Identification of epigenetic modulators as determinants of nuclear size and shape

  1. Andria C Schibler
  2. Predrag Jevtic
  3. Gianluca Pegoraro
  4. Daniel L Levy  Is a corresponding author
  5. Tom Misteli  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Cancer Institute, United States
  2. University of Wyoming, United States

Abstract

The shape and size of the human cell nucleus is highly variable amongst cell types and tissues. Changes in nuclear morphology are associated with disease, including cancer, as well as with premature and normal aging. Despite the very fundamental nature of nuclear morphology, the cellular factors that determine nuclear shape and size are not well understood. To identify regulators of nuclear architecture in a systematic and unbiased fashion, we performed a high-throughput imaging-based siRNA screen targeting 867 nuclear proteins including chromatin-associated proteins, epigenetic regulators, and nuclear envelope components. Using multiple morphometric parameters and eliminating cell cycle effectors, we identified a set of novel determinants of nuclear size and shape. Interestingly, most identified factors altered nuclear morphology without affecting the levels of lamin proteins, which are known prominent regulators of nuclear shape. In contrast, a major group of nuclear shape regulators were modifiers of repressive heterochromatin. Biochemical and molecular analysis uncovered a direct physical interaction of histone H3 with lamin A mediated via combinatorial histone modifications. Furthermore, disease-causing lamin A mutations that result in disruption of nuclear shape inhibited lamin A-histone H3 interactions. Finally, oncogenic histone H3.3 mutants defective for H3K27 methylation resulted in nuclear morphology abnormalities. Altogether, our results represent a systematic exploration of cellular factors involved in determining nuclear morphology and they identify the interaction of lamin A with histone H3 as an important contributor to nuclear morphology in human cells.

Data availability

All data generated are included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andria C Schibler

    National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Predrag Jevtic

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3978-5311
  3. Gianluca Pegoraro

    National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Daniel L Levy

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, United States
    For correspondence
    dlevy1@uwyo.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7853-3275
  5. Tom Misteli

    National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    mistelit@mail.nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3530-3020

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIH 1-ZIA-BC010309-23)

  • Tom Misteli

National Institutes of Health (NIH 1-ZIC-BC011567-08)

  • Gianluca Pegoraro

National Institutes of Health (NIH R35GM134885)

  • Daniel L Levy

National Institutes of Health (NIH P20GM103432)

  • Daniel L Levy

USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Hatch project #1012152)

  • Daniel L Levy

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,688
    views
  • 465
    downloads
  • 23
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andria C Schibler
  2. Predrag Jevtic
  3. Gianluca Pegoraro
  4. Daniel L Levy
  5. Tom Misteli
(2023)
Identification of epigenetic modulators as determinants of nuclear size and shape
eLife 12:e80653.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80653

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80653

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Rezwana Karim, Wendi Teng ... Hening Lin
    Research Article

    De novo lipogenesis is associated with the development of human diseases such as cancer, diabetes, and obesity. At the core of lipogenesis lies acetyl coenzyme A (CoA), a metabolite that plays a crucial role in fatty acid synthesis. One of the pathways contributing to the production of cytosolic acetyl-CoA is mediated by acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 (ACSS2). Here, we reveal that when cells encounter nutrient stress, particularly a deficiency in amino acids, Sirtuin 2 (SIRT2) catalyzes the deacetylation of ACSS2 at the lysine residue K271. This results in K271 ubiquitination and subsequently proteasomal degradation of ACSS2. Substitution of K271 leads to decreased ubiquitination of ACSS2, increased ACSS2 protein level, and thus increased lipogenesis. Our study uncovers a mechanism that cells employ to efficiently manage lipogenesis during periods of nutrient stress.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Developmental Biology
    Qian Wang, Hongge Li ... Xin Zhang
    Research Article

    Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling elicits multiple downstream pathways, most notably the Ras/MAPK cascade facilitated by the adaptor protein Grb2. However, the mechanism by which Grb2 is recruited to the FGF signaling complex remains unresolved. Here, we showed that genetic ablation of FGF signaling prevented murine lens induction by disrupting transcriptional regulation and actin cytoskeletal arrangements, which could be reproduced by deleting the juxtamembrane region of the FGF receptor and rescued by Kras activation. Conversely, mutations affecting the Frs2-binding site on the FGF receptor or the deletion of Frs2 and Shp2 primarily impact later stages of lens vesicle development involving lens fiber cell differentiation. Our study further revealed that the loss of Grb2 abolished MAPK signaling, resulting in a profound arrest of lens development. However, removing Grb2’s putative Shp2 dephosphorylation site (Y209) neither produced a detectable phenotype nor impaired MAPK signaling during lens development. Furthermore, the catalytically inactive Shp2 mutation (C459S) only modestly impaired FGF signaling, whereas replacing Shp2’s C-terminal phosphorylation sites (Y542/Y580) previously implicated in Grb2 binding only caused placental defects, perinatal lethality, and reduced lacrimal gland branching without impacting lens development, suggesting that Shp2 only partially mediates Grb2 recruitment. In contrast, we observed that FGF signaling is required for the phosphorylation of the Grb2-binding sites on Shc1 and the deletion of Shc1 exacerbates the lens vesicle defect caused by Frs2 and Shp2 deletion. These findings establish Shc1 as a critical collaborator with Frs2 and Shp2 in targeting Grb2 during FGF signaling.