1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology

Conformational regulation and target-myristoyl switch of calcineurin B homologous protein 3

  1. Florian Becker
  2. Simon Fuchs
  3. Lukas Refisch
  4. Friedel Drepper
  5. Wolfgang Bildl
  6. Uwe Schulte
  7. Shuo Liang
  8. Jonas Immanuel Heinicke
  9. Sierra C Hansen
  10. Clemens Kreutz
  11. Bettina Warscheid
  12. Bernd Fakler
  13. Evgeny V Mymrikov  Is a corresponding author
  14. Carola Hunte  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
  2. Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Germany
  3. Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics (IMBI), Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Germany
  4. Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Germany
  5. Biochemistry and Functional Proteomics, Institute of Biology II, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Germany
  6. Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany
  7. CIBSS - Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Germany
  8. BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Germany
  9. Department of Biochemistry, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, University of Würzburg, Germany
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83868
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Florian Becker
  2. Simon Fuchs
  3. Lukas Refisch
  4. Friedel Drepper
  5. Wolfgang Bildl
  6. Uwe Schulte
  7. Shuo Liang
  8. Jonas Immanuel Heinicke
  9. Sierra C Hansen
  10. Clemens Kreutz
  11. Bettina Warscheid
  12. Bernd Fakler
  13. Evgeny V Mymrikov
  14. Carola Hunte
(2023)
Conformational regulation and target-myristoyl switch of calcineurin B homologous protein 3
eLife 12:e83868.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83868
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Calcineurin B homologous protein 3 (CHP3) is an EF-hand Ca2+-binding protein involved in regulation of cancerogenesis, cardiac hypertrophy, and neuronal development through interactions with sodium/proton exchangers (NHEs) and signalling proteins. While the importance of Ca2+ binding and myristoylation for CHP3 function has been recognized, the underlying molecular mechanism remained elusive. In this study, we demonstrate that Ca2+ binding and myristoylation independently affect the conformation and functions of human CHP3. Ca2+ binding increased local flexibility and hydrophobicity of CHP3 indicative of an open conformation. The Ca2+-bound CHP3 exhibited a higher affinity for NHE1 and associated stronger with lipid membranes compared to the Mg2+-bound CHP3, which adopted a closed conformation. Myristoylation enhanced the local flexibility of CHP3 and decreased its affinity to NHE1 independently of the bound ion, but did not affect its binding to lipid membranes. The data exclude the proposed Ca2+-myristoyl switch for CHP3. Instead, a Ca2+-independent exposure of the myristoyl moiety is induced by binding of the target peptide to CHP3 enhancing its association to lipid membranes. We name this novel regulatory mechanism ‘target-myristoyl switch’. Collectively, the interplay of Ca2+ binding, myristoylation, and target binding allows for a context-specific regulation of CHP3 functions.

Editor's evaluation

In this work, the authors provide important mechanistic insights into how the intracellular effector protein Calcineurin B homologous protein 3 (CHP3) can be regulated in a calcium-independent manner to expose its lipid membrane binding site. Compelling evidence demonstrates a binding partner protein (NHE1) triggers a conformation change and exposure of the myristoyl group in CHP3 resulting in membrane association. This provides mechanistic insight into the signalling mechanisms achieved by CHP3 in a target-binding dependent manner, which will be of broad scientific interest.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83868.sa0

Introduction

The calcineurin B homologous protein 3 (CHP3, tescalcin) belongs to the EF-hand Ca2+-binding protein (EFCaBP) family (Kolobynina et al., 2016) and is closely related to calcineurin B homologous proteins CHP1 and CHP2 (Di Sole et al., 2012). CHPs interact with several isoforms of sodium/proton exchangers (NHEs), and this interaction is required for the localization and function of NHE transporters on the plasma membrane (Pedersen and Counillon, 2019). Besides NHEs, CHP3 interacts with calcineurin A (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003), subunit 4 of COP9 signalosome (Levay and Slepak, 2014) and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) (Kobayashi et al., 2015). Recent studies revealed that the CHP3 expression level correlates with the progression, metastasis, and invasiveness of gastric, renal, and colorectal cancers (Kang et al., 2016; Kim et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2018; Luo et al., 2019). In addition, genome-wide association studies in combination with neuroimaging identified CHP3 as a key regulator of neurogenesis for hippocampal volume formation (Dannlowski et al., 2015; Horgusluoglu-Moloch et al., 2019; Stein et al., 2012). Via regulation of GSK3 and calcineurin activities, it seems to counteract cardiac hypertrophy (Kobayashi et al., 2015; Viereck et al., 2020). Thus, CHP3 is an emerging important player in cellular Ca2+ signalling networks involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and development in different tissues. The underlying molecular mechanisms are not well understood.

All three CHPs were shown to undergo conformational changes upon Ca2+ binding (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003; Liang et al., 2020). Notably, CHP3 has a lower affinity for Ca2+ (0.8 µM) (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003) in comparison to CHP1 and CHP2 (KD values below 100 nM) (Li et al., 2011; Pang et al., 2004). Further, Ca2+-binding affinities of CHP1 and CHP2 strongly increased (45- and 42-fold, respectively) upon binding of the NHE1 target peptide (Li et al., 2011; Pang et al., 2004). This modulation is a common feature in EFCaBPs (Gifford et al., 2007) and should also apply to the CHP3 isoform. CHP3 may thus respond to Ca2+ signals with conformational changes when the intracellular Ca2+ concentration elevates from 100 nM to 1 µM or higher (Roderick and Cook, 2008). Ca2+-induced conformational changes are characteristic for Ca2+ sensor proteins such as calmodulin (CaM) and calcineurin B (Creamer, 2020; Nelson and Chazin, 1998). At the resting Ca2+ level, they adopt a closed conformation, in which the hydrophobic target-binding pocket is occluded. Upon a rise of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, Ca2+ binding to EF-hand(s) causes an opening of this pocket providing the structural basis for the transmission of Ca2+ signals (Nelson and Chazin, 1998). This opening often triggers the binding of EFCaBPs to their target proteins (Burgoyne et al., 2019). In addition, Ca2+-induced conformational changes of EFCaBPs such as calcineurin B or guanylyl cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs) stably associated with target proteins can affect the function of the latter (Creamer, 2020; Lim et al., 2014). Recently, we demonstrated an increase of CHP3 hydrophobicity upon Ca2+ binding that most likely resulted from the opening of the hydrophobic target-binding pocket (Liang et al., 2020). CHP3 binds also Mg2+ with a low affinity (KD = 73 µM) in the absence of Ca2+. The presence of 1 mM Mg2+ reduces the affinity for Ca2+ from 0.8 to 3.5 µM, indicating a direct competition between Ca2+ and Mg2+ for the EF-3 binding site (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003). Thus, CHP3 should be present in the Mg2+-bound state in a cell at basal Ca2+ concentration, ready to respond to Ca2+ signals, yet, the exact mechanism is not fully described.

In addition, CHP3 harbors an N-terminal myristoylation site similar to other EFCaBPs such as recoverin and calcineurin B (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003; Zaun et al., 2012). This modification often enhances protein binding to cellular membranes, but it can also stabilize the structure of a protein and/or regulate its function (Yuan et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2018). Membrane binding via the myristoyl moiety is usually enforced with either a second lipidation site or clusters of positively charged and/or hydrophobic residues (Yuan et al., 2020; Jiang et al., 2018). The exposure of the myristoyl moiety from the modified protein and thereby its binding to lipid membranes can be regulated by various signals, for instance by exchange of GDP to GTP (GTP-myristoyl switch in ADP ribosylation factor 1 [ARF1] GTPase) (Goldberg, 1998), by phosphorylation (myristoyl/phosphoserine switch in myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) [Braun et al., 2000] and in the C-subunit of protein kinase A [Gaffarogullari et al., 2011]) or by pH change (pH-dependent myristoyl-histidine switch in hisactophilin [Hanakam et al., 1996]). In many Ca2+ sensor proteins (for instance recoverin, neurocalcin, visinin-like proteins), the myristoyl group becomes accessible to lipid membranes after Ca2+ binding (Lim et al., 2014). This mechanism is called Ca2+-myristoyl switch. However, not all myristoylated EFCaBPs have a Ca2+-myristoyl switch. In the neuronal calcium sensor-1 (NCS-1) and in KChIP1, the myristoyl moiety becomes exposed in the presence of lipid membranes even at low Ca2+ concentration (Lim et al., 2014; McFerran et al., 1999; O’Callaghan and Burgoyne, 2004; O’Callaghan et al., 2003); and it is constantly hidden within the protein core in GCAPs (Lim et al., 2014).

Myristoylated CHP1 binds to microsomal membranes in a Ca2+-dependent manner indicating the presence of a Ca2+-myristoyl switch (Andrade et al., 2004), whereas binding of myristoylated CHP3 to lipid membranes has not been reported so far. Co-expression of NHE1 with CHP3 that lacks myristoylation and/or Ca2+-binding sites significantly reduced the half-life at the cell surface and the activity of this transporter (Zaun et al., 2012). Simultaneous myristoylation and Ca2+ binding was suggested to be important for NHE1 stabilization by CHP3 (Zaun et al., 2012). Based on these results, the presence of a Ca2+-myristoyl switch for CHP3 was proposed (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003; Zaun et al., 2012), though the exposure of the myristoyl group in response to Ca2+ binding has not been shown experimentally.

The interaction of CHP3 with NHE1 is an ideal system to analyse the effects of myristoylation and Ca2+ binding on CHP3. We previously demonstrated that CHP3 binds at 1:1 ratio to the CHP-binding region of human NHE1 (CBD) with high affinity in the presence of Mg2+ (Fuchs et al., 2018). At the same time, it was shown by co-immunoprecipitation of CHP3-myc and NHE1-HA that addition of Ca2+ increased the amount of the complex formed (Zaun et al., 2012). Here, we show that Ca2+ and N-terminal myristoylation independently regulate the conformation of CHP3 and its interaction with NHE1 providing the molecular basis for regulation of CHP3 function. This excludes a Ca2+-myristoyl switch in CHP3, instead, surface exposure of the myristoyl moiety was triggered by target peptide binding as probed by interaction with liposomes. We named this novel mechanism ‘target-myristoyl switch’. Our study provides fundamental mechanistic understanding of the regulation of CHP3 function.

