1. Cell Biology
  2. Neuroscience

Gain-of-function variants in the ion channel gene TRPM3 underlie a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders

  1. Lydie Burglen
  2. Evelien Van Hoeymissen
  3. Leila Qebibo
  4. Magalie Barth
  5. Newell Belnap
  6. Felix Boschann
  7. Christel Depienne
  8. Katrien De Clercq
  9. Andrew GL Douglas
  10. Mark P Fitzgerald
  11. Nicola Foulds
  12. Catherine Garel
  13. Ingo Helbig
  14. Katharina Held
  15. Denise Horn
  16. Annelies Janssen
  17. Angela M Kaindl
  18. Vinodh Narayanan
  19. Christina Prager
  20. Mailys Rupin-Mas
  21. Alexandra Afenjar
  22. Siyuan Zhao
  23. Vincent Th Ramaekers
  24. Sarah M Ruggiero
  25. Simon Thomas
  26. Stéphanie Valence
  27. Lionel Van Maldergem
  28. Tibor Rohacs
  29. Diana Rodriguez
  30. David Dyment
  31. Thomas Voets  Is a corresponding author
  32. Joris Vriens  Is a corresponding author
  1. Centre de référence des malformations et maladies congénitales du cervelet, Départementde Génétique, APHP, Sorbonne University, France
  2. Developmental Brain Disorders Laboratory, Imagine Institute, France
  3. Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of cellular and molecular medicine, University of Leuven, Belgium
  4. VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Belgium
  5. Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department Development & Regeneration, University of Leuven, Belgium
  6. Department of Genetics, University Hospital of Angers, France
  7. Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Neurogenomics Division, Center for Rare Childhood Disorders, United States
  8. Charité – Universitäts medizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Germany
  9. Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany
  10. University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
  11. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, United States
  12. Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
  13. Service de Radiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, Médecine Sorbonne Université, France
  14. Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Charité - Universitäts medizin Berlin, Germany
  15. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Charité - Universitäts medizin Berlin, Germany
  16. Charité – Universitäts medizin Berlin, Center for Chronically Sick Children, Germany
  17. Department of Neuropediatrics, University Hospital of Angers, France
  18. Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States
  19. Division Neuropediatrics, University Hospital Liège, Belgium
  20. Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, United Kingdom
  21. Sorbonne Université, Service de Neuropédiatrie, Hôpital Trousseau AP-HP, France
  22. Centre de Génétique Humaine, Université de Franche-Comté Besançon, France
  23. Center of Clinical Investigation 1431, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, France
  24. Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Canada
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81032
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Lydie Burglen
  2. Evelien Van Hoeymissen
  3. Leila Qebibo
  4. Magalie Barth
  5. Newell Belnap
  6. Felix Boschann
  7. Christel Depienne
  8. Katrien De Clercq
  9. Andrew GL Douglas
  10. Mark P Fitzgerald
  11. Nicola Foulds
  12. Catherine Garel
  13. Ingo Helbig
  14. Katharina Held
  15. Denise Horn
  16. Annelies Janssen
  17. Angela M Kaindl
  18. Vinodh Narayanan
  19. Christina Prager
  20. Mailys Rupin-Mas
  21. Alexandra Afenjar
  22. Siyuan Zhao
  23. Vincent Th Ramaekers
  24. Sarah M Ruggiero
  25. Simon Thomas
  26. Stéphanie Valence
  27. Lionel Van Maldergem
  28. Tibor Rohacs
  29. Diana Rodriguez
  30. David Dyment
  31. Thomas Voets
  32. Joris Vriens
(2023)
Gain-of-function variants in the ion channel gene TRPM3 underlie a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders
eLife 12:e81032.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81032
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

TRPM3 is a temperature- and neurosteroid-sensitive plasma membrane cation channel expressed in a variety of neuronal and non-neuronal cells. Recently, rare de novo variants in TRPM3 were identified in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, but the link between TRPM3 activity and neuronal disease remains poorly understood. We previously reported that two disease-associated variants in TRPM3 lead to a gain of channel function . Here, we report a further 10 patients carrying one of seven additional heterozygous TRPM3 missense variants. These patients present with a broad spectrum of neurodevelopmental symptoms, including global developmental delay, intellectual disability, epilepsy, musculo-skeletal anomalies, and altered pain perception. We describe a cerebellar phenotype with ataxia or severe hypotonia, nystagmus, and cerebellar atrophy in more than half of the patients. All disease-associated variants exhibited a robust gain-of-function phenotype, characterized by increased basal activity leading to cellular calcium overload and by enhanced responses to the neurosteroid ligand pregnenolone sulfate when co-expressed with wild-type TRPM3 in mammalian cells. The antiseizure medication primidone, a known TRPM3 antagonist, reduced the increased basal activity of all mutant channels. These findings establish gain-of-function of TRPM3 as the cause of a spectrum of autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental disorders with frequent cerebellar involvement in humans and provide support for the evaluation of TRPM3 antagonists as a potential therapy.

Editor's evaluation

This important study is of interest to scientists and clinicians working to understand genetic causes of neurodevelopmental disability, cerebellar ataxia, and epilepsy. It represents the most comprehensive functional characterization of disease-causing mutations in the TRPM3 gene and includes a discussion of novel cerebellar signs and symptoms affecting a subset of affected individuals. Using calcium imaging and electrophysiology, solid evidence is provided that disease-causing mutations have a gain-of-function phenotype when expressed together with WT subunits, as in the patients in the study who are heterozygous for the mutations.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81032.sa0

Introduction

TRPM3, a member of the transient receptor potential (TRP) superfamily of tetrameric ion channels, is a Ca2+-permeable cation channel activated by increasing temperature and by ligands, including the endogenous neurosteroid pregnenolone sulfate (PS; Vriens et al., 2011; Wagner et al., 2008). The channel is best known for its role in peripheral somatosensory neurons, where it is involved in heat sensation and in the development of pathological pain (Vriens et al., 2011; Su et al., 2021; Vangeel et al., 2020). In addition, TRPM3 is expressed in kidney, eye, pancreas, and several regions of the CNS, such as the hippocampal formation, the choroid plexus, and the cerebellum, but little is known about the channel’s physiological role in these brain tissues (Grimm et al., 2003; Oberwinkler et al., 2005; Zamudio-Bulcock et al., 2011).

Rare de novo nonsynonymous coding variants in neuronally expressed genes are frequent causes of global developmental delay (GDD) and intellectual disability (ID) (Rauch et al., 2012). Recently, de novo variants in TRPM3 were reported in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathy (DEE), including 16 patients with the recurrent missense variant p.Val1002Met and two additional patients with the variants p.Pro1102Gln and p.Ser1367Thr, respectively (de Sainte Agathe et al., 2020; Dyment et al., 2019; Gauthier et al., 2021; Kang et al., 2021; Lines et al., 2022; see results and Figure 1 for further discussion and details on numbering of TRPM3 variants). These patients consistently present with moderate-to-severe GDD and ID, variably associated with other clinical features such as childhood-onset epilepsy, hypotonia, altered heat, and/or pain sensitivity and variable facial dysmorphism. Functional characterization of the p.Val1002Met and p.Pro1102Gln variants in heterologous expression systems indicated that both lead to a gain of channel function (Van Hoeymissen et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). However, the relation between TRPM3 channel function and neuronal disease remains poorly understood, and it is unknown whether other variants in TRPM3 can cause human disease.

Figure 1 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Overview of the TRPM3 gene and location of the different variants.

(A) Exon-intron structure and alternative splicing of TRPM3. Percentages above colored exons indicate the percentage of transcripts that include the indicated exons in human cerebellar RNA-seq analyses. Exons included for numbering of the disease-associated variants are indicated in gray, blue, and green, resulting in the functional channel construct indicated in (B). Variant numbering was based on the amino acid position of the mutated residue in the NM_001366145.2 isoform. See text for more details.

Here, we report the clinical characteristics of 10 individuals exhibiting one of seven previously unreported heterozygous missense variants and highlight a novel cerebellar phenotype observed in more than half of the patients. Functional characterization of the newly discovered TRPM3 missense variants in a human cell line revealed a consistent and robust increase in channel activity when co-expressed with wild-type (WT) TRPM3 subunits. These findings establish gain-of-function variants in TRPM3 as pathogenic, causing an autosomal dominant neurodevelopmental syndrome with frequent cerebellar involvement.

Results

Organization of the human TRPM3 gene and alternative splicing in the cerebellum

The TRPM3 primary transcript can undergo alternative splicing at multiple sites, leading to a large number of potential splice variants that encode gene products of different lengths. More specifically, there are two alternative, mutually exclusive first exons (exon 1 and exon 2), potential exon skipping at exons 8, 15, and 17, an alternative 5’ splice site in exon 24, and intron retention in the final exon 28 (Figure 1A). Recent studies indicate that alternative splicing can have an important impact on TRPM3 channel functionality: the presence of exon 17 is essential for inhibitory regulation of TRPM3 by the Gβγ subunit of trimeric G proteins (Behrendt et al., 2020), whereas the use of alternative 5’ splice sites in exon 24 leads to channel isoforms with either a short or a long pore loop, exhibiting distinct cation selectivity and sensitivity to the neurosteroid PS (Oberwinkler et al., 2005; Held et al., 2022; Held et al., 2015; Held and Tóth, 2021). However, the impact of other splicing events on channel function remains unclear, with several splice variants that can be heterologously expressed as channels with indistinguishable functional properties (Zhao et al., 2020; Behrendt et al., 2020; Held et al., 2022). The existence of multiple transcripts has caused ambiguity in the amino acid numbering of channel variants in patients, and the frequency of the different alternative splicing events in disease-relevant tissue is currently unknown.

To address this issue, we analyzed a publicly available RNA-seq dataset from human cerebellum and used the Sashimi plot feature of the Integrative Genomics Viewer to quantify the frequency of the different potential alternative splicing events. This analysis indicates that the large majority of transcripts in human cerebellum use exon 2 as first exon (85%), have a short pore loop (>98%), and do not undergo intron retention in exon 28 (82%). Moreover, a variable number of transcripts included the optional exons 8 (12%), 15 (41%), and 17 (85%). A construct using exon 2 as the start exon, with a short pore, including all three optional exons as well as the full exon 28 (transcript variant NM_001366147.2), corresponding to a protein of 1744 amino acids, did, however, not yield a functional channel upon heterologous expression in HEK293T cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). In contrast, a construct lacking the lowly expressed exon 8 (transcript NM_001366145.2) yielded robust TRPM3-dependent signals upon expression in HEK293T cells, as assessed using Fura-2-based calcium microfluorimetry and whole-cell patch-clamp experiments. This included robust responses to PS stimulation and potentiation by co-application of PS + clotrimazole (Vriens et al., 2014; Figure 1—figure supplement 1). We propose to use the latter transcript as the reference for variant numbering, as it represents the longest functional splice variant that includes all exons that are frequently used in human brain tissue and covers all human disease-associated TRPM3 variants. For instance, according to this nomenclature, the recurrent variant initially indicated as p.Val837Met (de Sainte Agathe et al., 2020; Dyment et al., 2019; Gauthier et al., 2021; Lines et al., 2022) will be named p.Val1002Met.

