Abstract

Rodent studies have demonstrated that synaptic dynamics from excitatory to inhibitory neuron types are often dependent on the target cell type. However, these target cell-specific properties have not been well investigated in human cortex, where there are major technical challenges in reliably obtaining healthy tissue, conducting multiple patch-clamp recordings on inhibitory cell types, and identifying those cell types. Here, we take advantage of newly developed methods for human neurosurgical tissue analysis with multiple patch-clamp recordings, post-hoc fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), machine learning-based cell type classification and prospective GABAergic AAV-based labeling to investigate synaptic properties between pyramidal neurons and PVALB- vs. SST-positive interneurons. We find that there are robust molecular differences in synapse-associated genes between these neuron types, and that individual presynaptic pyramidal neurons evoke postsynaptic responses with heterogeneous synaptic dynamics in different postsynaptic cell types. Using molecular identification with FISH and classifiers based on transcriptomically identified PVALB neurons analyzed by Patch-seq, we find that PVALB neurons typically show depressing synaptic characteristics, whereas other interneuron types including SST-positive neurons show facilitating characteristics. Together, these data support the existence of target cell-specific synaptic properties in human cortex that are similar to rodent, thereby indicating evolutionary conservation of local circuit connectivity motifs from excitatory to inhibitory neurons and their synaptic dynamics.

Data availability

Single nucleus transcriptomic datasets from human MTG (Hodge et al., 2019) and mouse VISp (Tasic et al., 2018) are available in the Allen Institute website (https://portal.brain-map.org/atlases-and-data/rnaseq). Synaptic connectivity assay datasets including raw traces and related metadata information with MATLAB files (.mat), classifier analysis codes, and their intrinsic membrane property values are available in the DRYAD repository (doi:10.5061/dryad.jdfn2z3dm). Synaptic physiology experimental protocols and related topics are also available in the Allen Institute website (https://portal.brain-map.org/explore/connectivity/synaptic-physiology). To provide more publicly accessible data format, Neurodata Without Borders (NWB) files for synaptic connectivity assay performed in this study and human single cell patch-seq experimental data will be also available soon at DANDI or the BICCN data catalog.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mean-Hwan Kim

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    For correspondence
    meanhwank@alleninstitute.org
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8065-4631
  2. Cristina Radaelli

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Elliot R Thomsen

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Deja Monet

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Thomas Chartrand

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7093-8681
  6. Nikolas L Jorstad

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Joseph T Mahoney

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1374-3893
  8. Michael J Taormina

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Brian Long

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Katherine Baker

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Trygve E Bakken

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3373-7386
  12. Luke Campagnola

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Tamara Casper

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Michael Clark

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Nick Dee

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Florence D'Orazi

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  17. Clare Gamlin

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Brian E Kalmbach

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  19. Sara Kebede

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  20. Brian R Lee

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3210-5638
  21. Lindsay Ng

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  22. Jessica Trinh

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  23. Charles Cobbs

    Epilepsy Surgery and Functional Neurosurgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  24. Ryder P Gwinn

    Epilepsy Surgery and Functional Neurosurgery, Swedish Neuroscience Institute, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  25. C Dirk Keene

    Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5291-1469
  26. Andrew L Ko

    Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  27. Jeffrey G Ojemann

    Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  28. Daniel L Silbergeld

    Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  29. Staci Sorensen

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  30. Jim Berg

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  31. Kimberly A Smith

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  32. Philip R Nicovich

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  33. Tim Jarsky

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4399-539X
  34. Gabe J Murphy

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  35. Hongkui Zeng

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0326-5878
  36. Jonathan T Ting

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    Jonathan T Ting, U.S. patent application #PCT_US2019_054539 related to this work (vector CN1390)..
  37. Boaz P. Levi

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seatlle, United States
    Competing interests
    Boaz P. Levi, U.S. patent application #PCT_US2019_054539 related to this work (vector CN1390)..
  38. Ed Lein

    Allen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    Ed Lein, U.S. patent application #PCT_US2019_054539 related to this work (vector CN1390)..