Results

Pure fully myristoylated and non-myristoylated untagged CHP3 are functional in binding a single calcium ion

In order to dissect the effects of Ca2+ and myristoylation on target and lipid binding of human CHP3, we aimed for pure untagged CHP3 and myristoylated CHP3 (mCHP3). Non-myristoylated CHPs were previously produced with affinity tags and purified by corresponding affinity chromatography (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003; Liang et al., 2020; Fuchs et al., 2018). Yet, the peptide tag used for affinity purification of rat CHP1 was shown to interact with the hydrophobic target-binding pocket (Naoe et al., 2005) and might interfere with conformational changes. Myristoylated untagged CHP1 had been produced with low yield by co-expression with yeast N-myristoyltransferase (Timm et al., 1999). Here, we produced untagged CHP3 and mCHP3, the latter by co-expression with human N-myristoyltransferase 1, and used Ca2+-dependent hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) for purification. HIC has been previously used for purification of other EFCaBPs including CaM and calcineurin B (Tanaka et al., 1984; Wei and Lee, 1997). Combining HIC and gel filtration, we obtained pure untagged proteins, as shown by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) analysis (Figure 1A) with an average yield of 9 mg/l of expression culture. Single symmetrical peaks in the elution profiles of analytical gel filtration indicated monodisperse protein preparations of CHP3 and mCHP3. Both proteins form only monomers under reducing conditions in the presence of 2 mM TCEP (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). The slightly higher electrophoretic mobility of mCHP3 compared to CHP3 resolved in high-resolution SDS–PAGE analysis already indicated that the protein was covalently modified (Figure 1A). To check the degree of myristoylation, we analysed mCHP3 and CHP3 by native mass spectrometry (MS). The measured mass of mCHP3 was increased by ~211 Da (Figure 1B, bottom) in comparison to CHP3 (Figure 1B, top), which is in agreement with the covalent attachment of one myristoyl group (Mr = 210 Da). Native MS analysis of three independently produced and purified samples confirmed reproducible complete myristoylation of recombinant CHP3. Interestingly, the ion mobility arrival time was shorter for mCHP3 (Figure 1C) indicating a more compact shape of mCHP3 compared to CHP3. To reveal the stoichiometry of Ca2+ binding, we performed native MS analysis of CHP3 and mCHP3 after addition of Ca2+. The molecular masses of both proteins were shifted by ~40 Da (Figure 1B), which corresponds to the binding of a single Ca2+ ion and, thus, documents that both recombinant CHP3 and mCHP3 are functional in respect to Ca2+ binding and confirms the presence of one Ca2+-binding site (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003; Perera et al., 2001).

Figure 1 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Quality control of the purified non-myristoylated CHP3 and myristoylated CHP3 (mCHP3).

(A) Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) analysis (16%, tricine mini gels) showed a mobility shift of mCHP3 in comparison to CHP3; positions of co-migrated molecular mass standards are indicated in kDa on the left; Figure 1—source data 1: Full gel for (A). (B) Left, deconvoluted mass spectra of CHP3 (top) and mCHP3 (bottom) show a measured intact protein mass of 24.617 and 24.828 kDa (∆Mr = 211 Da), which is in line with the addition of the myristoyl group of 210 Da. For mCHP3, also low abundant dimeric species were observed by native MS analysis. Right, zoom-in spectra in the range of 24.8 ± 0.3 kDa that show differences in masses as indicated by dashed lines. In the presence of Ca2+, the measured intact protein mass of CHP3 and mCHP3 was increased by ~40 Da (mass accuracy ± 1 Da), respectively, indicating binding of one Ca2+ ion. (C) Ion mobility arrival time distributions for the +8 charge state of CHP3 (solid line) and mCHP3 (dashed line). A shoulder with shorter arrival times indicates the presence of a low abundant dimeric species for CHP3 and mCHP3. Arrival times of mCHP3 were reduced by 1.36 ms (±0.37 ms; n = 3; p = 0.024) compared to CHP3. See Figure 1—figure supplement 2 for non-deconvoluted mass spectra showing charge state distributions of CHP3 and mCHP3 measured in the positive ion mode by native MS.

Figure 1—source data 1

Full gel for Figure 1A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/83868/elife-83868-fig1-data1-v2.zip

Ca2+-induced conformational changes are similar in CHP3 and mCHP3

Next, we analysed the effect of Ca2+ binding in the presence of Mg2+ and of the N-terminal myristoylation on CHP3 conformation. For this purpose, we optimized the FPH (fluorescence probe hydrophobicity) assay, previously developed to monitor Ca2+-induced conformational changes of CHPs (Liang et al., 2020), by using the dye ProteOrange (Lumiprobe) at defined micromolar concentration (see Materials and methods). In this assay, the fluorescence of the dye strongly increases upon its binding to hydrophobic protein surfaces (Niesen et al., 2007).

In the Mg2+-bound state, CHP3 and mCHP3 showed low fluorescence (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). After Ca2+ addition, the fluorescence intensity increased by 30% and 40% for CHP3 and mCHP3, respectively, reflecting an increase in hydrophobicity (Figure 2A). Ca2+ removal by EGTA reduced the fluorescence to the initial level, indicating the reversibility of Ca2+ binding and of the respective conformational changes. Depletion of both Mg2+ and Ca2+ by EDTA turned the protein into the non-physiological apo-state, the fluorescence was in between that of the Mg2+- and Ca2+-bound states. The proteins appeared to be destabilized in the apo-state and could not be reverted into the functional form by Ca2+ addition (Figure 2A). Interestingly, the N-terminal myristoylation did not affect the conformational changes of CHP3. As a control, we probed the hydrophobicity of recoverin, the prototypic protein with a classical Ca2+-myristoyl switch (Ames et al., 1997; Figure 2—figure supplement 1B). Ca2+ induced similar changes of non-myristoylated recoverin as of CHP3 in the FPH assay, whereas hydrophobicity of the myristoylated protein increased much stronger (about 3.5-fold) in response to Ca2+ binding, which most likely resulted from the exposure of the myristic group.

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Ca2+-induced conformational changes in CHP3 and mCHP3.

(A) Kinetic fluorescence probe hydrophobicity (FPH) assay. Fluorescence of dye bound at hydrophobic protein surfaces was monitored at λem = 585 nm (excitation λex = 470 nm) and at 22°C. Protein (1.5 µM) was prepared in the Mg2+-bound state (2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA). CaCl2, EDTA, and EGTA were sequentially added as indicated. First, 2 mM CaCl2 was added and then chelated with addition of 3 mM EGTA. Next, 3 mM EDTA was added to remove both divalent ions (CHP3 in apo-state) followed by another addition of 4 mM CaCl2. (B) Intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence was monitored at λem = 330 nm (excitation λex = 280 nm) at 22°C. Protein (2.5 μM) in the Mg2+-bound state was used and the additions were performed as described above for the FPH assay. (C) AlphaFold2.0 model (Varadi et al., 2022) of CHP3 in surface presentation, with surface coloured for hydrophobicity (Eisenberg et al., 1984). The model most likely resembles the open or target-bound conformation. The single tryptophan residue highlighted in green (Trp191) is located in the hydrophobic target-binding pocket. EC50 values for binding of Ca2+ to CHP3 (D) and mCHP3 (E) determined with FPH assay. Fluorescence of samples with CHP3 or mCHP3 at different Ca2+ concentrations was measured at 590 nm in the presence of 2 mM MgCl2. Three biological replicates (shown in different colours) with three to four technical replicates each for CHP3 and mCHP3 were measured. The data were fitted with Hill equation using global non-linear regression. (F) 95% confidence intervals (Δχ2 of 3.84) of EC50 values for binding of Ca2+ calculated with profile likelihood method. EC50 values (asterisks) are shown with confidence intervals in square brackets below the graph.

To prove that changes in the dye-mediated fluorescence observed in the FPH assay were indeed caused by conformational changes, we probed the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of CHP3 and mCHP3. According to the 3D model of CHP3 predicted with AlphaFold2.0 (Varadi et al., 2022), the single tryptophan residue (Trp191) is located in CHP3’s hydrophobic target-binding pocket at the protein surface (Figure 2C) in line with the measured emission maxima of CHP3 and mCHP3 of ~330 nm (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). Intensity and emission maximum of intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence depend on the local environment of the residue (Vivian and Callis, 2001; Eftink, 2000). Ca2+ addition decreased the intrinsic fluorescence of CHP3 (Figure 2B) reflecting conformational changes accompanied with changes in the local environment of Trp191 in the hydrophobic pocket. This is in line with an increase of CHP3 hydrophobicity observed with the FPH assay. These conformational changes monitored by intrinsic fluorescence were also reverted by Ca2+ removal (EGTA addition) (Figure 2B). Only for mCHP3, the removal of both Mg2+ and Ca2+ caused irreversible changes in the intrinsic fluorescence.

In order to evaluate whether myristoylation affects the Ca2+-binding affinity of CHP3, we determined the EC50 values for binding of Ca2+ to CHP3 and mCHP3 in the presence of Mg2+ using the FPH assay. Addition of Ca2+ at saturating concentration increased the fluorescence (Figure 2A). We now titrated Ca2+ concentration from 0.3 µM to 8 mM and measured fluorescence using biological and technical replicates (Figure 2D, E). We determined Ca2+ EC50 values performing a global fit for all data. The difference between EC50’s obtained for CHP3 (161.1 [112.6; 233.8] μM; Figure 2D) and mCHP3 (152.6 [113.7; 209.7] µM; Figure 2E) is insignificant, indicating that myristoylation does not affect the Ca2+-binding properties of CHP3.

Combining the data of the FPH assay and of the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence, we conclude that CHP3 undergoes reversible Ca2+-induced conformational changes as typical for a Ca2+ sensor protein. The hydrophobic target-binding pocket of CHP3 is occluded in the Mg2+-bound state (closed conformation), and becomes exposed to the environment upon Ca2+ binding (open conformation).

