Senescence: A gradual path to mortality
In 1961, Hayflick and Moorhead discovered that human fibroblast cells cultured in the laboratory could only divide a limited number of times, after which they stopped multiplying but remained metabolically active (Hayflick and Moorhead, 1961). It did not matter how the cells were cultured – whether they were repeatedly transferred, or ‘passaged’, into a fresh environment, or if their growth was interrupted by episodes of freezing – the number of divisions they could make was always finite. This state was termed replicative senescence and was found to occur in a range of cell types.
Further research revealed that senescence is caused by the shortening of caps, or ‘telomeres’, on the end of chromosomes (Bodnar et al., 1998). Every time a cell divides, its telomeres shrink until they reach a critical length that stops the cell from multiplying. Once senescent, cells display unique features such as expressing certain proteins, releasing inflammatory molecules, and loosening tightly packed regions of DNA known as heterochromatin (Hernandez-Segura et al., 2018). New evidence showed that senescence is induced by cell stress as well as successive divisions, and that the number of senescent cells increases as tissues age (van Deursen, 2014).
Despite almost 60 years of research, many questions still remain about senescence; for instance, what happens to cells as they transition in to the senescent state? How does their metabolism change during this shift, and do they take on a new cell identity? Now, in eLife, David Botstein, David Hendrickson and colleagues from Calico Life Sciences – including Michelle Chan as first author – report the results of experiments that exquisitely profile the roadmap cells take on their path to senescence (Chan et al., 2022).
The team used a new experimental design to survey the entire genome and repertoire of RNAs, proteins, and metabolites present in fibroblasts cultured in the laboratory. These patterns were traced over time as the cells grew until they stopped dividing. Chan et al. then used a range of control conditions to pinpoint which changes were specific to replicative senescence. This included repeating the experiment on cells growing at a similar density to senescent cultures, cells that had only been passaged a few times (and therefore unlikely to be senescent), cells that never become senescent, and cells made senescent by radiation-induced stress.
To begin with, Chan et al. measured the level of unique RNAs in single cells to investigate how the genes that fibroblasts expressed changed over time. The data revealed that RNAs known to be expressed in fully senescent cells progressively accumulate throughout the cell cycle. This suggests that senescent cells in vivo may be slowly amassing these features, but not yet expressing the classic biomarkers associated with the end-point of senescence, such as the beta-galactosidase enzyme. This may explain why previous studies found less than 20% of cells in old tissues exhibited these biomarkers, which has led researchers to question the role of senescence in aging (Biran et al., 2017; Idda et al., 2020). Chan et al. also found cells that had experienced replicative senescence (but not senescence induced by radiation) expressed genes related to a subtype of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). This process, which sees epithelial cells lining surfaces of the body lose their identity and become mesenchymal, is common in development and cancer.
Further experiments revealed that cells change how they use and generate energy as they progress towards replicative senescence. Similar metabolic changes have also been observed in models of EMT, further validating the connection between replicative senescence and this transition. Chan et al. discovered that the protein complex YAP1/TEAD1 and its target, the growth factor protein TGFβ2, drove this shift in energy. Applying a drug that stops YAP1 and TEAD1 from assembling (Wang et al., 2016) reduced the expression of signatures associated with mesenchymal cells and senescence.
Finally, Chan et al. identified another signature of replicative stress: the increased expression of Nicotinamide N-methyltransferase (NNMT). This enzyme catalyzes chemical reactions that ultimately prevent certain proteins from condensing DNA. It is possible that by reducing the activity of these proteins, NNMT is able to open up closed regions of the genome, which may explain the reported loss of heterochromatin in senescent cells (Yang and Sen, 2018).
The findings of Chan et al. suggest that cells gradually acquire a number of changes on the path to replicative senescence: they express different genes, rewire their metabolic reactions and take on a new identity similar to mesenchymal cells (Figure 1). Previous studies have shown that removing senescent cells can increase the health- and life-span of mice (Di Micco et al., 2021). Therefore, interventions that target these early changes could help improve the wellbeing of individuals by stopping the cascade of events that lead to replicative senescence.
References
-
Cellular senescence in ageing: from mechanisms to therapeutic opportunitiesNature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 22:75–95.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-00314-w
-
The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strainsExperimental Cell Research 25:585–621.https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6
-
Hallmarks of cellular senescenceTrends in Cell Biology 28:436–453.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2018.02.001
-
Verteporfin inhibits YAP function through up-regulating 14-3-3sigma sequestering YAP in the cytoplasmAmerican Journal of Cancer Research 6:27–37.
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2022, Yang and Sen
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,287
- views
-
- 251
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
Previously, we showed that the germ cell-specific nuclear protein RBMXL2 represses cryptic splicing patterns during meiosis and is required for male fertility (Ehrmann et al., 2019). Here, we show that in somatic cells the similar yet ubiquitously expressed RBMX protein has similar functions. RBMX regulates a distinct class of exons that exceed the median human exon size. RBMX protein-RNA interactions are enriched within ultra-long exons, particularly within genes involved in genome stability, and repress the selection of cryptic splice sites that would compromise gene function. The RBMX gene is silenced during male meiosis due to sex chromosome inactivation. To test whether RBMXL2 might replace the function of RBMX during meiosis we induced expression of RBMXL2 and the more distantly related RBMY protein in somatic cells, finding each could rescue aberrant patterns of RNA processing caused by RBMX depletion. The C-terminal disordered domain of RBMXL2 is sufficient to rescue proper splicing control after RBMX depletion. Our data indicate that RBMX and RBMXL2 have parallel roles in somatic tissues and the germline that must have been conserved for at least 200 million years of mammalian evolution. We propose RBMX family proteins are particularly important for the splicing inclusion of some ultra-long exons with increased intrinsic susceptibility to cryptic splice site selection.
-
- Chromosomes and Gene Expression
To function effectively as an integrated system, the transcriptional and post-transcriptional machineries must communicate through mechanisms that are still poorly understood. Here, we focus on the zinc-finger Sfp1, known to regulate transcription of proliferation-related genes. We show that Sfp1 can regulate transcription either by binding to promoters, like most known transcription activators, or by binding to the transcribed regions (gene bodies), probably via RNA polymerase II (Pol II). We further studied the first mode of Sfp1 activity and found that, following promoter binding, Sfp1 binds to gene bodies and affects Pol II configuration, manifested by dissociation or conformational change of its Rpb4 subunit and increased backtracking. Surprisingly, Sfp1 binds to a subset of mRNAs co-transcriptionally and stabilizes them. The interaction between Sfp1 and its client mRNAs is controlled by their respective promoters and coincides with Sfp1’s dissociation from chromatin. Intriguingly, Sfp1 dissociation from the chromatin correlates with the extent of the backtracked Pol II. We propose that, following promoter recruitment, Sfp1 accompanies Pol II and regulates backtracking. The backtracked Pol II is more compatible with Sfp1’s relocation to the nascent transcripts, whereupon Sfp1 accompanies these mRNAs to the cytoplasm and regulates their stability. Thus, Sfp1’s co-transcriptional binding imprints the mRNA fate, serving as a paradigm for the cross-talk between the synthesis and decay of specific mRNAs, and a paradigm for the dual-role of some zinc-finger proteins. The interplay between Sfp1’s two modes of transcription regulation remains to be examined.