Gain-of-function variants in the ion channel gene TRPM3 underlie a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders

  1. Lydie Burglen
  2. Evelien Van Hoeymissen
  3. Leila Qebibo
  4. Magalie Barth
  5. Newell Belnap
  6. Felix Boschann
  7. Christel Depienne
  8. Katrien De Clercq
  9. Andrew GL Douglas
  10. Mark P Fitzgerald
  11. Nicola Foulds
  12. Catherine Garel
  13. Ingo Helbig
  14. Katharina Held
  15. Denise Horn
  16. Annelies Janssen
  17. Angela M Kaindl
  18. Vinodh Narayanan
  19. Christina Prager
  20. Mailys Rupin-Mas
  21. Alexandra Afenjar
  22. Siyuan Zhao
  23. Vincent Th Ramaekers
  24. Sarah M Ruggiero
  25. Simon Thomas
  26. Stéphanie Valence
  27. Lionel Van Maldergem
  28. Tibor Rohacs
  29. Diana Rodriguez
  30. David Dyment
  31. Thomas Voets  Is a corresponding author
  32. Joris Vriens  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre de référence des malformations et maladies congénitales du cervelet, Départementde Génétique, APHP, Sorbonne University, France
  2. Developmental Brain Disorders Laboratory, Imagine Institute, France
  3. Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of cellular and molecular medicine, University of Leuven, Belgium
  4. VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Belgium
  5. Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department Development & Regeneration, University of Leuven, Belgium
  6. Department of Genetics, University Hospital of Angers, France
  7. Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Neurogenomics Division, Center for Rare Childhood Disorders, United States
  8. Charité – Universitäts medizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Germany
  9. Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
  10. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
  11. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
  12. Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
  13. Service de Radiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, Médecine Sorbonne Université, France
  14. Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Charité - Universitäts medizin Berlin, Germany
  15. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Charité - Universitäts medizin Berlin, Germany
  16. Charité – Universitäts medizin Berlin, Center for Chronically Sick Children, Germany
  17. Department of Neuropediatrics, University Hospital of Angers, France
  18. Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States
  19. Division Neuropediatrics, University Hospital Liège, Belgium
  20. Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, United Kingdom
  21. Sorbonne Université, Service de Neuropédiatrie, Hôpital Trousseau AP-HP, France
  22. Centre de Génétique Humaine, Université de Franche-Comté Besançon, France
  23. Center of Clinical Investigation 1431, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, France
  24. Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Canada
5 figures, 3 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Figure 1 with 3 supplements
Overview of the TRPM3 gene and location of the different variants.

(A) Exon-intron structure and alternative splicing of TRPM3. Percentages above colored exons indicate the percentage of transcripts that include the indicated exons in human cerebellar RNA-seq analyses. Exons included for numbering of the disease-associated variants are indicated in gray, blue, and green, resulting in the functional channel construct indicated in (B). Variant numbering was based on the amino acid position of the mutated residue in the NM_001366145.2 isoform. See text for more details.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Functional characterization of different human TRPM3 constructs.

(A–B) Three different variants of human TRPM3 (AJ505026.1 black, n=416 cells), NM_001366145.2 (dark gray, n=673), and NM_001366147.2 (light gray, n=644) were functionally characterized via Fura-2 fluorimetric experiments (N≥3 independent experiments). The TRPM3 agonist pregnenolone sulfate (PS; 40 µM) and clotrimazole (Clt; 10 µM) were applied at the indicated time periods. (B) Corresponding calcium amplitudes after stimulation by PS, Clt, and co-application of PS + Clt, represented as mean ± SEM. (C–D) NM_001366145.2 construct was further characterized via whole-cell patch-clamp experiments in HEK293T cells (N=5) after stimulation by PS (40 µM), Clt (10 µM), and co-application PS + Clt. (C) Time course of whole-cell patch clamp recording at holding of +150 mV (open circles) and –150 mV (closed circles) of HEK293T cells expressing the TRPM3 NM_001366145.2 construct. (D) Current-voltage relationship of time points indicated in panel (C).

Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Structural model of TRPM3 based on the cryo-Electron Microscopy (EM) structure (pdb: 8DDQ).