Ca2+ binding and myristoylation independently affect thermal stabilities of CHP3 and its complex with NHE1 target peptide

To further dissect the effects of Ca2+ and N-terminal myristoylation on CHP3, we probed the thermal stability of CHP3 alone and in complex with the CHP-binding domain of NHE1 (CBD, NHE1 residues 525–545) using nano-differential scanning fluorimetry (nanoDSF). To obtain the CHP3:CBD complex used for nanoDSF, we co-expressed CHP3 and CBDHis using the pETDuet-1 system and purified the resulting complex. For the myristoylated complex (mCHP3:CBD), simultaneous co-expression of three proteins (CHP3, CBDHis, and human N-myristoyltransferase 1 (NMT1)) from a modified pETDuet-1 vector was performed, and the resulting complex was purified. Myristoylation of CHP3 in the complex was confirmed by electrospray ionization (ESI)-TOF mass spectrometric analysis. Free CHP3 had the highest thermal stability in the Mg2+-bound state (Tmapp 70.1 ± 0.3°C), and Ca2+ binding reduced the melting point to 66.9 ± 0.2°C (CHP3 in Figure 3). In the presence of both ions, the Ca2+ effect appeared to be dominant with a melting temperature (Tmapp) of 65.0 ± 0.9°C. In line with the results of the FPH assay, which indicated a destabilized apo-state, the latter showed strongly reduced thermal stability (Tmapp 56.1 ± 0.5°C). Notably, binding of the target peptide CBD strongly increased the thermal stability for the Ca2+-bound and apo-states (compare CHP3 and CHP3:CBD in Figure 3), with about 12°C in the presence of Ca2+, 13°C in the presence of Ca2+ plus Mg2+ and about 11°C for the apo-state. Thus, the CHP3:CBD complex showed the highest thermal stability when Ca2+ was bound. Surprisingly, CBD binding did not have any effect on the thermal stability of the Mg2+-bound state.

Figure 3 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Ca2+ and target peptide binding affect the thermal stability of CHP3 and mCHP3.

Thermal stabilities of free proteins and complexes with the target peptide CBD were measured with nanoDSF in the presence of either 10 mM Mg2+, Ca2+, Ca2+ + Mg2+, or EDTA. Temperatures of thermal unfolding (apparent Tm) are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent biological replicates. Raw nanoDSF traces are shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

The N-terminal myristoylation decreased the Tmapp of CHP3 in all states to the same degree (9.8°C for Mg2+-bound and 10.6°C for Ca2+-bound states, 10.9°C in the presence of both ions, 4.5°C for the already destabilized apo-state) (compare CHP3 and mCHP3 in Figure 3). A similar destabilizing effect of the myristoylation was observed for the mCHP3:CBD complex with a decrease of Tmapp in the range from 6.4°C for the Ca2+-bound state to 3.2°C for the apo-state (compare CHP3:CBD and mCHP3:CBD in Figure 3). Thus, the N-terminal myristoylation lowers the stability of CHP3 independently of the bound ion and of the target binding that means independent of the conformation.

Ca2+ binding to CHP3 allows more effective cleavage within EF-2, whereas CBD binding drastically increases proteolytic stability

In order to pinpoint flexible regions of CHP3 in a given conformation and to probe whether these regions are affected by myristoylation, ion and target binding, we performed limited trypsinolysis of CHP3, mCHP3, and their complexes with CBD in the presence of Ca2+, Mg2+, or EDTA.

CHP3 was readily proteolysed by trypsin with nearly one half of the protein already degraded after 5 min and almost no full-length protein remained after 60-min incubation (Figure 4A, top, FL). Trypsin cleavage sites (Arg and Lys residues) are distributed all over the CHP3 amino acid sequence (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A), yet productive cleavage requires not only availability of the site but also flexibility of the peptide chain at the cleavage site to adapt to the active site of the protease (Teilum et al., 2009). During the reaction, we observed the appearance of two major fragments (labelled 1 and 2 in Figure 4A). We analysed those fragments with MS to determine exact masses and precisely locate the cleavage sites (Figure 4—figure supplement 1C). Fragment 1 has a mass of 17.92 kDa corresponding to residues 2–155 of CHP3 (UniProtID Q96BS2-1) lacking the C-terminal part (Figure 4C). Fragment 2 has a mass of 9.63 kDa and includes residues 74–155. Thus, it derived from a cleavage of fragment 1 within the predicted EF-2 (Figure 4C). Noteworthy, both fragments still contain the single functional EF-hand of CHP3 (EF-3). Target peptide binding nearly completely prevented the trypsin cleavage, and the intensity of the full-length CHP3 band was only slightly reduced even after 60-min incubation (Figure 4A, bottom). Next, we compared the proteolytic stability of CHP3 in different states. In the presence of only Ca2+, Mg2+, or both ions together, the degradation rate of the full-length protein (FL) was comparable, whereas the apo-state degraded much faster (Figure 4B, FL). Fragment 1 appeared already after 5 min and degraded further over time (Figure 4B, 1), its cleavage was more pronounced in the presence of Ca2+ and was accompanied with an increase of fragment 2 (Figure 4B, 2). This indicates that the cleavage site located in EF-2 becomes more available for the protease in the open conformation (Ca2+ bound). N-terminal myristoylation did not affect the proteolytic stability of the full-length protein, whereas it slightly reduced the stability of fragment 1 in all states. In addition, a second minor band below fragment 1 appeared for mCHP3 (Figure 4B). The small differences in the tryptic cleavage of CHP3 and mCHP3 indicate a local destabilizing effect of the myristoyl moiety, in line with the lower thermal stability of mCHP3 compared to CHP3. The complex formation with CBD drastically increased the proteolytic stability of both CHP3 and mCHP3, as nearly no degradation occurred under all analysed experimental conditions (Figure 4B, CHP3:CBD and Figure 4—figure supplement 1B).

Figure 4 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Ca2+-binding and complex formation change the accessibility of trypsin cleavage sites in CHP3 and mCHP3.

(A) Time-dependent (0–60 min) limited proteolysis (trypsin) of CHP3 (top) and the complex of CHP3:CBD (bottom) in the presence of both Mg2+ and Ca2+. Positions of full-length protein (FL) and two major proteolytic fragments (1 and 2) as well as CBD are indicated on the right of the Coomassie-stained SDS–PAGE gel, positions of co-separated molecular mass standards (mass in kDa) – on the left; the sample containing only trypsin was loaded on the first lane (T); Figure 4—source data 1: Full gels of (A). (B) Time-dependent limited proteolysis of CHP3 and mCHP3 in the presence of Mg2+, Ca2+, both ions or in the absence of them. Sections of the gel with bands corresponding to the full-length protein (FL) and two major proteolytic fragments (1 and 2) are shown. Nearly no degradation was observed for CHP3 and mCHP3 in the complex with CBD in all conditions (Mg2+ + Ca2+ condition is presented here, other gels are shown in Figure 4—figure supplement 1B and its source data). (C) Schematic representation of full-length CHP3 with indication of N- and C-lobes, four EF-hand motifs (active EF-3 is highlighted in green). Proteolytic fragments 1 and 2 and trypsin cleavage sites were identified by mass spectrometry. (D) Combined ribbon and surface presentation of the CHP3 AlphaFold2.0 model (Varadi et al., 2022) with N- and C-lobes shown in blue and orange, respectively, and the connecting CHP-loop in cyan; the two major trypsin cleavage sites are highlighted in yellow and Ca2+ ion as a green sphere. The Ca2+ position in EF-3 was modelled by superimposition of the CHP3 model with the CHP1 X-ray structure, pdb ID 2ct9 (Andrade et al., 2004).

Figure 4—source data 1

Full gels for Figure 4A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/83868/elife-83868-fig4-data1-v2.zip

We mapped both major cleavage sites on the 3D model of CHP3 predicted with AlphaFold2.0 (Varadi et al., 2022; Figure 4D). This model closely resembles the structures of CHP1 and CHP2 in complex with CBD (Ammar et al., 2006; Mishima et al., 2007), of CHP1 in complex with full-length NHE1 (Dong et al., 2021) and of CHP1 with an artificial C-terminal helix bound in the target-binding pocket (Kennedy et al., 1996), that is structures of target-bound CHPs. All these structures represent the Ca2+-bound state. The cleavage site R155/S156 is located in this model at the N-side of the incoming α-helix of EF-4 and though surface exposed the α-helical location may hamper the proteolytic digest (Fontana et al., 1997). The other site, R73/K74 is located in the middle of the EF-2 loop (non-functional Ca2+-binding loop) (Figure 4D). Though the site appears to be surface exposed in the model, one should note that CHP3 has a 9-amino acid long insertion in that position as compared to CHP1 and CHP2 (Figure 4—figure supplement 2). The structure of CHP3 may deviate from the model and information for other conformations is lacking. Clearly, limited proteolysis showed that both sites are accessible and sufficiently flexible for productive cleavage in the free CHP3, yet become protected against cleavage upon complex formation. Both major cleavage sites are highly unlikely to be covered by CBD in the complex, as they are facing away from the target-binding pocket (Figure 4D). Thus, the drastic changes in the proteolytic stability indicate reduced flexibility in EF-2 and EF-4, which could be caused by structural rearrangements of CHP3 upon target peptide binding.

Ca2+ binding and the N-terminal myristoylation independently modulate the affinity of CHP3 for NHE1

To analyse how the conformational changes described above affect CHP3 function, we measured affinities of CHP3 and mCHP3 for the target peptide CBD with microscale thermophoresis (MST) in Ca2+- and in Mg2+-bound states. We used the system established earlier for quantification of binding affinities of CHP isoforms (CHP1, CHP2, and CHP3) to NHE1, in which the target peptide CBD was fused to maltose-binding protein (MBP-CBD) for its stabilization (Liang et al., 2020; Fuchs et al., 2018). We conducted the MST experiments with three biological replicates per sample and five individual titration series (technical replicates) per biological replicate (Figure 5). The dissociation constant (KD) for a given sample was calculated with a global parameter estimation procedure including all biological and technical replicates. We fitted the mass action law to the MST data points using non-linear regression. Confidence intervals were assessed for each KD value by calculating profile likelihoods (error surface plots) as described elsewhere (Kreutz et al., 2013; Scheuermann et al., 2016; Figure 5E). Comparison of the resulting KD values showed that the effects of Ca2+ binding and myristoylation on CHP3:CBD interaction are independent. Namely, Ca2+ binding increased affinities for CBD of both non-myristoylated (CHP3:CBD, KD = 3.1 [2.8; 3.4] nM) and myristoylated CHP3 (mCHP3:CBD, KD = 5.6 [5.1; 6.2] nM) by about fivefold as compared to the Mg2+-bound state (CHP3:CBD, KD = 14.6 [12.5; 16.9] nM; mCHP3:CBD, KD = 28.2 [26.6; 29.8] nM) (Figure 5A–D). In turn, for both Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound states, myristoylation decreased the affinity twofold (Figure 5). Hence, CHP3 binds to NHE1 with nanomolar affinity in both open and closed conformation and independently of its modification, however, Ca2+ binding and myristoylation modulates the affinity.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Ca2+ binding and myristoylation independently affect the interaction between CHP3 and MBP-CBD as measured with microscale thermophoresis (MST).

