Whole-brain comparison of rodent and human brains using spatial transcriptomics

  1. Antoine Beauchamp  Is a corresponding author
  2. Yohan Yee
  3. Benjamin C Darwin
  4. Armin Raznahan
  5. Rogier B Mars  Is a corresponding author
  6. Jason P Lerch  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Toronto, Canada
  2. Mouse Imaging Centre, Canada
  3. Hospital for Sick Children, Canada
  4. National Institute of Mental Health, United States
  5. Radboud University Nijmegen, Netherlands
  6. University of Oxford, United Kingdom

Abstract

The ever-increasing use of mouse models in preclinical neuroscience research calls for an improvement in the methods used to translate findings between mouse and human brains. Previously we showed that the brains of primates can be compared in a direct quantitative manner using a common reference space built from white matter tractography data (Rogier B. Mars et al., 2018b). Here we extend the common space approach to evaluate the similarity of mouse and human brain regions using openly accessible brain-wide transcriptomic data sets. We show that mouse-human homologous genes capture broad patterns of neuroanatomical organization, but that the resolution of cross-species correspondences can be improved using a novel supervised machine learning approach. Using this method, we demonstrate that sensorimotor subdivisions of the neocortex exhibit greater similarity between species, compared with supramodal subdivisions, and that mouse isocortical regions separate into sensorimotor and supramodal clusters based on their similarity to human cortical regions. We also find that mouse and human striatal regions are strongly conserved, with the mouse caudoputamen exhibiting an equal degree of similarity to both the human caudate and putamen.

Data availability

The Allen Mouse Brain Atlas and Allen Human Brain Atlas data sets are openly accessible and can be downloaded from the Allen Institute's API (http://api.brain-map.org). All of the code and additional data needed to generate this analysis, including figures and manuscript, is accessible at https://github.com/abeaucha/MouseHumanTranscriptomicSimilarity/

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Antoine Beauchamp

    Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    For correspondence
    antoine.beauchamp@mail.utoronto.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0008-7471
  2. Yohan Yee

    Mouse Imaging Centre, Montréal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7083-1932
  3. Benjamin C Darwin

    Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8689-046X
  4. Armin Raznahan

    Developmental Neurogenomics Unit, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5622-1190
  5. Rogier B Mars

    Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
    For correspondence
    rogier.mars@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jason P Lerch

    Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    jason.lerch@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Doctoral Award - Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarships (GSD-165737))

  • Antoine Beauchamp

Wellcome Trust (203139/Z/16/Z)

  • Rogier B Mars
  • Jason P Lerch

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 6,135
    views
  • 623
    downloads
  • 52
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Antoine Beauchamp
  2. Yohan Yee
  3. Benjamin C Darwin
  4. Armin Raznahan
  5. Rogier B Mars
  6. Jason P Lerch
(2022)
Whole-brain comparison of rodent and human brains using spatial transcriptomics
eLife 11:e79418.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79418

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79418

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Justine Boutry, Océane Rieu ... Fréderic Thomas
    Research Article

    While host phenotypic manipulation by parasites is a widespread phenomenon, whether tumors, which can be likened to parasite entities, can also manipulate their hosts is not known. Theory predicts that this should nevertheless be the case, especially when tumors (neoplasms) are transmissible. We explored this hypothesis in a cnidarian Hydra model system, in which spontaneous tumors can occur in the lab, and lineages in which such neoplastic cells are vertically transmitted (through host budding) have been maintained for over 15 years. Remarkably, the hydras with long-term transmissible tumors show an unexpected increase in the number of their tentacles, allowing for the possibility that these neoplastic cells can manipulate the host. By experimentally transplanting healthy as well as neoplastic tissues derived from both recent and long-term transmissible tumors, we found that only the long-term transmissible tumors were able to trigger the growth of additional tentacles. Also, supernumerary tentacles, by permitting higher foraging efficiency for the host, were associated with an increased budding rate, thereby favoring the vertical transmission of tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that, like true parasites, transmissible tumors can evolve strategies to manipulate the phenotype of their host.

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Zach Hensel
    Short Report

    Accurate estimation of the effects of mutations on SARS-CoV-2 viral fitness can inform public-health responses such as vaccine development and predicting the impact of a new variant; it can also illuminate biological mechanisms including those underlying the emergence of variants of concern. Recently, Lan et al. reported a model of SARS-CoV-2 secondary structure and its underlying dimethyl sulfate reactivity data (Lan et al., 2022). I investigated whether base reactivities and secondary structure models derived from them can explain some variability in the frequency of observing different nucleotide substitutions across millions of patient sequences in the SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic tree. Nucleotide basepairing was compared to the estimated ‘mutational fitness’ of substitutions, a measurement of the difference between a substitution’s observed and expected frequency that is correlated with other estimates of viral fitness (Bloom and Neher, 2023). This comparison revealed that secondary structure is often predictive of substitution frequency, with significant decreases in substitution frequencies at basepaired positions. Focusing on the mutational fitness of C→U, the most common type of substitution, I describe C→U substitutions at basepaired positions that characterize major SARS-CoV-2 variants; such mutations may have a greater impact on fitness than appreciated when considering substitution frequency alone.