or isolating the interactors of IMC protein. Known IMC proteins include glideosome-associated protein 45 (GAP45) (Perrin et al., 2018), GAP40 (Frénal et al., 2010), GAP50 (Bosch et al., 2012), myosin A tail domain interacting protein (MTIP) (Bergman et al., 2003), MyoA (Bergman et al., 2003), ECL1 (Green et al., 2017), GAP with multiple-membrane spans 1 (GAPM1), GAPM2, GAPM3 (Bullen et al., 2009), ISP1, and ISP3 (Wang et al., 2020) as well as the alveolin proteins IMCp, IMC1c, IMC1e, IMC1f, and IMC1g (Kono et al., 2012). In addition, calcium-dependent kinase 1 (CDPK1) and photosensitized INA-labeled protein 1 (PhIL1) were also reported to reside in the IMC of schizonts (Kumar et al., 2017; Saini et al., 2017). BCP1, MORN1, and CINCH, components of the basal complex, a subcompartment of the IMC at the posterior extending edge, were also recently identified (Morano and Dvorin, 2021). Remarkably, most of the known IMC proteins were refractory to gene deletion, suggesting an essential function in the development of asexual blood stage (Ferreira et al., 2020). Among the IMC proteins, GAP45 and CDPK1 have been studied extensively. CDPK1 plays a key role in early schizont development as its depletion or inhibition causes parasite arrest at the early schizonts (; Kumar et al., 2017; Azevedo et al., 2013). On the other hand, GAP45 is essential for merozoite invasion (Perrin et al., 2018). Despite great efforts in IMC research, many questions still remain regarding the IMC components and their function in schizogony. How many proteins are there in IMC? What determines IMC protein localization?

Enzyme-catalyzed proximity labeling (PL) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS) offers an alternative approach for proteome discovery (Kim and Roux, 2016). BioID is an engineered bacterial biotin ligase adapted for proximity-based biotinylation of proteins in living cells (Roux et al., 2012). The proteins covalently labeled with biotin can be isolated by streptavidin-biotin affinity purification followed by MS analysis. BioID has been used to identify the protein components of complexes and organelles in different model organisms (Qin et al., 2021). In Plasmodium, BioID-based PL has also generated organelle- and vesicle-specific proteins or proteomes, including those of the gametocyte-specific osmiophilic bodies of P. berghei, the blood stage parasitophorous vacuolar membrane of P. berghei and P. falciparum, the apicoplast of P. falciparum, and the IMC and apical annuli proteins of P. falciparum (Geiger et al., 2020; Boucher et al., 2018; Schnider et al., 2018; Khosh-Naucke et al., 2018; Kehrer et al., 2016; Wichers et al., 2021). These analyses have led to the functional discovery of previously undescribed proteins, providing new insights in the organelle biology of malaria parasites. However, BioID requires parasite exposure to biotin over a long period (18–24 hr), which is not ideal or feasible for certain developmental stages with a short life span. In addition, BioID does not work well at temperatures below 37°C (May et al., 2020; Bosch et al., 2021), rendering its application to the mosquito stages of Plasmodium unsuitable. Recently, a new biotin ligase, TurboID, was developed by directed evolution (Branon et al., 2018). Compared to BioID, TurboID is faster and can work under a broader range of temperatures (Branon et al., 2018). So far, the application of TurboID in the Plasmodium has not been reported.

In this study, we applied TurboID-PL and quantitative MS to obtain a proteome of the IMC in the schizonts of rodent malaria parasite P. yoelii. IMC targeting was achieved by fusing TurboID with the N-terminal 20 residues of ISP1, a known IMC resident protein. A collection of 300 proteins were identified as candidate IMC and IMC-associated proteins, of which 83 are potentially palmitoylated. We further demonstrated DHHC2 as a master IMC palmitoyl-acyl-transferase which plays a critical role in schizont segmentation and merozoite invasion by regulating the IMC localization of CDPK1 and GAP45 via palmitoylation.

Results

Biotin-labeling of Plasmodium proteins by TurboID ligase

To test the activity of the TurboID ligase relative to the BioID ligase for PL of malaria parasites, we fused a hemagglutinin (HA) tag to the N-terminus of each ligase (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). These ligases were episomally expressed in the asexual blood stages of P. yoelii under the promoter of the isp3 gene (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A), a gene that is highly transcribed in the schizonts (Otto et al., 2014). Immunoblot detected comparable BioID and TurboID expressions in the asexual blood stages (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Different from an automatous rupture of mature schizonts of the in vitro cultured P. falciparum, the P. yoelii schizonts displayed an arrest in rupture after maturation in the in vitro condition, which permits PL of mature schizonts. The schizonts expressing each ligase were incubated with 100 µM biotin at 37°C for different times (0.25, 1, 3, and 18 hr). Immunoblot using streptavidin-HRP detected robust protein biotinylation in the cell extracts of TurboID-parasites as early as 0.25 hr after biotin incubation (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). In contrast, protein biotinylation in the BioID-parasites appeared at a low level at 3 hr and reached a high level at 18 hr (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C). To confirm these results, dot blot experiments were performed using streptavidin-HRP and similar results were observed (Figure 1—figure supplement 1D). Next, we tested the temperature compatibility of the two ligases for PL in the parasites. BioID- and TurboID-schizonts were incubated for 18 and 3 hr, respectively, with 100 µM biotin at different temperatures (4, 22, 30, and 37°C). Biotin-incubated parasites stained with fluorescently conjugated streptavidin revealed that both ligases had similar labeling activity at 30 and 37°C (Figure 1—figure supplement 1E,F). Notably, only TurboID retained its activity at 22°C (Figure 1—figure supplement 1E,F). We further performed dot blots using streptavidin-HRP and obtained similar results (Figure 1—figure supplement 1G). These results indicate that TurboID is active at temperatures lower than 37°C, a temperature required for BioID to be fully functional. We also tested TurboID-mediated PL in the ookinetes, a mosquito stage of parasites with a preferential living temperature at 22°C. Cultured ookinetes from the BioID- and TurboID-parasites were incubated for 18 and 3 hr, respectively, with 100 µM biotin at 22°C. Costaining with the fluorescently conjugated streptavidin and anti-HA antibody detected cytosolic and nuclear protein biotinylation only in the TurboID-ookinetes when exogenous biotin was added (Figure 1—figure supplement 1H). Compared with BioID, TurboID allowed more robust PL of proteins in the living parasites with a shorter biotin incubation time and is less temperature sensitive.

Detection of IMC proteins using TurboID labeling and quantitative mass spectrometry

Next, we applied TurboID for PL of the IMC to identify new IMC proteins in the schizonts. The HA-tagged TurboID was fused with an IMC targeting peptide, the N-terminal 20 residues of ISP1 (Tb-IMC) (Wang et al., 2020; Wetzel et al., 2015; Figure 1—figure supplement 2A). The HA-tagged TurboID alone (Tb-cyto) served as a control to indicate non-specific biotinylation (Figure 1A and Figure 1—figure supplement 2A), permitting specific identification of IMC and IMC-associated proteins. Both ligases (Tb-IMC and Tb-cyto) were driven by the promoter of gene isp3 and episomally expressed in the asexual blood stages (Figure 1—figure supplement 2B). As expected, the Tb-IMC ligase dominantly colocalized with the IMC protein GAP45 in the IMC (Figure 1—figure supplement 2C). The schizonts expressing Tb-IMC, Tb-cyto, or empty vector (EV: construct without ligase gene) were purified and treated with 100 µM biotin at 37°C for 3 hr. Both immunoblot and dot blot assays using streptavidin-HRP detected increased biotinylation in cell extracts in the presence of biotin from the Tb-IMC and Tb-cyto schizonts but not from the EV group (Figure 1B and Figure 1—figure supplement 2D). Furthermore, parasites stained with fluorescent-conjugated streptavidin (SA-488) and anti-HA antibody exhibited an IMC distribution (surrounding daughter merozoites) of biotinylated proteins, which colocalized with ligase in Tb-IMC schizonts. The biotinylated proteins and the ligase displayed cytosolic and nuclear distribution in the Tb-cyto schizonts, while scarce signal was detected in the EV schizonts (Figure 1C and Figure 1—figure supplement 2E). Therefore, the Tb-IMC enables the PL of IMC in the living schizonts.

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Proteomic of P. *yoelii* schizont IMC by TurboID and quantitative mass spectrometry.