The interaction of CHP3 (A, B) and mCHP3 (C, D) with MBP-CBD was measured with three biological replicates shown in different colours (each with five technical replicates) in the presence of either Ca2+ (A, C) or Mg2+ (B, D). The combined data from individual experiments were fitted with a one-site binding model using global non-linear regression. (E) 95% confidence intervals (Δχ2 of 3.84) of KD’s for CHP3:CBD and mCHP3:CBD calculated with profile likelihood method. Raw MST traces are shown in Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

Target peptide and Ca2+ binding regulate the interaction of CHP3 with lipid membranes

As we showed that the effects of Ca2+ and myristoylation on conformational changes of CHP3 and mCHP3 are independent, the hypothesis of a Ca2+-myristoyl switch for CHP3 (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003; Zaun et al., 2012) had to be questioned. Therefore, we analysed binding of CHP3 and mCHP3 to POPC:POPS (3:1 molar ratio) liposomes with a co-sedimentation assay in the presence of either Mg2+ or Ca2+, and compared to the binding of recoverin, used as control protein for a Ca2+-myristoyl switch. In line with previous studies (Zozulya and Stryer, 1992), non-myristoylated recoverin (Rec) only weakly interacted with liposomes in both Mg2+- and Ca2+-bound states, whereas the interaction of myristoylated protein (mRec) increased about fourfold upon Ca2+ addition (Figure 6A, B). In the Mg2+-bound state, CHP3 interacted weakly with liposomes similar to recoverin, only a small protein amount co-sedimented with liposomes. In contrast to recoverin, Ca2+ addition increased the binding of non-myristoylated CHP3 (about 2.5 times) to liposomes, whereas myristoylation did not further increase this binding (Figure 6A, B). Interestingly, the binding of the target peptide CBD substantially changed the interaction of CHP3 with liposomes. In both the absence and the presence of Ca2+, only a small amount of the CHP3:CBD complex was associated with liposomes. However, CHP3 myristoylation increased the binding in both conditions about fourfold (Figure 6A, B). In the presence of Ca2+, the binding of mCHP3:CBD was even slightly higher than without it, however the difference was not significant. These results indicate the following mode of interaction. The myristic moiety is located in the protein core of target-free CHP3 and is not accessible to lipid membranes in the presence of Ca2+. Most likely, other protein regions are involved in membrane binding in this case. Target peptide binding causes conformational rearrangements with displacement of the myristic moiety from the protein core to the environment, which leads in consequence to an increased association of CHP3 and its target to lipid membranes.

Figure 6 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
The interaction of CHP3 and mCHP3 with liposomes is regulated by Ca2+ and target peptide binding.

Proteins were co-sedimented with POPC:POPS (3:1 molar ratio) liposomes in the presence of either 2 mM Mg2+ or 2 mM Mg2+ + 2 mM Ca2+ at 24°C. Non-myristoylated and myristoylated recoverin (Rec and mRec, respectively) were used as Ca2+-myristoyl switch control proteins. (A) Amount of proteins co-sedimented with liposomes was analysed with SDS–PAGE (4–12%, Bis-Tris). (B) Quantification of protein-liposome binding based on the densitometry of bands (SDS–PAGE shown in (A)) corresponded to the co-sedimented proteins with three biological (CHP3 and complexes) or technical (recoverin) replicates. Values were normalized to the respective non-myristoylated protein in the Mg2+-bound state. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey post-test was performed for mean comparison (statistical significance: n.s. – p > 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). (C) N-terminal myristoylation of target-associated CHP3 in mouse brain. LC–MS/MS analysis of a trypsin-digested size fraction of solubilized mouse brain membrane containing NHE1-associated CHP3 (see Materials and methods). Upper panel: high coverage of the mouse CHP3 primary sequence by MS/MS-identified peptides (in red; black: sequences not identified, grey: sequences not accessible to our MS analysis) without inclusion of N-myristoyl modification. Lower panel: MS/MS spectrum from the same measurement assigned to the myristoylated tryptic N-terminal peptide of CHP3. Note that no other forms of the N-terminal peptide were detectable in error-tolerant search. Figure 6—source data 1: Full gels for (A) and replicates; raw data of band densitometry and ANOVA test p-values.

Figure 6—source data 1

Full gels for Figure 6A and replicates; raw data of band densitometry and analysis of variance (ANOVA) test p-values for Figure 6B.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/83868/elife-83868-fig6-data1-v2.zip

Finally, we investigated the N-terminal myristoylation status of membrane associated CHP3 in vivo using liquid chromatography coupled mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). In three different preparations, namely (1) size fractionated complexes from mouse brain membranes (Figure 6C), (2) integral membrane proteins isolated from mouse platelets (i.e. after carbonate extraction, Figure 6—figure supplement 1), and (3) anti-NHE1-affinity purification from solubilized mouse brain membranes (data not shown) we identified the vast majority of MS-accessible CHP3 peptides, but only the myristoylated form of the N-terminal peptide. Together, this suggests that myristoylated CHP3 is both NHE1 associated and membrane anchored in agreement with a target-induced exposure and membrane integration of the N-terminal myristoyl moiety.

Discussion

Ca2+-induced conformational changes are a hallmark of Ca2+-sensing EFCaBPs, which control the interaction with and the function of specific target proteins (Burgoyne, 2007). Our in vitro experiments show that Ca2+ binding induces conformational changes in CHP3, thus it fulfills this prerequisite to respond to Ca2+ signals in the cell. Based on the reported affinities of CHP3 for Ca2+ and Mg2+ (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003), CHP3 should bind Mg2+ at resting Ca2+ concentration of about 0.1 µM in the cell (Roderick and Cook, 2008; Bootman and Bultynck, 2020) and it could bind Ca2+ when intracellular Ca2+ concentration rises up to 1 µM during signalling events (Bootman and Bultynck, 2020). As CHP3 can be N-terminally myristoylated, it was proposed to be regulated with a so-called Ca2+-myristoyl switch mechanism (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003; Zaun et al., 2012), in which Ca2+ binding induces the exposure of the myristic moiety to the environment. In contrast to this hypothesis, we described in the present study independent effects of Ca2+ binding and N-terminal myristoylation on CHP3 conformation and on the interaction with its target protein NHE1. We show that target peptide and not Ca2+ binding causes strong association of the myristoylated CHP3 to lipid membranes.

First, we optimized the protein production and purification to obtain pure myristoylated and non-myristoylated CHP3 devoid of affinity tags, a prerequisite for further quantitative biochemical and biophysical analysis. With the expression system based on that described for the production of N-myristoylated Nef protein of HIV-1 (Glück et al., 2010), we obtained preparative amounts of fully myristoylated CHP3. Stoichiometric myristoylation, which is still challenging for recombinant EFCaBPs (Vladimirov et al., 2020), was shown with native MS. The latter was also used to demonstrate that both CHP3 and mCHP3 bind a single Ca2+, and are thus functional EFCaBPs, in agreement with the results of equilibrium dialysis shown earlier (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003). Using the highly pure proteins, we showed with FPH and intrinsic fluorescence assays reversible conformational changes in CHP3 between a more hydrophobic Ca2+-bound state typical for an open conformation and a less hydrophobic Mg2+-bound state reflecting a closed conformation (Figure 7). Such conformational changes are typical for Ca2+ sensor EFCaBPs including calmodulin, recoverin, neuronal calcium sensor protein (NCS1), and others, and serve as a conformational switch for binding and/or regulation of a target protein (Chazin, 2011). We characterized different CHP3 conformations in respect to thermal and proteolytic stability. We revealed a stabilizing effect of Mg2+ on target-free CHP3 and mCHP3 with increased thermal stability. As we observed that CHP3 is not stable in the apo-state, we conclude that Mg2+ binding is important to stabilize the closed conformation of target-free protein in the cell at resting Ca2+ level. Stabilization by Mg2+ binding has been shown for other EFCaBPs including calmodulin and troponin C (Gifford and Vogel, 2013; Grabarek, 2011). Further, replacement of Mg2+ with Ca2+ at EF-3 (C-lobe) lowered the thermal stability of CHP3 and mCHP3 and enhanced proteolytic cleavage in EF-2 (N-lobe) suggesting an increase in local flexibility. Thus, Ca2+-induced conformational changes involve not only the C-lobe of CHP3 but also its N-lobe.

Figure 7
Download asset Open asset
Conformation of CHP3 is controlled by Ca2+ and target peptide (NHE1 CBD) binding.

Ca2+ (magenta) replaces Mg2+ (green) in EF-3 and induces the transition from the closed to the open conformation. Ca2+ binding affects the local flexibility in the N-lobe accelerating the tryptic cleavage and reduces the thermal stability of CHP3. In both, Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound states, CHP3 binds the target peptide CBD with nanomolar affinity (KD values indicated, in brackets for myristoylated CHP3). Complex formation has no effect on the thermal stability of the Mg2+-bound state (closed conformation), whereas it strongly enhances thermal stability of the Ca2+-bound state (open conformation). Independent of the bound ion, both trypsin cleavage sites are protected from proteolysis in the CHP3:CBD complex.

The Ca2+-induced open conformation with lower thermal stability and increased local flexibility appears to provide the molecular basis for CHP3 to interact more readily with its target(s) (Figure 7). Our data support this hypothesis. Firstly, the binding of the target peptide resulted in a drastic increase of CHP3 thermal and proteolytic stabilities. However, the thermal stability increased only in the presence of Ca2+, whereas for the Mg2+-bound state it remained unchanged. These characteristics of the Ca2+-induced open conformation may lower the energy barrier for binding of the target peptide. Secondly, in line with co-immunoprecipitation of tagged NHE1 and tagged CHP3 from transfected AP-1 cells (Zaun et al., 2012), we detected binding between CHP3 and CBD in both, Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound states (see Figure 5). The quantitative analysis with MST showed that the affinity of the Ca2+-bound state was about five times higher, clearly indicating that Ca2+ controls CHP3 function.