(A–B) Structural model of TRPM3, based on the cryo-EM structure (pdb: 8DDQ), seen from the side (A) and the top (B), indicating residues that are altered in the disease-associated variants. In one of the four subunits (blue), the red circled area indicates the location of the non-resolved loop where D694 is located, close to the interaction site of Gβγ. Other affected residues are indicated in magenta and green. (C) A cluster of disease-associated residues (magenta) is localized at the interface between transmembrane domain and cytosol, whereas P1092 is located at the extracellular part of transmembrane helix S6.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3
Sequence alignment of TRPM3 with different species and different members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) melastatin (M) family.

CLUSTAL Omega (1.2.4) multiple sequence alignment was used to perform the alignment and to obtain the Phylogenetic Tree as shown on the left top. Sequence alignment at positions D614, L769, V1002, G1007, P1102, N1126, and S1133 is conserved across multiple species (A) and conserved across related members of the TRPM family (B).

Figure 2 with 1 supplement
Successive MRI of several patients carrying different TRPM3 variants.

*Normal MRI: the fissures of the vermis and cerebellar hemispheres are nearly virtual. (a–i) MRI of the patients showing variable widening of the cerebellar fissures (arrows) reflecting cerebellar (vermis and/or hemispheres) atrophy. (a–d) Patient 1, MRI at 3 years 8 months showing slight atrophy of the vermis (a-sagittal T1) and cerebellar hemispheres (B-coronal T1); and majoration of the atrophy at 10 years (c-sagittal T1 and d-coronal T2), (e–f) Patient 3; MRI at 8 years 6 months: severe atrophy of the vermis (arrow) and brainstem (star), and atrophy of the cerebellar hemispheres (sagittal and coronal T1). (g–j) successive MRIs in patient showing progressive atrophy (g: 2 years 2 months; h: 6 months; i–j: 4 years 2 months). (k and l) Patient 4; MRI at 1 years 4 months: small vermis, thin brainstem (star) and atrophy of the cerebellar hemispheres (sagittal and coronal T1).

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
MRI of patient 7 and patient 8.

(a–b) Patient 7, very mild and localized atrophy of the cerebellar hemispheres (arrows), stable (2 years 10 months (a); 12 years 1 month (b)). (c) Patient 8, normal posterior fossa at age of 3 years; non-specific bilateral symmetric periventricular white matter hyperintensities on FLAIR axial MRI (arrows).

Figure 3 with 4 supplements
Homozygous mutant expression in HEK293T cells.

(A) Time course of intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]i) (± SEM) upon application of the TRPM3 inhibitor primidone (100 µM) for wild-type (WT; black; n=449), and homozygous V1002M (green; n=271), V1002G (blue; n=257), and G1007S (red; n=409) transfected HEK293T cells, and non-transfected (NT; gray; n=982; N=3 independent measurements). (B) Mean basal intracellular calcium concentrations, [Ca2+]I, in the absence (full bars) and presence of primidone (100 µM; striped bars). Data are represented as mean ± SEM, using a two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s posthoc test. p-Values of baseline vs WT: NT (p=0.8376), D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p>0.9999), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p<0.0001), P1102Q (p=0.0018), N1126D (p<0.0001), S1133P (p<0.0001); p-values baseline vs primidone: NT (p>0.9999), WT (p=0.9994), D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p>0.9999), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p=0.5663), P1102Q (p=0.0138), N1126D (p<0.0001), S1133P (p<0.0001). (C) Time course of [Ca2+]I (± SEM) for WT (black) (n=243), D614V (green) (n=220), L794V (blue) (n=420) and V1002L (red) (n=264) transfected HEK293T cells, and non-transfected (NT; gray) (n=452) upon application of pregnenolone sulfate (PS; 40 µM) (N=3 independent measurements). (D) Corresponding calcium amplitudes of the PS response, represented as mean ± SEM, using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunnett’s posthoc test (p-values vs WT: D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p<0.0001), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p=0.0006), P1102Q (p=0.0102), N1126D (p=0.0098), S1133P (p<0.0001)). For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Elevated basal activity in HEK293T cells expressing TRPM3 variants.