(A) Schematic of schizonts with TurboID ligase localizing in the cytoplasm (Tb-cyto) and IMC (Tb-IMC). EV indicates the schizonts expressing empty vector (EV). See the detailed information of Tb-IMC and Tb-cyto in Figure 1—figure supplement 2. (B) Immunoblot and streptavidin blot of total lysate from the schizonts expressing the EV, Tb-cyto and Tb-IMC. Tagged ligase was detected by anti-HA antibody while biotinylated proteins were detected by streptavidin-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (streptavidin-HRP). Comparable loaded lysate was indicated by BiP control and Coomassie blue stain. (C) Costaining of TurboID ligase and biotinylated proteins in the schizonts expressing the ligase of the EV, Tb-cyto, and Tb-IMC. The schizonts incubated with or without 100 µM biotin were costained with the SA-488 and anti-HA antibody. x/y in the figure is the number of cells displaying signal/the number of cells analyzed. Scale bar = 5 μm. (D) Workflow for filtering the Tb-IMC interacting proteins (proximal interactors). 488 biotinylated proteins that were at least two times more abundant in Tb-IMC than that in Tb-cyto control among three replicates and with an adjusted p-value<0.05, were significantly enriched. Detailed information in Figure 1—figure supplement 2. (E) Interaction network of 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins (STRING, p-value <1.0e-16, bold lines). Two subgroups (I: left, II: right) were functionally clustered. Many known inner membrane complex (IMC) or IMC-associated proteins were clustered into the subgroup I while many annotated ER/Golgi secretory or vesicle trafficking proteins were clustered into the subgroup II. (F) Volcano plots showing the 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins. Relative biotinylation of each protein was calculated by quantifying protein intensity in Tb-IMC relative to Tb-cyto schizonts (n=3). Proteins in the subgroup I (red circle) and subgroup II (yellow circle) are indicated. MS: mass spectrometry; HA: hemagglutinin.

Figure 1—source data 1 (related to Figure 1B) Immunoblot and streptavidin blot of total lysate from the schizonts expressing the EV, Tb-cyto and Tb-IMC.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig1-data1-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig1-data1-v3.xls

To further confirm that the IMC or IMC-associated proteins were the primary targets of biotin labeling in the Tb-IMC schizonts, the protein extracts were subjected to streptavidin pull-down, followed by immunoblot assays. As expected, cis-biotinylation of the Tb-IMC ligase was detected and the IMC protein GAP45 was enriched in the pull-down fraction (Figure 1—figure supplement 2F). In contrast, the proteins of other organelles, including the MSP1 (PM), Erd2 (Golgi marker), BiP (ER marker), and histone H3 (nucleus) were not detected (Figure 1—figure supplement 2F). Three biological replicates were prepared from the Tb-IMC and Tb-cyto schizonts, and the streptavidin-affinity purified proteins from cell extracts were subjected to proteomic analyses by SWATH-MS, a data-independent acquisition based quantitative MS method (Gillet et al., 2012; Li et al., 2015). The numbers of identified proteins with at least two independent peptides were comparable between the Tb-IMC (replicate 1:1964 hits, replicate 2:1995 hits, and replicate 3:1986 hits) and Tb-cyto schizonts (replicate 1:1970 hits, replicate 2:1946 hits, and replicate 3:1948 hits). Correlation analyses of changes in protein abundance demonstrated good reproducibility among biological replicates (Figure 1—figure supplement 2G). Quantitative MS yielded 488 enriched proteins with high confidence (an adjusted p-value<0.05) in the Tb-IMC compared to the Tb-cyto schizonts (Figure 1D and Figure 1—figure supplement 2H).

Genes coding for IMC proteins display transcription peak at late schizont and merozoite during P. falciparum asexual replication cycle (Hu et al., 2010). To further filter potential IMC proteins, we discriminated the 488 Tb-IMC interacting proteins by comparative analyses of their transcription pattern based on a P. berghei transcriptome dataset (Otto et al., 2014). After filtering out 188 proteins not showing transcription peak at schizont, we narrowed the candidates to 300 proteins (Figure 1D, Figure 1—figure supplement 2H, Supplementary file 1, and Supplementary file 2). These 300 Tb-IMC proximal interactors included many known IMC or IMC-associated proteins, including GAP40, GAP45, GAP50, MTIP, MyoA, ELC, GAPM1, GAPM2, GAPM3, IMCp, IMC1c, IMC1e, IMC1f, IMC1g, ISP3, BCP1, MORN1, CINCH, CDPK1, PhIL1, DHHC1, and DHHC2 (Figure 1E and F). The homologs of these proteins have displayed an IMC or IMC-like localization in the Plasmodium, or have been shown to interact or associate with IMC protein baits using immunoprecipitation assay in previous studies (Bullen et al., 2009; Kumar et al., 2017; Hodson et al., 2015; Dearnley et al., 2012; Parkyn Schneider et al., 2017; Yeoman et al., 2011; Vaid et al., 2008;). Therefore, the IMC and IMC-associated proteins were enriched in the list of 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins, suggesting reliable data quality generated by TurboID and quantitative MS.

Predicted functional profile of Tb-IMC interacting proteins

To further gain functional insights into the 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins, we cross-referenced these proteins with other Plasmodium datasets. First, the Tb-IMC proximal interactors were significantly enriched for interactions using Search Tool for Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) (Szklarczyk et al., 2019), a database of known and predicted physical and functional protein-protein interactions. Notably, these proteins were segregated into two distinct subgroups (I and II) (Figure 1E and F). The subgroup I contained 152 proteins while the subgroup II contained 148 proteins. Most of known IMC or IMC-associated proteins were clustered into the subgroup I. In contrast, many annotated ER/Golgi secretory- or vesicle trafficking-related proteins were clustered into the subgroup II (Figure 1E and F). Second, gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed to further discriminate the proteins in subgroup I and II (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). Interestingly, the subgroup II was highly enriched with the GO terms, including the vesicle-mediated transport (40 proteins), vesicle fusion (11 proteins), ER to Golgi vesicle-mediated transport (13 proteins), Golgi vesicle transport (20 proteins) (Figure 1—figure supplement 3, biological process panel), and SNARE complex (14 proteins), endosome membrane (9 proteins), late endosome (7 proteins), and endocytic vesicle (16 proteins) (cellular component panel), while the subgroup I was mainly assigned with the GO terms, like the inner membrane pellicle complex (22 proteins) (cellular component panel), protein lipidation (10 proteins) (biological process panel), and palmitoyltransferase activity (6 proteins) (molecular function panel). The IMC arises de novo from ER/Golgi-derived material via vesicular trafficking and membrane fusion in the schizonts of each replication cycle of the parasite (Gordon et al., 2008; Yeoman et al., 2011; Pieperhoff et al., 2013; Bannister et al., 2000). Detection of the subgroup II enriched with vesicular trafficking and membrane fusion effectors agrees with the notion of the ER/Golgi-derived IMC biogenesis. In addition, subgroup I and II within the Tb-IMC interacting proteins may reflect the tight and dynamic association between IMC organelle and endomembrane system in schizont development.