Identification of TRPM3 variants in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders

Through collaborations and research networks, we ascertained 10 patients carrying TRPM3 variants (8 females, 2 males; age 21 months to 45 years). Eight individuals carried a de novo variant, while one male patient had inherited the variant from his mildly affected father. Like patients harboring the recurrent p.Val1002Met TRPM3 variant, patients with the novel variants presented with a neurodevelopmental disorder of variable severity, variably associated with skeletal abnormalities and epilepsy. Clinical summaries of the patients are presented in Table 1, summarizing the core phenotypic features of the 10 patients. The first symptoms were observed within the first year of life in 8 out of 10 patients and included hypotonia, poor visual contact or pursuit, and motor delay. In one patient, the first concern was an unstable, ataxic standing at 14 months. One patient showed a slight motor delay in childhood and had mild intellectual deficiency but was only diagnosed when his son was investigated for the same condition. Gross motor milestones were delayed in 9 out of 10 patients, autonomous walking was achieved late, between 19 and 25 months in 4 out of 10 patients, walking with aid in one patient at 4 years, and walking was not achieved in 4 out of 10 patients (ages 21 months, 3 years, 10 years, and 20 years at time of study). Patients were stable or made developmental progress, but one individual had several episodes of behavioral changes with irritability, which were associated with transient degradation in motor skills. Four patients had cerebellar ataxia, and two other patients showed severe hypotonia without weakness and with nystagmus that may be related to cerebellar involvement. Language development was normal in 3 out of 10 patients, delayed in 3 patients, and absent in 4 patients. Two of the latter are able to communicate using non-verbal tools like pictograms. Intellectual deficiency was observed in all subjects, ranging from a low normal-mildly reduced IQ in 3 out of 10 patients to severe intellectual deficiency in 4 patients. There were no striking behavioral anomalies, except for patient n° 5 who displayed food-seeking behavior responsible for his obesity. One patient had febrile seizures. Epilepsy was diagnosed in only two patients: one patient had nocturnal generalized tonic-clonic seizures since 7 years of age, and a further patient had electrical status epilepticus during slow-wave sleep (ESES). Moreover, in a third patient, epilepsy was doubtful, and an epileptic therapy was started (patient n° 4). Note that sleep EEGs were not performed in all patients. None was refractory to antiseizure medication. None of the patients had hearing loss, and there was not a clearly recognizable facial dysmorphism. Notably, 7 out of 10 patients showed skeletal anomalies: hip subluxation (Wagner et al., 2008), patellar dislocation (Vriens et al., 2011), Perthes’ disease (Vriens et al., 2011), brachydactyly (Vriens et al., 2011), valgus foot (Wagner et al., 2008), and rib hypoplasia (Vriens et al., 2011). Two patients had a statural growth restriction, and 3 out of 10 patients showed mild proportional secondary microcephaly. Cranial MRI was normal in 3 out of 8 patients. However, a substantial number of patients showed cerebellar atrophy (5 out of 8 patients): vermian and cerebellar hemispheres atrophy in patients n° 1–4 (Figure 2 and Table 1) and a localized partial atrophy of both cerebellar hemispheres in patient n° 7 (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Serial cranial MRI performed in three patients showed that the atrophy was progressive and was not present in MRI performed in the first months of life (Figure 2). Finally, 4 out of 10 patients exhibit pain insensitivity, and 2 patients showed heat insensitivity.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Successive MRI of several patients carrying different TRPM3 variants.

*Normal MRI: the fissures of the vermis and cerebellar hemispheres are nearly virtual. (a–i) MRI of the patients showing variable widening of the cerebellar fissures (arrows) reflecting cerebellar (vermis and/or hemispheres) atrophy. (a–d) Patient 1, MRI at 3 years 8 months showing slight atrophy of the vermis (a-sagittal T1) and cerebellar hemispheres (B-coronal T1); and majoration of the atrophy at 10 years (c-sagittal T1 and d-coronal T2), (e–f) Patient 3; MRI at 8 years 6 months: severe atrophy of the vermis (arrow) and brainstem (star), and atrophy of the cerebellar hemispheres (sagittal and coronal T1). (g–j) successive MRIs in patient showing progressive atrophy (g: 2 years 2 months; h: 6 months; i–j: 4 years 2 months). (k and l) Patient 4; MRI at 1 years 4 months: small vermis, thin brainstem (star) and atrophy of the cerebellar hemispheres (sagittal and coronal T1).

Table 1
Overview patient information.
Patient12345 (Son of 6)6 (Father of 5)78910
MethodExome trioExome trioPanel NGSPanel NGSExome trioGenome trioPanel NGSExome trioExome trioExome trio
Age at last examination13 years7.5 years20 years30 months21 years45 years16 years4 years10 years3 years
SexFFFFMMFFFF
OFC (SD)0−2.5−2−2.5MM−1−1.8+1+1.5
Height (SD)0na−3−2.5+0.5+0.5−1.896.5 cmna0
Weight (SD)+0.5nana−2.5<+50na16 kg−0.5+1.8
Pregnancy or delivery eventNoPlacenta accretaNoClub footMild pre-eclampsiaReduced fetal movementsNoC-section
Breech position		Pre-eclampsia C-sectionNo
Maternal treatmentNoNoNoNoEnoxaparin injectionsCodeine –tooth abscessAntiretroviral therapyNoNoHeparine therapy
Birth (weeks)40Full term4140Full term42na393740
Birth OFC (cm)33.5na3634.5nana3435.6nana
Birth weight (g)3020350031403150309033603080357026373430
Birth length (cm)44na4847nana47.550.8na50
First signs (age)Unstable gait (14 months)Poor visual contact (1 month)Hypotonia and poor visual contact (first weeks)Lack of visual pursuit (3 months)Motor delay (first months)Mild learning difficultiesPoor visual contact (first weeks) and abnormal ocular movementsFeeding difficulties hypotonia and no visual tracking (3 months)Neonatal hypotonia and abnormal ocular movementsMotor delay (first months)
Hypotonia first monthsNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesNo
Achieved psychomotor milestonesAble to walk unaided (ataxic)Able to walk with aidAble to sit, hypotonia, moves on the buttocks, and poor visual contactUnstable head, hypotonia, and unable to followAble to walk unaided after motor delayAble to sit unaided with delayAble to walk unaided after motor delayUnable to walkUnable to walkAble to sit: 12 months
Walking age25 m (ataxic)4 years with aidNot acquiredNot acquired19 monthsNormal20 monthsNot acquiredNot acquired24 months
AtaxiaYesYesSevere hypotonianaNoNoYes, improving; at 16: very mildna (unable to walk)NoYes
TremorYesNoNoNoNoNoYes (hands)NoNoNo
DysmetriaYesnananaNoNoVery mild and adiadococinesiaYesNona
DysarthriaYesnananaNoNonaNon-verbalNona
DystoniaNonaYesNoNoNohand ‘crispation’NonaNo
Abnormal movementsMyocloniesnaSaccadic gesticulationNoNoNoSyncinesiaStereotyped hand movementnaAtaxia
AmyotrophyYesnanananananananaNo
Epilepsy (age and treatment)NoFebrile seizures (5 years, no treatment)NoDoubtful seizures and abundant interictal discharges (4 years, primidone)Nocturnal epilepsy generalized tonic-clonic (7 years, no treatment)NoNoDoubtfulNeonatal episodes (uncertain)Yes (30 m, primidone)
EEG: age/findings/(Wake W/Sleep S)na5 years: Background slowing (W); episodes of sharp waves in the fronto-central regions (S)1/8 years: Normal (W/S)30 months: Normal EEG 4 years: Background slowing, alpha central since 6 m, biparietal spikes, no epilepticus during slow-wave sleep (ESES; W/S)7 years: bifrontal synchronous spike and waves discharges (W)nana3 years: Generalized -background slowing, no eptileptic dicharges (W/S)Several before 10 years: Normal (W/S)2.5 years: ESES (W/S)
Pain insensitivity (Y/N)?NoYesnanaYesYesnanaNoYes
Heat insensitivityNoNonanaNoYesnaYesNona
LanguageNormalMonosyllabicAbsentAbsentDelayedNormalSlightly delayed then normalNon-verbal
(picture cards)		Non-verbal (picture cards)Delayed
Intellectual deficiencyNormal low/mild IDSevere–moderateSevereProbably severeModerateMildVery mild-low normalModerateSevereYes
Behavior anomaliesNoNoNoNoFood-seekingNoNoYesOccasional outbursts and stereotypies ‡Aggressivity
Autism spectrum disorder (Y/N)?NoNoPoor contact (severe ID)Poor contact (severe ID)NoNoNoNoYesYes
SchoolSpecial school (attention deficit and slow)Specialized institutionInstitution for children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilitiesnaSpecial educationNormal then special educationMainstream school with support measures, able to read, writing difficulties, and slowFoundation for Blind School making slow progressnana
EvolutionProgressProgressStableStableProgressProgressProgressProgress but episodes of mild psychomotor regression concomitant with behavioral fluctuationsnaProgress
Ocular
anomalies		Strabismus, saccadic breakdown
of smooth pursuit		Abnormal eye pursuitStrabismusNoHypermetropia and left convergent squintNoNystagmusCortical visual impairment, nystagmus, and strabismusDisconjugate nystagmusStrabismus
Skeletal
anomalies		12th hypoplastic rib pairPes calcaneovalgusCongenital hip luxation – later paralytic kyphoscoliosisnaLeft Perthes’ diseaseNoValgus foot and patellar dislocationNoHip dysplasiaBrachydactyly
OthersSmall genitalia, delayed puberty, and gynecomastiaSkin tags and dry palmar skinPrognathismFailure to thrive (milk protein allergy and GERD)Feedings difficulties G-tube fedImmune thrombocytopenia and hypochromic microcytic anemia
MRI (age)3 years 8 months: cerebellar atrophy, increased at 10 years6 months: normal 2 years 2 months: cerebellar vermis and hemispheres atrophy4 months: ‘normal’ 8 months: brainstem and cerebellar atrophy, short corpus callosum1 years 4 months: brainstem and cerebellar atrophyNormalNot done†Very mild localized atrophy of cerebellar hemispheresNormalNot done*Normal (3 years)
Mutation NM_001366145.2c.1841A>T p.(Asp614Val)c.2305C>G p.(Leu769Val)c.3004G>T p.(Val1002Leu)c.3005T>G p.(Val1002Gly)c.3019G>A p.(Gly1007Ser)c.3019G>A p.(Gly1007Ser)c.3019G>A p.(Gly1007Ser)c.3376A>G p.(Asn1126Asp)c.3376A>G p.(Asn1126Asp)c.3397T>C p.(Ser1133Pro)
Inheritancede novode novode novode novoInherited from the fatherde novode novode novode novode novo

  1. Abbreviations: NGS = Next Generation Sequencing; OFC = occipitofrontal circumference.

  2. *

    Cerebral computed tomography (CT) at 5 years: Periventricular white matter loss.

  3. †

    CT normal.

  4. ‡

    repetitive hyperventilation.

Genetic analyses identified seven novel TRPM3 heterozygous variants in a total of 10 affected patients (Table 1 and Figure 1). All variants were absent from the gnomAD database and predicted to be pathogenic according to at least two out of four prediction meta-analysis programs like REVEL (CADD, DANN, and PROVEAN; Table 3; Quang et al., 2015). Eight variants occurred de novo, and one was inherited from the affected father. Sequence alignment at positions D614, L769, V1002, G1007, P1102, N1126, and S1133 shows that the variants are located in highly conserved areas, both across orthologs from multiple species (Drosophila, zebrafish, mouse, rat, and macaca) and in the most closely related homologs within the TRPM subfamily, namely TRPM1, TRPM6, and TRPM7 (Figure 1—figure supplement 3). The previously identified and novel disease-associated variants localize to different regions of TRPM3, including the cytosolic N-terminus (D614V and L769V), the transmembrane region (V1002M, V1002G, V1002L, G1007S, and P1102Q), and the cytosolic C-terminus of the channel (N1126D, S1133P, and S1392T; Figure 1—figure supplement 3).

When mapped on the recent cryo-EM structure of TRPM3 in the closed state and in the presence of Gβγ (pdb:8DDQ; Zhao and MacKinnon, 2023), it can be noted that many of the disease-associated variants cluster at the interface between the transmembrane domain and the cytosol (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Notably, the N-terminal L769 sits in close proximity to V1002 and G1007 at the cytosolic end of transmembrane helix S4 and the S4-S5 linker, whereas N1126 and S1133 are located in the cytosolic TRP helix, which runs parallel to the plasma membrane, in close proximity to the S4-S5 linker. Thus, disease-associated variants affecting these residues are localized in a region that is critically involved in the gating of TRP and related voltage-gated cation channels. Interestingly, residue D614 is located in a cytosolic loop that is disordered in the cryo-EM structures. In the structure of the TRPM3 channel subunit in contact with nanobody-tethered Gβγ (pdb:8DDQ), D614 is located just adjacent to the TRPM3-Gβγ interaction site (Behrendt et al., 2020; Zhao and MacKinnon, 2023) raising the possibility that charge neutralization in the D614V variant may affect Gβγ-dependent channel regulation (Figure 1—figure supplement 2).

Functional expression of disease-related TRPM3 variants

To address whether the seven newly identified variants affect TRPM3 channel activity, we introduced the corresponding point mutations into a previously well-characterized human TRPM3 expression vector for heterologous expression (Van Hoeymissen et al., 2020). Fura-2-based calcium imaging in transfected HEK293T cells was used to evaluate basal channel activity and responses to the TRPM3 antagonist primidone (Krügel et al., 2017) and to investigate the sensitivity toward stimulation via the agonist PS. In line with earlier work, cells transfected with the WT TRPM3 construct showed a small increase in basal intracellular calcium concentration ([Ca2+]i) compared to non-transfected (NT) cells. In WT transfected cells, the cytosolic [Ca2+]i decreased slightly in response to treatment with a high dose of primidone (100 µM; Figure 3A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 1 and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). The primidone dose was based on earlier work, demonstrating a lower sensitivity of TRPM3 variants p.Val1002Met and p.Pro1102Gln toward primidone stimulation (Van Hoeymissen et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020).