Time course of intracellular calcium concentrations, [Ca2+]I ± SEM upon application of the TRPM3 inhibitor primidone (100 µM) in homozygous (orange) and heterozygous (blue) transfected HEK293T cells. Cells were transfected with (A) TRPM3 wild-type (WT) and non-transfected cells (NT), and the TRPM3 variant D614V (B), L769V (C), V1002M (D), V1002G (E), V1002L (F), G1007S (G), P1102Q (H), N1126D (I) and S1133P (J) (N=3 independent experiments). For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
PS-induced calcium influxes in TRPM3-developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) mutants.

Time course of intracellular calcium concentrations, [Ca2+]i ± SEM upon application of the pregnenolone sulfate (PS; 40 µM) in homozygous (orange) and heterozygous (blue) transfected HEK293T cells. Cells were transfected with (A) TRPM3 wild-type (WT, black) and non-transfected cells (NT, gray), the TRPM3 variant D614V (B), L769V (C), V1002M (D), V1002G (E), V1002L (F), G1007S (G), P1102Q (H), N1126D (I) and S1133P (J) (N=3 independent experiments). For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3
Pregnenolone Sulfate dose dependency of the TRPM3 variant G1007S.

HEK293T cells were transfected with TRPM3 or its mutant G1007S, or a 1:1 ratio of mutant and wild-type TRPM3 plus the calcium sensor GCaMP6. Fluorescence was measured in a 96-well plate reader (Flexstation-3). (A–C) Representative fluorescence traces of wild-type TRPM3 (A), the G1007S mutant (B), co-transfection of TRPM3 and G1007S (1:1 ratio) (C). The applications of various concentrations of PS and ionomycin (Iono; 2 µM) are indicated by the arrows. Basal fluorescence was subtracted and PS-induced Ca2+ signals were normalized to the signal after applying ionomycin. Each single trace shows the average of four replicates from the same transfection. (D) Hill 1 fits of the PS dose dependency of the TRPM3 mutant G1007S. Symbols represent Mean ± SEM from 3 independent experiments. For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to NCBI reference sequence NM_001366141.2 cloned in the pcDNA3.1(+)-N-eGFP vector, was used.

Figure 3—figure supplement 4
Fluorescence Intensity of channel-linked yellow fluorescence protein (YFP) in cells expressing WT TRPM3 and TRPM3 variants.

(A) YFP fluorescence in HEK293T cells expressing the indicated variants, with (1:1) or without co-expression of the WT subunit. Fluorescence values were normalized to the mean YFP fluorescence of cells expressing WT TRPM3 transfected on the same experimental day. A one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s posthoc test was used and significant p-values are reported on the graph. (B) Scatter plot (small crosses) of basal [Ca2+]i levels vs normalized YFP fluorescence for cells expressing WT TRPM3, D614V, and WT + D614V. The large filled symbols show the mean basal [Ca2+]i levels for pooled cells with similar YFP fluorescence. Cells were binned according to YFP fluorescence with a bin width of 50%. All cells with YFP levels higher than the highest bin for WT were pooled in the rightmost bin. (C) Same as (B), but for the V1002G variant. Note that the total amount of DNA used for transfection was identical for all conditions. Symbols represent Mean ± SEM.

Figure 4 with 3 supplements
Heterozygous mutant + wild-type (WT) expression in HEK293T cells.