Validation of the candidate IMC proteins

To assess whether the identified proteins are indeed localized in the IMC, 21 candidates were selected among the 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins for subcellular localization analysis (Figure 2A). These hits showed various levels at the enrichment ratio in the PL experiments. Among these proteins, the orthologues of 9 proteins including PY17X_ 0314700 (CDPK1), PY17X_0617900 (CDPK4), PY17X_1440500 (PKAr), PY17X_0839000 (PKAc), PY17X_1420600 (Rab11A), PY17X_1462100 (MTIP), PY17X_0206000 (PhIL1), PY17X_0525300 (GAPM2), and PY17X_1411000 (PIC5) have been experimentally validated to be IMC-residing or association in the schizonts of P. berghei or P. falciparum (Patil et al., 2020; Bullen et al., 2009; Kumar et al., 2017; Saini et al., 2017; Parkyn Schneider et al., 2017; Fang et al., 2018; Green et al., 2006; Wilde et al., 2019), while IMC localization or association of the 12 other candidates (PY17X_0207400, PY17X_0312400, PY17X_0417300, PY17X_0418000, PY17X_0917100, PY17X_1131200, PY17X_1139700, PY17X_1220300, PY17X_1348200, PY17X_1359500, PY17X_1441500, and PY17X_1453100) (Figure 2B) have not been well characterized in the Plasmodium. Among the 21 candidates, 6 out of them were endogenously tagged with a 6 HA at the C-terminus (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A,B), while others were tagged with a 6 HA at the N- or C-terminus and driven by the promoter of gene isp3 for episomal expression in the asexual blood stages. Immunoblot assays were used to detect each protein, all displaying a band fitting their expected molecular weight (Figure 2—figure supplement 2A). As expected, immunofluorescence assays (IFA) showed clear colocalization of the 9 known proteins (CDPK1, CDPK4, PKAr, PKAc, Rab11A, MTIP, PhIL1, GAPM2, and PIC5) with the IMC marker GAP45 (Figure 2—figure supplement 2B). Additionally, we performed the ultrastructural expansion microscopy (U-ExM) and immune-EM to analyze the localization of CDPK1 in the cdpk1::6 HA schizonts and both methods detected the IMC localization of CDPK1 (Figure 2—figure supplement 3A,B). Among the 12 newly characterized candidates, 9 of them (PY17X_0312400, PY17X_0418000, PY17X_1131200, PY17X_1139700, PY17X_1220300, PY17X_1348200, PY17X_1359500, PY17X_1441500, and PY17X_1453100) displayed the IMC or IMC-like pellicle localization (Figure 2C), while 3 other candidates (PY17X_0207400, PY17X_0417300, and PY17X_0917100) did not. Collectively, we confirmed the IMC or IMC-like localization of 18 proteins from the 21 candidates in the P. yoelii schizonts.

Figure 2 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Validation of 9 new IMC proteins by localization analysis.

(A) 21 candidates selected from the Tb-IMC interacting proteins for subcellular localization analysis in the *P. yoelii*. The orthologues of 9 proteins (blue dot) have been experimentally validated to be IMC-residing or -associated in the schizonts of *P. berghei* or *P. falciparum*, while subcellular localization of other 12 proteins (red dot) have not been well-characterized in *Plasmodium* species.(B) Information and subcellular localization summary of the 12 newly tested Tb-IMC interacting proteins shown in A. (C) Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) analysis of 12 Tb-IMC interacting proteins in the *P. yoelii* schizonts. Each protein was tagged with a 6 HA at the N- or C-terminus and episomally expressed in the schizonts. The schizonts were costained with antibodies against GAP45 and HA. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. Scale bar = 5 μm.

Palmitoylation of IMC proteins and regulation of localization

While a growing number of IMC proteins were discovered, their localization determinants remain incompletely known. Protein palmitoylation is a reversible lipid modification that facilitates protein attachment to the plasma and organelle membranes (Fukata and Fukata, 2010). Previous studies have shown that palmitoylation is important for the binding or targeting of proteins to IMC in the Plasmodium (Wang et al., 2020; Wetzel et al., 2015). We speculated that certain IMC proteins use lipid moieties for IMC membrane attachment. Interestingly, we observed a significant enrichment of the biological-process term of protein lipidation (GO: 0006497) in the Tb-IMC interacting proteins (Figure 3A and Figure 1—figure supplement 3). Three palmitoyl-S-acyl-transferases (PAT) including DHHC1, DHHC2, and DHHC7 were enriched (Figure 3A), implying a role of these PATs for palmitoylation of the IMC proteins.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Palmitoylation regulates IMC protein localization.

(A) Enrichment of enzymes for protein lipidation in the Tb-IMC interacting proteins shown in Figure 1F, including three palmitoyl-S-acyl-transferases DHHC2, DHHC1, and DHHC7. (B) Venn diagram showing overlap between Tb-IMC interactors (green) identified in this study and the orthologs within the *P. falciparum* palmitome (blue). 83 Tb-IMC interactors (overlap, 28%) were considered to be potentially palmitoylated. Numbers indicate the number of proteins identified. (C) Acyl-RAC method detecting palmitoylation of CDPK1, GAP45, ISP3, and PIC5, but not PhIL1 in schizonts. NH: NH₂OH. MSP1 and BiP served as loading controls. Total proteins were treated with MMTs to block the thiol side chain in free cysteine. Proteins with palmitoylated cysteine were re-exposed the thiol side chain with removal of palmitic acid by NH₂OH, purified via Thiopropyl Sepharose, and eluted by DTT for immunoblot. Representative of two independent replicates. (D) Palmitoylation analysis of CDPK1, GAP45, and ISP3 in schizonts treated with 2-BP. NH: NH₂OH. MSP1 and BiP served as loading controls. Representative of two independent replicates. (E) Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) analysis of CDPK1, GAP45, PIC5, PhIL1, and MSP1 in schizonts treated with 2-BP and DMSO, respectively. Purified mature schizonts were treated with 2-BP for 12 hr. Scale bar = 5 μm. (F) Fractionation analysis of CDPK1, GAP45, PIC5, and MSP1 in schizonts treated with 2-BP and DMSO, respectively. Light fraction includes cytosolic proteins while heavy fraction includes membrane proteins and cytoskeleton proteins. Representative of two independent replicates.

Figure 3—source data 1 (related to Figure 3C) Acyl-RAC method detecting palmitoylation of CDPK1, GAP45, ISP3, and PIC5, but not PhIL1 in schizonts.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig3-data1-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig3-data1-v3.xls
Figure 3—source data 2 (related to Figure 3D) Palmitoylation analysis of CDPK1, GAP45, and ISP3 in schizonts treated with 2-BP.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig3-data2-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig3-data2-v3.xls
Figure 3—source data 3 (related to Figure 3F) Fractionation analysis of CDPK1, GAP45, PIC5, and MSP1 in schizonts treated with 2-BP and DMSO, respectively.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig3-data3-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig3-data3-v3.xls

To identify IMC proteins with palmitoylation, we examined a collection of 494 palmitoylated proteins previously detected in the schizonts of P. falciparum (Jones et al., 2012). Among the 300 P. yoelii Tb-IMC interacting proteins identified in this study, 83 proteins (28%) have orthologs that are palmitoylated in P. falciparum (Figure 3B and Supplementary file 1). Importantly, these 83 proteins includes GAP45 and ISP3, whose palmitoylations have been experimentally validated (Wang et al., 2020; Jones et al., 2012), and CDPK1, GAP50, IMC1g, and IMC1c, which are predicted to be palmitoylated. Out of these 83 proteins, we assessed 4 (CDPK1, GAP45, ISP3, and a newly identified IMC protein PIC5) for their palmitoylation using the resin-assisted capture of acylated proteins (Acyl-RAC) method (Forrester et al., 2011). Palmitoylation was confirmed in these 4 proteins in P. yoelii schizonts (Figure 3C), while PhIL1, an IMC protein not in the list of 83 proteins, did not display palmitoylation (Figure 3C). To further confirm palmitoylation, mature schizonts was treated with 100 μΜ 2-bromopalmitate (2-BP), an inhibitor of protein palmitoylation. We observed markedly reduced palmitoylation of CDPK1, GAP45, and ISP3 in the 2-BP treated schizonts (Figure 3D). Notably, CDPK1, GAP45, and PIC5 lost their IMC localization and were found in the cytosol or nucleus after 2-BP treatment (Figure 3E). Lower fluorescence signal of GAP45 and CDPK1 after 2-BP treatment may be due to loss of protein concentration at the IMC. As control, the IMC localization of PhIL1 and the PM localization of merozoite surface protein MSP1 were unaffected. Fractionation of schizont protein extracts (Figure 3F) revealed that CDPK1, GAP45, and PIC5 were mainly present in the heavy fraction, in agreement with the IMC membrane association of these proteins. However, these proteins were mostly detected in the light fraction after 2-BP treatment, suggesting their distribution alterations after losing the palmitoylation. Together, these results suggest that palmitoylation may exist in a relatively high proportion of the IMC proteins and that it is important for subcellular localization of certain IMC proteins including CDPK1, GAP45, and PIC5.