Figure 3 with 4 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Homozygous mutant expression in HEK293T cells.

(A) Time course of intracellular calcium concentrations ([Ca2+]i) (± SEM) upon application of the TRPM3 inhibitor primidone (100 µM) for wild-type (WT; black; n=449), and homozygous V1002M (green; n=271), V1002G (blue; n=257), and G1007S (red; n=409) transfected HEK293T cells, and non-transfected (NT; gray; n=982; N=3 independent measurements). (B) Mean basal intracellular calcium concentrations, [Ca2+]I, in the absence (full bars) and presence of primidone (100 µM; striped bars). Data are represented as mean ± SEM, using a two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s posthoc test. p-Values of baseline vs WT: NT (p=0.8376), D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p>0.9999), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p<0.0001), P1102Q (p=0.0018), N1126D (p<0.0001), S1133P (p<0.0001); p-values baseline vs primidone: NT (p>0.9999), WT (p=0.9994), D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p>0.9999), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p=0.5663), P1102Q (p=0.0138), N1126D (p<0.0001), S1133P (p<0.0001). (C) Time course of [Ca2+]I (± SEM) for WT (black) (n=243), D614V (green) (n=220), L794V (blue) (n=420) and V1002L (red) (n=264) transfected HEK293T cells, and non-transfected (NT; gray) (n=452) upon application of pregnenolone sulfate (PS; 40 µM) (N=3 independent measurements). (D) Corresponding calcium amplitudes of the PS response, represented as mean ± SEM, using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunnett’s posthoc test (p-values vs WT: D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p<0.0001), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p=0.0006), P1102Q (p=0.0102), N1126D (p=0.0098), S1133P (p<0.0001)). For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

When overexpressing the newly identified TRPM3 variants, with the exception of the L769V variant, we consistently observed basal [Ca2+]i levels that were significantly higher compared to NT cells or cells transfected with WT-TRPM3, an effect that was most pronounced for the V1002G variant (Figure 3A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 1 and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Except for the L769V and the G1007S variant, application of primidone caused a reduction of [Ca2+]i, albeit not to the levels of NT cells (Figure 3A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 1 and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). These results indicate that the patient variants lead to increased basal TRPM3 activity. A more mixed result was obtained when assessing the responses of the variants to the neurosteroid agonist PS. Compared to WT-TRPM3, PS responses were increased for the D614V, N1126D, and S1133P variants and reduced for the L769V, V1002G, V1002L, and G1007S variants (Figure 3C and D, Figure 3—figure supplement 2 and Figure 4—figure supplement 2).

Note that all described patients are heterozygous for the specific TRPM3 variants and thus possess one WT allele. To mimic the patient situation in our cellular assay, we performed experiments in HEK293T cells transfected with a mixture of cDNA encoding WT and variant TRPM3 in a 1:1 ratio. Under these conditions, significantly higher basal [Ca2+]i levels for all WT/variant mixtures were observed compared to cells expressing only WT-TRPM3, with the exception of the P1102Q and N1126D variant, where the elevated basal [Ca2+]i levels were found not to be significant. Moreover, under these heterozygous conditions, primidone caused a reduction in basal [Ca2+]i for all tested variants with higher basal [Ca2+]i levels (Figure 4A and B, Figure 3—figure supplement 1 and Figure 4—figure supplement 1). Finally, cells co-expressing WT-TRPM3 with any of the newly discovered disease-associated variants consistently exhibited larger PS-induced Ca2+ responses (Figure 4C and D, Figure 3—figure supplement 2 and Figure 4—figure supplement 2).

Figure 4 with 3 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Heterozygous mutant + wild-type (WT) expression in HEK293T cells.

(A) Time course of [Ca2+]I ± SEM upon application of the TRPM3 inhibitor primidone (100 µM) for WT (black; n=449), and heterozygous WT + V1002 M (green; n=373), WT + V1002 G (blue; n=482), and WT + G1007 S (red) (n=561) transfected HEK293T cells, and non-transfected (NT; gray; n=982; N=3 independent measurements). (B) Mean basal [Ca2+]I ± SEM in the absence (full bars) and presence of primidone (striped bars). A two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s posthoc test was used. p-Values of baseline vs WT: NT (p=0.6733), D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p<0.0001), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p<0.0001), P1102Q (p=0.9249), N1126D (p=0.5539), and S1133P (p<0.0001); p-Values baseline vs primidone: NT (p>0.9999), WT (p=0.9994), D614V (p<0.0001), L794V (p<0.0001), V1002M (p<0.0001), V1002G (p<0.0001), V1002L (p<0.0001), G1007S (p<0.0001), P1102Q (p=0.8205), N1126D (p=0.5132), and S1133P (p<0.0001). (C) Time course of [Ca2+]I (± SEM) for WT (black; n=243), WT + D614V (green; n=281), WT + L794V (blue; n=497) and WT + V1002L (red; n=276) transfected HEK293T cells, and non-transfected (NT; gray; n=452) upon application of pregnenolone sulfate (PS; 40 µM; N=3 independent measurements). (D) Corresponding calcium amplitudes of the PS response, represented as mean ± SEM, using a Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA with Dunnett’s posthoc test (p-values vs WT: D614V [p<0.0001], L794V [p<0.0001], V1002M [p<0.0001], V1002G [p=0.0155], V1002L [p<0.0001], G1007S [p<0.0001], P1102Q [p=0.0564], N1126D [p=0.0277], and S1133P [p<0.0001]). For these experiments, the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1 was used.

Since the calcium imaging experiments suggested that the L769V and G1007S variants had opposite effects on channel activity when expressed alone vs combined with WT subunits, we further evaluated their functionality using whole-cell patch-clamp electrophysiology. We measured whole-cell TRPM3 currents in response to a voltage step protocol ranging from –160 mV to +160 mV (Figure 4—figure supplement 3), both at baseline and upon stimulation with PS. At room temperature, and in the absence of activating ligand, WT-TRPM3 carries a small, outwardly rectifying current (Vriens et al., 2011; Wagner et al., 2008). We observed that cells expressing WT + L769 V, G1007S, and WT + G1007 S produced robust outwardly rectifying currents, whereas currents in cells expressing only L769V were not different from those in NT cells (Figure 4—figure supplement 3B). Upon stimulation with PS, robust outwardly rectifying currents were evoked in cells expressing WT, WT + L769 V, G1007S, and WT + G1007 S, whereas currents in cells expressing L769V were not different from those in NT controls (Figure 4—figure supplement 3D). Notably, in cells expressing WT + L769V, we measured an increase in inward current at –160 mV when compared to NT controls, reminiscent of the inwardly rectifying current component observed in the V1002M variant (Figure 4—figure supplement 3E; Van Hoeymissen et al., 2020).

Since the G1007S variant showed a reduced Ca2+ response to PS stimulation in the homozygous condition, but a significantly increased PS response in the heterozygous condition, we tested the concentration dependence of the response to PS for this variant using a calcium-based assay performed in a plate-reader system. These experiments revealed a shift of the concentration-response curve to lower PS concentrations for the heterozygous, but not for the homozygous condition (EC50 value of 2.9±0.3 µM, 4.0±0.5 µM, and 1.1±0.1 µM for, respectively, WT-TRPM3, homozygous G1007S, and heterozygous WT + G1007 S transfected HEK293 cells; Figure 3—figure supplement 3). Taken together, these data demonstrate that all patient variants are dominant gain-of-function mutations, provoking significantly increased basal activity resulting in cellular calcium overload, as well as enhanced PS-induced responses.

To investigate whether alterations in the cellular expression levels of the variant TRPM3 channel subunits contribute to the increased channel activity, we measured single-cell yellow fluorescence protein (YFP) fluorescence and basal [Ca2+]i levels in HEK293T cells transfected with the different TRPM3 variants (either alone or in combination with WT-TRPM3) and compared them with levels in cells transfected with WT-TRPM3 on the same experimental day. For variants V1002L, G1007S, N1126D, and S1133P, YFP levels were not higher than in cells expressing WT-TRPM3, similar to our earlier observations for the V1002M and P1102Q variants (Van Hoeymissen et al., 2020; Figure 3—figure supplement 4). In cells expressing the L769V variant in the absence of WT subunits, which do not show a response to the channel antagonist primidone or the channel agonist PS (Figure 3), cellular YFP values were significantly reduced compared to WT (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). However, normal YFP levels were found in cells co-expressing the L769V variant with WT (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). Finally, in the case of D614V and V1002G variants, cellular YFP levels were significantly higher than WT control, both under homozygous and heterozygous conditions (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). To evaluate whether the increased basal activity for these variants is a mere consequence of the increased channel expression levels, we plotted basal [Ca2+]i vs cellular YFP levels for individual cells expressing either WT, variant, or WT + variant. This analysis revealed that, in cells with similar YFP fluorescence, basal [Ca2+]i levels were consistently higher for cells expressing the D614V and V1002G variants, either alone or with WT subunits (Figure 3—figure supplement 4).

Taken together, these data indicate that elevated basal [Ca2+]i levels in cells expressing disease-associated TRPM3 variants can be attributed to increased activity of individual channels rather than to increased channel protein expression.

Discussion

TRPM3 is a calcium-permeable cation channel belonging to the melastatin subfamily of TRP channels. It functions as a heat- and neurosteroid-activated channel in peripheral sensory neurons of the trigeminal and dorsal root ganglia (Vangeel et al., 2020) but is also expressed in other tissues, including the CNS (Figure 5—figure supplement 1). Recently, three de novo variants in the TRPM3 gene were identified in patients with DEE (de Sainte Agathe et al., 2020; Dyment et al., 2019; Gauthier et al., 2021; Kang et al., 2021; Lines et al., 2022). The 16 patients heterozygous for the common recurrent variant (V1002M), share a number of clinical features including GDD, moderate to severe ID, with or without childhood-onset epilepsy (Lines et al., 2022).

Here, we describe patients carrying one of seven novel de novo variants in the TRPM3 gene. These patients present with a large spectrum of neurodevelopmental symptoms, including GDD and ID, variably associated with seizures, skeletal anomalies, and insensitivity to pain and heat. Intellectual deficiency as well as motor disabilities are highly variable, from polyhandicap to very mild impact compatible with parentality and normal life in adulthood. We highlight a cerebellar phenotype (ataxia or severe hypotonia, nystagmus or abnormal oculomotricity, and cerebellar atrophy) in more than half of the patients as a novel feature of the TRPM3-linked disease pattern. The cerebellum is known to integrate neuronal networks coupling motor function with cognition, emotional skills, and language (Leto et al., 2016; Sathyanesan et al., 2019; Schmahmann, 2019). Distortion of cerebellar development could induce (cerebellar) diseases (Sathyanesan et al., 2019). Abundant RNA expression of TRPM3 in the brain is already described (Held and Tóth, 2021); however, limited knowledge is available on the functional expression of TRPM3 in the CNS, including cerebellar Purkinje cells and oligodendrocytes (Zamudio-Bulcock et al., 2011; Held and Tóth, 2021; Hoffmann et al., 2010; Oberwinkler and Philipp, 2014). By reanalyzing publicly available single cell RNA sequencing datasets of the developing (Aldinger et al., 2021) and adult (Lake et al., 2018) cerebellum and adult cortex (Velmeshev et al., 2019), it becomes apparent that TRPM3 is robustly expressed in different cell types of these brain regions (Figure 5 and Figure 5—figure supplement 2). Highest expression of TRPM3 in the adult cortex (Velmeshev et al., 2019) was found in layer 5/6 neurons (Figure 5—figure supplement 2A, C, E). Furthermore, TRPM3 expression was observed in distinct cellular clusters of the adult cerebellum (Lake et al., 2018), including neuronal (e.g. distinct cerebellar granule cells and Purkinje neurons) and non-neuronal (e.g. cerebellar-specific astrocytes) cell types (Figure 5B, D and F). Interestingly, prominent TRPM3 expression was observed in early stages of the developing cerebellum (Figure 5—figure supplement 2B, D) and detected in different cell types (Figure 5A, C and E), including excitatory cerebellar and unipolar brush cell interneurons, and Purkinje cells (Aldinger et al., 2021). Highest expression is noted in cells of the rhombic lip (Figure 5A, C, E and G), where TRPM3 is expressed in all four zones: choroid plexus epithelium, intermediate zone, subventricular zone, and ventricular zone (Aldinger et al., 2021). Interestingly, low RNA levels were detected in different muscle types (Figure 5—figure supplement 1A). This might suggest that hypotonia in most of the patients (Table 1) is most likely caused by malfunctioning of the neuronal innervation of the skeletal muscles, probably related to a cerebellar defect. Taken together, the expression data of TRPM3 in the CNS points toward an important role of the channel in specific brain regions, both in the early developmental and adult stage.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
TRPM3 expression in the human cerebellum.

