Angelman Syndrome: How late is too late for treatment?

Experiments on mice suggest that an approach called antisense oligonucleotide therapy may be able to treat some symptoms of Angelman syndrome, including problems with epilepsy and sleep.
  1. Lawrence T Reiter  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, United States

An approach called antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapy has ushered in a new age in genetic medicine. ASO therapy works by introducing a short strand of RNA that binds to specific messenger RNA (mRNA) molecules in the host, and thus prevents the mRNA from being translated. Clinical trials are currently under way to see if ASO therapy will work for various neurodevelopmental disorders, including Dravet syndrome (an epilepsy disorder), spinal muscular atrophy (a neuromuscular condition) and Batten’s disease (a devastating lysosomal storage disorder; Hill and Meisler, 2021).

Angelman syndrome is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is considered an ideal candidate for ASO therapy. Symptoms appear very early in childhood and include learning disabilities, abnormally happy demeanor, epilepsy, and difficulty controlling motor function, particularly while walking (Dagli et al., 1993). Children with Angelman syndrome also suffer from sleep problems. It has previously been shown, using cellular and animal models, that the regulation of a single gene, UBE3A, in the nervous system leads to the major features of Angelman syndrome (Kishino et al., 1997; Matsuura et al., 1997; Sutcliffe et al., 1997). UBE3A is found on chromosome 15, and most cases of Angelman syndrome are the result of a large deletion in the maternal copy of this chromosome. This means that most individuals have a working – but silent – paternal copy of UBE3A on chromosome 15. However, this copy is silenced by an antisense transcript which interferes with the expression of the paternal UBE3A.

Using ASO therapy to interfere with the antisense transcript – and thus allowing the intact copy of UBE3A to be expressed – is a promising approach for the treatment of Angelman syndrome. However, some scientists remain skeptical about the potential for ASO therapy to treat neurodevelopmental disorders, and several questions remain regarding how these treatments will work. For example, when does it become too late in human development to reactivate a missing gene in the nervous system? Are there neurogenetic diseases that can be rescued in adulthood? And, if so, what features of the disease can be treated with ASO therapies?

Extensive research has focused on answering these questions by reactivating the paternal copy UBE3A in a commonly used mouse model for Angelman syndrome. One goal of these studies has been to determine which symptoms can be reduced or eliminated. Another goal, which may be more challenging to achieve, is to establish when the gene should be reactivated during development in order to achieve the desired effect.

In 2018, researchers at the Erasmus Medical Center in Rotterdam published a set of behaviors that can be used to assess phenotypes for motor performance, repetitive behavior, anxiety, and seizure susceptibility using Ube3a maternal deficient mice (Sonzogni et al., 2018). These behaviors provide a framework to test the effectiveness of drugs (or ASOs) that reactivate the silent paternal copy of the gene. However, there are not many studies that dig deeper into the cognitive issues, sleep or epilepsy-related brain activity (as measured with EEG) that are known to be affected in this mouse model. Now, in eLife, Mingshan Xue and colleagues from Baylor College of Medicine and Ionis Pharmaceuticals – including Dongwon Lee, Wu Chen, Heet Naresh Kaku and Xinming Zhuo as first authors – report on the use of an ASO to rescue the characteristic EEG pattern and disordered sleep observed in a mouse model of Angelman syndrome (Lee et al., 2023).

First, Lee et al. designed a new Angelman syndrome mouse model that is less ‘leaky’ than the model used by other labs in previous studies – that is, a model where Ube3a expression from the maternal chromosome was more completely blocked. Then they injected the mice with an ASO against the Ube3a antisense transcript to see if the expression of the Ube3a protein could be rescued from the paternal chromosome. The results showed that, after injecting the mice with the ASO, the levels of Ube3a protein increased in multiple regions of the brain, including the cortex, the hippocampus and the hypothalamus, which controls sleep. Importantly, Ube3a expression was rescued in both juvenile and adult animals, which had previously been challenging.

Next, Lee et al. showed that the electrical activity in the brain of these mice is significantly rescued by injection of this ASO, in both juvenile and adult animals. They were also able to rescue the low level of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep observed in individuals with Angelman syndrome, with animals getting an almost normal amount of REM sleep six weeks after injection with the ASO.

The findings of Lee et al. illustrate that it may be possible to treat some aspects of Angelman syndrome after birth, and even into adulthood, using ASO therapeutics. This challenges the current view of what symptoms of Angelman syndrome are treatable, and at what age. While the delivery of ASOs to the brain is still a struggle, the latest results are encouraging for potential treatments for Angelman syndrome, and perhaps other neurodevelopmental disorders thought to be untreatable after birth.