DHHC2 is an IMC-residing palmitoyl-S-acyl-transferase in schizonts

Next, we searched for the PATs that catalyze the palmitoylation of IMC residing proteins in the schizonts. 11 putative PATs (named DHHC1–11) were predicted in the genomes of rodent malaria parasites (Hodson et al., 2015). Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis revealed that the P. yoelii dhhc2 displayed the highest mRNA level in the schizonts (Figure 4A). The mRNA levels of these P. yoelii dhhc genes were positively correlated (R²=0.94) with the transcription profiles of their orthologs in P. berghei determined via RNA-seq (Otto et al., 2014; Figure 4A). Furthermore, we analyzed the localization of the 11 P. yoelii endogenous PATs individually in the schizonts of transgenic strains previously generated (Wang et al., 2020). Out of the 11 PATs, only DHHC1 and DHHC2 displayed clear IMC localization in the schizonts with a stronger IFA signal for DHHC2 (Figure 4B and Figure 4—figure supplement 1A). Immunoblot analysis of protein extracts from the same number of schizonts of the endogenously tagged dhhc2::6 HA and dhhc1::6 HA parasites revealed approximately fivefold higher level of DHHC2 than DHHC1 (Figure 4C). Interestingly, DHHC2 but not DHHC1 displayed an interrelation with several IMC proteins, including CDPK1 and GAP45, in a STRING analysis which predicts the likelihood of protein-protein interaction (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B). The IMC localization of DHHC2 was confirmed in two independent strains 6 HA::dhhc2 and dhhc2::4Myc, whose endogenous DHHC2 was tagged with an N-terminal 6 HA and C-terminal 4Myc tag, respectively (Figure 4D). Immunoblot analyses of the membrane and cytoplasmic fractions of schizont lysates also revealed that DHHC2 was mainly detected in the membrane fraction (Figure 4E). As a control, merozoite PM protein MSP1 was detected in the membrane fraction while the cytosolic protein GAPDH was in the cytoplasmic fraction (Figure 4E).

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

DHHC2 is an IMC-residing palmitoyl-S-acyl-transferase in schizonts.

(A) RT-qPCR of transcripts for 11 *dhhc* (*dhhc1- dhhc11*) in schizonts. Gene expression was normalized to the *gapdh* transcript. The inlet indicates positive correlation between mRNA levels of these *P. yoelii dhhc* genes and mRNA levels of their *dhhc* orthologs in *P. berghei* determined via RNA-seq. Values are means ± SD (n=3). (B) Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) analysis of DHHC1 and DHHC2 in schizonts from two tagged parasite strains *dhhc1::6* HA and *dhhc2::6* HA. Scale bar = 5 μm. (C) Immunoblot of DHHC1 and DHHC2 from the cell lysate of similar number of schizonts from the *dhhc1::6* HA and *dhhc2::6* HA parasite, respectively. Right panel: the quantification of band intensity. Values are means ± SEM (n=3 biological replicates), two-tailed t-test, *p<0.05. (D) IFA analysis of DHHC2 in schizonts of another two tagged parasite strains *6 HA::dhhc2* and *dhhc2::4Myc*. Scale bar = 5 μm. (E) Solubility assay detected membrane association of DHHC2 in schizonts using different detergents. Cytosolic soluble proteins are in hypotonic buffer (Hypo), peripheral membrane proteins in carbonate buffer (Carb), integral membrane proteins in Triton X-100 buffer (Trx), and insoluble proteins in pellet (Pel). DHHC2 is in the membrane-associated fractions as IMC protein GAP45 and PM protein MSP1, while cytoplasm protein GAPDH is in the soluble fraction. Representative of two independent replicates. (F) Immunoblot of DHHC2 from early stages containing ring and trophozoite (R/T) and late stages containing schizont (S) of the *dhhc2::6* HA parasites. Merozoite surface protein MSP1 was mainly expressed in the schizonts. BiP, histone H3, and Coomassie blue staining of total lysate were used as loading control. Representative of two independent replicates. (G) DHHC2 expression dynamics in different asexual blood stages (ring, trophozoite, schizont, and merozoite) of the parasite *dhhc2::6* HA by IFA. Scale bar = 5 μm. (H) Fluorescent microscopy of GFP::DHHC2 in different asexual blood stages of the parasites *gfp::dhhc2*. Scale bar = 5 μm. (I) Maximum intensity projections of super-resolution immunofluorescence microscopy (Airyscan) of early and mature *dhhc2::6* HA schizonts stained with anti-HA and anti-GAP45 antibodies. Arrow in the graph indicated a ‘GAP45-only spot’, which likely resulted from the difference in protein stain efficiency for DHHC2 and GAP45. Scale bar = 5 μm. (J) Model showing the IMC-associated localization of DHHC2 in the schizonts.

Figure 4—source data 1 (related to Figure 4A) RT-qPCR of transcripts for 11 dhhc (dhhc1- dhhc11) in schizonts.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig4-data1-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig4-data1-v3.xls
Figure 4—source data 2 (related to Figure 4C) Immunoblot of DHHC1 and DHHC2 from the cell lysate of similar number of schizonts from the dhhc1::6 HA and dhhc2::6 HA parasite, respectively.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig4-data2-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig4-data2-v3.xls
Figure 4—source data 3 (related to Figure 4C) Quantification of DHHC1 and DHHC2 intensity in immunoblot.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig4-data3-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig4-data3-v3.xls
Figure 4—source data 4 (related to Figure 4E) Solubility assay detected membrane association of DHHC2 in schizonts using different detergents.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig4-data4-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig4-data4-v3.xls
Figure 4—source data 5 (related to Figure 4F) Immunoblot of DHHC2 from early stages containing ring and trophozoite (R/T) and late stages containing schizont (S) of the dhhc2::6 HA parasites.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig4-data5-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig4-data5-v3.xls

To investigate the expression dynamics of DHHC2 during parasite development, early and later stages of intraerythrocytic dhhc2::6 HA parasites were isolated using the Nycodenz gradient centrifugation. Immunoblot showed that DHHC2 is highly expressed in the late trophozoites and schizonts, but not in the rings or early trophozoites (Figure 4F). IFA also revealed DHHC2 signal in the early and mature schizonts and free merozoites (Figure 4G). These observations were independently confirmed in another strain gfp::dhhc2, in which endogenous DHHC2 was tagged with an N-terminal GFP (Figure 4H and Figure 4—figure supplement 1C,D). The expression dynamics of DHHC2 is consistent with the IMC biogenesis in the schizonts. Using the Airyscan microscopy, we observed clear colocalization between DHHC2 and GAP45 in both early and mature schizonts (Figure 4I). Interestingly, both proteins were found as separate dots that colocalize at the periphery of the intact nucleus in the early schizonts (Figure 4I), suggesting that IMC arises de novo at multiple points at or close to the nucleus. Together, these results indicate that DHHC2, as an IMC-residing PAT, is expressed throughout the IMC biogenesis in the schizonts of P. yoelii (Figure 4J).

DHHC2 is essential for the asexual blood stage development in mice

DHHC2 has been suggested to play an essential role in the asexual blood stage development of the parasites since no viable mutant clone was obtained using either the conventional or Cas9-based knockout strategies in the P. yoelii and P. berghei (Wang et al., 2020; Santos et al., 2015). To explore the functions of DHHC2, we applied an Auxin-inducible degron (AID)-based protein degradation system in the P. yoelii transgenic strain Tir1 (Liu et al., 2020), which allows depletion of the target protein fused to a miniAID (mAID) motif with the aid of the plant hormone auxin (Indole-3-acetic acid, IAA). The N-terminus of the endogenous dhhc2 locus was tagged with the sequence encoding mAID::2 HA in the Tir1 strain, generating the mAID::dhhc2 clone (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A). This parasite displayed normal proliferation during asexual blood stages and the fusion protein mAID::DHHC2 exhibited IMC localization in the schizonts (Figure 5—figure supplement 1B), indicating no detrimental effect of mAID tagging on DHHC2 localization and function. IAA treatment (1 mM for 3 hr) of the mAID::dhhc2 schizonts efficiently depleted the mAID::DHHC2 protein (Figure 5—figure supplement 1C). To determine whether IAA itself affects parasites development in vivo, mice infected with the 17XNL parasite were injected intraperitoneally with 200 mg/kg/day IAA or vehicle (DMSO) for 3 consecutive days. The in vivo parasitemia increased at an indistinguishable rate in both groups (Figure 5—figure supplement 1D), indicating no notable effect of IAA on parasite proliferation in mice. Next, we tested whether the parasite mAID::DHHC2 protein could be depleted in mice. The mice with ~10% parasitemia of the mAID::dhhc2 parasite were injected intraperitoneally with IAA once and the parasite-infected red blood cells were collected for immunoblot at 1 and 3 hr after IAA injection (Figure 5—figure supplement 1E). The mAID::DHHC2 protein was significantly reduced in the parasites from IAA-treated mice, indicating successful mAID::DHHC2 degradation by IAA (Figure 5—figure supplement 1E). As a control, the IAA treatment had little effect on the 6 HA::DHHC2 protein in the 6 HA::dhhc2 parasite (Figure 5—figure supplement 1E).