(A and B) Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) visualization of human cerebellar nuclei annotated on the basis of marker genes for the developing (A) and adult cerebellum (B). (C and D) The same UMAP visualization of human cerebellar nuclei as panel (A) and (B), now representing the expression of TRPM3 for the developing (C) and adult cerebellum (D), respectively. (E and F) Dot plot showing the expression of one selected marker gene per cell type for the developing (E) and adult cerebellum (F). The size of the dot represents the percentage of nuclei within a cell type in which that marker was detected, and its color represents the average expression level. (G) Dot plot showing the expression of one selected marker gene per region of the rhombic lip (RL). Data set of TRPM3 in developing cerebellum adapted from Aldinger et al., 2021. Data set of TRPM3 in adult cerebellum adapted from Lake et al., 2018.

As it is known in some other congenital ataxia, we observed that cerebellar atrophy could be progressive in a patient who has a clinically non-progressive disorder. This should encourage repetition of brain imaging in the early years of life in ataxic children. Although clinical variability, even intra-familial, is observed with the same mutation, we point on some possible genotype-phenotype correlation to be confirmed in larger series, with p.(Gly1007Ser) being associated with a milder phenotype and p.(Asn1126Asp) with a more severe phenotype.

Functional characterization of the newly identified TRPM3 variants revealed a pronounced gain-of-function phenotype for all variants in the heterozygous (WT + mutant) condition. Typically, cells expressing these variants along with the WT channel displayed an elevated intracellular calcium concentration and increased calcium responses upon stimulation with PS. These characteristics are consistent with the previously described gain-of-function TRPM3 variants p.(Val1002Met) and p.(Pro1102Gln) (Van Hoeymissen et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020).

The different disease-associated gain-of-function variants occur in different parts of the TRPM3 channel, including the cytosolic N-terminus, the transmembrane region, and the cytosolic C-terminus, suggesting that they increase channel activity via distinct mechanisms (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). Based on fluorescent tagging of the channels, we can exclude increased protein expression levels as an underlying mechanism, suggesting that the variants affect channel gating or membrane localization (Figure 3—figure supplement 4). In this respect, it is interesting to note that when mapped on the recent cryo-EM structure of TRPM3, the affected residues L769, V1002, G1007, N1126, and S1133 cluster at the interface between the transmembrane domain and the cytosol, in the gating of TRPM3 and related channels with six transmembrane domains (Figure 1—figure supplement 2; Owsianik et al., 2006). The D614V variant is located adjacent to exon 17, in a region that is not resolved in the cryo-EM structures of the entire TRPM3 channel but forms the N-terminal interaction site for the binding of the Gβγ subunits of trimeric G proteins, leading to channel inhibition (Badheka et al., 2017; Dembla et al., 2017; Quallo et al., 2017). Intriguingly, our previous results showed a reduced sensitivity toward Gβγ-dependent modulation for the p.(Val1002Met) variant compared to WT transfected cells (Van Hoeymissen et al., 2020). Further work will be needed to clarify whether increased activation of the D614V variant occurs (partly) via disturbed binding of the Gβγ subunits. Interestingly, there are known mutations in the upstream genetic component guanine nucleotide-binding protein beta 1 (GNB1) causing severe neurodevelopmental disability, hypotonia, and seizures (Petrovski et al., 2016). In addition, other mutations in GNB2 (Fukuda et al., 2020) and GNB5 (Lodder et al., 2016) are observed in patients with neurodevelopmental disorders. Potentially, these neurodevelopmental phenotypes could be partially explained via dysregulation of downstream TRPM3 activity.

Notably, L769V was the only variant that exhibited no functional activity when expressed in the absence of WT channel subunits, whereas it caused a gain-of-function in the presence of WT subunits, which corresponds to the situation in the cells of the heterozygous patients. One possible explanation could be that the variation in the N-terminus affects proper trafficking of the homotetrameric channel to the plasma membrane and that this trafficking deficit can be rescued by heteromeric channels composed of WT and variant subunits. Clearly, further research is needed to pinpoint the molecular and cellular mechanisms that lead to the gain-of-function caused by the channel variants and to reveal the pathophysiological mechanisms whereby altered channel function leads to the complex symptoms encountered by the patients.

Importantly, the increased channel activity under basal conditions and associated increased basal calcium levels observed with all the characterized disease-associated TRPM3 variants can be blocked by application of a high dose of the antiepileptic drug primidone, which has been identified as a direct TRPM3 antagonist in in vitro studies and in animal models (Krügel et al., 2017). Since plasma levels in subjects taking primidone are expected to be sufficiently high to cause significant inhibition of TRPM3 activity, it will be of great interest to evaluate whether the drug can alleviate or revert symptoms in patients carrying disease-associated TRPM3 variants.

Taken together, we have described seven novel variants in patients with a TRPM3-associated neurodevelopmental syndrome. The clinical phenotype of these patients is variable, with GDD and ID as consistent features. Epileptic seizures, skeletal anomalies, and pain insensitivity are observed in a subset of patients, and more than half of the patients presented with a cerebellar phenotype (ataxia or severe hypotonia, nystagmus, or abnormal oculomotricity) associated with a progressive cerebellar atrophy. We propose that TRPM3 should be added in NGS panels designed for the diagnosis of epilepsy, ID, and congenital ataxia. The disease-associated variants consistently result in a pronounced gain of channel function, providing strong support for the hypothesis that increased channel activity, potentially leading to neuronal hyperexcitability and cellular calcium overload, underlies a spectrum of TRPM3 channelopathies.

Materials and methods

Patient recruitment and genomic sequencing

Request a detailed protocol

Patients with TRPM3 variants were recruited through GeneMatcher (Sobreira et al., 2015) or previous collaboration between the participating teams. Clinical data of each patient as well as brain images were reviewed by the clinicians (geneticists, neuropediatricians, and radiologists) from the participating centers. Sequencing and genetic analyses were performed in the respective centers on a clinical basis. The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines specified by the institutional review boards (IRBs) and ethics committees at each institution. In seven patients, trio whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed (patients 1, 2, 5, 6, and 8–10), while comprehensive multi-gene panel (NGS targeted panel analysis) was performed in three other patients (patients 3, 4, and 7). Confirmation of the variants was performed using targeted Sanger sequencing in probands and parents. All parents agreed on sharing and publishing the patients data.

Ethics statement

Request a detailed protocol

Patients 1, 3, 4, and 7: For these patients, clinical genetic services and a genetic testing were done as part of routine clinical care. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the probands for molecular genetic analysis and possible publication of the anonymized clinical data. The study was done in accordance with local research and ethics requirements. Patient 2: Parents signed an informed consent, received a genetic counseling before and after the analysis, and the genetic study was performed in accordance with German and French ethical requirements and laws. Data sharing was performed using anonymized genetic and clinical information. Patient 5: The patient was identified via the Deciphering Developmental Disorders (DDD) study, which was granted by the UK ethical approval by the Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (10/H0305/83). Patient 6: This patient was identified through diagnostic testing as part of their routine clinical care within the UK National Health Service and so no specific institutional ethical approval was required. Patient 8: Informed consent for participation was obtained from subjects themselves or, where necessary, their parents. The study was completed per protocol in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki with local approval by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) IRB (15–12226). Patient 9: The participating family signed the IRB research protocol of the University of Pennsylvania division of Neurology. Patient 10: The participating family, consisting of the mother, father, and female proband, provided written consent and was enrolled into the Center for Rare Childhood Disorders (C4RCD) research protocol at the Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen). Written consent for the proband under the age of 18 years was obtained from the parents. The study protocol and consent documents were approved by the Western IRB (WIRB # 20120789). The retrospective analysis of epilepsy patient data was approved by the local ethics committees of the Charité (approval no. EA2/084/18).

Patient information

Patient 1

Request a detailed protocol

The proband is the first child from non-consanguineous healthy parents. She has a healthy brother. No medical history in the family was reported. She was born at term without significant pregnancy history. Birth parameters were within normal limits. Initially, psychomotor development was described as normal, with head holding before 3 months, and she was able to sit at around 8 months. The first parental concerns occurred at 14 months as the first steps were abnormally unstable. A neurological assessment at 2 years noted ataxic of stance and gait, and dysmetria. The child evolved with a motor delay and acquired autonomous but unsteady walking at 25 months. She evolved with cerebellar motor symptoms, ataxia of stance and gait, dysmetria, adiadochokinesia, intention tremor, dysarthria, and saccadic breakdown of smooth pursuit with strabismus. The onset of speech appeared normally despite dysarthria. During its evolution, until the last examination at 13 years, she made motor progress, walking is less ataxic, but she had persistent tremor in fine motor skills and severe dysarthria. She never had seizure. She had a neuropsychological assessment at 10 years which showed mild ID (total IQ not calculable because of the heterogeneity of the scores). Difficulties were more marked in executive functions (perseveration, distractibility, and disorder of emotion regulation) and visuospatial function. She was in normal school and had intervention aids such as speech therapy, physiotherapy, and adapted educational equipment. She needed help because of lack of autonomy and emotional immaturity. Brain MRIs performed at 3 years 8 months showed cerebellar atrophy, predominant on the superior cerebellar vermis (Figure 2), which had increased at 10 years. Trio WES identified a de novo, heterozygous, missense variant in the TRPM3 gene (M_001366145.2:c.1841A>T; p.[Asp614Val]).

For this patient, clinical genetic services and a genetic testing were done as part of routine clinical care. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the probands for molecular genetic analysis and possible publication of the anonymized clinical data. The study was done in accordance with local research and ethics requirements.

Patient 2

Request a detailed protocol

She was born from healthy unrelated parents. Pregnancy, delivery, and birth parameters were normal. Poor visual contact was noticed in the first month of life. Ophthalmological examination revealed a severely reduced central visual acuity, photophobia, normal funduscopy, and a mitigated photopic and scotopic ERG responses with normal flash evoked visual responses. These findings were compatible with a mainly central retinal dysfunction. She also had a Mittendorf cataract at the right eye. MRI performed at 6 months was considered normal. At 11 months, she was able to smile, but she had axial hypotonia, poor visual contact, was unable to sit, and had hand wringing. She had no feeding difficulties. MRI was performed at 16 months and showed a slight enlargement of cerebellar sulci. She progressed slowly, and at 5 years, she was able to walk with assistance, with unsteady gait. She had febrile seizures. Wake EEG showed background slowing without epileptic discharges, and she had some episodes of sharp waves in the fronto-central regions during the night. Head circumference (HC) was at –2.5 SD. She had pes calcaneovalgus and slight dysmorphism, with wide nasal bridge, thin upper lip, and pointed chin. Parents reported a low reactivity to pain when specifically asked the question. At that time, MRI showed cerebellar atrophy (Figure 2), confirmed by MRI at 4 years. Trio exome sequencing identified the NM_001366145.2:c.2305C>G, p.(Leu769Val) de novo, heterozygous TRMP3 missense variant.

Parents signed an informed consent and received a genetic counseling before, and after the analysis, and the genetic study was performed in accordance with German and French ethical requirements and laws. Data sharing was performed using anonymized genetic and clinical information.

