Abstract

Viruses interact with the intracellular transport machinery to promote viral replication. Such host-virus interactions can drive host gene adaptation, leaving signatures of pathogen-driven evolution in host genomes. Here we leverage these genetic signatures to identify the dynein activating adaptor, ninein-like (NINL), as a critical component in the antiviral innate immune response and as a target of viral antagonism. Unique among genes en­­coding components of active dynein complexes, NINL has evolved under recurrent positive (diversifying) selection, particularly in its carboxy-terminal cargo binding region. Consistent with a role for NINL in host immunity, we demonstrate that NINL knockout cells exhibit an impaired response to interferon, resulting in increased permissiveness to viral replication. Moreover, we show that proteases encoded by diverse picornaviruses and coronaviruses cleave and disrupt NINL function in a host- and virus-specific manner. Our work reveals the importance of NINL in the antiviral response and the utility of using signatures of host-virus genetic conflicts to uncover new components of antiviral immunity and targets of viral antagonism.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.The NCBI nucleotide database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nucleotide/) was used to collect sequences for human and non-human primate genes shown in Figure 1.Source Data files have been provided for Figures 2 through 7.RNA sequencing data used in Figure 3 have been deposited in GEO under accession code GSE206784.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Donte Alexander Stevens

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3732-9972
  2. Christopher Beierschmitt

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0151-1091
  3. Swetha Mahesula

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Miles R Corley

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. John Salogiannis

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Vermont, Burlington, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Brian V Tsu

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0268-8323
  7. Bryant Cao

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Andrew P Ryan

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2630-9837
  9. Hiroyuki Hakozawki

    Nikon Imaging Center, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Samara L Reck-Peterson

    Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, United States
    For correspondence
    sreckpeterson@ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    Samara L Reck-Peterson, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1553-465X
  11. Matthew D Daugherty

    Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, United States
    For correspondence
    mddaugherty@ucsd.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4879-9603

Funding

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM133633)

  • Matthew D Daugherty

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM141825)

  • Samara L Reck-Peterson

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM007240)

  • Donte Alexander Stevens
  • Christopher Beierschmitt
  • Brian V Tsu
  • Andrew P Ryan

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Samara L Reck-Peterson

National Science Foundation (GRFP)

  • Donte Alexander Stevens
  • Christopher Beierschmitt

Howard Hughes Medical Institute (Gilliam Fellowship)

  • Donte Alexander Stevens

Pew Charitable Trusts (Biomedical Scholars Program)

  • Matthew D Daugherty

Burroughs Wellcome Fund (Investigators in the Pathogenesis of Infectious Diseases)

  • Matthew D Daugherty

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Stevens et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,400
    views
  • 236
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Donte Alexander Stevens
  2. Christopher Beierschmitt
  3. Swetha Mahesula
  4. Miles R Corley
  5. John Salogiannis
  6. Brian V Tsu
  7. Bryant Cao
  8. Andrew P Ryan
  9. Hiroyuki Hakozawki
  10. Samara L Reck-Peterson
  11. Matthew D Daugherty
(2022)
Antiviral function and viral antagonism of the rapidly evolving dynein activating adapter NINL
eLife 11:e81606.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81606

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81606

Further reading

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Somen K Mistri, Brianna M Hilton ... Jonathan E Boyson
    Research Article

    During thymic development, most γδ T cells acquire innate-like characteristics that are critical for their function in tumor surveillance, infectious disease, and tissue repair. The mechanisms, however, that regulate γδ T cell developmental programming remain unclear. Recently, we demonstrated that the SLAM/SAP signaling pathway regulates the development and function of multiple innate-like γδ T cell subsets. Here, we used a single-cell proteogenomics approach to identify SAP-dependent developmental checkpoints and to define the SAP-dependent γδ TCR repertoire in mice. SAP deficiency resulted in both a significant loss of an immature Gzma+Blk+Etv5+Tox2+ γδT17 precursor population and a significant increase in Cd4+Cd8+Rorc+Ptcra+Rag1+ thymic γδ T cells. SAP-dependent diversion of embryonic day 17 thymic γδ T cell clonotypes into the αβ T cell developmental pathway was associated with a decreased frequency of mature clonotypes in neonatal thymus, and an altered γδ TCR repertoire in the periphery. Finally, we identify TRGV4/TRAV13-4(DV7)-expressing T cells as a novel, SAP-dependent Vγ4 γδT1 subset. Together, the data support a model in which SAP-dependent γδ/αβ T cell lineage commitment regulates γδ T cell developmental programming and shapes the γδ TCR repertoire.

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    Jasmine Rowell, Ching-In Lau ... Tessa Crompton
    Research Article

    Here, we sequenced rearranged TCRβ and TCRα chain sequences in CD4+CD8+ double positive (DP), CD4+CD8- single positive (SP4) and CD4-CD8+ (SP8) thymocyte populations from the foetus and young adult mouse. We found that life-stage had a greater impact on TCRβ and TCRα gene segment usage than cell-type. Foetal repertoires showed bias towards 3’TRAV and 5’TRAJ rearrangements in all populations, whereas adult repertoires used more 5’TRAV gene segments, suggesting that progressive TCRα rearrangements occur less frequently in foetal DP cells. When we synchronised young adult DP thymocyte differentiation by hydrocortisone treatment the new recovering DP thymocyte population showed more foetal-like 3’TRAV and 5’TRAJ gene segment usage. In foetus we identified less influence of MHC-restriction on α-chain and β-chain combinatorial VxJ usage and CDR1xCDR2 (V region) usage in SP compared to adult, indicating weaker impact of MHC-restriction on the foetal TCR repertoire. The foetal TCRβ repertoire was less diverse, less evenly distributed, with fewer non-template insertions, and all foetal populations contained more clonotypic expansions than adult. The differences between the foetal and adult thymus TCR repertoires are consistent with the foetal thymus producing αβT-cells with properties and functions that are distinct from adult T-cells: their repertoire is less governed by MHC-restriction, with preference for particular gene segment usage, less diverse with more clonotypic expansions, and more closely encoded by genomic sequence.