Centriolar satellites expedite mother centriole remodeling to promote ciliogenesis

Abstract

Centrosomes are orbited by centriolar satellites, dynamic multiprotein assemblies nucleated by Pericentriolar Material 1 (PCM1). To study the requirement for centriolar satellites, we generated mice lacking PCM1, a crucial component of satellites. Pcm1-/- mice display partially penetrant perinatal lethality with survivors exhibiting hydrocephalus, oligospermia and cerebellar hypoplasia, and variably expressive phenotypes such as hydronephrosis. As many of these phenotypes have been observed in human ciliopathies and satellites are implicated in cilia biology, we investigated whether cilia were affected. PCM1 was dispensable for ciliogenesis in many cell types, whereas Pcm1-/- multiciliated ependymal cells and human PCM1-/- retinal pigmented epithelial 1 (RPE1) cells showed reduced ciliogenesis. PCM1-/- RPE1 cells displayed reduced docking of the mother centriole to the ciliary vesicle and removal of CP110 and CEP97 from the distal mother centriole, indicating compromised early ciliogenesis. Similarly, Pcm1-/- ependymal cells exhibited reduced removal of CP110 from basal bodies in vivo. We propose that PCM1 and centriolar satellites facilitate efficient trafficking of proteins to and from centrioles, including the departure of CP110 and CEP97 to initiate ciliogenesis, and that the threshold to trigger ciliogenesis differs between cell types.

Data availability

Proteomics data files are be uploaded ProteomeXchange (Identifier: PXD031920), with the accession number is available with the paper.All analysis tools have been made available on GitHub (https://github.com/IGC-Advanced-Imaging-Resource/Hall2022_Paper), as described in Materials and Methods.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Emma A Hall

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Dhivya Kumar

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3737-014X
  3. Suzanna L Prosser

    Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Patricia L Yeyati

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Vicente Herranz-Pérez

    Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1969-1214
  6. Jose Manuel García-Verdugo

    Cavanilles Institute of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Lorraine Rose

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Lisa McKie

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Daniel O Dodd

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Peter A Tennant

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Roly Megaw

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5605-4540
  12. Laura C Murphy

    Institute of Genetics and Cancer, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Marisa F Ferreira

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8123-4612
  14. Graeme Grimes

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Lucy Williams

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Tooba Quidwai

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5248-9010
  17. Laurence Pelletier

    Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1171-4618
  18. Jeremy F Reiter

    Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    Jeremy.Reiter@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    Jeremy F Reiter, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6512-320X
  19. Pleasantine Mill

    MRC Human Genetics Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    pleasantine.mill@ed.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5218-134X

Funding

Medical Research Council (MR_UU_1201018/26)

  • Emma A Hall
  • Dhivya Kumar
  • Patricia L Yeyati
  • Lorraine Rose
  • Lisa McKie
  • Daniel O Dodd
  • Peter A Tennant
  • Roly Megaw
  • Laura C Murphy
  • Marisa F Ferreira
  • Graeme Grimes
  • Lucy Williams
  • Tooba Quidwai
  • Pleasantine Mill

Sandler Foundation

  • Dhivya Kumar

Krembil Foundation

  • Suzanna L Prosser
  • Laurence Pelletier

European Commission (866355)

  • Emma A Hall
  • Daniel O Dodd
  • Pleasantine Mill

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (167279)

  • Suzanna L Prosser
  • Laurence Pelletier

European Commission (702601)

  • Suzanna L Prosser

National Institutes of Health (R01GM095941)

  • Dhivya Kumar
  • Vicente Herranz-Pérez
  • Jose Manuel García-Verdugo
  • Jeremy F Reiter

National Institutes of Health (R01AR054396)

  • Dhivya Kumar
  • Vicente Herranz-Pérez
  • Jose Manuel García-Verdugo
  • Jeremy F Reiter

National Institutes of Health (RO1HD089918)

  • Dhivya Kumar
  • Vicente Herranz-Pérez
  • Jose Manuel García-Verdugo
  • Jeremy F Reiter

National Institutes of Health (5K99GM140175)

  • Dhivya Kumar

Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research

  • Dhivya Kumar

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animals were maintained in SPF environment and studies carried out in accordance with the guidance issued by the Medical Research Council in "Responsibility in the Use of Animals in Medical Research" (July 1993) and licensed by the Home Office under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 under project license number P18921CDE in facilities at the University of Edinburgh (PEL 60/6025).

Copyright

© 2023, Hall et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,916
    views
  • 521
    downloads
  • 26
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Emma A Hall
  2. Dhivya Kumar
  3. Suzanna L Prosser
  4. Patricia L Yeyati
  5. Vicente Herranz-Pérez
  6. Jose Manuel García-Verdugo
  7. Lorraine Rose
  8. Lisa McKie
  9. Daniel O Dodd
  10. Peter A Tennant
  11. Roly Megaw
  12. Laura C Murphy
  13. Marisa F Ferreira
  14. Graeme Grimes
  15. Lucy Williams
  16. Tooba Quidwai
  17. Laurence Pelletier
  18. Jeremy F Reiter
  19. Pleasantine Mill
(2023)
Centriolar satellites expedite mother centriole remodeling to promote ciliogenesis
eLife 12:e79299.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79299

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79299

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Sofía Suárez Freire, Sebastián Perez-Pandolfo ... Mariana Melani
    Research Article

    Eukaryotic cells depend on exocytosis to direct intracellularly synthesized material toward the extracellular space or the plasma membrane, so exocytosis constitutes a basic function for cellular homeostasis and communication between cells. The secretory pathway includes biogenesis of secretory granules (SGs), their maturation and fusion with the plasma membrane (exocytosis), resulting in release of SG content to the extracellular space. The larval salivary gland of Drosophila melanogaster is an excellent model for studying exocytosis. This gland synthesizes mucins that are packaged in SGs that sprout from the trans-Golgi network and then undergo a maturation process that involves homotypic fusion, condensation, and acidification. Finally, mature SGs are directed to the apical domain of the plasma membrane with which they fuse, releasing their content into the gland lumen. The exocyst is a hetero-octameric complex that participates in tethering of vesicles to the plasma membrane during constitutive exocytosis. By precise temperature-dependent gradual activation of the Gal4-UAS expression system, we have induced different levels of silencing of exocyst complex subunits, and identified three temporarily distinctive steps of the regulated exocytic pathway where the exocyst is critically required: SG biogenesis, SG maturation, and SG exocytosis. Our results shed light on previously unidentified functions of the exocyst along the exocytic pathway. We propose that the exocyst acts as a general tethering factor in various steps of this cellular process.

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.