(A) Time course of [Ca2+]I ± SEM upon application of the TRPM3 inhibitor primidone (100 µM) for WT (black; n=449), and heterozygous WT + V1002 M (green; n=373), WT + V1002 G (blue; n=482), and WT + G1007 S (red) (n=561) transfected HEK293T cells, and non-transfected (NT; gray; n=982; N=3 independent measurements). (B) Mean basal [Ca2+]I ± SEM in the absence (full bars) and presence of primidone (striped bars). A two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s posthoc test was used. p-Values of baseline vs WT: NT (p=0.6733), D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p<0.0001), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p<0.0001), P1102Q (p=0.9249), N1126D (p=0.5539), and S1133P (p<0.0001); p-Values baseline vs primidone: NT (p>0.9999), WT (p=0.9994), D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p<0.0001), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p<0.0001), P1102Q (p=0.8205), N1126D (p=0.5132), and S1133P (p<0.0001). (C) Time course of [Ca2+]I (± SEM) for WT (black; n=243), WT + D614V (green; n=281), WT + L794V (blue; n=497) and WT + V1002L (red; n=276) transfected HEK293T cells, and non-transfected (NT; gray; n=452) upon application of pregnenolone sulfate (PS; 40 µM; N=3 independent measurements). (D) Corresponding calcium amplitudes of the PS response, represented as mean ± SEM, using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunnett’s posthoc test (p-values vs WT: D614V [p<0.0001], L794V [p<0.0001], V1002M [p<0.0001], V1002G [p=0.0155], V1002L [p<0.0001], G1007S [p<0.0001], P1102Q [p=0.0564], N1126D [p=0.0277], and S1133P [p<0.0001]). For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Individual data points of intracellular calcium concentrations at baseline and upon application of the TRPM3 inhibitor primidone.

Time course of intracellular calcium concentrations, [Ca2+]I ± SEM upon application of the pregnenolone sulfate (PS; 40 µM) in homozygous (orange) and heterozygous (blue) transfected HEK293T intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]I), in the absence (Base) and presence of primidone (Prim; 100 µM). Each individual cells is represented as a single dot, and the same cell is connected with a line before and after the application of primidone. (A) Non-transfected (NT) cells and wild-type (WT) transfected HEK293T cells are represented in gray and black, respectively. (B–J) Homozygous and heterozygous (WT + mutant construct) transfected HEK293T cells are represented in orange and blue, respectively. Including the TRPM3 variant D614V (B), L769V (C), V1002M (D), V1002G (E), V1002L (F), G1007S (G), P1102Q (H), N1126D, (I) and S1133P (J). For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2
Individual data points of intracellular calcium amplitudes upon application of the TRPM3 agonist pregnenolone sulfate (PS).

Corresponding calcium amplitudes (Δ[Ca2+]I) of the PS responses. Non-transfected (NT) cells and wild-type (WT) transfected HEK293T cells are represented in gray and black, respectively. (A) Homozygous and (B) heterozygous (WT + mutant construct) transfected HEK293T cells are represented in orange and blue, respectively. Each individual cells is represented as a single dot and the line represents mean ± SEM. For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

Figure 4—figure supplement 3
Baseline and pregnenolone sulfate (PS)-induced current densities of the L769V and G1007S substitution.

(A) Representative whole-cell TRPM3 current densities (pA/pF) recorded at baseline without an agonist (left) and during the application of the agonist PS (right) during voltage steps ranging from –160 mV to +160 mV, separated by steps of + 40 mV for non-transfected HEK293T cells (NT), wild-type (WT), L769V (LV), WT + LV, G1007S (GS), and WT + GS transfected HEK293T cells. (B–E) Scatter plot of current densities (pA/pF) for NT, WT, LV, WT + LV, GS, and WT + GS transfected HEK293T cells (N=7 for WT and N=8 for other conditions) without the application of an agonist at + 160 mV (B) and –160 mV (C) and during the application of PS at +160 mV (D) and –160 mV (E). (F) Fraction of current densities (pA/pF) at baseline compared to current densities when the agonist PS was applied (IBaseline/IPS). Data are represented as mean ± SEM, and individual cells are represented as a dot (B–F). A Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunn’s posthoc test was used. For all plots, relevant p-values are reported on the graphs, and other p-values are reported below. Panel (B) vs NT: WT (p>0.9999), LV (p>0.9999), WT + LV (p=0.0171), GS (p=0.0002), WT + GS (p=0.0056) vs WT: LV (p>0.9999), WT + LV (p=0.5596), and WT + GS (p=0.2871); panel (C) vs NT: WT (p>0.9999), LV (p>0.9999), WT + LV (p>0.9999), GS (p>0.9999), WT + GS (p=0.2326) vs WT: LV (p>0.9999), WT + LV (p>0.9999), GS (p>0.9999), and WT + GS (p>0.9999); panel (D) vs NT: WT (p=0.0025), LV (p>0.9999), WT + LV (p=0.0095), GS (p=0.0016), WT + GS (p=0.0007) vs WT: WT + LV (p>0.9999), GS (p>0.9999), and WT + GS (p>0.9999); panel (E) vs NT: WT (p>0.9999), LV (p>0.9999), WT + LV (p=0.0016), GS (p>0.9999), WT + GS (p>0.9999) vs WT: LV (p=0.8377), WT + LV (p=0.0993), GS (p>0.9999), and WT + GS (p>0.9999); panel (F) vs NT: WT (p<0.0001), LV (p>0.9999), WT + LV (p=0.0010), GS (p=0.2394), WT + GS (p=0.0014) vs WT: WT + LV (p=0.9001), and WT + GS (p=0.7680). For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements
TRPM3 expression in the human cerebellum.