Patient 3

Request a detailed protocol

Patient 3 is the second child of healthy parents. Her brother was healthy. She was born at 41 weeks after an uneventful pregnancy. Her birth parameters were normal (weight 3140 g; length 48 cm; HC 36 cm). Left hip luxation was treated by abduction splint for 6 months. She had hypotonia and feeding difficulties from the first weeks, and her development was significantly delayed. She was able to attain head control and independent sitting but was never able to stand alone or walk. She had a paralytic thoracolumbar kyphoscoliosis requiring surgical treatment at 15 years old. She had failure to thrive, and her HC growth slowed in the first months to reach −2 SD. At 20 years of age, she had profound IDs and multiple disabilities. She was able to grasp the objects with dysmetria. She had no language due to her severe intellectual deficiency and was not able to communicate even through visual contact. Brainstem Auditorial Evoked Potential showed hearing threshold at 20 db on the left and 30 db on the right. She had stereotypies, and she never had seizures. Sleep and wake EEG were both normal (one year and 8 years). She experienced feeding difficulties with selective food, and insufficient weight and height gain were on going. MRI performed at 4 months was normal, but the following MRI at 8 month’s old showed global cerebellar atrophy that became marked at 8 years 6 months (Figure 2) and a short corpus callosum (–3 SD). Array CGH was normal. Analysis of our NGS targeted congenital ataxia panel including TRPM3 (panel designed after the diagnosis made in patient 1 using WES), identified the NM_001366145.2:c.3004G>A, p.(Val1002Leu) variant. Parental analysis confirmed that the variant was absent in both parents and occurred de novo. Parental status was confirmed using 16 polymorphic markers.

Clinical genetic services and a genetic testing were done as part of routine clinical care. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the probands for molecular genetic analysis and possible publication of the anonymized clinical data. The study was done in accordance with local research and ethics requirements.

Patient 4

Request a detailed protocol

Patient 4 is the second child of healthy parents and has a healthy brother. Pregnancy was notable by the finding of clubfeet on fetal ultrasound. Amniocentesis was performed, and karyotype was normal. Delivery was normal at 40 weeks of gestation, and birth parameters were normal. At 3 months, parents worried about a lack of visual pursuit. Complete ophthalmological examination (including fundus, ERG) was normal. The child was hypotonic and was not able to hold her head at 18 months. At 2 ½ years, she had growth restriction (weight and height at −2.5 SD) and secondary microcephaly (HC −2.5 SD). She was still unable to sit, but her tone improved slightly. She could not grab but was able to hold the toy placed in contact with her hand. She had poor visual contact. She babbled but was unable to pronounce words. She had no spasticity. She had no clinical seizures and normal EEG at this time. Control with a 24 hr EEG recorded at 4 years old showed discharges of bi-centro-parietal spikes during wake and sleep, without electrical status epilepticus during slow-wave sleep. There was no obvious motor or behavioral modification, but sometimes apneas occurred at beginning of the discharges, making clinical seizures possible. Primidone was recently started; however, at the moment, we do not have enough hindsight to judge the effectiveness of primidone. MRI performed at 1 year and 4 months showed a small vermis with slight atrophy, atrophy of cerebellar hemispheres, and thin brainstem with small protuberance (Figure 2). Array CGH was normal. Analysis of our NGS targeted congenital ataxia panel including TRPM3 (panel designed after the diagnosis made in patient 1 using WES), identified the NM_001366145.2:c.3005T>G; p.(Val1002Gly) variant. Parental analysis confirmed that the variant was absent in both parents and occurred de novo. Parental status was confirmed using 16 polymorphic markers.

Clinical genetic services and a genetic testing were done as part of routine clinical care. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the probands for molecular genetic analysis and possible publication of the anonymized clinical data. The study was done in accordance with local research and ethics requirements.

Patient 5

Request a detailed protocol

This boy is the son of patient 6. He was referred to Clinical Genetics at the age of 8 years with a history of GDD, nocturnal epilepsy, and voracious appetite. He was born at term weighing 3.09 kg following a normal pregnancy complicated only by mild pre-eclampsia from 32 weeks gestation and a maternal history of factor V Leiden requiring enoxaparin injections. His motor milestones were delayed, sitting unaided at 12 months and walking at 20 months. He required speech and language therapy from three years of age. His behavior was noted to change at around 13 months, becoming easily unsettled when he had previously been a placid baby. He developed food-seeking behavior with lack of satiety, leading to obesity. He was noted to have small genitalia and subsequently had delayed puberty with reduced testosterone levels. He has never shown any aggressive behavior and has never had regression of skills. He initially attended a mainstream school with support but subsequently transferred to special needs education. Seizures were first noted at the age of 7 years and were only present during sleep, occurring two to three times a month and gradually reducing with sodium valproate treatment, which was discontinued at the age of 14 years. Wake EEG at 7 years showed bifrontal synchronous spike and waves discharges suggestive of epileptic activity. His last seizure was at the age of 18 years. Aged 21 years, he has moderate learning difficulties and attends a college for learning life skills. He has some pain and heat insensitivity. He has had unilateral Perthes’ disease, for which he is awaiting hip replacement surgery. MRI brain did not identify any gross structural abnormalities. He had normal Fragile-X syndrome testing, normal Prader-Willi syndrome methylation analysis, and a normal karyotype. He additionally had normal methylation testing for chromosome 14 uniparental disomy. Array CGH found a maternally inherited (NCBI Build 36) 6p22.3 (18155949_18237422)×3 duplication of between 81 and 252 kb, which was not thought to account for his phenotype. Whole-exome analysis via the DDD project identified the TRPM3 NM_001366145.2:c.3019G>A, p.(Gly1007Ser), heterozygous variant inherited from his father.

The patient was identified via the DDD study, which was granted by the UK ethical approval by the Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (10/H0305/83).

Patient 6

Request a detailed protocol

This man was the father of patient 5 and was referred to Clinical Genetics for investigation of his mild learning difficulties. He was born at 42 weeks gestation weighing 3.36 kg following a normal pregnancy. His mother had required codeine analgesia for a tooth abscess early in pregnancy. There were no specific concerns regarding his motor development, although he may have sat unaided later than average and never crawled. He took his first steps at the age of1 year and developed language at a normal time. He did not display any food-seeking behavior, aggression, or regression of skills. He attended mainstream junior school but transferred to a special educational needs senior school. He has no history of seizures. He is in paid employment, undertaking manual work in a warehouse. Heat and pain insensitivity has not been formally assessed, but the patient is reported not to feel hot when wearing warm clothing in summer time and also has a history of picking at his toenails causing traumatic dystrophy without reporting this to be painful.

He had normal testing for Fragile X syndrome and a normal array CGH. Trio whole-genome sequencing identified the de novo TRPM3 variant NM_001366145.2:c.3019G>A, p.(Gly1007Ser).

This patient was identified through diagnostic testing as part of their routine clinical care within the UK National Health Service and so no specific institutional ethical approval was required.

Patient 7

Request a detailed protocol

She is the only child of unrelated parents. During the pregnancy, her mother was treated by antiretrovirals because of an HIV infection. Delivery and birth parameters were normal (3080 g, 47.5 cm, and 34 cm). The first concern was poor visual contact noted in the first weeks and later, a nystagmus and a delayed motor development. She was able to walk unaided at 20 months. Language development was only slightly delayed, and her cognitive level was in normal-low range. Audiometry was normal, and EEG was not performed in this context. At 6 years old, she was able to read but had difficulties writing and with fine motor skills in general. She was unable to climb or jump like other children. At examination, she had a mild ataxia, only detectable when she walked following a line on the floor, mild dysmetria, and nystagmus. She also had synkinesis and a prognathism. She attended mainstream school with support measures (personal school assistant, logico-mathematical reeducation, and psychomotricity). MRI performed at 2 years and 12 years showed a mild and localized atrophy of the cerebellar hemispheres (Figure 2—figure supplement 1).

At 16 years, weight is 48.6 kg, height 157 cm, and OFC 54 cm. Walk has drastically improved, and she has a slight nystagmus. She is in good health but had a recurrent patellar dislocation leading to the consideration of surgery. She is a special unit for inclusive education in a normal high school and attends a professional training in commerce.

NGS targeted ‘cerebellar anomalies’ panel identified the NM_001366145.2:c.3019G>A, p.(Gly1007Ser) missense variant in TRPM3. Parental analysis showed that the variant was de novo. Parental status was confirmed using 16 polymorphic markers.

Clinical genetic services and a genetic testing were done as part of routine clinical care. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the probands for molecular genetic analysis and possible publication of the anonymized clinical data. The study was done in accordance with local research and ethics requirements.

Patient 8

Request a detailed protocol

The patient is a 4-year-old female with GDD who was born to a 32-year-old G1 P0-1 Ab0 woman at 39 weeks by cesarean section due to breech position. Her birth weight was 3.57 kg. Pre-natal period was normal. Peri-natal period was complicated with feeding difficulties, and she remained in the hospital for 3 days. She continued with feeding difficulties and gaining weight until 8 months of age. Her formula was changed to an amino acid base, and she was diagnosed with GERD and successfully treated with lansoprazole and nizatidine.

Her development was noted to be delayed at 3 months. She was hypotonic and had no visual tracking. Her ERG was abnormal, and she was diagnosed with cortical visual impairment, strabismus, and nystagmus. She wore corrective lenses. Her brain MRI and chromosome microarray were normal. Her development has been slow, but she made progress. She can grab things with her hands, but her fine motor skills are poor, and she is unable to feed herself. She is unable to walk, but she can bear weight on her legs. She is non-verbal but uses picture cards to indicate choices and can recognize more than 20 images. She has not any seizures. Her EEGs have showed generalized background slowing, without epileptiform discharges (routine EEG and 26 hr video EEG). For the past year or two, parents have noted episodic fluctuation in her behavior. She might be very happy and playful for a week or two and then go into a period where she is irritable, crying, and is inconsolable as if in pain. With these periods of extreme irritability, there is often transient regression in her development. She might achieve things like standing, stepping with support, chewing her food, or learning to use a spoon and then she will stop doing these things for a while. Some of the episodes have been shown to be concomitant with an infection. She has no dysmorphic features, cardiac, or pulmonary problems. MRI showed only bilateral, symmetric, posterior periventricular non-specific white matter FLAIR hyperintensities.

WES identified a de novo, heterozygous, missense variant in TRPM3 gene (NM_001366145.2:c.3376A>G; p.[Asn1126Asp]) and a de novo, heterozygous, missense variant in PRPH2 c. 659 G>A, p.Arg220Gln pathogenic for a recessive retinopathy and possibly responsible for a macular phenotype when heterozygous.

Informed consent for participation was obtained from subjects themselves or, where necessary, their parents. The study was completed per protocol in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki with local approval by the CHOP IRB (15–12226).

Patient 9

Request a detailed protocol

Patient 9 is the oldest child of healthy, nonconsanguineous parents of northern European descent and was delivered by an uncomplicated cesarean section for breech presentation at 37 weeks’ gestation. Pregnancy was complicated by pre-eclampsia. She was diagnosed with bilateral hip dysplasia and was in a Pavlik harness for 3 months. Shortly after birth, she was noted to have diffuse hypotonia, hypoactive reflexes, and roving eye movements. Difficulty tracking visual stimuli was noted at about 4 weeks, and ophthalmological evaluation revealed decreased visual acuity, mild bilateral macular pigmentary changes, normal refractive indices, bilateral ptosis, and disconjugate nystagmus. By the age of 25 months, she was demonstrating few motor movements, impaired upgaze, and increased lower extremity tone. She began receiving developmental services at the age of 3 months. At the age of 10 years, she can sit unsupported, but she cannot sit independently. She can roll over. She cannot walk and does not regularly stand with support. She can reach and grab for items of interest. She can fixate on objects visually and can track them but has been diagnosed with cortical visual impairment. She can communicate with picture cards. She has a Toby device for communication but is not proficient with this. There are some behavioral outbursts. She was diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder at the age of 8 years.

She initially had interruptible staring spells and episodes of lip smacking and hand wringing shortly after birth. She was evaluated with EEG, including a 24 hr EEG at that time; the results of which were reportedly normal. She has not had any definite clinical seizures. Her parents deny any movements suspicious for seizure, including stiffening, shaking, or staring spells. Parents also deny any repetitive, purposeless movements such as hand wringing.

On examination, she has facial dysmorphism including a short philtrum, wide nasal bridge, bulbous nose tip, and epicanthal folds. She is fed via g-tube. She is capable of visual fixation and tracking briefly and is averse to a bright light shone in her eyes. She can also blink to threat bilaterally. She has intermittent, subtle, high-frequency lateral nystagmus in primary gaze and in all directions of gaze. Her muscle bulk is diffusely decreased, and she is globally hypotonic. She is unable to stand or walk. She has normal deep tendon reflexes.

MRI scans over time have demonstrated stable periventricular leukomalacia. WES demonstrated a de novo pathogenic variant in TRPM3 (NM_001366145.2:c.3376A>G; p.Asn1126Asp). Exome sequencing also revealed a single de novo loss of function (LOF) variant (c.2659dupA; p.R887Kf*42) in TUBGCP5, a gene tolerant to LOF (pLi = 0).

