The circadian clock controls temporal and spatial patterns of floral development in sunflower

  1. Carine M Marshall
  2. Veronica L Thompson
  3. Nicky M Creux
  4. Stacey L Harmer  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Davis, United States
  2. University of Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Biological rhythms are ubiquitous. They can be generated by circadian oscillators, which produce daily rhythms in physiology and behavior, as well as by developmental oscillators such as the segmentation clock, which periodically produces modular developmental units. Here, we show that the circadian clock controls the timing of late-stage floret development, or anthesis, in domesticated sunflowers. In these plants, up to thousands of individual florets are tightly packed onto a capitulum disk. While early floret development occurs continuously across capitula to generate iconic spiral phyllotaxy, during anthesis floret development occurs in discrete ring-like pseudowhorls with up to hundreds of florets undergoing simultaneous maturation. We demonstrate circadian regulation of floral organ growth and show that the effects of light on this process are time-of-day dependent. Delays in the phase of floral anthesis delay morning visits by pollinators, while disruption of circadian rhythms in floral organ development causes loss of pseudowhorl formation and large reductions in pollinator visits. We therefore show that the sunflower circadian clock acts in concert with environmental response pathways to tightly synchronize the anthesis of hundreds of florets each day, generating spatial patterns on the developing capitulum disk. This coordinated mass release of floral rewards at predictable times of day likely promotes pollinator visits and plant reproductive success.

Data availability

All source data have been uploaded to Dryad under the following accession codes: 10.25338/B8865X (timelapse scoring), 10.25338/B86358 (pollinator visits), 10.25338/B8963G (consensus scoring), 10.25338/B8CW5R (ovary measurements), and 10.25338/B8HP9F (organ growth kinetics).

The following data sets were generated
    1. Marshall C
    2. Creux N
    (2023) Sunflower timelapse scoring
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.25338/B8865X.
    1. Marshall C
    2. Thompson V
    (2022) Sunflower pollinator visit scoring
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.25338/B86358.
    1. Marshall C
    (2023) Sunflower consensus scoring
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.25338/B8963G.
    1. Marshall C
    (2023) Sunflower ovary measurements
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.25338/B8CW5R.
    1. Marshall C
    2. Thompson V
    (2022) Organ kinetics measurements
    Dryad Digital Repository, doi:10.25338/B8HP9F.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Carine M Marshall

    Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Veronica L Thompson

    Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0500-5639
  3. Nicky M Creux

    Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4179-6995
  4. Stacey L Harmer

    Department of Plant Biology, University of California, Davis, Davis, United States
    For correspondence
    slharmer@ucdavis.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6813-6682

Funding

National Science Foundation (IOS 1238040)

  • Stacey L Harmer

U.S. Department of Agriculture (CA-D-PLB-2259-H)

  • Stacey L Harmer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Pil Joon Seo, Seoul National University, Korea (South), Republic of

Version history

  1. Received: June 11, 2022
  2. Preprint posted: July 2, 2022 (view preprint)
  3. Accepted: January 12, 2023
  4. Accepted Manuscript published: January 13, 2023 (version 1)
  5. Version of Record published: February 28, 2023 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2023, Marshall et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,739
    views
  • 426
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Carine M Marshall
  2. Veronica L Thompson
  3. Nicky M Creux
  4. Stacey L Harmer
(2023)
The circadian clock controls temporal and spatial patterns of floral development in sunflower
eLife 12:e80984.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80984

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80984

Further reading

  1. Sunflowers need to keep track of time to develop and reproduce

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Melody C Iacino, Taylor A Stowe ... Mark J Ferris
    Research Article Updated

    Adolescence is characterized by changes in reward-related behaviors, social behaviors, and decision-making. These behavioral changes are necessary for the transition into adulthood, but they also increase vulnerability to the development of a range of psychiatric disorders. Major reorganization of the dopamine system during adolescence is thought to underlie, in part, the associated behavioral changes and increased vulnerability. Here, we utilized fast scan cyclic voltammetry and microdialysis to examine differences in dopamine release as well as mechanisms that underlie differential dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) core of adolescent (P28-35) and adult (P70-90) male rats. We show baseline differences between adult and adolescent-stimulated dopamine release in male rats, as well as opposite effects of the α6 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) on modulating dopamine release. The α6-selective blocker, α-conotoxin, increased dopamine release in early adolescent rats, but decreased dopamine release in rats beginning in middle adolescence and extending through adulthood. Strikingly, blockade of GABAA and GABAB receptors revealed that this α6-mediated increase in adolescent dopamine release requires NAc GABA signaling to occur. We confirm the role of α6 nAChRs and GABA in mediating this effect in vivo using microdialysis. Results herein suggest a multisynaptic mechanism potentially unique to the period of development that includes early adolescence, involving acetylcholine acting at α6-containing nAChRs to drive inhibitory GABA tone on dopamine release.