Monoallelic CRMP1 gene variants cause neurodevelopmental disorder

  1. Ethiraj Ravindran
  2. Nobuto Arashiki
  3. Lena-Luise Becker
  4. Kohtaro Takizawa
  5. Jonathan Lévy
  6. Thomas Rambaud
  7. Konstantin L Makridis
  8. Yoshio Goshima
  9. Na Li
  10. Maaike Vreeburg
  11. Bénédicte Demeer
  12. Achim Dickmanns
  13. Alexander PA Stegmann
  14. Hao Hu  Is a corresponding author
  15. Fumio Nakamura  Is a corresponding author
  16. Angela M Kaindl  Is a corresponding author
  1. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
  2. Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan
  3. Robert Debré University Hospital, France
  4. Laboratoire de biologie médicale multisites Seqoia, France
  5. Yokohama City University, Japan
  6. Guangzhou Medical University, China
  7. Maastricht University Medical Centre, Netherlands
  8. CHU Amiens-Picardie, France
  9. Georg-August-University Göttingen, Germany

Abstract

Collapsin response mediator proteins (CRMPs) are key for brain development and function. Here, we link CRMP1 to a neurodevelopmental disorder. We report heterozygous de novo variants in the CRMP1 gene in three unrelated individuals with muscular hypotonia, intellectual disability and/or autism spectrum disorder. Based on in silico analysis these variants are predicted to affect the CRMP1 structure. We further analyzed the effect of the variants on the protein structure/levels and cellular processes. We showed that the human CRMP1 variants impact the oligomerization of CRMP1 proteins. Moreover, overexpression of the CRMP1 variants affect neurite outgrowth of murine cortical neurons. While altered CRMP1 levels have been reported in psychiatric diseases, genetic variants in CRMP1 gene have never been linked to human disease. We report for the first-time variants in the CRMP1 gene and emphasize its key role in brain development and function by linking directly to a human neurodevelopmental disease.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript. Source Data files have been provided for Figures 2 and 3

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Ethiraj Ravindran

    Department of Pediatric Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0095-116X
  2. Nobuto Arashiki

    Department of Biochemistry, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Lena-Luise Becker

    Department of Pediatric Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Kohtaro Takizawa

    Department of Biochemistry, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jonathan Lévy

    Department of Genetics, Robert Debré University Hospital, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Thomas Rambaud

    Laboratoire de biologie médicale multisites Seqoia, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Konstantin L Makridis

    Department of Pediatric Neurology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2609-4557
  8. Yoshio Goshima

    Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Neurobiology, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Na Li

    Laboratory of Medical Systems Biology, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Maaike Vreeburg

    Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Bénédicte Demeer

    Center for Human Genetics, CHU Amiens-Picardie, Amiens, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Achim Dickmanns

    Department of Molecular Structural Biology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Alexander PA Stegmann

    Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9736-7137
  14. Hao Hu

    Laboratory of Medical Systems Biology, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
    For correspondence
    huh@cougarlab.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Fumio Nakamura

    Department of Biochemistry, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
    For correspondence
    nakamura.fumio@twmu.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Angela M Kaindl

    Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    For correspondence
    angela.kaindl@charite.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9454-206X

Funding

Charité - Universitatsmedizin Berlin

  • Ethiraj Ravindran
  • Lena-Luise Becker
  • Konstantin L Makridis
  • Angela M Kaindl

Berlin Institute of Health (CRG1)

  • Angela M Kaindl

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16K07062)

  • Fumio Nakamura

Sonnenfeld Stiftung

  • Konstantin L Makridis

German Research Foundation (SFB665,SFB1315,FOR3004)

  • Angela M Kaindl

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Joseph G Gleeson, University of California, San Diego, United States

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experimental protocols were checked and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Tokyo Women's medical University with protocol No. 'AE21-086'. All animal experiments were performed at daytime. The study was not pre-registered.

Human subjects: Written informed consent was obtained from all parents of the patients. The human study adhered to the World Health Association Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and was approved by the local ethics committees of the Charité (approval no. EA1/212/08).

Version history

  1. Received: June 4, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: July 6, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: December 12, 2022
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: December 13, 2022 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: December 30, 2022 (version 2)
  6. Version of Record updated: January 6, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2022, Ravindran et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,073
    views
  • 160
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ethiraj Ravindran
  2. Nobuto Arashiki
  3. Lena-Luise Becker
  4. Kohtaro Takizawa
  5. Jonathan Lévy
  6. Thomas Rambaud
  7. Konstantin L Makridis
  8. Yoshio Goshima
  9. Na Li
  10. Maaike Vreeburg
  11. Bénédicte Demeer
  12. Achim Dickmanns
  13. Alexander PA Stegmann
  14. Hao Hu
  15. Fumio Nakamura
  16. Angela M Kaindl
(2022)
Monoallelic CRMP1 gene variants cause neurodevelopmental disorder
eLife 11:e80793.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80793

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80793

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Yifei Weng, Shiyi Zhou ... Coleen T Murphy
    Research Article

    Cognitive decline is a significant health concern in our aging society. Here, we used the model organism C. elegans to investigate the impact of the IIS/FOXO pathway on age-related cognitive decline. The daf-2 Insulin/IGF-1 receptor mutant exhibits a significant extension of learning and memory span with age compared to wild-type worms, an effect that is dependent on the DAF-16 transcription factor. To identify possible mechanisms by which aging daf-2 mutants maintain learning and memory with age while wild-type worms lose neuronal function, we carried out neuron-specific transcriptomic analysis in aged animals. We observed downregulation of neuronal genes and upregulation of transcriptional regulation genes in aging wild-type neurons. By contrast, IIS/FOXO pathway mutants exhibit distinct neuronal transcriptomic alterations in response to cognitive aging, including upregulation of stress response genes and downregulation of specific insulin signaling genes. We tested the roles of significantly transcriptionally-changed genes in regulating cognitive functions, identifying novel regulators of learning and memory. In addition to other mechanistic insights, a comparison of the aged vs young daf-2 neuronal transcriptome revealed that a new set of potentially neuroprotective genes is upregulated; instead of simply mimicking a young state, daf-2 may enhance neuronal resilience to accumulation of harm and take a more active approach to combat aging. These findings suggest a potential mechanism for regulating cognitive function with age and offer insights into novel therapeutic targets for age-related cognitive decline.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Samuel Pattillo Smith, Gregory Darnell ... Lorin Crawford
    Research Article

    LD score regression (LDSC) is a method to estimate narrow-sense heritability from genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics alone, making it a fast and popular approach. In this work, we present interaction-LD score (i-LDSC) regression: an extension of the original LDSC framework that accounts for interactions between genetic variants. By studying a wide range of generative models in simulations, and by re-analyzing 25 well-studied quantitative phenotypes from 349,468 individuals in the UK Biobank and up to 159,095 individuals in BioBank Japan, we show that the inclusion of a cis-interaction score (i.e. interactions between a focal variant and proximal variants) recovers genetic variance that is not captured by LDSC. For each of the 25 traits analyzed in the UK Biobank and BioBank Japan, i-LDSC detects additional variation contributed by genetic interactions. The i-LDSC software and its application to these biobanks represent a step towards resolving further genetic contributions of sources of non-additive genetic effects to complex trait variation.