The participating family signed the IRB research protocol of the University of Pennsylvania division of Neurology.

Patient 10

Request a detailed protocol

The patient is a 4-year-old girl, the third child of non-consanguineous German parents. The family history was unremarkable. She was born at 40th week of gestation with a birth length of 50 cm and a birth weight of 3430 g. Her psychomotor development was delayed. At age of 12 months, she was able to sit, and at age of 24 months, she started to walk. At the age of 24 months, she began to speak. At the age of 2.5 years, EEG investigations indicated electrical status ESES. Because of the diagnosis (TRPM3 gain-of-function mutation) and the literature showing primidone as an antagonist of TRPM3, a treatment by primidone was initiated. At this time, she had ataxia that improved with primidone treatment as well as EEG.

Physical examination at age of 3 years showed a height of 94 cm (+0.05 SD), a weight of 19 kg (+1.81 SD), and an HC of 51.5 cm (+1.53 SD).

Her facial signs included a flat midface, a flat and broad nasal bridge with a broad nasal tip, upward slanting palpebral fissures, strabismus, and full lips. Her fingers were short and the metacarpal bones IV and V also appeared to be short. Her toes II to V also showed brachydactyly. Cranial MRI at the age of 3 years was normal. In addition, she had immune thrombocytopenia and hypochromic microcytic anemia.

Cytogenetic analysis and molecular karyotyping gave normal results. Trio exome sequencing identified a de novo variant in TRPM3: NM_001366145.2:c.3397T>C, p.(Ser1133Pro).

The participating family, consisting of the mother, father, and female proband, provided written consent and was enrolled into the C4RCD research protocol at the TGen. Written consent for the proband under the age of 18 years was obtained from the parents. The study protocol and consent documents were approved by the WIRB (# 20120789). The retrospective analysis of epilepsy patient data was approved by the local ethics committees of the Charité (approval no. EA2/084/18).

Comment on the numbering of TRPM3 variants and DNA constructs

Request a detailed protocol

The human TRPM3 gene contains 28 exons, and alternative splicing of the primary transcripts gives rise to a large number of splice isoforms, leading to ambiguity in the numbering of gene variants. Most of the previous reports based the numbering of disease-associated variants on the NM_020952.4 reference sequence (de Sainte Agathe et al., 2020; Dyment et al., 2019; Gauthier et al., 2021; Lines et al., 2022), including the Human Gene Mutation Database (Stenson et al., 2017) and OMIM (https://www.omim.org/), whereas NM_001007471.2 was used as reference by others (Van Hoeymissen et al., 2020; Zhao et al., 2020). In this report, we based the numbering of the TRPM3 variants on the Mane transcript NM_001366145.2 sequence (see explanation in the section ‘Organization of the human TRPM3 gene and alternative splicing in the cerebellum’ in Results).

For functional expression, we used four different WT TRPM3 constructs, representing different splice isoforms (Figure 1—figure supplement 1; Table 2; Vriens et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2020). For single-cell calcium imaging, we used the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1, with YFP directly linked to the channel’s C-terminus, cloned in the pCDNA3 vector. For plate reader-based experiments, we used the isoform corresponding to NCBI reference sequence NM_001366141.2 cloned in the pcDNA3.1(+)-N-eGFP vector. For whole-cell patch-clamp experiments, we used (a) the isoform corresponding to GenBank AJ505026.1, (b) the isoform corresponding to NCBI reference sequence NM_001366145.2, and (c) the isoform corresponding to NCBI reference sequence NM_001366147.2, both (b) and (c) were cloned in the pCAGGSM2_Ires_GFP vector. Human disease-associated variants were introduced using the standard PCR overlap extension method, and variant sequences were verified by sequencing of the entire DNA constructs (Vriens et al., 2007). As indicated in the results section, variant numbering was based on the amino acid position of the mutated residue in the NM_001366145.2 isoform. According to this numbering, the recurrent variant p.Val1027Met will be referred to as p.Val1002Met, p.Pro1127Gln as p.Pro1102Gln, and p.Ser1392Thr as p.Ser1367Thr (Table 3).

Table 2
Overview used splice isoforms.
Splice isoformStartExon 8Exon 15Exon 17Exon 24Exon 28Functionality*
AJ505026.1 Exon 2−−+ShortSplicedNormal
NM_001366141.2 Exon 1−−+ShortFullNormal
NM_001366145.2 Exon 2−++ShortFullNormal
NM_001366147.2 Exon 2+++ShortFullNo activity
  1. *

    Normal functionality refers to whole-cell currents activated by ligands including pregnenolone sulfate (PS), CIM0216, and clotrimazole, with biophysical properties as described in Held et al., 2015 and Vriens et al., 2014.

Table 3
Characteristics of the variants.
VariantgnomADSIFTCADDPROVEANDANN
c.1841A>T p.(Asp614Val)AbsentDeleterious25.3Damaging0.9865
c.2305C>G p.(Leu769Val)AbsentTolerated25.9Damaging0.9986
c.3004G>T p.(Val1002Leu)AbsentTolerated24.8Damaging0.9969
c.3005T>G p.(Val1002Gly)AbsentDeleterious26.3Damaging0.9973
c.3019G>A
p.(Gly1007Ser)		AbsentDeleterious27.8Damaging0.9986
c.3376A>G p.(Asn1126Asp)AbsentTolerated28.4Damaging0.9977
c.3397T>C p.(Ser1133Pro)AbsentDeleterious27.2Damaging0.9987

  1. Characteristics of the variants (database, predicted pathogenicity). Overview of the different variants and the identification protocol.

Sequence alignment

Request a detailed protocol

CLUSTAL Omega (1.2.4) multiple sequence alignment was used to perform the alignment and to obtain the Phylogenetic Tree. Jalview (2.11.2.4) was used for visualization.

Cell culture and transfection

Request a detailed protocol

HEK293T cells (identifier ATCCCRL-3216) were kindly provided by Dr. S Roper (University of Miami school of medicine Department of physiology and biophysics, 4044 Miami FL 33136). The cells were cultured as described previously (Vriens et al., 2007) and used up to passage number 25. The cells were tested for the lack of mycoplasma. For patch-clamp and single-cell calcium imaging, cells were transfected with 2 µg of channel cDNA using TransIT-293 transfection reagent (MirusBio) (Vriens et al., 2007) and analyzed 36–48 hr after transfection. For the intracellular Ca2+ measurements using a fluorescent microplate reader, cells were transfected with 400 ng of channel cDNA plus 1 μg of GCaMP6 using Effectene transfection reagent (Qiagen). When indicated, to mimic heterozygous conditions, a mixture of WT and TRPM3 variant cDNA was used (ratio 1:1). NT HEK293T cells were used as negative controls in all experiments.

Calcium microfluorimetry

Request a detailed protocol

The imaging system for standard single cell calcium measurements has been described before (Vriens et al., 2011). Briefly, cells were incubated with 2 µM Fura-2-acetoxymethyl ester (Thermo Fisher Scientific) in 1 ml culture medium for 20–60 min at 37°C. Fluorescent signals evoked during alternating illumination at 340 and 380 nm using a Lambda XL illuminator (Sutter Instrument, Novato, CA, USA) and recorded by an Orca Flash 4.0 camara (Hamamatsu Photonics, Belgium) on a Nikon Eclipse Ti fluorescence microscope (Nikon Benelux, Brussels, Belgium). The imaging data were recorded using NIS-element software (NIS-Elements). Absolute calcium concentrations were calculated from the ratio of the fluorescence signals at both wavelengths (F340/F380) after correction for the individual background fluorescence signals, using the Grynkiewicz equation (Grynkiewicz et al., 1985): [Ca2+]=Km × (R−Rmin)/(Rmax−R), where Km, Rmin, and Rmax were estimated from in vitro calibration experiments with known calcium concentrations. The standard imaging solution contained (in mM): 150 NaCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4 with NaOH (~320 mOsm). Calcium amplitudes were calculated as the difference between the maximum calcium concentration during the period of stimulus application and the basal value before stimulation of responding cells. At the start of the recording, cellular YFP fluorescence was determined as a measure of TRPM3 protein expression levels. All data represent the results from at least three independent coverslips.

For the intracellular Ca2+ measurements using a fluorescent microplate reader, HEK293T cells were plated on poly-D-lysine coated black-wall clear-bottom 96-well plates after 24 hr of transfection, and measurements were performed 24–48 hr after plating. Experiments were performed at room temperature in a buffer containing (in mM): 137 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose (pH 7.4) with NaOH. Intracellular Ca2+ levels were measured by a Flexstation-3 96‐well plate reader (Molecular Devices). GCaMP6 signal was detected at excitation wavelengths 485 nm, and fluorescence emission was detected at 525 nm. Various concentrations of PS were applied to activate TRPM3 channels, and 2 μM ionomycin was applied at the end of the experiment to induce the maximum calcium influx. For every experimental group, three transfections were performed, and signals from four replicates were collected for different PS concentrations within the same transfection.

Electrophysiology

Request a detailed protocol

Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were performed using an EPC‐10 amplifier and the PatchMasterPro software (HEKA Elektronik). Current measurements were done at a sampling rate of 20 kHz, and currents were digitally filtered at 2.9 kHz. In all measurements, 70% of the series resistance was compensated. The standard internal solution contained (in mM): 100 CsAsp, 45 CsCl, 10 EGTA, 10 Hepes, and 1 MgCl2 (pH 7.2 with CsOH); the standard extracellular solution contained (in mm): 150 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, and 10 Hepes (pH 7.4 with NaOH). The standard patch pipette resistance was between 2 and 4 MΩ when filled with pipette solution. All experiments were performed at room temperature (23 ± 1°C). To evaluate the channel activity at basal level and in the presence of PS (40 µM), a voltage step protocol was applied in which voltage steps of +40 mV were applied starting from –160 mV toward +160 mV with a holding potential at 0 mV.

Chemicals

All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, ionomycin was purchased from Cayman Chemical. PS and primidone were dissolved in the bath solutions from a 100 mM stock diluted in Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO).

Statistics

Calcium microfluorimetry data were analyzed with NIS-Elements software (Nikon, Japan), Excel (Microsoft, WA, USA), IgorPro 6.2 (WaveMetrics, OR, USA), and OriginPro 9.5 (OriginLab, MA, USA). RStudio Team (2020; Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA; URL http://www.rstudio.com/), GraphPad Prism (9.2.0) and OriginPro 9.5 were further used for statistical analysis and data display. All data sets were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test and depending on the outcome, a one-way ANOVA or a Kruskal-Wallis test with subsequent Tukey’s, Dunn’s, or Dunnett’s posthoc tests were performed, or a two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison was used. When having paired non-normally distributed data sets, a Wilcoxon signed rank test was performed. p-Values below 0.05 were considered as significant. Data points represent means ± SEM of the given number (n) of identical experiments. No exclusion of statistical outliers was performed in this study.

Data availability

Raw data for the following figures are made available via figshare (https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21799604): Figure 1 - Figure Supplement 1; Figure 3; Figure 3 - Figure Supplement 1, 2, 3 and 4; Figure 4; Figure 4 - Figure Supplement 1, 2 and 3.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Van Hoeymissen E
    2. Rohacs T
    (2022) figshare
    Data of Evelien Van Hoeymissen for manuscript "Gain-of-function variants in the ion channel gene TRPM3 underlie a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders".
    https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21799604

References

    1. Oberwinkler J
    2. Philipp SE
    (2014)
    Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology
    427–459, TRPM3, Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Springer, 10.1007/978-3-642-54215-2_17, 24756716.
    1. Owsianik G
    2. D’hoedt D
    3. Voets T
    4. Nilius B
    (2006)
    Structure-Function relationship of the trp channel superfamily
    Reviews of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology 156:61–90.

Decision letter

  1. Andrés Jara-Oseguera
    Reviewing Editor; The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  2. Richard W Aldrich
    Senior Editor; The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  3. Andrés Jara-Oseguera
    Reviewer; The University of Texas at Austin, United States

In the interests of transparency, eLife publishes the most substantive revision requests and the accompanying author responses.

Decision letter after peer review:

Thank you for submitting your article "Gain-of-function variants in the ion channel gene TRPM3 underlie a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders" for consideration by eLife. Your article has been reviewed by 3 peer reviewers, including Andrés Jara-Oseguera as the Reviewing Editor and Reviewer #1, and the evaluation has been overseen by Richard Aldrich as the Senior Editor.

