1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
  2. Cell Biology

DYRK1A interacts with the tuberous sclerosis complex and promotes mTORC1 activity

  1. Pinhua Wang
  2. Sunayana Sarkar
  3. Menghuan Zhang
  4. Tingting Xiao
  5. Fenhua Kong
  6. Zhe Zhang
  7. Deepa Balasubramanian
  8. Nandan Jayaram
  9. Sayantan Datta
  10. Ruyu He
  11. Ping Wu
  12. Peng Chao
  13. Ying Zhang
  14. Michael Washburn
  15. Laurence A Florens
  16. Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal
  17. Manish Jaiswal  Is a corresponding author
  18. Man Mohan  Is a corresponding author
  1. State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, China
  2. Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, India
  3. CSIR–Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, India
  4. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), India
  5. National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai, Zhangjiang Lab, China
  6. Stowers Institute for Medical Research, United States
  7. Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, United States
  8. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Inflammation, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, China
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88318.3
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Pinhua Wang
  2. Sunayana Sarkar
  3. Menghuan Zhang
  4. Tingting Xiao
  5. Fenhua Kong
  6. Zhe Zhang
  7. Deepa Balasubramanian
  8. Nandan Jayaram
  9. Sayantan Datta
  10. Ruyu He
  11. Ping Wu
  12. Peng Chao
  13. Ying Zhang
  14. Michael Washburn
  15. Laurence A Florens
  16. Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal
  17. Manish Jaiswal
  18. Man Mohan
(2024)
DYRK1A interacts with the tuberous sclerosis complex and promotes mTORC1 activity
eLife 12:RP88318.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88318.3
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

eLife assessment

This fundamental study identifies the kinase DYRK1A as a novel component of the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) protein complex, which is central to cellular growth and cell size. The findings presented here have broad implications for how cell size and growth is regulated. The methodology and analysis are convincing and support the findings.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88318.3.sa0

Abstract

DYRK1A, a ubiquitously expressed kinase, is linked to the dominant intellectual developmental disorder, microcephaly, and Down syndrome in humans. It regulates numerous cellular processes such as cell cycle, vesicle trafficking, and microtubule assembly. DYRK1A is a critical regulator of organ growth; however, how it regulates organ growth is not fully understood. Here, we show that the knockdown of DYRK1A in mammalian cells results in reduced cell size, which depends on mTORC1. Using proteomic approaches, we found that DYRK1A interacts with the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) proteins, namely TSC1 and TSC2, which negatively regulate mTORC1 activation. Furthermore, we show that DYRK1A phosphorylates TSC2 at T1462, a modification known to inhibit TSC activity and promote mTORC1 activity. We also found that the reduced cell growth upon knockdown of DYRK1A can be rescued by overexpression of RHEB, an activator of mTORC1. Our findings suggest that DYRK1A inhibits TSC complex activity through inhibitory phosphorylation on TSC2, thereby promoting mTORC1 activity. Furthermore, using the Drosophila neuromuscular junction as a model, we show that the mnb, the fly homologs of DYRK1A, is rescued by RHEB overexpression, suggesting a conserved role of DYRK1A in TORC1 regulation.

Introduction

The dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1 A (DYRK1A) is a ubiquitously expressed kinase that belongs to the CMGC group (Cyclin-dependent kinases, Mitogen-activated protein kinase, Glycogen synthase kinases, and CDK-like kinases group). DYRK1A, is located within the Down syndrome critical region (DSCR). The phenotypes associated with Down syndrome (Antonarakis, 2017), including abnormal neurodevelopment (Hämmerle et al., 2011; Najas et al., 2015), and increased susceptibility to acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (Malinge et al., 2012), have been reasoned to be due to an increased expression of DYRK1A. On the other hand, haploinsufficiency of DYRK1A causes DYRK1A syndrome, a rare autosomal dominant disease characterized by intellectual disability, intrauterine growth retardation, microcephaly, and stunted growth (Courcet et al., 2012; Kay et al., 2016; Møller et al., 2008). Mouse models heterozygous for Dyrk1a also show a reduction in brain and body size (Fotaki et al., 2002; Fotaki et al., 2004). In Drosophila, loss of mnb, the Drosophila homolog of DYRK1A, results in reduced organ size, including brain, legs, and wings (Degoutin et al., 2013; Tejedor et al., 1995). Therefore, DYRK1A is a critical regulator of organ growth (Guedj et al., 2012); however, the cellular processes by which DYRK1A promotes organ growth are unclear.