To dissect the DHHC2 function in vivo, mice were infected with the Tir1 or mAID::dhhc2 schizonts which were pretreated with IAA or vehicle for 3 hr in vitro to deplete DHHC2 (Figure 5A). From 12 hr postinfection, the parasitemia in mice infected with Tir1 and mAID::dhhc2 was monitored in parallel every 12 hr. The parasitemia of Tir1 increased at an equal rate after either IAA or vehicle pretreatment (Figure 5B, left panel). However, the IAA-pretreated mAID::dhhc2 parasite displayed delayed proliferation compared to the parasite pretreated with vehicle (Figure 5B, right panel). The parasite with IAA-pretreatment emerged in the mouse blood at 96 hr postinfection while the parasite with vehicle-pretreatment emerged at 36 hr. Notably, continuation of DHHC2 depletion by another IAA injection (IAA+) at time of parasite infection resulted in complete suppression of mAID::dhhc2 in mice (Figure 5B, right panel), while this treatment had no effect on the proliferation of Tir1 (Figure 5B, left panel). These results provided a direct evidence that DHHC2 is essential for the asexual blood stage development in mice.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

DHHC2 is essential for parasite proliferation in mice and regulates schizont segmentation and merozoite invasion.

(A) Experimental design of in vivo test of DHHC2 essentiality using AID. Parasites of *Tir1* and *mAID::dhhc2* were pretreated with vehicle or indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) for 3 hr in vitro, then intravenously injected to C57BL/6 mice. In the IAA+ treatment group, another IAA injection (200 mg/kg, ip) at time of parasite infection was applied for further DHHC2 depletion in vivo. From 12–192 hr postinfection, the parasitemia in mice infected with *Tir1* and *mAID::dhhc2* was monitored by blood smear every 12 hr. (B) *Tir1* and *mAID::dhhc2* parasite proliferation in mice (n=3 per group) at each treatment group in (A), two-tailed t-test, **p<0.01, ns, not significant. (C) Schematic of the schizont development from trophozoite in vitro. Purified early stage parasites including ring and trophozoite were cultured with vehicle, IAA, or 2-BP for 12 hr for schizont development. (D) Giemsa staining of the schizonts developed from *Tir1* and *mAID::dhhc2* parasites treated with vehicle, IAA, or 2-BP illustrated in (C). Scale bar = 5 μm. (E) Quantification of mature schizonts in (D). Purified early stage parasites including ring and trophozoite were treated with IAA or 2-BP for 12 hr. Values are means ± SEM (n=3 biological replicates), two-tailed t-test, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001. (F) Costaining of the *mAID::dhhc2* schizonts in (C) with antibody against merozoite surface protein MSP1 and Hoechst 33342. Scale bar = 5 μm. (G) Quantification of Hoechst signal in schizonts indicating nuclear DNA contents in (F). More than 30 schizonts were analyzed in each group. Signal in ring stage parasites serves as a control. Values were means ± SD, Mann–Whitney U test applied, ns, not significant. (H) Immunoblot of MSP1 in the schizonts developed from the *mAID::dhhc2* parasites treated with vehicle and IAA. Precursor form (~200 kD) and mature form (~42 kD) of MSP1 were shown. Histone H3 used as a loading control. (I) Representative images of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of schizonts developed from the *mAID::dhhc2* parasites treated with vehicle, IAA, or 2-BP. Purified early stage parasites including ring and trophozoite were treated with IAA or 2-BP for 12 hr. Right panels indicate three examples of representative daughter cell pellicle including plasma membrane (PM) and inner membrane complex (IMC). (J) Quantification of fully segmented merozoites in schizonts in (I). More than 30 schizonts were analyzed in each group. Values were shown as means ± SD, Mann–Whitney U test, ****p<0.0001.

Figure 5—source data 1 (related to Figure 5B) Tir1 and mAID-dhhc2 parasite proliferation in mice.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig5-data1-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig5-data1-v3.xls
Figure 5—source data 2 (related to Figure 5E) Quantification of mature schizonts.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig5-data2-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig5-data2-v3.xls
Figure 5—source data 3 (related to Figure 5G) Quantification of Hoechst signal in schizonts.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig5-data3-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig5-data3-v3.xls
Figure 5—source data 4 (related to Figure 5H) Immunoblot of MSP1 in the schizonts developed from the mAID::dhhc2 parasites treated with vehicle and IAA.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig5-data4-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig5-data4-v3.xls
Figure 5—source data 5 (related to Figure 5J) Quantification of fully segmented merozoites in schizonts.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig5-data5-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig5-data5-v3.xls

DHHC2 regulates schizont segmentation

Because DHHC2 is specifically expressed in the schizonts, we speculated that DHHC2 regulates schizont development. A mixture of early stage parasites (rings and early trophozoites) was purified using Nycodenz centrifugation and cultured for 12 hr to mature schizonts using an in vitro culture method (Janse et al., 2006; Figure 5C). We evaluated the effect of DHHC2 depletion on schizont development by counting the mature schizonts using Giemsa staining. The IAA-treated Tir1 parasite developed to mature schizonts at a similar level as the vehicle-treated Tir1 parasite, indicating no effect of IAA alone on the schizont development (Figure 5D and E). However, IAA treatment severely decreased the formation of mature schizonts in the mAID::dhhc2 parasite (Figure 5D and E). Importantly, the treated mAID::dhhc2 parasite had apparent nuclear replication but failed to segregate into individual merozoites. This result suggests arrest of schizont cytokinesis or segmentation after nuclear multiplication. In addition, treatment with the PAT inhibitor 2-BP resulted in no formation of mature schizonts in either Tir1 or mAID::dhhc2 parasites (Figure 5D and E), which is in agreement with the previous reports (Jones et al., 2012).

To further examine the defects within the schizonts, the mAID::dhhc2 parasite was costained with the nuclear dye and an antibody against the merozoite surface protein MSP1, which coats the parasite PM of newly formed daughter merozoites after segmentation (Blackman et al., 1994). Hoechst signals in the schizonts showed no notable difference between the IAA- and vehicle-treated groups (Figure 5F and G), indicating normal nuclear DNA multiplication in the DHHC2-deficient (IAA-treated) parasites. However, MSP1 staining revealed that the schizonts of DHHC2-deficient group had agglomerates of daughter cells that failed to separate (Figure 5F) while the schizonts of the vehicle control group exhibited normal morphology (Figure 5F). Expression and cleavage (from ~200 to 42 kD) of full length MSP1 have been used to indicate schizont maturation and merozoite ready-to-egress from erythrocytes (Silmon de Monerri et al., 2011; Child et al., 2010). Consistent with an impaired schizont development, an immunoblot of the IAA-treated parasite showed reduced MSP1 expression and processing compared to the vehicle control (Figure 5H).

Next, using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), we examined the ultrastructure of the mAID::dhhc2 schizonts produced after the 12 hr in vitro maturation in the presence of the vehicle, IAA, or 2-BP. The daughter cells were normally segmented in the schizonts of the vehicle-treated group, forming fully separated daughter merozoites (Figure 5I). However, severe morphological defects occurred in the DHHC2-deficient parasites. Large daughter cell agglomerates were observed in the center of most schizonts although a few mononucleated daughter merozoites were formed (Figure 5I). This segmentation arrest resulted in significant fewer daughter merozoites in the DHHC2-deficient schizonts compared to the control (Figure 5J). Interestingly, we observed the incomplete IMC beneath the PM in some daughter merozoites and the agglomerates within the DHHC2-deficient schizonts (Figure 5I), suggesting no remarkable effect of DHHC2 depletion in the initial biogenesis of the IMC. In addition, the organelles including possible rhoptries or micronemes were observed in the large agglomerates of the DHHC2-deficient schizonts, suggesting normal biogenesis and development of these organelles but a defect in allocation of daughter merozoites during schizont segmentation. As a control, the 2BP treatment completely blocked schizont segmentation (Figure 5I).