Though all CHP isoforms bind NHE1 with nanomolar affinities in the absence and presence of Ca2+ (Liang et al., 2020; Fuchs et al., 2018), intracellular Ca2+ signals might regulate NHE1 function (e.g. activity or stability) via CHPs affecting the conformation of the complex. Regulation of the activity by Ca2+ binding to the regulatory subunit was described for calcineurin, a phosphatase consisting of the catalytic and regulatory subunits calcineurin A (CnA) and B (CnB), respectively. Similar to the CHP3:NHE1 interaction, CnB forms a stable complex with CnA independently of Ca2+ binding. Nevertheless, Ca2+ binding induces conformational changes of CnB resulting in the release of the calmodulin-binding domain of CnA and allowing its activation by calmodulin (Creamer, 2020; Yang and Klee, 2000). In the case of CHPs, and particularly of CHP3, Ca2+ binding to the C-terminal EF-hands (EF-3 in CHP3) affects the conformation also of the N-terminal lobe (Figure 7), most likely via the hydrophobic cluster at the interface between N- and C-lobes, which is characteristic for the so-called CPV (calcineurin B, p22/CHP1, visinin) subfamily of EFCaBPs (Kawasaki and Kretsinger, 2017). Such conformational changes of CHP might affect the overall structure of the complex formed by CHPs and NHE1. All CHP structures so far, the recent cryo-EM structure of the NHE1:CHP1 complex (Dong et al., 2021), and structures of CHP1 (Mishima et al., 2007) and CHP2 (Ammar et al., 2006) in complex with the target peptide CBD obtained with NMR and X-ray crystallography, showed one conformation of CHPs with Ca2+ (or the Ca2+-mimic Y3+) and the target peptide bound. The structure of CHP3 has not been determined so far and moreover, structural information of target-free CHPs in the open and closed conformations is lacking. Therefore, further structural studies are required to better understand the molecular mechanisms for NHE1 regulation by Ca2+ binding to CHPs. This information would be valuable also to elucidate signal integration through the regulatory domain of NHE1, which acts as signalling hub interacting with several regulatory proteins including the Ca2+-binding proteins calmodulin and calcineurin (Pedersen and Counillon, 2019).

Regarding the lipidation modification, many Ca2+ sensor proteins have an N-terminal myristoylation site and often Ca2+ binding to the myristoylated EFCaBP causes an exposure of the myristoyl moiety. A surface-exposed myristoyl moiety strongly increases the binding of the Ca2+-bound EFCaBP to lipid membranes. This regulatory mechanism is called Ca2+-myristoyl switch and was described for a subgroup of neuronal calcium sensor (NCS) proteins (recoverin, hippocalcin, visinin-like proteins, and neurocalcin δ) (Ames et al., 1997; Burgoyne, 2004). In other NCSs, the position of the myristoyl moiety is not affected by calcium binding, but it is constantly exposed (NCS1, KChIP1) (McFerran et al., 1999; O’Callaghan et al., 2003) or hidden inside the protein (GCAP1, GCAP2) (Lim et al., 2014; Burgoyne, 2007; Burgoyne, 2004). So far, there is no apparent correlation between number and position of active EF-hands with the position of the myristoyl moiety in NCS proteins. Even for highly homologous myristoylated NCS proteins with known structures, the location of the myristoyl moiety varies (Lim et al., 2014). Thus, structural information and models are not sufficient to assign a calcium-myristoyl switch. For CHP3, a Ca2+-myristoyl switch was proposed as mutational analysis indicated that deficiency in Ca2+ binding and/or myristoylation of CHP3 reduced the surface expression and activity of NHE1 in the same degree (Zaun et al., 2012). Yet, a direct evidence for a Ca2+-myristoyl switch in CHP3 was lacking. Our data indicate an independent regulation of CHP3 by Ca2+ binding and myristoylation, and contradict the presence of a Ca2+-myristoyl switch. Firstly, CHP3 myristoylation only slightly increased the hydrophobicity of the Ca2+-bound state in comparison to the prominent hydrophobicity increase of recoverin that has a classical Ca2+-myristoyl switch (Ames et al., 1997). Secondly, myristoylation did not affect Ca2+-binding properties of CHP3. Next, myristoylation reduced the thermal stability of free and target-bound CHP3 in a similar manner for both Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound states. Furthermore, mCHP3 affinities to CBD in both ion-bound states were decreased twofold compared to CHP3. We also provided further evidence for the lack of a Ca2+-myristoyl switch in CHP3 by analysing its interaction with liposomes. Although Ca2+ addition strongly increased the CHP3 association with POPC/POPS liposomes, the effect was the same for both myristoylated and non-myristoylated proteins. In the closed conformation, the myristic group is usually buried in the protein core of EFCaBPs, however the binding interface differs a lot in different EFCaBPs (Lim et al., 2014). We assume that CHP3 resembles GCAPs, which have the myristoyl group enclosed in the protein hydrophobic core independently of Ca2+ binding (Lim et al., 2014). The membrane binding of CHP3 independent of its myristoylation suggests that different protein regions, for example clusters of hydrophobic or positively charged residues, are involved in proteinlipid interaction. Binding of the target peptide CBD drastically reduced the interaction of CHP3 with lipid membranes that is apparently caused by large structural rearrangements. The CHP3:CBD complex did not bind to liposomes in the presence of Ca2+. One can speculate that residues involved in membrane binding of the target-free Ca2+-bound CHP3 can be either covered by the target peptide or become inaccessible due to structural rearrangements upon complex formation. In stark contrast to the target-free CHP3, myristoylation increased fourfold the amount of CHP3:CBD complex associated with liposomes. We propose that the target peptide competes with the myristoyl moiety for binding in the hydrophobic pocket and by this way shifts the conformational equilibrium of CHP3, resulting in the exposure of the myristoyl moiety to the environment (Figure 8). The competition for the hydrophobic pocket is also in line with the lower affinity of mCHP3 to CBD in comparison to non-myristoylated protein as shown by MST analysis (Figure 5). As the effect on affinity is small, the myristoyl moiety binds most likely weakly or transiently to the target-binding pocket. This resembles the dynamic regulatory interaction of disordered protein regions of p53 to its DNA-binding domain (Krois et al., 2018) and of Radical-Induced Cell Death 1 (RCD1) to the ligand-binding pocket (Staby et al., 2021).

Figure 8
Download asset Open asset
Target-myristoyl switch in CHP3.

N-terminal myristoylation of CHP3 by NMT1 increases the local flexibility in the N-lobe, as it accelerated its tryptic cleavage. The myristoyl moiety most likely binds weakly or transiently to the target-binding pocket in both Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound states, as myristoylation reduced twofold the affinity of CHP3 to CBD. CBD binding causes displacement from the hydrophobic pocket and the surface exposure of the myristoyl moiety resulting in enhanced CHP3 binding to lipid membranes in both Ca2+- and Mg2+-bound states.

In general, the surface exposure of the myristoyl moiety in myristoylated regulatory proteins can be induced by Ca2+ or by small molecule binding, phosphorylation, and pH shift. Respective regulatory mechanisms were termed Ca2+-myristoyl switch (neuronal calcium sensor proteins) (Ames et al., 1997; Burgoyne, 2004), GTP-myristoyl switch (ARF1 GTPase [Goldberg, 1998]), myristoyl/phosphoserine switch (Braun et al., 2000; Gaffarogullari et al., 2011), and pH-dependent myristoyl switch (hisactophilin [Hanakam et al., 1996]). The myristoyl switch induced by proteinprotein interaction described here for CHP3 is a novel mechanism that regulates the association of myristoylated proteins with lipid membranes. We propose to call it ‘target-myristoyl switch’ (Figure 8). This mechanism was supported by LC–MS/MS analyses, which exclusively detected the N-terminally myristoylated CHP3 in brain membrane fraction (Figure 6C) and in a preparation from platelets containing integral membrane proteins and lipid-anchored proteins (Figure 6—figure supplement 1). We suggest that the target-myristoyl switch is the canonical mechanism to anchor the regulatory domain of NHE1 to the plasma membrane, which appears to be the molecular basis for an increase of NHE1 surface stability by CHP3. A defined conformation enforced by the membrane anchor may also regulate NHE1 activity. As the second mode of regulation, Ca2+ binding to CHP3 can affect NHE1:CHP3 interaction in two ways. Ca2+ directly increases the binding affinity of CHP3 for NHE1, and indirectly increases the probability to interact with NHE1 via enhanced association of free CHP3 with lipid membranes. Our hypothesis is in line with the previous observation that both, CHP3 myristoylation and Ca2+ binding are important for NHE1 surface stability when both proteins were co-expressed in AP-1 cell line (Zaun et al., 2012).

It will be interesting to investigate whether the interaction of CHP3 with other described target proteins, such as with subunit 4 of COP9 signalosome, GSK3ß, and calcineurin A (Gutierrez-Ford et al., 2003; Levay and Slepak, 2014; Kobayashi et al., 2015) can induce the target-myristoyl switch and how Ca2+ binding affects these interactions. Structural characterization of CHP3 in different conformations is needed to further explore the underlying molecular basis of the regulatory mechanism. The target-myristoyl switch might exist in other proteins including CHP1 and CHP2 and can be explored by comparison of the membrane association for myristoylated and non-myristoylated complexes.

CHP3 is an emerging important player in the cellular Ca2+ signalling network that is involved in regulation of cancerogenesis, cardiac hypertrophy, and neuronal development. Our data can help to better understand the molecular mechanisms of regulation of these processes by CHP3 and of signal integration by NHE1.

Materials and methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Recombinant DNA reagentpETDuet-1Δ6His_hNMT_NefDOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0010081Provided by Prof. Willbold (Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany)
Peptide, recombinant proteinBovine serum albumin (BSA)Sigma-AldrichCat.# A7906For production of mCHP3 and mRec
Peptide, recombinant proteinTrypsinSigma-AldrichCat.# T1426For limited trypsinolysis
Chemical compound, drugMyristic acidCarl Roth GmbHCat.# 6469.1For production of mCHP3 and mRec
Chemical compound, drugPOPCAvanti Polar Lipids, IncCat.# 850457CLiposome preparation
Chemical compound, drugPOPSAvanti Polar Lipids, IncCat.# 840034CLiposome preparation
Chemical compound, drugProteOrangeLumiprobeCat.# 40210Dye for FPH assay
Commercial assay, kitMonolith Series Protein labeling kit – RED-NHSNanotemper TechnologiesCat.# MO-001MST labeling kit
Commercial assay, kitMonolith Series Premium CapillariesNanotemper TechnologiesCat.# MO-K025MST capillaries
Software, algorithmData2Dynamics Softwarehttps://github.com/Data2Dynamics/d2d; Kreutz, 2023For statistical analysis of datasets consisted of technical and biological replicates
Other16% Novex Tricine GelThermo Fisher ScientificCat.# EC66955BOXSDS–PAGE system for separation of CHP3 and mCHP3
Other96-well black platesGreiner Bio-OneCat.# 655076For FPH assay

Plasmids

The generation of all plasmids was performed using NEBuilder HiFi DNA assembly Master Mix (New England Biolabs GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany). Protein-coding sequences (CDS) were inserted without any additions for affinity tags if not stated otherwise. The pETDuet-1Δ6His_hNMT_Nef containing the codon optimized CDS of the human N-myristoyltransferase 1 (NMT1, Gene ID 4836, UniProtKB ID P30419) was kindly provided by Prof. Willbold (Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany). To obtain the pETDuet1_NMT1_TESC plasmid, the codon optimized (E. coli) CDS of human CHP3 (TESC, Gene ID 54997, UniProtKB ID Q96BS2) was cloned into the second multiple cloning site of the pETDuet-1Δ6His_hNMT_Nef plasmid replacing the Nef CDS. The NMT1 CDS was deleted from the pETDuet1_NMT1_TESC plasmid to generate the plasmid pETDuet1_TESC. For co-expression of the NHE1 CBD:CHP3 complexes, the codon optimized (E. coli) CDS of a minimal NHE1 CBD with three additional histidines added C-terminally (NHE1 residues 525–545, MRSINEEIHTQFLDHLLTGIEDICGHYGHHHHHH, CBDHis) was used. In case of the pETDuet1_CBDHis_TESC plasmid, the CBDHis CDS was inserted in the first multiple cloning site, whereas for the pETDuet1_NMT1_CBDHis_TESC plasmid, the CBDHis CDS, and the linker region containing T7 promoter/lac operator and ribosome-binding site was inserted between NMT1 and CHP3 CDSs. The plasmid pETDuet1_Rec containing the codon optimized CDS of human recoverin (Gene ID 5957, UniProtKB ID P35243) in the second multiple cloning site was obtained from BioCat (Heidelberg, Germany). NMT1 CDS was inserted into the first site of this plasmid to obtain the pETDuet1_NMT1_Rec plasmid.