DYRK1A and its homologs have also been implicated in many cellular processes, such as cell cycle, signal transduction, gene expression, vesicle trafficking, and microtubule assembly (Arbones et al., 2019). DYRK1A has been shown to extend the G1 phase of the cell cycle in neuroblastoma cells by phosphorylation and subsequent degradation of cyclin D1 (Chen et al., 2013). In glioblastoma cells, DYRK1A phosphorylates ubiquitin ligase CDC23, which mediates mitotic protein degradation, thereby promoting tumor growth (Recasens et al., 2021). Furthermore, DYRK1A expression positively correlates with EGFR levels, and DYRK1A inhibitors reduce EGFR-dependent glioblastoma growth (Pozo et al., 2013). DYRK1A promotes the expression of several genes required for ribosomal biogenesis and protein translation (Di Vona et al., 2015; Li et al., 2018); for example, RPS6 ribosomal protein S6, a component of the 40 S subunit, and translation initiation factor, EIF4A3 (Xue et al., 2021). However, if the regulation of these genes by DYRK1A is physiologically significant, it is currently unknown.

The mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) is a key energy sensor and a master regulator of anabolic processes (Rehbein et al., 2021). The mTORC1 promotes anabolic processes such as protein, nucleotide, and lipid synthesis and represses catabolic processes such as autophagy, thereby promoting cellular growth (Ben-Sahra and Manning, 2017; Saxton and Sabatini, 2017). The mechanism of mTORC1-mediated regulation of multiple anabolic pathways has been studied extensively (Rehbein et al., 2021; Ben-Sahra and Manning, 2017; Saxton and Sabatini, 2017). TSC consisting of TSC1, TSC2, and TBC1D7 (TBC1 domain family member 7), integrates various extracellular signals and negatively regulates mTORC1 complex activity (Rehbein et al., 2021; Dibble et al., 2012). TSC2 is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) and promotes the conversion of GTP-bound RHEB (Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain) to the GDP-bound state, thereby inhibiting it. When TSC2 is inhibited, the GTP-bound RHEB activates mTORC1 (Li et al., 2003; Tee et al., 2003). The mTORC1 activation is controlled by extracellular stimuli, nutrients, energy status, and stress. For example, in response to insulin stimulation, AKT phosphorylates TSC2 at several sites, including S939 and T1462, suppressing its inhibitory effect on RHEB-GTP recycling, thus activating mTORC1 (Potter et al., 2002). Similarly, in response to growth factors, extracellular signal-regulated Kinase (ERK) (Ma et al., 2005) and p90 ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (RSK1) phosphorylate TSC2 and activate mTORC1 (Roux et al., 2004). MK2 (MAP kinase-activated protein kinase 2/MAPKAPK2) phosphorylates TSC2 at yet another site, S1210, in the presence of serum and leads to the inhibition of TSC2 activity, which allows the activation of mTORC1 (Li et al., 2003). Catabolic signals, such as low energy levels during glucose scarcity, drive AMPK-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 that promotes its GAP function and suppresses mTORC1 activity (Corradetti et al., 2004). Several kinases regulating the TSC activity underscores the importance of investigating novel kinases involved in its regulation, which may regulate mTORC1 activity in distinct cellular contexts.

In this study, we discover that DYRK1A interacts with TSC1 and TSC2. We show that DYRK1A phosphorylates TSC2 at T1462 and is a possible positive regulator of mTORC1 activity and cell growth. Furthermore, we show that in Drosophila, both Mnb, the DYRK1A-homolog, and mTORC1 are required to promote neuromuscular junction (NMJ) growth. Moreover, the activation of mTORC1 can rescue the NMJ growth phenotype of mnb loss of function, suggesting Mnb may regulate mTORC1 to promote neuromuscular junction morphology. We propose that DYRK1A-mediated regulation of mTORC1 activity is a conserved mechanism to regulate cell size and development.