The reviewers have discussed their reviews with one another, and the Reviewing Editor has drafted this to help you prepare a revised submission. All three reviewers were in agreement that this is a carefully done manuscript that makes important contributions that will be of interest to both clinical scientists and ion channel biophysicists. However, the reviewers raised some concerns that should be addressed before publication, which are summarized below.

Essential revisions:

1) Differences in exon composition and amino acid sequence should be clearly described for each of the five constructs that are examined in the study, both in Figure 1 and in each of the figure legends. A justification should be provided for using different background constructs to study the mutations.

2) A more detailed characterization of the mutants is required, at least in regards to their surface expression in the plasma membrane. Surface biotinylation followed by pull-down and western blotting, or using a membrane-impermeable fluorescent dye directed at the channels would be appropriate. Alternatively, the current densities of the different constructs in a sufficiently large number of cells should be evaluated using patch-clamp electrophysiology – patch-clamp experiments should be performed for at least L769V, G1007S channels expressed alone and together with WT, showing the extent of baseline channel activity, and the magnitude in the response to PS.

3) Individual data points should be included in Figure 3B, D and Figure 4B, D. For the (B) panels, data from individual cells at each of the two conditions could be linked by a line to allow readers to assess the robustness of the findings and the cell-to-cell variability. I suggest displaying the data in the (D) panels in a similar fashion, which would be more informative than how data is currently displayed.

4) A sequence alignment should be included that allows more precise and mechanistically informative mapping of the mutants onto the channel sequence. The alignment could include TRPM3 orthologues from other species, as well as other TRPM channels that are closely related and whose structures have been determined. A discussion on the relative conservation at these positions would be informative.

5) Please comment or discuss the use of such high concentrations of primidone (100 µM) when the reported KD for its block of TRPM3 is ~1µM (Krugel et al., Pain, 2017).

6) Please comment or discuss whether mutations in the upstream genetic components (receptor, Gbeta, Ggamma, or prenylation enzymes) are coincident with any of the phenotypes.

7) Patient 1: authors refer to "kinetic and static cerebellar symptoms" at 365, please specify. Kinetic and static are often dichotomous pairs used to describe tremor (is it a kinetic and static tremor that the authors are reporting here).

– Patient 1: also at 365, "ocular saccadic pursuit" is written. Is the meaning that the patient had saccadic intrusions? Dysmetric saccades? Or saccadic breakdown of smooth pursuit? The table refers to nystagmus…

8) Patient 2: line 375 says "diffuse retinal dysfunction." How was the retinal dysfunction diagnosed? Did the patient have ERG? Was it a structural finding?

9) Patient 4: line 424 "Seizures were doubtful…apneas at the beginning of discharges" is unclear. Apnea can be a clinical manifestation of seizures. A more detailed explanation is required.

10) Patient 5: Line 451 and table "spike and waves." Were these epileptiform findings generalized or focal and, if the latter, where were they located?

11) Patient 9: "nystagmoid" is used at 541 and 557. Please clarify.

12) Patient 10: CSWS is referred to in the text and ESES in the table. Use one or the other and indicate in the description of the patient whether the finding was felt to be strictly an EEG pattern or whether it was felt to be part of epileptic encephalopathy. Primidone was given, presumably directed by the genetic results: was it effective clinically and/or electrographically?

13) Please give ages that EEGs were performed for all patients who had EEGs and whether wake and sleep were recorded for each

14) Additional information or discussion should be provided about the behavior of TRPM3 channels in neurons, and ideally in neurons of the cerebellum. Other information would also be useful, is known, such as the types of neurons in the cerebellum of the brain in general that express TRPM3 channels.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81032.sa1

Author response

Essential revisions:

1) Differences in exon composition and amino acid sequence should be clearly described for each of the five constructs that are examined in the study, both in Figure 1 and in each of the figure legends. A justification should be provided for using different background constructs to study the mutations.

We thank you for this useful suggestion and we agree that additional information is required to clarify the figure legends. Information on the used isoforms are now provided in each of the figure legends. In addition, a short motivation of the different isoforms is now included in the section of Material & Methods. In addition, a additional table (Table 2) in included in the revised version of the manuscript to further clarify the different constructs.

2) A more detailed characterization of the mutants is required, at least in regards to their surface expression in the plasma membrane. Surface biotinylation followed by pull-down and western blotting, or using a membrane-impermeable fluorescent dye directed at the channels would be appropriate. Alternatively, the current densities of the different constructs in a sufficiently large number of cells should be evaluated using patch-clamp electrophysiology – patch-clamp experiments should be performed for at least L769V, G1007S channels expressed alone and together with WT, showing the extent of baseline channel activity, and the magnitude in the response to PS.

To further investigate the expression of the TRPM3 variants at the plasma membrane, we evaluated L769V and G1007S mutants in whole-cell patch-clamp experiments in both homozygous and heterozygous (WT + mutant) conditions. These additional results are now included in figure 4Supplementary figure 3 of the revised manuscript. In combination with the YFP fluorescent measurements, they provide further support for our conclusions that the mutations lead to increased channel activity. A detailed study of potential effects on channel trafficking and stability at the plasma membrane of all the different disease-associated variants, with and without co-expression of WT TRPM3, is ongoing, but falls beyond the scope of the present study.

3) Individual data points should be included in Figure 3B, D and Figure 4B, D. For the (B) panels, data from individual cells at each of the two conditions could be linked by a line to allow readers to assess the robustness of the findings and the cell-to-cell variability. I suggest displaying the data in the (D) panels in a similar fashion, which would be more informative than how data is currently displayed.

We thank the reviewers for this suggestion. We agree that adding individual datapoints is more informative as it allows the reader to assess the robustness of our data. However, since there are many data points per condition, plotting the individual datapoints over the bar plots will make the figure rather complicated and unclear. Therefore, we added supplementary figures (Figure 4 —figure supplement 1, 2), displaying the individual data points.

4) A sequence alignment should be included that allows more precise and mechanistically informative mapping of the mutants onto the channel sequence. The alignment could include TRPM3 orthologues from other species, as well as other TRPM channels that are closely related and whose structures have been determined. A discussion on the relative conservation at these positions would be informative.

We have followed the suggestion of the reviewers and included a sequence alignment, including TRPM3 orthologues from other species as well as other members of the TRPM family. This additional information convincingly showed the conservation of the amino acid residues in TRPM3 orthologues from other species (Drosophila, Zebrafish, mouse, rat, macaca). The alignment with other members of the TRPM subfamily illustrates that all of the residues are conserved in the close homologues of TRPM3 namely TRPM1, TRPM6 and TRPM7. In other non-closely related TRPM members (TRPM4, TRPM5, TRPM2 and TRPM8) some residues are no longer present and substituted by other residues. This additional information is included in the additional Figure 1 —figure supplement 3. Moreover, we now included a figure mapping the residues on the very recent TRPM3 cryo-EM structure and additional discussion, which provides further mechanistically relevant information.

5) Please comment or discuss the use of such high concentrations of primidone (100 µM) when the reported KD for its block of TRPM3 is ~1µM (Krugel et al., Pain, 2017).

We acknowledge that we used a very high concentration of primidone compared to the described IC50 value. The main motivation for this is that some of the mutants were less sensitive for primidone compared to wild-type TRPM3, as published in our earlier work (Van Hoeymissen et al., eLife, 2020) and work of others (Zhao S et al., 2020, eLife). Primidone was used to illustrate that the elevated basal cytosolic calcium concentrations were caused by the basal overactivity of the variants. References to this work is now included in the revised version of the manuscript.

6) Please comment or discuss whether mutations in the upstream genetic components (receptor, Gbeta, Ggamma, or prenylation enzymes) are coincident with any of the phenotypes.

We included a short paragraph in the discussion where we comment on the possible link between genetic variant in TRPM3 and previously described upstream genetic components. Indeed, there are some known mutations in the GNB11, GNB22 and GNB53 gene causing similar phenotypes as the patients described in this work.

Petrovski S, Kury S, Myers CT, Anyane-Yeboa K, Cogne B, Bialer M, et al. Germline de novo Mutations in GNB1 Cause Severe Neurodevelopmental Disability, Hypotonia, and Seizures. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;98(5):1001-10.

Fukuda T, Hiraide T, Yamoto K, Nakashima M, Kawai T, Yanagi K, et al. Exome reports A de novo GNB2 variant associated with global developmental delay, intellectual disability, and dysmorphic features. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63(4):103804.

Lodder EM, De Nittis P, Koopman CD, Wiszniewski W, Moura de Souza CF, Lahrouchi N, et al. GNB5 Mutations Cause an Autosomal-Recessive Multisystem Syndrome with Sinus Bradycardia and Cognitive Disability. Am J Hum Genet. 2016;99(3):704-10

7) Patient 1: authors refer to "kinetic and static cerebellar symptoms" at 365, please specify. Kinetic and static are often dichotomous pairs used to describe tremor (is it a kinetic and static tremor that the authors are reporting here).

We appreciate the comments of the referees concerning the lack of patient information. The requested information is included in the manuscript. The patient had a complete cerebellar motor syndrome: ataxia of stance, ataxic gait, dysmetria, adiadochokinesia, intention tremor, dysarthria and saccadic pursuit.

– Patient 1: also at 365, "ocular saccadic pursuit" is written. Is the meaning that the patient had saccadic intrusions? Dysmetric saccades? Or saccadic breakdown of smooth pursuit? The table refers to nystagmus…

The patient did not show eye movements during clinical observation. In young patients, only a clinical examination for abnormal eye movements is performed, and therefore it is difficult to be highly specific in the description of the abnormal ocular movements. Unlike adults, eye movements recording in young children is difficult and not routinely performed in our center, particularly in disabled children.

We performed only a clinical examination and concluded to saccadic breakdown of smooth pursuit.

This information is included in the table and the clinical description.

8) Patient 2: line 375 says "diffuse retinal dysfunction." How was the retinal dysfunction diagnosed? Did the patient have ERG? Was it a structural finding?

The patient had a severely reduced central visual acuity, photophobia, normal funduscopy and a mitigated photopic and scotopic ERG responses with normal flash evoked visual responses. These findings were compatible with a mainly central retinal dysfunction. She also had a Mittendorf cataract at the right eye. The table and clinical summary have been corrected in the revised manuscript.

9) Patient 4: line 424 "Seizures were doubtful…apneas at the beginning of discharges" is unclear. Apnea can be a clinical manifestation of seizures. A more detailed explanation is required.

We thank you for the comment, and agree with the comment that the sentence was not clear. Indeed, apnea can be a clinical manifestation of seizures and because of this doubt, the EEG anomalies, and the nature of the gene, a primidone therapy was started as noted in the table. We missed to report the therapy in the clinical summary in the submitted manuscript (noted in table). The sentence in the clinical description was corrected and clarified: There was no obvious motor or behavioral modification, but sometimes apneas occurred at beginning of the discharges, making clinical seizures possible. Primidone was started but, because the beginning of this therapy is recent in this child, we do not have enough hindsight to judge its effectiveness. We also added a sentence in the results part (line 176).

10) Patient 5: Line 451 and table "spike and waves." Were these epileptiform findings generalized or focal and, if the latter, where were they located?

The EEG showed bifrontal synchronous spike and waves discharges. There was also frequent right sided spike and wave discharges over posterior temporal/centroparietal area. This clarification is added in the clinical summary.

11) Patient 9: "nystagmoid" is used at 541 and 557. Please clarify.

The patient 9 had disconjugate nystagmus. This clarification has been corrected in the clinical summary of the manuscript.

12) Patient 10: CSWS is referred to in the text and ESES in the table. Use one or the other and indicate in the description of the patient whether the finding was felt to be strictly an EEG pattern or whether it was felt to be part of epileptic encephalopathy. Primidone was given, presumably directed by the genetic results: was it effective clinically and/or electrographically?

This was harmonized : we describe the EEG anomalies as ESES (Electrical status epilepticus during slowwave sleep) in the manuscript and in the table. It was only an EEG pattern, the patient did not have clinical seizures. Because of the TRPM3 diagnosis, and the literature showing that primidone is an antagonist of TRPM3, primidone was started and was effective clinically on ataxia and EEG normalized.

This additional information has been modified in the description of patient 10 in the manuscript.

13) Please give ages that EEGs were performed for all patients who had EEGs and whether wake and sleep were recorded for each

The age and conditions of EEG have been added in the clinical summary and table, when missing.