(A and B) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization of human cerebellar nuclei annotated on the basis of marker genes for the developing (A) and adult cerebellum (B). (C and D) The same UMAP visualization of human cerebellar nuclei as panel (A) and (B), now representing the expression of TRPM3 for the developing (C) and adult cerebellum (D), respectively. (E and F) Dot plot showing the expression of one selected marker gene per cell type for the developing (E) and adult cerebellum (F). The size of the dot represents the percentage of nuclei within a cell type in which that marker was detected, and its color represents the average expression level. (G) Dot plot showing the expression of one selected marker gene per region of the rhombic lip (RL). Data set of TRPM3 in developing cerebellum adapted from Aldinger et al., 2021. Data set of TRPM3 in adult cerebellum adapted from Lake et al., 2018.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
RNA expression of TRPM3 in humans.

(A) RNA-seq tissue data generated by the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project, reported as nTPM (normalized protein-coding transcripts per million), corresponding to mean values of the different individual samples from each tissue. (B) Illustration of human brain RNA expression levels, where darker color represents higher expression patterns. (C) Illustration of the human brain, where each color represents a different brain region. (D) GTEx human brain RNA-seq dataset reported as nTPM. Colors correspond to panel (C). Figures were adapted from the human protein atlas (https://www.proteinatlas.org/).

Figure 5—figure supplement 2
TRPM3 expression in adult cortex and developing cerebellum.

(A) UMAP visualization of human cortical nuclei annotated on the basis of marker genes. (B) UMAP visualization of human developing cerebellar nuclei annotated on the basis of post conception weeks (PCW). (C and D) The same UMAP visualization of human nuclei as panel (A) and (B), now representing the expression of TRPM3 for the adult cortex (C) and developing cerebellum (D), respectively. (E) Dot plot showing the expression of one selected marker gene per cell type for the adult cortex. The size of the dot represents the percentage of nuclei within a cell type in which that marker was detected, and its color represents the average expression level. Data set of TRPM3 in adult cortex adapted from Velmeshev et al., 2019. Data set of TRPM3 in developing cerebellum adapted from Aldinger et al., 2021.

