Gallbladder adenocarcinomas undergo subclonal diversification and selection from precancerous lesions to metastatic tumors

Abstract

We aimed to elucidate the evolutionary trajectories of gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) using multi-regional and longitudinal tumor samples. Using whole-exome sequencing data, we constructed phylogenetic trees in each patient and analyzed mutational signatures. A total of 11 patients including 2 rapid autopsy cases were enrolled. The most frequently altered gene in primary tumors was ERBB2 and TP53 (54.5%), followed by FBXW7 (27.3%). Most mutations in frequently altered genes in primary tumors were detectable in concurrent precancerous lesions (biliary intraepithelial neoplasia, BilIN), but a substantial proportion was subclonal. Subclonal diversity was common in BilIN (n=4). However, among subclones in BilIN, a certain subclone commonly shrank in concurrent primary tumors. In addition, selected subclones underwent linear and branching evolution, maintaining subclonal diversity. Combined analysis with metastatic tumors (n=11) identified branching evolution in 9 patients (81.8%). Of these, 8 patients (88.9%) had a total of 11 subclones expanded at least 7-fold during metastasis. These subclones harbored putative metastasis-driving mutations in cancer-related genes such as SMAD4, ROBO1, and DICER1. In mutational signature analysis, 6 mutational signatures were identified: 1, 3, 7, 13, 22, and 24 (cosine similarity >0.9). Signatures 1 (age) and 13 (APOBEC) decreased during metastasis while signatures 22 (aristolochic acid) and 24 (aflatoxin) were relatively highlighted. Subclonal diversity arose early in precancerous lesions and clonal selection was a common event during malignant transformation in GBAC. However, selected cancer clones continued to evolve and thus maintained subclonal diversity in metastatic tumors.

Data availability

The raw sequence data underlying this manuscript are available as fastq files at the NCBI SRA database under the BioProject number PRJNA821382.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Minsu Kang

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6491-2277
  2. Hee Young Na

    Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Soomin Ahn

    Department of Pathology and Translational Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    suminy317@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ji-Won Kim

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    jiwonkim@snubh.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6426-9074
  5. Sejoon Lee

    Center for Precision Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Soyeon Ahn

    Medical Research Collaboration Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Ju Hyun Lee

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jeonghwan Youk

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Haesook T Kim

    Department of Data Science, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Kui-Jin Kim

    Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Koung Jin Suh

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jun Suh Lee

    Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Se Hyun Kim

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2292-906X
  14. Jin Won Kim

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Yu Jung Kim

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Keun-Wook Lee

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Yoo-Seok Yoon

    Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Jee Hyun Kim

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Jin-Haeng Chung

    Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Ho-Seong Han

    Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Jong Seok Lee

    Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Research Fund (No. 16-2021-001)

  • Ji-Won Kim

Small Grant for Exploratory Reserach (NRF-2018R1D1A1A02086240)

  • Ji-Won Kim

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (Number: B-1902/522-303). Informed consent was waived because of the retrospective and anonymous nature of the study.

Copyright

© 2022, Kang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,013
    views
  • 161
    downloads
  • 7
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Minsu Kang
  2. Hee Young Na
  3. Soomin Ahn
  4. Ji-Won Kim
  5. Sejoon Lee
  6. Soyeon Ahn
  7. Ju Hyun Lee
  8. Jeonghwan Youk
  9. Haesook T Kim
  10. Kui-Jin Kim
  11. Koung Jin Suh
  12. Jun Suh Lee
  13. Se Hyun Kim
  14. Jin Won Kim
  15. Yu Jung Kim
  16. Keun-Wook Lee
  17. Yoo-Seok Yoon
  18. Jee Hyun Kim
  19. Jin-Haeng Chung
  20. Ho-Seong Han
  21. Jong Seok Lee
(2022)
Gallbladder adenocarcinomas undergo subclonal diversification and selection from precancerous lesions to metastatic tumors
eLife 11:e78636.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78636

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78636

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Maojin Tian, Le Yang ... Peiqing Zhao
    Research Article

    TIPE (TNFAIP8) has been identified as an oncogene and participates in tumor biology. However, how its role in the metabolism of tumor cells during melanoma development remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated that TIPE promoted glycolysis by interacting with pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) in melanoma. We found that TIPE-induced PKM2 dimerization, thereby facilitating its translocation from the cytoplasm to the nucleus. TIPE-mediated PKM2 dimerization consequently promoted HIF-1α activation and glycolysis, which contributed to melanoma progression and increased its stemness features. Notably, TIPE specifically phosphorylated PKM2 at Ser 37 in an extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK)-dependent manner. Consistently, the expression of TIPE was positively correlated with the levels of PKM2 Ser37 phosphorylation and cancer stem cell (CSC) markers in melanoma tissues from clinical samples and tumor bearing mice. In summary, our findings indicate that the TIPE/PKM2/HIF-1α signaling pathway plays a pivotal role in promoting CSC properties by facilitating the glycolysis, which would provide a promising therapeutic target for melanoma intervention.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ananda Kishore Mukherjee, Subhajit Dutta ... Shantanu Chowdhury
    Research Article

    Telomeres are crucial for cancer progression. Immune signalling in the tumour microenvironment has been shown to be very important in cancer prognosis. However, the mechanisms by which telomeres might affect tumour immune response remain poorly understood. Here, we observed that interleukin-1 signalling is telomere-length dependent in cancer cells. Mechanistically, non-telomeric TRF2 (telomeric repeat binding factor 2) binding at the IL-1-receptor type-1 (IL1R1) promoter was found to be affected by telomere length. Enhanced TRF2 binding at the IL1R1 promoter in cells with short telomeres directly recruited the histone-acetyl-transferase (HAT) p300, and consequent H3K27 acetylation activated IL1R1. This altered NF-kappa B signalling and affected downstream cytokines like IL6, IL8, and TNF. Further, IL1R1 expression was telomere-sensitive in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) clinical samples. Infiltration of tumour-associated macrophages (TAM) was also sensitive to the length of tumour cell telomeres and highly correlated with IL1R1 expression. The use of both IL1 Receptor antagonist (IL1RA) and IL1R1 targeting ligands could abrogate M2 macrophage infiltration in TNBC tumour organoids. In summary, using TNBC cancer tissue (>90 patients), tumour-derived organoids, cancer cells, and xenograft tumours with either long or short telomeres, we uncovered a heretofore undeciphered function of telomeres in modulating IL1 signalling and tumour immunity.