Protein productions and purifications

Request a detailed protocol

We adapted the protocol of Glück et al., 2010 for the production of recombinant myristoylated CHP3 (mCHP3) by co-expression with human NMT1. Pre-cultures in TBcarb medium were made from a single colony of E. coli BL21 (DE3) transformed with the pETDuet1_NMT1_TESC plasmid. Main cultures in TBcarb medium containing the surfactant Antifoam 204 (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) were inoculated to a final OD600 = 0.1 and incubated at 37°C. At OD600 = 0.6, the temperature was shifted to 28°C and 3% ethanol (vol/vol) was added. Myristic acid (mixed with 4% bovine serum albumin) was added at OD600 = 0.70–0.75. The protein production was induced at OD600 = 0.8 with 0.5 mM IPTG (isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside). After 4-hr incubation, cells were harvested and stored at −80°C. Non-myristoylated CHP3 was produced similarly using the plasmid without NMT1 (pETDuet1_TESC); no antifoam, ethanol and myristic acid were added to the medium. The expression was performed at 30°C overnight.

All chromatography columns were obtained from Cytiva (Marlborough, MS, USA). CHP3 and mCHP3 were purified using Ca2+-dependent HIC based on protocols established for other EFCaBPs (Tanaka et al., 1984; Wei and Lee, 1997). Briefly, sedimented cells were resuspended in buffer A (20 mM HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid), 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM DTT (dithiothreitol), 10% glycerol [wt/vol], pH 7.2) containing 10 mM CaCl2 and 0.3 mM Pefabloc (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany), and lysed with a cell disruptor (Constant systems, Daventry, UK). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the supernatant was loaded onto a HiPrep 16/10 Phenyl HP column equilibrated with buffer A containing 10 mM CaCl2. After removal of unbound material with 10 column volumes of the equilibration buffer, the protein was eluted with buffer A containing 10 mM EGTA (ethylene glycol bis(2-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N´,N´-tetraacetic acid), and the eluate was mixed with an equal volume of buffer A containing 10 mM MgCl2. The eluted protein was concentrated and loaded onto a pre-equilibrated HiLoad 26/600 Superdex 75 column. Buffer A containing 10 mM MgCl2 was used as a running buffer. Fractions containing the purified protein were pooled, concentrated, mixed 1:1 with the cryo-storage buffer (2 M sucrose in gel filtration buffer), flash frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C.

Recoverin and mRecoverin were produced and purified as described above for CHP3 and mCHP3 using the pETDuet1_Rec and pETDuet1_NMT1_Rec plasmids, respectively. The fusion construct of maltose-binding protein and NHE1 CBD (MBP-CBD) was produced and purified as described previously (Fuchs et al., 2018).

The production of CHP3:CBD and mCHP3:CBD complexes was performed as described above using pETDuet1_CBDHis_TESC or pETDuet1_NMT1_CBDHis_TESC plasmids, respectively. Cells were lysed in the presence of 20 mM imidazol. The complexes were purified by IMAC followed by gel filtration. Cell lysate was loaded onto a HisTrap FF 5 ml column pre-equilibrated with buffer A containing 10 mM CaCl2 and 20 mM imidazol. After removal of unbound material with 10 column volumes of the equilibration buffer, elution was done with a linear gradient from 20 to 600 mM imidazol over 20 column volumes. For gel filtration, buffer A containing 10 mM CaCl2 was used as a running buffer.

Native mass spectrometry

Request a detailed protocol

The degree of myristoylation was determined by native MS. For native ion mobility separation (IM)-MS analysis, proteins were transferred into 200 mM ammonium acetate, pH 6.7. Capillaries for nanoflow ESI were prepared in-house from borosilicate glass capillaries 1.0 mm OD × 0.78 mm ID (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) using a micropipette puller Model P-97 (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA, USA) and coated with gold using a sputter coater 108 auto (Cressington TESCAN GmbH, Dortmund, Germany). 3–5 µl of 20 µM protein were loaded per experiment. Measurements were carried out with quadrupole-IM-MS-ToF instrument Synapt G1 HDMS (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA and MS Vision, Almere, The Netherlands) equipped with a 32,000 m/z range quadrupole. Pressures were 8 mbar backing in the source, 0.017 mbar argon in the trap and transfer collision cell and 0.5 mbar nitrogen in the ion mobility cell. Instrument parameters were as follow: capillary voltage 1.2 kV, source temperature 60°C, sample cone voltage 100 V, extraction cone voltage 10 V, acceleration voltages in the trap and transfer cell 5 and 35 V, respectively, IM bias potential 22 V, wave velocity and height 300 m/s and 8 V. Spectra were acquired in the positive ion mode in the m/z range 1000–6000. Spectra recorded for cesium iodide at 50 mg/ml in 50% (vol/vol) isopropanol were used for external mass calibration. Data were processed and analysed using MassLynx Software version 4.1 (Waters Corporation) and UniDec version 2.7.3 (Marty et al., 2015). For charge state deconvolution, smoothing and subtraction of linear background from raw spectra were done.

MS sequencing of native CHP3

Request a detailed protocol

Mouse brain membranes were prepared, solubilized with ComplexioLyte 47 (Logopharm, Germany) and protein complexes were separated by BN-PAGE as described (Schwenk et al., 2012). A section corresponding to an apparent molecular weight of 630 kDa (the migration size of native NHE1 complexes) was excised and subjected to MS analysis (as described below). Mouse platelets were prepared from fresh blood by differential centrifugation and 20 µg washed with 50 µl 100 mM Na2CO3 pH 11 (10 min at 4°C, followed by ultracentrifugation at 233,000 × g for 20 min). The resulting pellet was dissolved in Laemmli buffer and separated on an SDS–PAGE gel and silver stained. The section <50 kDa was excised, in-gel digested with trypsin, the peptides were dissolved in 20 µl 0.5% (vol/vol) trifluoroacetic acid, and 1 µl was analysed on an LC–MS/MS setup (UltiMate 3000 RSLCnano HPLC/QExactive HF-X mass spectrometer, both Thermo Scientific, Germany) as described (Kollewe et al., 2021). MS/MS data were extracted and searched against the UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot database (mouse, rat, human, release 20220525; Mascot search engine version 2.7, Matrix Science, UK) with the following settings: Acetyl (Protein N-term), Carbamidomethyl (C), Gln->pyro-Glu (N-term Q), Glu->pyro-Glu (N-term E), Oxidation (M), Propionamide (C) as variable modifications, one missed cleavage allowed, with or without myristoylation (N-term G) or in error-tolerant mode; precursor/fragment mass tolerance was ±10 ppm/±25 mmu, significance threshold p < 0.05.

Fluorescence-based assays

Request a detailed protocol

The conformational changes of the protein in response to ion binding were probed with the FPH assay (Liang et al., 2020) and by monitoring the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence. The buffer of the protein solution was exchanged to the assay buffer (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM TCEP (Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphin), 2 mM MgCl2, pH 7.2) containing 1 mM EGTA using Zeba spin desalting columns (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, Waltham, MA, USA). The FPH assay was modified as follows. 500 µl of 1.5 µM protein and 5 µM ProteOrange (Lumiprobe GmbH, Hannover, Germany) in the assay buffer were mixed and incubated for 30 min in the dark. The fluorescence at 585 nm (excitation at 470 nm) was measured continuously with the Cary Eclipse spectrofluorimeter (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Every 60 s a new compound was added in the following order: 2 mM CaCl2, 3 mM EGTA, 3 mM EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and 4 mM CaCl2.

Determination of Ca2+ EC50 values was performed using the FPH assay, mixing 1.5 µM protein and 5 µM ProteOrange with varied (0.34 µM to 8.0 mM) concentrations of CaCl2. The assay was carried out in 96-well black plates (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) with a sample volume of 100 μl. For each biological replicate, three to four technical replicates were measured. The fluorescence at 590 nm with excitation at 485 nm (F590) was measured with the BioTek Synergy 2 plate reader (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The data were fitted using the Hill equation

F590(c(Ca2+))=F0+Fmax1+(EC50c(Ca2+))n

to estimate parameters from data which has the a priori unknown parameters: F0 (F590 in the absence of Ca2+), Fmax (maximal change of F590), EC50, and n (Hill coefficient). The parameters EC50 and the Hill coefficient n represent biological quantities that are global and therefore shared between the three biological replicates. The parameters F0 and Fmax are affected by experimental procedures and therefore different between the three biological replicates. Adding one parameter for dose-independent measurement noise, a total of nine parameters has to be estimated simultaneously for each condition. Parameter uncertainty can be assessed using the profile likelihood method, which is also referred to as error surface plots. We utilized optimization to obtain the best parameter set that minimizes deviation between model and data in terms of the negative log-likelihood. Uncertainty of the parameters is quantified using profile likelihood method (Kreutz et al., 2013), which is also termed error surface plots in the literature. This fitting procedure was independently applied to both conditions in order to obtain EC50 values and corresponding uncertainties for both conditions. Data2Dynamics Software (Raue et al., 2015) used for EC50 determination from data including biological and technical replicates is available at GitHub (https://github.com/Data2Dynamics/d2d, copy archived at Kreutz, 2023).