Funding

NIH BRAIN Initiative (1RF1MH114126-01)

  • Jonathan T Ting
  • Boaz P. Levi
  • Ed Lein

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Kim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,403
    views
  • 350
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mean-Hwan Kim
  2. Cristina Radaelli
  3. Elliot R Thomsen
  4. Deja Monet
  5. Thomas Chartrand
  6. Nikolas L Jorstad
  7. Joseph T Mahoney
  8. Michael J Taormina
  9. Brian Long
  10. Katherine Baker
  11. Trygve E Bakken
  12. Luke Campagnola
  13. Tamara Casper
  14. Michael Clark
  15. Nick Dee
  16. Florence D'Orazi
  17. Clare Gamlin
  18. Brian E Kalmbach
  19. Sara Kebede
  20. Brian R Lee
  21. Lindsay Ng
  22. Jessica Trinh
  23. Charles Cobbs
  24. Ryder P Gwinn
  25. C Dirk Keene
  26. Andrew L Ko
  27. Jeffrey G Ojemann
  28. Daniel L Silbergeld
  29. Staci Sorensen
  30. Jim Berg
  31. Kimberly A Smith
  32. Philip R Nicovich
  33. Tim Jarsky
  34. Gabe J Murphy
  35. Hongkui Zeng
  36. Jonathan T Ting
  37. Boaz P. Levi
  38. Ed Lein
(2023)
Target cell-specific synaptic dynamics of excitatory to inhibitory neuron connections in supragranular layers of human neocortex
eLife 12:e81863.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81863

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81863

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Neuroscience
    Luis Sánchez-Guardado, Peyman Callejas Razavi ... Carlos Lois
    Research Article

    The assembly and maintenance of neural circuits is crucial for proper brain function. Although the assembly of brain circuits has been extensively studied, much less is understood about the mechanisms controlling their maintenance as animals mature. In the olfactory system, the axons of olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) expressing the same odor receptor converge into discrete synaptic structures of the olfactory bulb (OB) called glomeruli, forming a stereotypic odor map. The OB projection neurons, called mitral and tufted cells (M/Ts), have a single dendrite that branches into a single glomerulus, where they make synapses with OSNs. We used a genetic method to progressively eliminate the vast majority of M/T cells in early postnatal mice, and observed that the assembly of the OB bulb circuits proceeded normally. However, as the animals became adults the apical dendrite of remaining M/Ts grew multiple branches that innervated several glomeruli, and OSNs expressing single odor receptors projected their axons into multiple glomeruli, disrupting the olfactory sensory map. Moreover, ablating the M/Ts in adult animals also resulted in similar structural changes in the projections of remaining M/Ts and axons from OSNs. Interestingly, the ability of these mice to detect odors was relatively preserved despite only having 1–5% of projection neurons transmitting odorant information to the brain, and having highly disrupted circuits in the OB. These results indicate that a reduced number of projection neurons does not affect the normal assembly of the olfactory circuit, but induces structural instability of the olfactory circuitry of adult animals.

    1. Neuroscience
    GVS Devakinandan, Mark Terasaki, Adish Dani
    Research Article

    Specialized chemosensory signals elicit innate social behaviors in individuals of several vertebrate species, a process that is mediated via the accessory olfactory system (AOS). The AOS comprising the peripheral sensory vomeronasal organ has evolved elaborate molecular and cellular mechanisms to detect chemo signals. To gain insight into the cell types, developmental gene expression patterns, and functional differences amongst neurons, we performed single-cell transcriptomics of the mouse vomeronasal sensory epithelium. Our analysis reveals diverse cell types with gene expression patterns specific to each, which we made available as a searchable web resource accessed from https://www.scvnoexplorer.com. Pseudo-time developmental analysis indicates that neurons originating from common progenitors diverge in their gene expression during maturation with transient and persistent transcription factor expression at critical branch points. Comparative analysis across two of the major neuronal subtypes that express divergent GPCR families and the G-protein subunits Gnai2 or Gnao1, reveals significantly higher expression of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) associated genes within Gnao1 neurons. In addition, differences in ER content and prevalence of cubic membrane ER ultrastructure revealed by electron microscopy, indicate fundamental differences in ER function.