14) Additional information or discussion should be provided about the behavior of TRPM3 channels in neurons, and ideally in neurons of the cerebellum. Other information would also be useful, is known, such as the types of neurons in the cerebellum of the brain in general that express TRPM3 channels.

We thank the reviewers for this suggestion. We agree that adding additional information on the expression of TRPM3 in the brain would be informative for the reader and therefore reanalyzed publicly available single cell RNA sequencing datasets of the developing and adult cerebellum and adult cortex. Shortly, this expression data points towards an important role of TRPM3 in specific brain tissues both in early development and adult stage. This additional information is included in the Discussion section, in Figure 5 and in the additional Figure 5 —figure supplement 1,2.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81032.sa2

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lydie Burglen

    1. Centre de référence des malformations et maladies congénitales du cervelet, Départementde Génétique, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
    2. Developmental Brain Disorders Laboratory, Imagine Institute, Paris, France
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – original draft
    Contributed equally with
    Evelien Van Hoeymissen
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  2. Evelien Van Hoeymissen

    1. Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of cellular and molecular medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    2. VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
    3. Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department Development & Regeneration, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Lydie Burglen
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3897-8998

  3. Leila Qebibo

    Centre de référence des malformations et maladies congénitales du cervelet, Départementde Génétique, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Magalie Barth

    Department of Genetics, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  5. Newell Belnap

    Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Neurogenomics Division, Center for Rare Childhood Disorders, Phoenix, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Felix Boschann

    Charité – Universitäts medizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. Christel Depienne

    Institute of Human Genetics, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Katrien De Clercq

    1. Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of cellular and molecular medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    2. VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
    3. Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department Development & Regeneration, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Contribution
    Data curation, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. Andrew GL Douglas

    University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  10. Mark P Fitzgerald

    Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  11. Nicola Foulds

    Wessex Clinical Genetics Service, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  12. Catherine Garel

    1. Centre de référence des malformations et maladies congénitales du cervelet, Départementde Génétique, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
    2. Service de Radiologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, Médecine Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  13. Ingo Helbig

    Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  14. Katharina Held

    1. Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of cellular and molecular medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    2. VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
    3. Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department Development & Regeneration, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Contribution
    Conceptualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  15. Denise Horn

    Charité – Universitäts medizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Genetics and Human Genetics, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0870-8911

  16. Annelies Janssen

    1. Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of cellular and molecular medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    2. VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
    Contribution
    Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6735-8248

  17. Angela M Kaindl

    1. Institute of Cell Biology and Neurobiology, Charité - Universitäts medizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    2. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Charité - Universitäts medizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    3. Charité – Universitäts medizin Berlin, Center for Chronically Sick Children, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Writing – original draft
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9454-206X

  18. Vinodh Narayanan

    Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Neurogenomics Division, Center for Rare Childhood Disorders, Phoenix, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0658-3847

  19. Christina Prager

    1. Department of Pediatric Neurology, Charité - Universitäts medizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
    2. Charité – Universitäts medizin Berlin, Center for Chronically Sick Children, Berlin, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Supervision
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  20. Mailys Rupin-Mas

    Department of Neuropediatrics, University Hospital of Angers, Angers, France
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  21. Alexandra Afenjar

    Centre de référence des malformations et maladies congénitales du cervelet, Départementde Génétique, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  22. Siyuan Zhao

    Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Visualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2005-9440

  23. Vincent Th Ramaekers

    Division Neuropediatrics, University Hospital Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  24. Sarah M Ruggiero

    Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  25. Simon Thomas

    Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory, Salisbury District Hospital, Salisbury, United Kingdom
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  26. Stéphanie Valence

    1. Centre de référence des malformations et maladies congénitales du cervelet, Départementde Génétique, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
    2. Sorbonne Université, Service de Neuropédiatrie, Hôpital Trousseau AP-HP, Paris, France
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  27. Lionel Van Maldergem

    1. Centre de Génétique Humaine, Université de Franche-Comté Besançon, Besancon, France
    2. Center of Clinical Investigation 1431, National Institute of Health and Medical Research, Besancon, France
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  28. Tibor Rohacs

    Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Neuroscience, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, United States
    Contribution
    Supervision
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3580-2575

  29. Diana Rodriguez

    1. Centre de référence des malformations et maladies congénitales du cervelet, Départementde Génétique, APHP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
    2. Sorbonne Université, Service de Neuropédiatrie, Hôpital Trousseau AP-HP, Paris, France
    Contribution
    Data curation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  30. David Dyment

    Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  31. Thomas Voets

    1. Laboratory of Ion Channel Research, Department of cellular and molecular medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    2. VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, Leuven, Belgium
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft
    For correspondence
    thomas.voets@kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  32. Joris Vriens

    Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, Department Development & Regeneration, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
    Contribution
    Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft
    For correspondence
    Joris.Vriens@kuleuven.be
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2502-0409

Funding

FWO (G.0D1417N)

  • Joris Vriens

FWO (G.084515N)

  • Joris Vriens

FWO (G.0A6719N)

  • Joris Vriens

FWO (11E782)

  • Evelien Van Hoeymissen

Queen Elisabeth Medical Foundation for Neurosciences

  • Thomas Voets

Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie

  • Joris Vriens

FWO (G079623N)

  • Joris Vriens

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank all parents and children for their willingness to participate to this study. We thank all members of the Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis and Reproductive Medicine (LEERM) and the members of the Laboratory of Ion Channel Research (LICR) Leuven for their help during experiments and useful discussions. We thank Dr. L Gaspers for the kind gift on GCaMP6, and Bahar Bazeli for help with visualizing the TRPM3 variants on the cryo-EM structure. The study was supported by the Einstein Stiftung Fellowship through the Günter Endres Fond.

We thank the Research Foundation-Flanders FWO, (G.0D1417N, G.084515N, G.0A6719N), the Research Council of the KU Leuven (C14/18/106, C3/21/049) for funding the project of JV, Einstein Stiftung for AMK, and the association “Connaître les syndromes cérébelleux” for funding the project of LB. EVH is a fellow of the Research Foundation-Flanders FWO (11E782N).

Ethics

The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines specified by the institutional review boards and ethics committees at each institution. Information of institutional protocols are provided in the section of Material & Methods. All parents agreed on sharing and publicing the patients' information. Patients information: Patient 1, 3, 4 and 7: Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the probands for molecular genetic analysis and possible publication of the anonymized clinical data. The study was done in accordance with local research and ethics requirements. Patient 2: Parents signed an informed consent, received a genetic counselling before and after the analysis, and the genetic study was performed in accordance with German and French ethical requirements and laws. Patient 5: UK ethical approval by the Cambridge South Research Ethics Committee (10/H0305/83). Patient 6: outine clinical care within the UK National Health Service, and so no specific institutional ethical approval was required. Patient 8: Declaration of Helsinki with local approval by the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) Institutional Review Board (IRB 15-12226). Patient 9: The participating family signed the IRB research protocol of the University of Pennsylvania division of Neurology. Patient 10: The study protocol and consent documents were approved by the Western Institutional Review Board (WIRB # 20120789). The retrospective analysis of epilepsy patient data was approved by the local ethics committees of the Charité (approval no. EA2/084/18).

Senior Editor

  1. Richard W Aldrich, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Reviewing Editor

  1. Andrés Jara-Oseguera, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Reviewer

  1. Andrés Jara-Oseguera, The University of Texas at Austin, United States

Publication history

  1. Received: June 13, 2022
  2. Accepted: December 7, 2022
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: January 17, 2023 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: January 19, 2023 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: January 30, 2023 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2023, Burglen, Van Hoeymissen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,395
    Page views
  • 321
    Downloads
  • 3
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lydie Burglen
  2. Evelien Van Hoeymissen
  3. Leila Qebibo
  4. Magalie Barth
  5. Newell Belnap
  6. Felix Boschann
  7. Christel Depienne
  8. Katrien De Clercq
  9. Andrew GL Douglas
  10. Mark P Fitzgerald
  11. Nicola Foulds
  12. Catherine Garel
  13. Ingo Helbig
  14. Katharina Held
  15. Denise Horn
  16. Annelies Janssen
  17. Angela M Kaindl
  18. Vinodh Narayanan
  19. Christina Prager
  20. Mailys Rupin-Mas
  21. Alexandra Afenjar
  22. Siyuan Zhao
  23. Vincent Th Ramaekers
  24. Sarah M Ruggiero
  25. Simon Thomas
  26. Stéphanie Valence
  27. Lionel Van Maldergem
  28. Tibor Rohacs
  29. Diana Rodriguez
  30. David Dyment
  31. Thomas Voets
  32. Joris Vriens
(2023)
Gain-of-function variants in the ion channel gene TRPM3 underlie a spectrum of neurodevelopmental disorders
eLife 12:e81032.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81032

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression

    Cohesin-independent STAG proteins interact with RNA and R-loops and promote complex loading

    Hayley Porter, Yang Li ... Suzana Hadjur
    Research Article Updated

    Most studies of cohesin function consider the Stromalin Antigen (STAG/SA) proteins as core complex members given their ubiquitous interaction with the cohesin ring. Here, we provide functional data to support the notion that the SA subunit is not a mere passenger in this structure, but instead plays a key role in the localization of cohesin to diverse biological processes and promotes loading of the complex at these sites. We show that in cells acutely depleted for RAD21, SA proteins remain bound to chromatin, cluster in 3D and interact with CTCF, as well as with a wide range of RNA binding proteins involved in multiple RNA processing mechanisms. Accordingly, SA proteins interact with RNA, and R-loops, even in the absence of cohesin. Our results place SA1 on chromatin upstream of the cohesin ring and reveal a role for SA1 in cohesin loading which is independent of NIPBL, the canonical cohesin loader. We propose that SA1 takes advantage of structural R-loop platforms to link cohesin loading and chromatin structure with diverse functions. Since SA proteins are pan-cancer targets, and R-loops play an increasingly prevalent role in cancer biology, our results have important implications for the mechanistic understanding of SA proteins in cancer and disease.

    1. Cell Biology

    Identification of paired-related Homeobox Protein 1 as a key mesenchymal transcription factor in pulmonary fibrosis

    Emmeline Marchal-Duval, Méline Homps-Legrand ... Arnaud A Mailleux
    Research Article

    Matrix remodeling is a salient feature of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Targeting cells driving matrix remodeling could be a promising avenue for IPF treatment. Analysis of transcriptomic database identified the mesenchymal transcription factor PRRX1 as upregulated in IPF. PRRX1, strongly expressed by lung fibroblasts, was regulated by a TGF-b/PGE2 balance in vitro in control and IPF human lung fibroblasts, while IPF fibroblast-derived matrix increased PRRX1 expression in a PDGFR dependent manner in control ones. PRRX1 inhibition decreased human lung fibroblast proliferation by downregulating the expression of S phase cyclins. PRRX1 inhibition also impacted TGF-β driven myofibroblastic differentiation by inhibiting SMAD2/3 phosphorylation through phosphatase PPM1A upregulation and TGFBR2 downregulation, leading to TGF-β response global decrease. Finally, targeted inhibition of Prrx1 attenuated fibrotic remodeling in vivo with intra-tracheal antisense oligonucleotides in bleomycin mouse model of lung fibrosis and ex vivo using human and mouse precision-cut lung slices. Our results identified PRRX1 as a key mesenchymal transcription factor during lung fibrogenesis.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    APOE expression and secretion are modulated by mitochondrial dysfunction

    Meghan E Wynne, Oluwaseun Ogunbona ... Victor Faundez
    Research Article Updated

    Mitochondria influence cellular function through both cell-autonomous and non-cell autonomous mechanisms, such as production of paracrine and endocrine factors. Here, we demonstrate that mitochondrial regulation of the secretome is more extensive than previously appreciated, as both genetic and pharmacological disruption of the electron transport chain caused upregulation of the Alzheimer’s disease risk factor apolipoprotein E (APOE) and other secretome components. Indirect disruption of the electron transport chain by gene editing of SLC25A mitochondrial membrane transporters as well as direct genetic and pharmacological disruption of either complexes I, III, or the copper-containing complex IV of the electron transport chain elicited upregulation of APOE transcript, protein, and secretion, up to 49-fold. These APOE phenotypes were robustly expressed in diverse cell types and iPSC-derived human astrocytes as part of an inflammatory gene expression program. Moreover, age- and genotype-dependent decline in brain levels of respiratory complex I preceded an increase in APOE in the 5xFAD mouse model. We propose that mitochondria act as novel upstream regulators of APOE-dependent cellular processes in health and disease.