Results

DYRK1A promotes cell growth

To study the function of DYRK1A, we knocked down DYRK1A in multiple cell lines, including in HEK293 cells (Li et al., 2018). We noticed that DYRK1A-depleted cells were smaller than the control cells. To explore if DYRK1A has a role in maintaining cell size, we performed a systematic analysis of the cell size phenotypes after transient knockdown of DYRK1A in HEK293 and observed a reduction in cell size (Figure 1A and B). Since mutations in DYRK1A are associated with stunted growth and microcephaly, we wondered if neuronal cells require DYRK1A to maintain proper cell size. Therefore, we knocked down DYRK1A in the human neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y and observed a significant reduction in cell size (Figure 1C and D). Furthermore, we tested if the observed cell size phenotype is conserved in mice. We targeted Dyrk1a in NIH-3T3 using CRISPR/Cas9 and observed a significant reduction in cell size (Figure 1E and F). Our data suggests that DYRK1A promotes cell size across cell lines derived from different models and tissues. Thus, we tested if the overexpression of DYRK1A can promote cell size. Since strong overexpression of DYRK1A leads to cell cycle exit (Hämmerle et al., 2011; Litovchick et al., 2011; Soppa et al., 2014), we used the Doxycycline-inducible system to express low levels of Flag-DYRK1A in HEK293 cells (Zhang et al., 2021). We noted a change in cell size with an increasing dosage of Doxycycline, which reached a saturation state at 100 ng/ml Doxycycline in our system (Figure 1—figure supplement 1). We observed a significant increase in cell size at 40 ng/ml Doxycycline treatment for 48 hr when the DYRK1A mRNA levels were approximately twice that of control (Figure 1G and H). At this level of DYRK1A mRNA expression, overexpressed Flag-DYRK1A was undetectable by western blot. Overall, our knockdown and overexpression experiments in different cell lines, including both human and mouse, suggest that DYRK1A promotes cell size.

Figure 1 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) regulates cell size.

shRNA-mediated knockdown of DYRK1A was performed in (A, B) HEK293 and (C, D) SH-SY5Y cells using lentivirus. Transduced cells were selected for four days before analysis. Western blot shows the efficiency of DYRK1A knockdown. (E, F) NIH3T3 cells were treated with Dyrk1a-targeting sgRNA expressing lentivirus and selected for four days before analysis. Western blot shows the efficiency of DYRK1A knockdown. (G, H) HEK293 cells expressing Flag-DYRK1A and the parental cells were treated with 40ng/ml Doxycycline for 48hr and analyzed for cell size. (G) Overexpression was analyzed by qRT-PCR. GAPDH mRNA was used to normalize RNA in q-RT-PCR samples. Data represent the mean ± SD (n=3 biological replicates).

Figure 1—source data 1

Uncropped blots for Figure 1A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig1-data1-v1.zip
Figure 1—source data 2

Raw blots showing knockdown of DYRK1A for Figure 1A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig1-data2-v1.zip
Figure 1—source data 3

Uncropped blots for Figure 1C.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig1-data3-v1.zip
Figure 1—source data 4

Raw blots showing knockdown of DYRK1A for Figure 1C.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig1-data4-v1.zip
Figure 1—source data 5

Uncropped blots for Figure 1E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig1-data5-v1.zip
Figure 1—source data 6

Raw blots showing knockdown of Dyrk1a for Figure 1E.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig1-data6-v1.zip

DYRK1A physically interacts with the tuberous sclerosis complex

To understand how DYRK1A promotes cell growth, we investigated DYRK1A protein-interactors. Previously, we have identified protein-interactors of wild-type and kinase-dead DYRK1A (K188R) from HEK293 cells using affinity purification and mass spectrometry (Li et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2021). In these purifications, we have observed significant enrichment of DCAF7, ARIP4, RB1, EP300, CREBBP, TRAF2, TRAF3, FAM53C, and RNF169, many of which have also been identified by many other groups as bona fide DYRK1A interacting proteins (Guard et al., 2019; Li et al., 2021; Menon et al., 2019; Miyata and Nishida, 2011; Sitz et al., 2004). We also observed significant enrichment of TSC components TSC1 and TSC2 among proteins co-purified with wild-type and kinase-dead DYRK1A (K188R) (Figure 2A). Interestingly, a few peptides of TBC1D7, the third component of TSC, were also detected in the wild-type pull-down (see dNSAF values in Figure 2A), suggesting that DYRK1A interacts with the TSC complex. This interaction is intriguing as TSC is a negative regulator of the mTORC1, which is known to promote cell growth (Astrinidis et al., 2002; Gao and Pan, 2001; Tapon et al., 2001).