References

  1. Website
    1. Dagli AI
    2. Mathews J
    3. Williams CA
    (1993) Angelman syndrome
    GeneReviews. Accessed February 2, 2023.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Lawrence T Reiter

    Lawrence T Reiter is in the Department of Neurology, the Department of Pediatrics and the Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, United States

    For correspondence
    lreiter@uthsc.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4100-2630

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: February 7, 2023 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2023, Reiter

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,814
    views
  • 54
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Lawrence T Reiter
(2023)
Angelman Syndrome: How late is too late for treatment?
eLife 12:e86117.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86117

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    Ruijie Zeng, Yuying Ma ... Hao Chen
    Research Article

    Background:

    Adverse effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have raised wide concerns. The association of PPIs with influenza is unexplored, while that with pneumonia or COVID-19 remains controversial. Our study aims to evaluate whether PPI use increases the risks of these respiratory infections.

    Methods:

    The current study included 160,923 eligible participants at baseline who completed questionnaires on medication use, which included PPI or histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA), from the UK Biobank. Cox proportional hazards regression and propensity score-matching analyses were used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

    Results:

    Comparisons with H2RA users were tested. PPI use was associated with increased risks of developing influenza (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.12–1.56) and pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26–1.59). In contrast, the risk of COVID-19 infection was not significant with regular PPI use (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.99–1.17), while the risks of severe COVID-19 (HR 1.19. 95% CI 1.11–1.27) and mortality (HR 1.37. 95% CI 1.29–1.46) were increased. However, when compared with H2RA users, PPI users were associated with a higher risk of influenza (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.19–2.54), but the risks with pneumonia or COVID-19-related outcomes were not evident.

    Conclusions:

    PPI users are associated with increased risks of influenza, pneumonia, as well as COVID-19 severity and mortality compared to non-users, while the effects on pneumonia or COVID-19-related outcomes under PPI use were attenuated when compared to the use of H2RAs. Appropriate use of PPIs based on comprehensive evaluation is required.

    Funding:

    This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82171698, 82170561, 81300279, 81741067, 82100238), the Program for High-level Foreign Expert Introduction of China (G2022030047L), the Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars of Guangdong Province (2021B1515020003), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2022A1515012081), the Foreign Distinguished Teacher Program of Guangdong Science and Technology Department (KD0120220129), the Climbing Program of Introduced Talents and High-level Hospital Construction Project of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (DFJH201923, DFJH201803, KJ012019099, KJ012021143, KY012021183), and in part by VA Clinical Merit and ASGE clinical research funds (FWL).

    1. Immunology and Inflammation
    2. Medicine
    Joanna C Porter, Jamie Inshaw ... Venizelos Papayannopoulos
    Research Article

    Background:

    Prinflammatory extracellular chromatin from neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and other cellular sources is found in COVID-19 patients and may promote pathology. We determined whether pulmonary administration of the endonuclease dornase alfa reduced systemic inflammation by clearing extracellular chromatin.

    Methods:

    Eligible patients were randomized (3:1) to the best available care including dexamethasone (R-BAC) or to BAC with twice-daily nebulized dornase alfa (R-BAC + DA) for seven days or until discharge. A 2:1 ratio of matched contemporary controls (CC-BAC) provided additional comparators. The primary endpoint was the improvement in C-reactive protein (CRP) over time, analyzed using a repeated-measures mixed model, adjusted for baseline factors.

    Results:

    We recruited 39 evaluable participants: 30 randomized to dornase alfa (R-BAC +DA), 9 randomized to BAC (R-BAC), and included 60 CC-BAC participants. Dornase alfa was well tolerated and reduced CRP by 33% compared to the combined BAC groups (T-BAC). Least squares (LS) mean post-dexamethasone CRP fell from 101.9 mg/L to 23.23 mg/L in R-BAC +DA participants versus a 99.5 mg/L to 34.82 mg/L reduction in the T-BAC group at 7 days; p=0.01. The anti-inflammatory effect of dornase alfa was further confirmed with subgroup and sensitivity analyses on randomised participants only, mitigating potential biases associated with the use of CC-BAC participants. Dornase alfa increased live discharge rates by 63% (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.01–2.61, p=0.03), increased lymphocyte counts (LS mean: 1.08 vs 0.87, p=0.02) and reduced circulating cf-DNA and the coagulopathy marker D-dimer (LS mean: 570.78 vs 1656.96 μg/mL, p=0.004).

    Conclusions:

    Dornase alfa reduces pathogenic inflammation in COVID-19 pneumonia, demonstrating the benefit of cost-effective therapies that target extracellular chromatin.

    Funding:

    LifeArc, Breathing Matters, The Francis Crick Institute (CRUK, Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust).

    Clinical trial number:

    NCT04359654.