For monitoring the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence, 500 µl of 2.5 µM of the respective protein in assay buffer were prepared. Fluorescence was measured at 330 nm with an excitation at 280 nm. The time traces were recorded as described above for the FPH assay. For the tryptophan fluorescence spectra, a protein concentration of 5 µM was used and emission spectra of CHP3 and mCHP3 were measured from 300 to 380 nm (excitation at 280 nm) in the presence of 2 mM Mg2+ plus 1 mM EGTA and with further addition of 2 mM Ca2+.

All assays were performed with three individually purified biological replicates of CHP3 and mCHP3.

Thermal stability analysis with nanoDSF

Request a detailed protocol

The thermal stability of CHP3, mCHP3, and the complexes with CBD was compared at different conditions using nano differential scanning fluorimetry (nanoDSF). Buffer of the protein solutions was exchanged to the assay buffer as above; the final concentration was adjusted to 100 µM and thermal stability was measured in the presence of 10 mM of either MgCl2, CaCl2, MgCl2 and CaCl2, or EDTA. Each sample was measured with two technical and three independent biological replicates in standard capillaries (Nanotemper Technologies, Munich, Germany) with the Prometheus NT.48 device (Nanotemper Technologies). Measurements were carried out from 20 to 95°C with a heating rate of 1°C/min. Unfolding of proteins analysed was irreversible, thus apparent melting temperatures (Tmapp) are given. They were determined as an inflection point of the unfolding curves using the PR.ThermControl software (Nanotemper Technologies).

Limited proteolysis

Request a detailed protocol

Next, we probed the proteolytic stability of CHP3, mCHP3, and of their complexes with CBD. Buffer of the protein solutions was exchanged to the assay buffer containing either 2 mM MgCl2 + 0.5 mM EGTA, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2 + 2 mM CaCl2, or 2 mM EDTA as an additive. The final protein concentration was adjusted to 0.5 mg/ml for each sample. Each reaction was started with the addition of 0.01 mg/ml trypsin (Sigma Aldrich, Cat. No. T1426) dissolved in 1 mM HCl, and performed for 1 hr on ice. Samples were taken after 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min, directly mixed with an equal volume of 2× reducing NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and boiled for 5 min at 95°C. The proteolytic fragments were separated on 12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

To determine which trypsin cleavage sites in CHP3 are accessible for proteolysis, the major proteolytic fragments were analysed by ESI MS. 100 µl of CHP3 and mCHP3 in the assay buffer with 2 mM CaCl2 and 2 mM MgCl2 were incubated with trypsin for 15 min. Protein fragments were separated on 16% Novex Tricine gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The major bands were cut, minced into smaller pieces and loaded on top of 300 kDa Nanosep centrifugal devices (Pall Corporation, Port Washington, NY, USA). Proteins were eluted two times with 400 µl of the assay buffer containing 0.1% SDS by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 20 min. Eluates were concentrated with Vivaspin500 5,000 MWCO concentrators (Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany). SDS was removed by precipitation with 0.2 M KCl followed by 10 min centrifugation at 14,000 × g. 10 µl of each sample were analysed with liquid chromatography (Thermo Fisher Ultimate 3000 with Phenomenex Jupiter 5 µm C4 300 Å 50 × 2 mm) coupled to high-resolution ESI MS (Maxis 4G, Bruker Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA). The resulting peptide masses were compared to all possible trypsin digestion fragments of CHP3 or mCHP3 to identify the cleavage sites.

Microscale thermophoresis

Request a detailed protocol

MST was performed using the Monolith Pico device (Nanotemper Technologies) as described previously (Fuchs et al., 2018). The only difference was the use of the measuring buffer containing either 10 mM CaCl2 or 10 mM MgCl2 (20 mM HEPES, 5 mM TCEP, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20, 10 mM MgCl2, or 10 mM CaCl2; pH 7.2). All measurements were performed with three independently produced and purified protein replicates of CHP3, mCHP3, and MBP-CBD. Every condition was titrated and measured five times per biological replicate (technical replicates).

Mass action kinetics of a one-site binding model was utilized to derive the fitting function for dissociation constant (KD) determination: Let A and B* denote the concentrations of unlabelled and labelled binding partners respectively, and the concentration of the protein complex by AB*. The total amounts of A and B* (Atot and Btot∗) can be controlled by the experimental setup. In our application, Btot∗ =10 nM was fixed and Atot =[MBP-CBD] was the independent variable for the dose response analysis. The thermophoresis data were normalized and fitted with global non-linear regression to the dose response function (Scheuermann et al., 2016):

Fn(Atot)=(B∗Btot∗⋅Fn, B∗)+(AB∗Btot∗⋅Fn,AB∗)

with Fn(Atot) – thermophoresis (change of normalized fluorescence) as a function of MBP-CBD concentration, Fn, B* and Fn,AB* – thermophoresis of the labelled partner and the complex, respectively. The concentration of the complex is given by

AB∗= (KD+Atot+Btot∗)−(KD+Atot+Btot∗)2−4⋅Atot⋅Btot∗2

which follows from solving a quadratic function originating from mass action kinetics combined with equilibrium assumption for the signal strength.

Simultaneously, all individual parameters (B*, Fn, B*,Fn,AB*) per biological replicate were fitted together with the global KD value. To estimate the noise level within the technical replicates we used an error model with absolute and relative errors represented by two parameters per biological replicate. With three biological replicates, this results in a total of 16 parameters that were fitted simultaneously. We utilized deterministic multistart optimization to obtain the best parameter set that minimizes deviation between model and data in terms of the negative log-likelihood. Uncertainty of the parameter of interest KD is quantified using profile likelihood method (Kreutz et al., 2013), which is also termed error surface plots in the literature. This fitting procedure was independently applied to each condition in order to obtain KD values and corresponding uncertainties for all four conditions. Data2Dynamics Software (Raue et al., 2015) used for KD determination from data including biological and technical replicates is available at GitHub (https://github.com/Data2Dynamics/d2d, copy archived at Kreutz, 2023).

Interaction of proteins with lipid membranes

Request a detailed protocol

The POPC:POPS (Avanti Polar Lipids, Birmingham, AL, USA) mixture (3:1 molar ratio) in chloroform was dried in round bottom glass vials under a nitrogen stream. The dried lipid film was resuspended in liposome buffer (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, 10% sucrose, pH 7.2) at a final concentration of 4 mM, sonified three times for 20 s with 40 s breaks (Bandelin Sonorex ultrasonic bath). Then liposomes were subjected to 10 freeze–thaw cycles and extruded through a 1-μm polypropylene membrane (Avestin, Ottawa, Canada). The size of the resulting liposomes was controlled with DLS (DynaPro NanoStar, Wyatt Technology, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). Liposomes were stored at room temperature in the dark.

The lipidprotein co-sedimentation assay was performed mostly as described previously (Zozulya and Stryer, 1992). Briefly, proteins were transferred to the assay buffer. Liposomes were washed once with the assay buffer containing either 2 mM CaCl2 (Ca2+ condition) or 1 mM EGTA (Mg2+ condition) and mixed with the protein in the respective buffer. Final lipid and protein concentrations were 1.4 mM and 10 µM, respectively. The samples were incubated for 20 min at 24°C with constant mixing and centrifuged at 17,000 × g for 15 min. The pellet was washed once with the respective buffer and resuspended in 1× reducing NuPAGE LDS sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Samples were analysed using 4-12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

The lipid-binding experiments were performed with three individually purified biological replicates of CHP3 and mCHP3 and respective complexes with CBD. Three technical replicates were analysed for Recoverin and mRecoverin as controls. Densitometry of protein bands was done with ImageJ (NIH). Band intensities were normalized to the Mg2+ condition of the respective non-myristoylated protein.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript. Source files have been provided for Figures 1, 4, 6, and Figure 4—figure supplement 1. Data2Dynamics Software used for EC50 and KD determination is available at GitHub (https://github.com/Data2Dynamics/d2d, copy archived at Kreutz, 2023).