DHHC2 also controls merozoite invasion

Upon schizont maturation, merozoites egress from the erythrocyte to invade new erythrocytes. To investigate DHHC2 function in merozoite invasion, we collected the merozoites released from the mechanically disrupted mature schizonts, which undergo natural rupture in an extremely low efficacy under the in vitro condition for the P. yoelii. Released merozoites were capable of invading the erythrocytes in mice, indicative of merozoite’s viability and activity. The merozoites collected from the IAA- or vehicle-treated schizonts were injected intravenously into mice and the number of the ring stage parasites indicative of successful invasion was counted by flow cytometry and light microscopy (Figure 5—figure supplement 2A). At 20 min postinjection, the number of newly developed rings was significantly lower in the IAA-treated group compared with the vehicle-treated group (Figure 5—figure supplement 2B,C). As a control, the IAA treatment had no effect on merozoite invasion of the Tir1 parasite (Figure 5—figure supplement 2B,C). Taking all the results together, DHHC2 has an important function in both schizont segmentation and merozoite invasion, two processes during which the parasites possess IMC.

DHHC2 palmitoylates GAP45 and CDPK1

GAP45 and CDPK1 are essential for the asexual blood stage development of P. falciparum (Perrin et al., 2018; Kumar et al., 2017; Azevedo et al., 2013). Additionally, palmitoylation regulates IMC targeting of these proteins in the schizonts and merozoites (Figure 3E). We speculated that DHHC2 exerts its function via palmitoylating GAP45 and CDPK1. To test this hypothesis, the palmitoylation and localization of GAP45 and CDPK1 were examined in the DHHC2-deficient schizonts after pretreating with IAA at 1 mM for 12 hr. The palmitoylation level of GAP45 and CDPK1 was significantly reduced in the DHHC2-deficient schizonts compared to the vehicle control (Figure 6A). Notably, both GAP45 and CDPK1 lost their typical IMC localization in both the schizonts and the released merozoites of the DHHC2-deficient parasite (Figure 6C and D). In contrast, PhIL1 retained the IMC localization in the DHHC2-deficient parasite (Figure 6C and Figure 6—figure supplement 1A,B), consistent with the fact that PhIL1 is not palmitoylated (Figure 3C). The distribution of MSP1 in the DHHC2-deficient schizonts was also unaffected (Figure 6C). In agreement with the changes in subcellular distribution of proteins by IFA, the detergent extraction-based protein solubility assay also revealed that GAP45 and CDPK1 lost their membrane association upon the depletion of DHHC2 by IAA (Figure 6E).

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

DHHC2 palmitoylates GAP45 and CDPK1 in the schizonts.

(A) Acyl-RAC method detecting palmitoylation of GAP45 and CDPK1 in the *mAID::dhhc2* schizonts treated with vehicle or indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). BiP served as a loading control. Representative of two independent replicates. (B) Acyl-RAC method detecting palmitoylation of GAP45 and CDPK1 in the *dhhc1::mAID* schizonts treated with vehicle or IAA. BiP served as a loading control. Representative of two independent replicates. (C) Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) analysis of GAP45, CDPK1, PhIL1, and MSP1 expression in schizonts treated with vehicle or IAA. Purified mature schizonts were treated with IAA for 12 hr. Parasites *mAID::dhhc2* and *mAID::dhhc2;phil1::4Myc* used are indicated. PhIL1 is an inner membrane complex (IMC) protein without palmitoylation. MSP1 is a plasma membrane protein. Scale bar = 5 μm. (D) IFA analysis of GAP45 and CDPK1 in released *mAID::dhhc2* merozoites treated with vehicle or IAA. Scale bar = 5 μm. (E) Solubility assay detected membrane association of GAP45, CDPK1, and MSP1 in the *mAID::dhhc2* schizonts treated with vehicle or IAA. PM protein MSP1 and cytoplasmic protein GAPDH are set as control. Representative of two independent replicates. (F) Palmitoylation analysis of GAP45 and CDPK1 ectopically expressed in human cells. Human embryonic kidney 293T cells were cotransfected with plasmids coding for the HA-tagged and human codon-optimized DHHC2 (WT) or its catalytic-deficient mutant (C128A), along with the GAP45 and CDPK1. Flag-tagged mouse CD36 (mCD36-Flag) was also cotransfected and serves as a control of evidenced palmitoylated protein. Tubulin served as a loading control. Representative of two independent replicates. (G) Palmitoylation analysis of GAP45 and CDPK1 ectopically expressed in human HEK293T cells treated with or without 2-BP. The cells were cotransfected with a HA-tagged and human codon-optimized DHHC2 and a flag-tagged mouse CD36 (mCD36-Flag). Representative of two independent replicates.

Figure 6—source data 1 (related to Figure 6A) Acyl-RAC method detecting palmitoylation of GAP45 and CDPK1 in the mAID::dhhc2 schizonts treated with vehicle or IAA.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig6-data1-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig6-data1-v3.xls
Figure 6—source data 2 (related to Figure 6B) Acyl-RAC method detecting palmitoylation of GAP45 and CDPK1 in the dhhc1::mAID schizonts treated with vehicle or IAA.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig6-data2-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig6-data2-v3.xls
Figure 6—source data 3 (related to Figure 6E) Solubility assay detected membrane association of GAP45, CDPK1, and MSP1 in the mAID::dhhc2 schizonts treated with vehicle or IAA.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig6-data3-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig6-data3-v3.xls
Figure 6—source data 4 (related to Figure 6F) Palmitoylation analysis of GAP45 and CDPK1 ectopically expressed in human cells.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig6-data4-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig6-data4-v3.xls
Figure 6—source data 5 (related to Figure 6G) Palmitoylation analysis of GAP45 and CDPK1 ectopically expressed in human HEK293T cells treated with or without 2BP.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig6-data5-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig6-data5-v3.xls

Besides DHHC2, DHHC1 also displayed IMC localization in the schizonts although it is expressed at lower abundance (Figure 4B and C). To investigate whether DHHC1 also contributes to the palmitoylation of GAP45 and CDPK1, we generated the dhhc1::mAID parasite clone in which the C-terminus of endogenous DHHC1 was tagged with the mAID::HA module in the Tir1 strain (Figure 6—figure supplement 1A,B). IAA treatment depleted the DHHC1::mAID protein in the dhhc1::mAID schizonts (Figure 6—figure supplement 1C), but had little impact on the palmitoylation level of GAP45 and CDPK1 (Figure 6B). These results indicated that DHHC2, but not DHHC1, contributes to the palmitoylation of GAP45 and CDPK1 in the schizonts.

To further confirm DHHC2 as the enzyme capable of palmitoylating GAP45 and CDPK1, we transfected constructs encoding HA-tagged human codon optimized DHHC2 (DHHC2-HA), GAP45 and CDPK1 into the human HEK293T cells. Indeed, the ectopically expressed GAP45 and CDPK1 could be palmitoylated by cotransfected DHHC2-HA, while the PAT catalytic-deficient mutant protein DHHC2/C128A-HA failed to palmitoylate GAP45 and CDPK1 (Figure 6F). As a control, the palmitoylation of cotransfected mouse CD36 protein, which was reported to be constitutively palmitoylated in HEK293T (Tao et al., 1996), was independent of Plasmodium DHHC2 (Figure 6F). The palmitoylation of GAP45 and CDPK1 was also significantly reduced in HEK293T culture treated with inhibitor 2-BP (Figure 6G). These results in human cells replicate the observations of DHHC2 activity in the Plasmodium schizonts and demonstrate the ability of DHHC2 to palmitoylate GAP45 and CDPK1.