Tables

Table 1
Overview patient information.
Patient12345 (Son of 6)6 (Father of 5)78910
MethodExome trioExome trioPanel NGSPanel NGSExome trioGenome trioPanel NGSExome trioExome trioExome trio
Age at last examination13 years7.5 years20 years30 months21 years45 years16 years4 years10 years3 years
SexFFFFMMFFFF
OFC (SD)0−2.5−2−2.5MM−1−1.8+1+1.5
Height (SD)0na−3−2.5+0.5+0.5−1.896.5 cmna0
Weight (SD)+0.5nana−2.5<+50na16 kg−0.5+1.8
Pregnancy or delivery eventNoPlacenta accretaNoClub footMild pre-eclampsiaReduced fetal movementsNoC-section
Breech position
Pre-eclampsia C-sectionNo
Maternal treatmentNoNoNoNoEnoxaparin injectionsCodeine –tooth abscessAntiretroviral therapyNoNoHeparine therapy
Birth (weeks)40Full term4140Full term42na393740
Birth OFC (cm)33.5na3634.5nana3435.6nana
Birth weight (g)3020350031403150309033603080357026373430
Birth length (cm)44na4847nana47.550.8na50
First signs (age)Unstable gait (14 months)Poor visual contact (1 month)Hypotonia and poor visual contact (first weeks)Lack of visual pursuit (3 months)Motor delay (first months)Mild learning difficultiesPoor visual contact (first weeks) and abnormal ocular movementsFeeding difficulties hypotonia and no visual tracking (3 months)Neonatal hypotonia and abnormal ocular movementsMotor delay (first months)
Hypotonia first monthsNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNo
Achieved psychomotor milestonesAble to walk unaided (ataxic)Able to walk with aidAble to sit, hypotonia, moves on the buttocks, and poor visual contactUnstable head, hypotonia, and unable to followAble to walk unaided after motor delayAble to sit unaided with delayAble to walk unaided after motor delayUnable to walkUnable to walkAble to sit: 12 months
Walking age25 m (ataxic)4 years with aidNot acquiredNot acquired19 monthsNormal20 monthsNot acquiredNot acquired24 months
AtaxiaYesYesSevere hypotonianaNoNoYes, improving; at 16: very mildna (unable to walk)NoYes
TremorYesNoNoNoNoNoYes (hands)NoNoNo
DysmetriaYesnananaNoNoVery mild and adiadococinesiaYesNona
DysarthriaYesnananaNoNonaNon-verbalNona
DystoniaNonaYesNoNoNohand ‘crispation’NonaNo
Abnormal movementsMyocloniesnaSaccadic gesticulationNoNoNoSyncinesiaStereotyped hand movementnaAtaxia
AmyotrophyYesnanananananananaNo
Epilepsy (age and treatment)NoFebrile seizures (5 years, no treatment)NoDoubtful seizures and abundant interictal discharges (4 years, primidone)Nocturnal epilepsy generalized tonic-clonic (7 years, no treatment)NoNoDoubtfulNeonatal episodes (uncertain)Yes (30 m, primidone)
EEG: age/findings/(Wake W/Sleep S)na5 years: Background slowing (W); episodes of sharp waves in the fronto-central regions (S)1/8 years: Normal (W/S)30 months: Normal EEG 4 years: Background slowing, alpha central since 6 m, biparietal spikes, no epilepticus during slow-wave sleep (ESES; W/S)7 years: bifrontal synchronous spike and waves discharges (W)nana3 years: Generalized -background slowing, no eptileptic dicharges (W/S)Several before 10 years: Normal (W/S)2.5 years: ESES (W/S)
Pain insensitivity (Y/N)?NoYesnanaYesYesnanaNoYes
Heat insensitivityNoNonanaNoYesnaYesNona
LanguageNormalMonosyllabicAbsentAbsentDelayedNormalSlightly delayed then normalNon-verbal
(picture cards)
Non-verbal (picture cards)Delayed
Intellectual deficiencyNormal low/mild IDSevere–moderateSevereProbably severeModerateMildVery mild-low normalModerateSevereYes
Behavior anomaliesNoNoNoNoFood-seekingNoNoYesOccasional outbursts and stereotypies Aggressivity
Autism spectrum disorder (Y/N)?NoNoPoor contact (severe ID)Poor contact (severe ID)NoNoNoNoYesYes
SchoolSpecial school (attention deficit and slow)Specialized institutionInstitution for children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilitiesnaSpecial educationNormal then special educationMainstream school with support measures, able to read, writing difficulties, and slowFoundation for Blind School making slow progressnana
EvolutionProgressProgressStableStableProgressProgressProgressProgress but episodes of mild psychomotor regression concomitant with behavioral fluctuationsnaProgress
Ocular
anomalies
Strabismus, saccadic breakdown
of smooth pursuit
Abnormal eye pursuitStrabismusNoHypermetropia and left convergent squintNoNystagmusCortical visual impairment, nystagmus, and strabismusDisconjugate nystagmusStrabismus
Skeletal
anomalies
12th hypoplastic rib pairPes calcaneovalgusCongenital hip luxation – later paralytic kyphoscoliosisnaLeft Perthes’ diseaseNoValgus foot and patellar dislocationNoHip dysplasiaBrachydactyly
OthersSmall genitalia, delayed puberty, and gynecomastiaSkin tags and dry palmar skinPrognathismFailure to thrive (milk protein allergy and GERD)Feedings difficulties G-tube fedImmune thrombocytopenia and hypochromic microcytic anemia
MRI (age)3 years 8 months: cerebellar atrophy, increased at 10 years6 months: normal 2 years 2 months: cerebellar vermis and hemispheres atrophy4 months: ‘normal’ 8 months: brainstem and cerebellar atrophy, short corpus callosum1 years 4 months: brainstem and cerebellar atrophyNormalNot doneVery mild localized atrophy of cerebellar hemispheresNormalNot done*Normal (3 years)
Mutation NM_001366145.2c.1841A>T p.(Asp614Val)c.2305C>G p.(Leu769Val)c.3004G>T p.(Val1002Leu)c.3005T>G p.(Val1002Gly)c.3019G>A p.(Gly1007Ser)c.3019G>A p.(Gly1007Ser)c.3019G>A p.(Gly1007Ser)c.3376A>G p.(Asn1126Asp)c.3376A>G p.(Asn1126Asp)c.3397T>C p.(Ser1133Pro)
Inheritancede novode novode novode novoInherited from the fatherde novode novode novode novode novo
  1. Abbreviations: NGS = Next Generation Sequencing; OFC = occipitofrontal circumference.