References

  14. Book
    1. Eftink MR
    (2000) Intrinsic fluorescence of proteins
    In: Lakowicz JR, editors. Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy: Volume 6: Protein Fluorescence. Boston, MA: Springer US. pp. 1–15.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/b115628
  20. Book
    1. Gifford JL
    2. Vogel HJ
    (2013) EF-hand proteins and magnesium
    In: Kretsinger RH, Uversky VN, Permyakov EA, editors. Encyclopedia of Metalloproteins. Springer. pp. 775–783.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1533-6
    1. Hall TA
    (1999)
    BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT
    Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95–98.
    1. Stein JL
    2. Medland SE
    3. Vasquez AA
    4. Hibar DP
    5. Senstad RE
    6. Winkler AM
    7. Toro R
    8. Appel K
    9. Bartecek R
    10. Bergmann Ø
    11. Bernard M
    12. Brown AA
    13. Cannon DM
    14. Chakravarty MM
    15. Christoforou A
    16. Domin M
    17. Grimm O
    18. Hollinshead M
    19. Holmes AJ
    20. Homuth G
    21. Hottenga JJ
    22. Langan C
    23. Lopez LM
    24. Hansell NK
    25. Hwang KS
    26. Kim S
    27. Laje G
    28. Lee PH
    29. Liu X
    30. Loth E
    31. Lourdusamy A
    32. Mattingsdal M
    33. Mohnke S
    34. Maniega SM
    35. Nho K
    36. Nugent AC
    37. O’Brien C
    38. Papmeyer M
    39. Pütz B
    40. Ramasamy A
    41. Rasmussen J
    42. Rijpkema M
    43. Risacher SL
    44. Roddey JC
    45. Rose EJ
    46. Ryten M
    47. Shen L
    48. Sprooten E
    49. Strengman E
    50. Teumer A
    51. Trabzuni D
    52. Turner J
    53. van Eijk K
    54. van Erp TGM
    55. van Tol MJ
    56. Wittfeld K
    57. Wolf C
    58. Woudstra S
    59. Aleman A
    60. Alhusaini S
    61. Almasy L
    62. Binder EB
    63. Brohawn DG
    64. Cantor RM
    65. Carless MA
    66. Corvin A
    67. Czisch M
    68. Curran JE
    69. Davies G
    70. de Almeida MAA
    71. Delanty N
    72. Depondt C
    73. Duggirala R
    74. Dyer TD
    75. Erk S
    76. Fagerness J
    77. Fox PT
    78. Freimer NB
    79. Gill M
    80. Göring HHH
    81. Hagler DJ
    82. Hoehn D
    83. Holsboer F
    84. Hoogman M
    85. Hosten N
    86. Jahanshad N
    87. Johnson MP
    88. Kasperaviciute D
    89. Kent JW
    90. Kochunov P
    91. Lancaster JL
    92. Lawrie SM
    93. Liewald DC
    94. Mandl R
    95. Matarin M
    96. Mattheisen M
    97. Meisenzahl E
    98. Melle I
    99. Moses EK
    100. Mühleisen TW
    101. Nauck M
    102. Nöthen MM
    103. Olvera RL
    104. Pandolfo M
    105. Pike GB
    106. Puls R
    107. Reinvang I
    108. Rentería ME
    109. Rietschel M
    110. Roffman JL
    111. Royle NA
    112. Rujescu D
    113. Savitz J
    114. Schnack HG
    115. Schnell K
    116. Seiferth N
    117. Smith C
    118. Steen VM
    119. Valdés Hernández MC
    120. Van den Heuvel M
    121. van der Wee NJ
    122. Van Haren NEM
    123. Veltman JA
    124. Völzke H
    125. Walker R
    126. Westlye LT
    127. Whelan CD
    128. Agartz I
    129. Boomsma DI
    130. Cavalleri GL
    131. Dale AM
    132. Djurovic S
    133. Drevets WC
    134. Hagoort P
    135. Hall J
    136. Heinz A
    137. Jack CR
    138. Foroud TM
    139. Le Hellard S
    140. Macciardi F
    141. Montgomery GW
    142. Poline JB
    143. Porteous DJ
    144. Sisodiya SM
    145. Starr JM
    146. Sussmann J
    147. Toga AW
    148. Veltman DJ
    149. Walter H
    150. Weiner MW
    151. EPIGEN Consortium
    152. IMAGEN Consortium
    153. Saguenay Youth Study Group
    154. Bis JC
    155. Ikram MA
    156. Smith AV
    157. Gudnason V
    158. Tzourio C
    159. Vernooij MW
    160. Launer LJ
    161. DeCarli C
    162. Seshadri S
    163. Cohorts for Heart and Aging Research in Genomic Epidemiology Consortium
    164. Andreassen OA
    165. Apostolova LG
    166. Bastin ME
    167. Blangero J
    168. Brunner HG
    169. Buckner RL
    170. Cichon S
    171. Coppola G
    172. de Zubicaray GI
    173. Deary IJ
    174. Donohoe G
    175. de Geus EJC
    176. Espeseth T
    177. Fernández G
    178. Glahn DC
    179. Grabe HJ
    180. Hardy J
    181. Hulshoff Pol HE
    182. Jenkinson M
    183. Kahn RS
    184. McDonald C
    185. McIntosh AM
    186. McMahon FJ
    187. McMahon KL
    188. Meyer-Lindenberg A
    189. Morris DW
    190. Müller-Myhsok B
    191. Nichols TE
    192. Ophoff RA
    193. Paus T
    194. Pausova Z
    195. Penninx BW
    196. Potkin SG
    197. Sämann PG
    198. Saykin AJ
    199. Schumann G
    200. Smoller JW
    201. Wardlaw JM
    202. Weale ME
    203. Martin NG
    204. Franke B
    205. Wright MJ
    206. Thompson PM
    207. Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis Consortium
    (2012) Identification of common variants associated with human hippocampal and intracranial volumes
    Nature Genetics 44:552–561.
    https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2250

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Florian Becker

    1. Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    2. Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Simon Fuchs
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5889-8728

  2. Simon Fuchs

    Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft
    Contributed equally with
    Florian Becker
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  3. Lukas Refisch

    1. Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics (IMBI), Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    2. Institute of Physics, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9049-1944

  4. Friedel Drepper

    Biochemistry and Functional Proteomics, Institute of Biology II, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2043-5795

  5. Wolfgang Bildl

    Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Uwe Schulte

    1. Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    2. CIBSS - Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    3. BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    is an employee and shareholder of Logopharm GmbH that produces ComplexioLyte 47 used in this study
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3557-0591

  7. Shuo Liang

    Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Jonas Immanuel Heinicke

    Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. Sierra C Hansen

    Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Investigation
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  10. Clemens Kreutz

    1. Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics (IMBI), Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    2. CIBSS - Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  11. Bettina Warscheid

    1. Biochemistry and Functional Proteomics, Institute of Biology II, Faculty of Biology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    2. CIBSS - Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    3. Department of Biochemistry, Theodor-Boveri-Institute, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Supervision, Validation, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5096-1975

  12. Bernd Fakler

    1. Institute of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    2. CIBSS - Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    3. BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Supervision, Validation, Methodology
    Competing interests
    is shareholder of Logopharm GmbH. The company provides ComplexioLyte reagents to academic institutions on a non-profit basis

  13. Evgeny V Mymrikov

    1. Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    2. CIBSS - Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    evgeny.mymrikov@biochemie.uni-freiburg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4817-6278

  14. Carola Hunte

    1. Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, ZBMZ, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    2. CIBSS - Centre for Integrative Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    3. BIOSS Centre for Biological Signalling Studies, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    carola.hunte@biochemie.uni-freiburg.de
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0826-3986

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (EXC-2189 - 390939984)

  • Clemens Kreutz
  • Bettina Warscheid
  • Carola Hunte
  • Bernd Fakler
  • Evgeny V Mymrikov

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1381 - 403222702)

  • Uwe Schulte
  • Carola Hunte
  • Bettina Warscheid

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1453 - 431984000)

  • Bernd Fakler
  • Carola Hunte

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RTG 2202 - 278002225)

  • Carola Hunte

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (FKZ031L0080)

  • Clemens Kreutz

The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany’s Excellence Strategy (CIBSS – EXC-2189 – Project ID 390939984) in the form of project funding to BW, BF, CH, CK and of CIBSS Launchpad Program Funds to EM; by the DFG through Project-ID 403222702/SFB 1381 to CH, US, and BW, through Project-ID 431984000/SFB 1453 to BF and CH, and through project-ID 278002225/RTG 2202 to CH; and by the German Ministry of Education and Research by grant EA:Sys (FKZ031L0080) to CK. We thank Prof. Willbold (Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany) for kindly providing the pETDuet-1Δ6His_hNMT_Nef plasmid, Dr Michael Pfeffer (MS Service at University of Basel) for performing ESI mass spectrometry, and Michal Rössler (CIBSS, University of Freiburg) for supporting the artwork in Figures 7–8.

Copyright

© 2023, Becker, Fuchs et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 646
    views
  • 88
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Florian Becker
  2. Simon Fuchs
  3. Lukas Refisch
  4. Friedel Drepper
  5. Wolfgang Bildl
  6. Uwe Schulte
  7. Shuo Liang
  8. Jonas Immanuel Heinicke
  9. Sierra C Hansen
  10. Clemens Kreutz
  11. Bettina Warscheid
  12. Bernd Fakler
  13. Evgeny V Mymrikov
  14. Carola Hunte
(2023)
Conformational regulation and target-myristoyl switch of calcineurin B homologous protein 3
eLife 12:e83868.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83868

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83868

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology

    The membrane domains of mammalian adenylyl cyclases are lipid receptors

    Marius Landau, Sherif Elsabbagh ... Joachim E Schultz
    Research Article

    The biosynthesis of cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) by mammalian membrane-bound adenylyl cyclases (mACs) is predominantly regulated by G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Up to now the two hexahelical transmembrane domains of mACs were considered to fix the enzyme to membranes. Here, we show that the transmembrane domains serve in addition as signal receptors and transmitters of lipid signals that control Gsα-stimulated mAC activities. We identify aliphatic fatty acids and anandamide as receptor ligands of mAC isoforms 1–7 and 9. The ligands enhance (mAC isoforms 2, 3, 7, and 9) or attenuate (isoforms 1, 4, 5, and 6) Gsα-stimulated mAC activities in vitro and in vivo. Substitution of the stimulatory membrane receptor of mAC3 by the inhibitory receptor of mAC5 results in a ligand inhibited mAC5–mAC3 chimera. Thus, we discovered a new class of membrane receptors in which two signaling modalities are at a crossing, direct tonic lipid and indirect phasic GPCR–Gsα signaling regulating the biosynthesis of cAMP.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology

    Disordered proteins interact with the chemical environment to tune their protective function during drying

    Shraddha KC, Kenny H Nguyen ... Thomas C Boothby
    Research Article

    The conformational ensemble and function of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are sensitive to their solution environment. The inherent malleability of disordered proteins, combined with the exposure of their residues, accounts for this sensitivity. One context in which IDPs play important roles that are concomitant with massive changes to the intracellular environment is during desiccation (extreme drying). The ability of organisms to survive desiccation has long been linked to the accumulation of high levels of cosolutes such as trehalose or sucrose as well as the enrichment of IDPs, such as late embryogenesis abundant (LEA) proteins or cytoplasmic abundant heat-soluble (CAHS) proteins. Despite knowing that IDPs play important roles and are co-enriched alongside endogenous, species-specific cosolutes during desiccation, little is known mechanistically about how IDP-cosolute interactions influence desiccation tolerance. Here, we test the notion that the protective function of desiccation-related IDPs is enhanced through conformational changes induced by endogenous cosolutes. We find that desiccation-related IDPs derived from four different organisms spanning two LEA protein families and the CAHS protein family synergize best with endogenous cosolutes during drying to promote desiccation protection. Yet the structural parameters of protective IDPs do not correlate with synergy for either CAHS or LEA proteins. We further demonstrate that for CAHS, but not LEA proteins, synergy is related to self-assembly and the formation of a gel. Our results suggest that functional synergy between IDPs and endogenous cosolutes is a convergent desiccation protection strategy seen among different IDP families and organisms, yet the mechanisms underlying this synergy differ between IDP families.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Isobaric crosslinking mass spectrometry technology for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and complexes

    Jie Luo, Jeff Ranish
    Tools and Resources

    Dynamic conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes play a central and ubiquitous role in the regulation of protein function, yet it is very challenging to study these changes, especially for large protein complexes, under physiological conditions. Here, we introduce a novel isobaric crosslinker, Qlinker, for studying conformational and structural changes in proteins and protein complexes using quantitative crosslinking mass spectrometry. Qlinkers are small and simple, amine-reactive molecules with an optimal extended distance of ~10 Å, which use MS2 reporter ions for relative quantification of Qlinker-modified peptides derived from different samples. We synthesized the 2-plex Q2linker and showed that the Q2linker can provide quantitative crosslinking data that pinpoints key conformational and structural changes in biosensors, binary and ternary complexes composed of the general transcription factors TBP, TFIIA, and TFIIB, and RNA polymerase II complexes.