Residues for palmitoylation in GAP45 and CDPK1

To identify the residue(s) of palmitoylation in GAP45, we used an online software CSS-Palm (csspalm.biocuckoo.org) for prediction, which generated six candidate cysteines (C5, C140, C156, C158, C169, and C172) (Figure 7A). To test them, we initially generated four constructs expressing HA-tagged GAP45, each with a single or double cysteine-to-alanine mutations (C5A, C140A, C156A/C158A, and C169A/C172A) (Figure 7A, Figure 7—figure supplement 1A,B). These constructs were episomally expressed in the schizonts. Only the C140A mutant displayed the IMC localization similar to wildtype (WT) GAP45; other mutants (C5A, C156A/C158A, and C169A/C172A) lost the IMC localization (Figure 7B). We also tested the GAP45 C-terminal fragment (30–184 aa) which displayed an IMC localization when fused with a N-terminal GFP (Figure 7A, Figure 7—figure supplement 2A and B). Substitution of C156A/C158A or C169A/C172A impaired the IMC localization of this fragment while C140A did not (Figure 7A and Figure 7—figure supplement 2A,B), consistent with the localization for HA-tagged GAP45 in Figure 7B. These results suggest that these cysteines (C5, C156 and/or C158, C169 and/or C172) are critical for IMC targeting of GAP45 and might be the residues for modification. Indeed, the Acyl-RAC assay detected significantly decreased palmitoylation of GAP45 in the C5A, C156A/C158A, and C169A/C172A mutants, but not the C140A mutant. Thus, for GAP45, there is an association between IMC localization and palmitoylation. Additionally, the degree of palmitoylation was further reduced in the triple cysteine mutants (C5A/C156A/C158A and C5A/C169A/C172A) relative to the single and double mutants (Figure 7C).

Figure 7 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Residues for palmitoylation in GAP45 and CDPK1.

(A) Six cysteine predicated for palmitoylation in GAP45 (upper panel). The score of the predicted palmitoylation sites was provided by the CSS-Palm software. Lower panels indicate schematic of constructs expressing HA-tagged GAP45, each with a cysteine to alanine replacement in single, double, or triple residues (C5A, C140A, C156A/C158A, C169A/C172A, C5A/C140A, C5A/C156A/C158A, and C5A/C169A/C172A). These constructs were episomally expressed in the schizonts. (B) Immunofluorescence assays (IFA) of GAP45::HA and seven mutant proteins episomally expressed in schizonts. Scale bar = 5 μm. Representative of three independent repeats. (C) Palmitoylation analysis of GAP45::HA and seven mutant proteins episomally expressed in schizonts. Representative of two independent repeats. (D) Two cysteine predicated for palmitoylation in CDPK1 (upper panel). The score of the predicted palmitoylation sites was provided by the CSS-Palm software. Lower panels indicate schematic of constructs expressing HA-tagged CDPK1, each with a cysteine to alanine replacement in single residue (C3A and C252A). These constructs were episomally expressed in the schizonts. (E) IFA of CDPK1::HA and two mutant proteins episomally expressed in schizonts. Scale bar = 5 μm. Representative of three independent repeats. (F) Palmitoylation analysis of CDPK1::HA and two mutant proteins episomally expressed in schizonts. Representative of two independent repeats. HA: hemagglutinin;WT: wild type.

Figure 7—source data 1 (related to Figure 7C) Palmitoylation analysis of GAP45::HA and seven mutant proteins episomally expressed in schizonts.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig7-data1-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig7-data1-v3.xls
Figure 7—source data 2 (related to Figure 7F) Palmitoylation analysis of CDPK1::HA and two mutant proteins episomally expressed in schizonts.: https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/77447/elife-77447-fig7-data2-v3.xls
Download elife-77447-fig7-data2-v3.xls

In CDPK1, two cysteines (C3 and C252) were predicted as the potential residues for palmitoylation (Figure 7D and Figure 7—figure supplement 1C,D). Using the same approach, we found that only the C3A mutation caused a complete loss in both protein palmitoylation and IMC targeting of CDPK1 in the schizonts while the C252A mutation had no effect (Figure 7E–F), suggesting C3 as the critical residue for protein palmitoylation and IMC targeting of CDPK1 in schizonts. Interestingly, the cysteine residues C5, C156, C158, C169, and C172 of GAP45 and C3 of CDPK1 are evolutionarily conserved among different Plasmodium species (Figure 7—figure supplement 1A,C). Together, these results suggest that C5, C156, C158, C169, and C172 of GAP45 and C3 of CDPK1 are residues for palmitoylation which direct IMC targeting of the proteins in schizonts.

Palmitoylation in GAP45 and CDPK1 is essential for parasite viability

Lastly, we asked whether the palmitoylation in GAP45 and CDPK1 is essential for protein function and thus parasite viability. The above cysteine to alanine mutation experiments indicated that the palmitoylation of the N-terminal cysteine (C5 in GAP45 and C3 in CDPK1) is required for the correct IMC targeting of proteins. We attempted to replace the C5 with alanine in the endogenous GAP45 of 17XNL parasite using the CRISPR-Cas9 method. A 742 bp DNA donor template containing the nucleotide substitution was used for homologous replacement. Seven sgRNAs were designed for guiding the Cas9 complex to the target DNA. After three independent transfections with each of these seven Cas9/sgRNA plasmids, we failed to obtain the GAP45 C5A mutant parasites. In contrast, a control mutant parasite clone GAP45 C5C was generated with a silent mutation still encoding C5 (Figure 7—figure supplement 1E). Using the same approach, we attempted to replace the C3 with alanine in the endogenous CDPK1 of 17XNL parasite. Similarly, only mutant parasite clones with CDPK1 C3C, but not CDPK1 C3A, were generated (Figure 7—figure supplement 1F). Together, these results suggest that palmitoylation of C5 in GAP45 and C3 in CDPK1 is essential for protein function and parasite viability in the asexual blood stage development.

Discussion

In this study, we attempted a proteome analysis of IMC in the schizonts using the biotin ligase TurboID-mediated PL. Besides abundant proteins relatively easily detected by conventional immunoprecipitation, PL enables detection of proteins with weak or transient interactions. TurboID achieved satisfactory biotinylation in 1 hr, which is much shorter than the 18 hr needed by the BioID. To our knowledge, this is the first application of TurboID-based PL in the Plasmodium. We obtained a list of 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins in the schizonts of P. yoelii. Among these proteins, 297 have orthologs in P. falciparum (Supplementary file 1), suggesting a conserved protein composition of IMC in the schizonts of rodent and human malaria parasites. Although the collection of 300 proteins may contain some false positives, two lines of evidence suggest good reliability of this IMC proteome. Firstly, about 50 IMC or IMC-associated proteins have been identified in Plasmodium to date (Ferreira et al., 2020; Wichers et al., 2021). Among these, 30 proteins (60%) have orthologs included in the Tb-IMC interacting proteins (Supplementary file 1). The absence of certain known IMC or IMC-associated proteins in the collection of Tb-IMC interacting proteins may attribute to the following reasons: restricted labeling radius of TurboID, lack of lysines for biotinylation, sterically inaccessibility of proteins by TurboID, or protein expression in other parasite stages (Sanchez et al., 2021). Secondly, subcellular localization analysis of 22 candidates confirmed the IMC localization of 8 known and 11 previously undescribed proteins. The localization results strongly suggest a predominantly IMC localization of the proteins tested, although the precise localization at the parasite PM or SPMT cannot be differentiated because of close proximity between IMC and these structures. The exact localization of these proteins at the parasite pellicle needs to be determined in the future using other methods, such as super resolution imaging, immunoelectron microscopy, or split green fluorescent protein. We noted that Wichers et al., recently explored an IMC proteome in asexual blood stages of P. falciparum with BioID using PhIL1 as the bait (Wichers et al., 2021). Of the 225 PhIL1-interacting protein candidates, the orthologs of 37 proteins are listed among the 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins in our study (Supplementary file 1). We speculate that the differences in protein quantity and depth by PL are probably attributed to the species of biotin ligase, expression abundance of ligase, and the bait strategy.

PL experiments could produce a considerable number of false positives if proper controls are not included for ratiometric or statistical analysis (Qin et al., 2021). In a rational design, the PL enzyme is fused to the protein bait of interest while the PL enzyme alone works as a reference control (Qin et al., 2021). To achieve the PL of IMC, the TurboID ligase is fused to an IMC targeting peptide (N-terminal 20 aa of ISP1) (Wang et al., 2020), directing the IMC targeting of ligase (Tb-IMC) through the ER/Golgi secretary pathway. It is worth noting that the cytoplasm-facing feature of Tb-IMC ligase may prevent the detection of proteins in the IMC lumen. Background levels of ligase activity are set by a ligase not fused to the IMC targeting peptide. This ligase (Tb-cyto), as a spatial reference control, would not enter the ER/Golgi secretory pathway but instead stays in the cytosol or nucleus. Therefore, the Tb-IMC likely measures both interactions with the IMC proteins and interactions with the secretory pathway. Indeed, the 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins were segregated into two distinct subgroups based on interaction network (Figure 1E). Most of known IMC or IMC-associated proteins were clustered into the subgroup I. In contrast, the subgroup II included many ER/Golgi secretory pathway-related proteins. The major role of the subgroup I proteins is likely in IMC function, while the major role of the subgroup II proteins is likely in the secretory pathway. It is possible that some Tb-IMC interacting proteins may have roles in both the IMC and secretory pathway. Detection of the subgroup II proteins in this study provided another independent evidence supporting the IMC formation from the ER/Golgi-derived secretory system. In addition, concomitant capture of subgroup I and II as the Tb-IMC interacting proteins may reflect the tight and dynamic association between the IMC organelle and the endomembrane system in schizont development.