  2. *

    Cerebral computed tomography (CT) at 5 years: Periventricular white matter loss.

  3. CT normal.

  4. repetitive hyperventilation.

Table 2
Overview used splice isoforms.
Splice isoformStartExon 8Exon 15Exon 17Exon 24Exon 28Functionality*
AJ505026.1 Exon 2+ShortSplicedNormal
NM_001366141.2 Exon 1+ShortFullNormal
NM_001366145.2 Exon 2++ShortFullNormal
NM_001366147.2 Exon 2+++ShortFullNo activity
  1. *

    Normal functionality refers to whole-cell currents activated by ligands including pregnenolone sulfate (PS), CIM0216, and clotrimazole, with biophysical properties as described in Held et al., 2015 and Vriens et al., 2014.

Table 3
Characteristics of the variants.
VariantgnomADSIFTCADDPROVEANDANN
c.1841A>T p.(Asp614Val)AbsentDeleterious25.3Damaging0.9865
c.2305C>G p.(Leu769Val)AbsentTolerated25.9Damaging0.9986
c.3004G>T p.(Val1002Leu)AbsentTolerated24.8Damaging0.9969
c.3005T>G p.(Val1002Gly)AbsentDeleterious26.3Damaging0.9973
c.3019G>A
p.(Gly1007Ser)
AbsentDeleterious27.8Damaging0.9986
c.3376A>G p.(Asn1126Asp)AbsentTolerated28.4Damaging0.9977
c.3397T>C p.(Ser1133Pro)AbsentDeleterious27.2Damaging0.9987
  1. Characteristics of the variants (database, predicted pathogenicity). Overview of the different variants and the identification protocol.

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lydie Burglen
  2. Evelien Van Hoeymissen
  3. Leila Qebibo
  4. Magalie Barth
  5. Newell Belnap
  6. Felix Boschann
  7. Christel Depienne
  8. Katrien De Clercq
  9. Andrew GL Douglas
  10. Mark P Fitzgerald
  11. Nicola Foulds
  12. Catherine Garel
  13. Ingo Helbig
  14. Katharina Held
  15. Denise Horn
  16. Annelies Janssen
  17. Angela M Kaindl
  18. Vinodh Narayanan
  19. Christina Prager
  20. Mailys Rupin-Mas
  21. Alexandra Afenjar
  22. Siyuan Zhao
  23. Vincent Th Ramaekers
  24. Sarah M Ruggiero
  25. Simon Thomas
  26. Stéphanie Valence
  27. Lionel Van Maldergem
  28. Tibor Rohacs
  29. Diana Rodriguez
  30. David Dyment
  31. Thomas Voets
  32. Joris Vriens
(2023)
Gain-of-function variants in the ion channel gene TRPM3 underlie a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders
eLife 12:e81032.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81032