Homophilic wiring principles underpin neuronal network topology in vitro

  1. Danyal Akarca  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alexander WE Dunn
  3. Philipp J Hornauer
  4. Silvia Ronchi
  5. Michele Fiscella
  6. Congwei Wang
  7. Marco Terrigno
  8. Ravi Jagasia
  9. Petra E Vértes
  10. Susanna B Mierau
  11. Ole Paulsen
  12. Stephen J Eglen
  13. Andreas Hierlemann
  14. Duncan E Astle
  15. Manuel Schröter  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  2. ETH Zurich, Switzerland
  3. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Switzerland
  4. Harvard Medical School, United States

Abstract

Economic efficiency has been a popular explanation for how networks self-organize within the developing nervous system. However, the precise nature of the economic negotiations governing this putative organizational principle remains unclear. Here, we address this question further by combining large-scale electrophysiological recordings, to characterize the functional connectivity of developing neuronal networks in vitro, with a generative modeling approach capable of simulating network formation. We find that the best fitting model uses a homophilic generative wiring principle in which neurons form connections to other neurons which are spatially proximal and have similar connectivity patterns to themselves. Homophilic generative models outperform more canonical models in which neurons wire depending upon their spatial proximity either alone or in combination with the extent of their local connectivity. This homophily-based mechanism for neuronal network emergence accounts for a wide range of observations that are described, but not sufficiently explained, by traditional analyses of network topology. Using rodent and human neuronal cultures, we show that homophilic generative mechanisms can accurately recapitulate the topology of emerging cellular functional connectivity, representing an important wiring principle and determining factor of neuronal network formation in vitro.

Data availability

All data used in this study, along with documentation detailing each dataset, is openly available at https://zenodo.org/records/14544729

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Danyal Akarca

    MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    danyal.akarca@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5931-0295
  2. Alexander WE Dunn

    Department of Physiology Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1504-499X
  3. Philipp J Hornauer

    Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2265-6679
  4. Silvia Ronchi

    Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Silvia Ronchi, is employed by MaxWell Biosystems AG, which commercializes HD-MEA technology..
  5. Michele Fiscella

    Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Congwei Wang

    NRD, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Congwei Wang, is affiliated with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  7. Marco Terrigno

    NRD, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Marco Terrigno, is affiliated with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  8. Ravi Jagasia

    NRD, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    Ravi Jagasia, is affiliated with F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. The author has no financial interests to declare..
  9. Petra E Vértes

    Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0992-3210
  10. Susanna B Mierau

    Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Ole Paulsen

    Department of Physiology Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2258-5455
  12. Stephen J Eglen

    Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8607-8025
  13. Andreas Hierlemann

    Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3838-2468
  14. Duncan E Astle

    MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Manuel Schröter

    Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    manuel.schroeter@bsse.ethz.ch
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9347-9203

Funding

European Research Council (694829)

  • Philipp J Hornauer
  • Andreas Hierlemann
  • Manuel Schröter

Medical Research Council (MC-A0606-5PQ41)

  • Danyal Akarca
  • Alexander WE Dunn
  • Duncan E Astle

James S. McDonnel Foundation

  • Danyal Akarca
  • Duncan E Astle

MQ: Transforming Mental Health (MQF17_24)

  • Petra E Vértes

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal experiments were approved by the veterinary office of the Kanton Basel-Stadt (license #2358) and carried out according to Swiss federal laws on animal welfare.

Copyright

© 2025, Akarca et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 184
    views
  • 45
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Danyal Akarca
  2. Alexander WE Dunn
  3. Philipp J Hornauer
  4. Silvia Ronchi
  5. Michele Fiscella
  6. Congwei Wang
  7. Marco Terrigno
  8. Ravi Jagasia
  9. Petra E Vértes
  10. Susanna B Mierau
  11. Ole Paulsen
  12. Stephen J Eglen
  13. Andreas Hierlemann
  14. Duncan E Astle
  15. Manuel Schröter
(2025)
Homophilic wiring principles underpin neuronal network topology in vitro
eLife 14:e85300.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85300

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85300