Kinetochore-fiber lengths are maintained locally but coordinated globally by polesin the mammalian spindle

  1. Manuela Richter  Is a corresponding author
  2. Lila Neahring
  3. Jinghui Tao
  4. Renaldo Sutanto
  5. Nathan H Cho
  6. Sophie Dumont  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California - San Francisco, United States

Abstract

At each cell division, nanometer-scale components self-organize to build a micron-scale spindle. In mammalian spindles, microtubule bundles called kinetochore-fibers attach to chromosomes and focus into spindle poles. Despite evidence suggesting that poles can set spindle length, their role remains poorly understood. In fact, many species do not have spindle poles. Here, we probe the pole's contribution to mammalian spindle length, dynamics, and function by inhibiting dynein to generate spindles whose kinetochore-fibers do not focus into poles, yet maintain a metaphase steady-state length. We find that unfocused kinetochore-fibers have a mean length indistinguishable from control, but a broader length distribution, and reduced length coordination between sisters and neighbors. Further, we show that unfocused kinetochore-fibers, like control, can grow back to their steady-state length if acutely shortened by drug treatment or laser ablation: they recover their length by tuning their end dynamics, albeit slower due to their reduced baseline dynamics. Thus, kinetochore-fiber dynamics are regulated by their length, not just pole-focusing forces. Finally, we show that spindles with unfocused kinetochore-fibers can segregate chromosomes but fail to correctly do so. We propose that mammalian spindle length emerges locally from individual k-fibers while spindle poles globally coordinate k-fibers across space and time.

Data availability

We provide all source data and analyzed data for all figures. We provide source code for Figure 1.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Manuela Richter

    Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    manuela.richter@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Lila Neahring

    Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2272-8732
  3. Jinghui Tao

    Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Renaldo Sutanto

    Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1252-1482
  5. Nathan H Cho

    Tetrad Graduate Program, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0110-1343
  6. Sophie Dumont

    Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    sophie.dumont@ucsf.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8283-1523

Funding

Achievement Rewards for College Scientists Foundation (Graduate Student Scholarship)

  • Manuela Richter

Hertz Foundation (Hertz Fellowship)

  • Lila Neahring

American Heart Association (Predoctoral Fellowship)

  • Nathan H Cho

University of California, San Francisco (Discovery Fellows Program)

  • Lila Neahring
  • Nathan H Cho

National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship Program)

  • Manuela Richter

University of California, San Francisco (PIBS Bishop Fellowship)

  • Manuela Richter

National Institutes of Health (NIHR35GM136420)

  • Sophie Dumont

National Science Foundation (NSF CAREER 1554139)

  • Sophie Dumont

National Science Foundation (NSF 1548297 Center for Cellular Construction)

  • Sophie Dumont

Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (Chan Zuckerberg Biohub)

  • Sophie Dumont

University of California, San Francisco (Byers Award)

  • Sophie Dumont

University of California, San Francisco (Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research (PBBR))

  • Sophie Dumont

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Richter et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 939
    views
  • 145
    downloads
  • 1
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Manuela Richter
  2. Lila Neahring
  3. Jinghui Tao
  4. Renaldo Sutanto
  5. Nathan H Cho
  6. Sophie Dumont
(2023)
Kinetochore-fiber lengths are maintained locally but coordinated globally by polesin the mammalian spindle
eLife 12:e85208.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85208

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85208

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Roy Ng ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.

    1. Cell Biology
    Tomoharu Kanie, Beibei Liu ... Peter K Jackson
    Research Article

    Distal appendages are nine-fold symmetric blade-like structures attached to the distal end of the mother centriole. These structures are critical for formation of the primary cilium, by regulating at least four critical steps: ciliary vesicle recruitment, recruitment and initiation of intraflagellar transport (IFT), and removal of CP110. While specific proteins that localize to the distal appendages have been identified, how exactly each protein functions to achieve the multiple roles of the distal appendages is poorly understood. Here we comprehensively analyze known and newly discovered distal appendage proteins (CEP83, SCLT1, CEP164, TTBK2, FBF1, CEP89, KIZ, ANKRD26, PIDD1, LRRC45, NCS1, CEP15) for their precise localization, order of recruitment, and their roles in each step of cilia formation. Using CRISPR-Cas9 knockouts, we show that the order of the recruitment of the distal appendage proteins is highly interconnected and a more complex hierarchy. Our analysis highlights two protein modules, CEP83-SCLT1 and CEP164-TTBK2, as critical for structural assembly of distal appendages. Functional assays revealed that CEP89 selectively functions in RAB34+ ciliary vesicle recruitment, while deletion of the integral components, CEP83-SCLT1-CEP164-TTBK2, severely compromised all four steps of cilium formation. Collectively, our analyses provide a more comprehensive view of the organization and the function of the distal appendage, paving the way for molecular understanding of ciliary assembly.