Mitochondrial redox adaptations enable alternative aspartate synthesis in SDH-deficient cells

  1. Madeleine L Hart
  2. Evan Quon
  3. Anna-Lena BG Vigil
  4. Ian A Engstrom
  5. Oliver J Newsom
  6. Kristian Davidsen
  7. Pia Hoellerbauer
  8. Samantha M Carlisle
  9. Lucas B Sullivan  Is a corresponding author
  1. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
  2. New Mexico State University, United States

Abstract

The oxidative tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle is a central mitochondrial pathway integrating catabolic conversions of NAD+ to NADH and anabolic production of aspartate, a key amino acid for cell proliferation. Several TCA cycle components are implicated in tumorigenesis, including loss of function mutations in subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), also known as complex II of the electron transport chain (ETC), but mechanistic understanding of how proliferating cells tolerate the metabolic defects of SDH loss is still lacking. Here, we identify that SDH supports human cell proliferation through aspartate synthesis but, unlike other ETC impairments, the effects of SDH inhibition are not ameliorated by electron acceptor supplementation. Interestingly, we find aspartate production and cell proliferation are restored to SDH-impaired cells by concomitant inhibition of ETC complex I (CI). We determine that the benefits of CI inhibition in this context depend on decreasing mitochondrial NAD+/NADH, which drives SDH-independent aspartate production through pyruvate carboxylation and reductive carboxylation of glutamine. We also find that genetic loss or restoration of SDH selects for cells with concordant CI activity, establishing distinct modalities of mitochondrial metabolism for maintaining aspartate synthesis. These data therefore identify a metabolically beneficial mechanism for CI loss in proliferating cells and reveal how compartmentalized redox changes can impact cellular fitness.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1-8.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Madeleine L Hart

    Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Evan Quon

    Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Anna-Lena BG Vigil

    Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Ian A Engstrom

    Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Oliver J Newsom

    Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kristian Davidsen

    Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3821-6902
  7. Pia Hoellerbauer

    Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Samantha M Carlisle

    Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Lucas B Sullivan

    Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    lucas@fredhutch.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6745-8222

Funding

National Cancer Institute (P30CA015704)

  • Lucas B Sullivan

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM095421)

  • Madeleine L Hart

National Cancer Institute (R00CA218679-03S1)

  • Madeleine L Hart

National Cancer Institute (R00CA218679)

  • Lucas B Sullivan

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM147118)

  • Lucas B Sullivan

Andy Hill Cancer Research Endowment (CARE Award)

  • Lucas B Sullivan

National Cancer Institute (U54CA132381)

  • Samantha M Carlisle
  • Lucas B Sullivan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Mark S Sharpley, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All mouse work was performed in accordance with FHCC-approved IACUC protocol 51069 and AAALAS guidelines and ethical regulations.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted: March 14, 2022 (view preprint)
  2. Received: March 15, 2022
  3. Accepted: March 6, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: March 8, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 9, 2023 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record published: March 20, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Hart et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,610
    views
  • 469
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Madeleine L Hart
  2. Evan Quon
  3. Anna-Lena BG Vigil
  4. Ian A Engstrom
  5. Oliver J Newsom
  6. Kristian Davidsen
  7. Pia Hoellerbauer
  8. Samantha M Carlisle
  9. Lucas B Sullivan
(2023)
Mitochondrial redox adaptations enable alternative aspartate synthesis in SDH-deficient cells
eLife 12:e78654.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78654

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78654

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Ramona Weber, Chung-Te Chang
    Research Article

    Recent findings indicate that the translation elongation rate influences mRNA stability. One of the factors that has been implicated in this link between mRNA decay and translation speed is the yeast DEAD-box helicase Dhh1p. Here, we demonstrated that the human ortholog of Dhh1p, DDX6, triggers the deadenylation-dependent decay of inefficiently translated mRNAs in human cells. DDX6 interacts with the ribosome through the Phe-Asp-Phe (FDF) motif in its RecA2 domain. Furthermore, RecA2-mediated interactions and ATPase activity are both required for DDX6 to destabilize inefficiently translated mRNAs. Using ribosome profiling and RNA sequencing, we identified two classes of endogenous mRNAs that are regulated in a DDX6-dependent manner. The identified targets are either translationally regulated or regulated at the steady-state-level and either exhibit signatures of poor overall translation or of locally reduced ribosome translocation rates. Transferring the identified sequence stretches into a reporter mRNA caused translation- and DDX6-dependent degradation of the reporter mRNA. In summary, these results identify DDX6 as a crucial regulator of mRNA translation and decay triggered by slow ribosome movement and provide insights into the mechanism by which DDX6 destabilizes inefficiently translated mRNAs.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Amy H Andreotti, Volker Dötsch
    Editorial

    The articles in this special issue highlight how modern cellular, biochemical, biophysical and computational techniques are allowing deeper and more detailed studies of allosteric kinase regulation.