The list of increased IMC proteins allowed us to investigate the localization determinant(s) of IMC proteins which had remained unclear. Several mechanisms underlying IMC targeting have been proposed, including vesicle-mediated transporting of proteins containing a signal peptide, IMC membrane trapping of proteins with lipid modification, protein motif (alveolin repeats)-mediated IMC localization, and protein-protein interaction for IMC targeting (Kono et al., 2012). Palmitoylation is a post-translation modification in which a cysteine residue undergoes a reversible lipid modification, regulating localization and function of target proteins (Bijlmakers and Marsh, 2003). Previous studies have implied that palmitoylation mediates the binding or trafficking of proteins to the IMC (Wang et al., 2020; Wetzel et al., 2015). In T. gondii, many glideosome-associated proteins were also palmitoylated (Foe et al., 2015). Interestingly, out of the 300 P. yoelii Tb-IMC interacting proteins, 83 (28%) have orthologs of the P. falciparum palmitoylated proteins in the schizonts (Jones et al., 2012). These 83 proteins include GAP45 and ISP3 with validated palmitoylation and CDPK1, GAP50, IMC1g, and IMC1c with predicted palmitoylation. These results imply that a high proportion of IMC proteins are palmitoylated. Palmitoylation of these proteins may be critical for their localization and function. Interaction of these palmitoylated IMC proteins with other non-palmitoylated proteins may also mediate the IMC localization of the latter.

11 putative PATs (DHHC1–11) are encoded in the genomes of rodent malaria parasites while there are 12 PATs (DHHC1-12) in P. falciparum (Hodson et al., 2015). So far, viable mutant clones were obtained for only DHHC3, DHHC5, DHHC9, and DHHC10 in previous knockout attempts (Santos et al., 2016; Tay et al., 2016; Hopp et al., 2016), suggesting other PATs (DHHC1, DHHC2, DHHC4, DHHC6, DHHC7, DHHC8, DHHC11, and DHHC12) may be essential for the asexual blood stage development. However, the association of these PATs with IMC has not been investigated in the schizonts. In this study, DHHC2 and DHHC1 are among the 300 Tb-IMC interacting proteins and both displayed clear IMC localization in the schizonts. Protein abundance assays and STRING analysis suggested that DHHC2 is likely the main mediator of palmitoylation of the IMC proteins in the schizonts. To determine if DHHC2 contributes to parasite development in vivo, we developed a method for investigating its function in the infected mice. Induced depletion of DHHC2 resulted in a complete growth arrest of the engineered strain mAID::dhhc2 in mice in an IAA dosage-dependent manner, confirming the essentiality of DHHC2 in the asexual blood stage. In in vitro culture, we observed a significant decrease, but not complete ablation of mature schizont formation in DHHC2-depleted parasites. Most parasites were arrested at a stage earlier than the mature schizont due to defective segmentation or cytokinesis. The defect in asexual blood stage development in vivo and in vitro caused by the loss of DHHC2 was associated with impairment of IMC localization of certain IMC proteins. Indeed, among the 83 potentially palmitoylated IMC proteins, our analysis validated CDPK1 and GAP45 as substrates of DHHC2, but not DHHC1. Aside from CDPK1 and GAP45, other IMC protein substrates palmitoylated by DHHC2 remain to be validated. We previously reported that DHHC2 is critical for parasite development during the zygote-to-ookinete morphogenesis in the mosquito, and DHHC2 palmitoylates ISP1 and ISP3 for their attachment to the IMC to facilitate connection between the IMC and the SPMT (Wang et al., 2020). Therefore, DHHC2 plays critical roles in IMC targeting of many proteins at multiple developmental stages.

Compared to the reduction in the mAID::dhhc2 schizonts caused by IAA treatment, the treatment with 2-BP, a broad-spectrum inhibitor of protein palmitoylation, resulted in no formation of mature mAID::dhhc2 schizonts (Figure 6D and E). The effects of IAA are specific to the mAID-fused DHHC2 in the mAID::dhhc2 schizonts, whereas 2-BP could inhibit protein palmitoylation mediated by DHHC2 and other PATs, including DHHC1. We suspect that the IMC-residing DHHC1 is also essential for schizont development, but its precise roles and substrate proteins also awaits investigation in the future.

Besides the PATs DHHC2 and DHHC1, several kinases including CDPK1, CDPK4, and PKA, were also found among the Tb-IMC interacting proteins. CDPK1, CDPK4, and PKA were further validated to localize at the IMC of P. yoelii, in accordance with their orthologs’ localization in P. falciparum (Kumar et al., 2017; Fang et al., 2018; Wilde et al., 2019). CDPK1 has been reported to be essential for schizont development. Both conditional knockdown and inhibition of CDPK1 can arrest P. falciparum schizont development (Kumar et al., 2017; Azevedo et al., 2013), mimicking the phenotypes of the DHHC2-depleted parasites in this study. Interestingly, phosphoproteomic analysis revealed that the conditional knockdown of CDPK1 led to the hypophosphorylation of several IMC and glideosome proteins, including GAP45, MTIP, and PKA regulatory subunit (PKAr) (; Kumar et al., 2017; Wilde et al., 2019; Green et al., 2008; Ridzuan et al., 2012). In this study, we found that DHHC2-mediated palmitoylation is required for CDPK1 localization at IMC. Thus, palmitoylation and IMC localization are the prerequisites for CDPK1-mediated phosphorylation of IMC proteins. Based on all available data, we speculated that once the IMC biogenesis is initiated in early schizonts, DHHC2 is recruited to the nascent IMC, possibly by an auto-palmitoylation mechanism (Wang et al., 2020). However, DHHC2 seems inessential for IMC biogenesis because the IMC seemed morphologically normal despite DHHC2 depletion (Figure 5I). In contrast, DHHC2 palmitoylates certain important proteins for their IMC localization in the developing schizonts and mature merozoites. It has critical function in schizont cytokinesis and erythrocyte invasion.

Share this article

Cite this article

Proteomic of P. yoelii schizont IMC by TurboID and quantitative mass spectrometry.

Figure 1—source data 1

Validation of 9 new IMC proteins by localization analysis.

Palmitoylation regulates IMC protein localization.

Figure 3—source data 1

Figure 3—source data 2

Figure 3—source data 3

DHHC2 is an IMC-residing palmitoyl-S-acyl-transferase in schizonts.

Figure 4—source data 1

Figure 4—source data 2

Figure 4—source data 3

Figure 4—source data 4

Figure 4—source data 5

DHHC2 is essential for parasite proliferation in mice and regulates schizont segmentation and merozoite invasion.

Figure 5—source data 1

Figure 5—source data 2

Figure 5—source data 3

Figure 5—source data 4

Figure 5—source data 5

DHHC2 palmitoylates GAP45 and CDPK1 in the schizonts.

Figure 6—source data 1

Figure 6—source data 2

Figure 6—source data 3

Figure 6—source data 4

Figure 6—source data 5

Residues for palmitoylation in GAP45 and CDPK1.

Figure 7—source data 1

Figure 7—source data 2

Author details

Pengge Qian

Contribution

Contributed equally with

Competing interests

Xu Wang

Contribution

Contributed equally with

Competing interests

Chuan-Qi Zhong

Contribution

Contributed equally with

Competing interests

Jiaxu Wang

Contribution

Contributed equally with

Competing interests

Mengya Cai

Contribution

Competing interests

Wang Nguitragool

Contribution

Competing interests

Jian Li

Contribution

For correspondence

Competing interests

Huiting Cui

Contribution

For correspondence

Competing interests

Jing Yuan

Contribution

For correspondence

Competing interests

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

Categories and tags

Further reading