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all
Download asset Open asset
Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) interacts with the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC).

(A) The tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) datasets previously acquired by MudPIT analyses of FLAG-DYRK1A affinity purifications and negative FLAG controls (Li et al., 2018) were searched against the most recent releases of the human protein sequence databases (built by collating and removing redundant entries from NCBI Homo sapiens RefSeq GCF_000001405.40_GRCh38.p14 and GCF_009914755.1_T2T-CHM13v2.0). Highly enriched proteins include known and novel DYRK1A-interacting partners and are reported with their peptide counts and distributed normalized spectral abundance factor (dNSAF) values, which reflect their relative abundance in the samples (Zhang et al., 2010). (B) Flag beads were used to pull down Flag-DYRK1A from whole cell extracts of HEK293 transfected with Flag-DYRK1A, and Protein A beads were used as a control. The blots were probed with TSC1 and TSC2 antibodies. Actin was used to normalize the lysate inputs. (C) Endogenous DYRK1A was immunoprecipitated with DYRK1A antibody from HEK293 cytoplasmic fraction generated using the Dignam protocol (Li et al., 2018) and probed with antibodies against endogenous DYRK1A, TSC1, and TSC2. Rabbit IgG was used as the IP control (D) Flag-DYRK1A and Flag-DYRK1A kinase domain constructs were affinity purified using Flag-beads from HEK293 cells co-transfected with HA3-TSC1 and probed with α-HA and α-Flag antibodies. Actin was used as the loading control.

Figure 2—source data 1

Uncropped blots for Figure 2B.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig2-data1-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 2

Raw data of Flag-DYRK1A affinity purification and Flag, TSC1 and TSC2 blot for Figure 2B.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig2-data2-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 3

Uncropped blots for Figure 2C.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig2-data3-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 4

Raw data of interaction between endogenous DYRK1A and TSC1 and TSC2 for Figure 2C.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig2-data4-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 5

Uncropped blots for Figure 2D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig2-data5-v1.zip
Figure 2—source data 6

Raw data of interaction between Kinase domain of Flag-DYRK1A and HA-TSC1 for Figure 2D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig2-data6-v1.zip

To ascertain the interaction between DYRK1A and TSC, we expressed Flag-DYRK1A in HEK293 cells through the Doxycycline-inducible system and performed Flag affinity purification. Surprisingly, when we used HEPES buffer containing either 0.5% NP40 or 1% Tween 20, we did not detect co-purification of TSC2 with Flag-DYRK1A (data not shown). However, when we prepared extracts by lysing the cells in hypotonic buffer without detergent followed by Dounce homogenization, we found that both TSC1 and TSC2 co-purify with Flag-DYRK1A (Figure 2B). Furthermore, we tested the interaction between endogenous DYRK1A and TSC by immunoprecipitating DYKR1A; we observed co-purification of both TSC1 and TSC2 (Figure 2C). Immuno-affinity purification of overexpressed HA3-TSC1 and Flag-TSC2 was also able to pull down endogenous DYRK1A (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). These results confirmed that DYRK1A physically interacts with the TSC complex. We then sought to identify the domains of DYRK1A that interact with TSC1, as TSC1 is the scaffolding protein in the TSC (Rehbein et al., 2021). We co-overexpressed HA3-TSC1 and various truncated forms of Flag-DYRK1A in HEK293 cells (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). We found that interaction between DYRK1A and TSC1 was abolished in all the truncated forms that lack the DYRK1A kinase domain, which suggests that the DYRK1A kinase domain is required for the interaction (Figure 2—figure supplement 2). We further confirmed that DYRK1A interacts with TSC1 through its kinase domain by co-expressing the FLAG-tagged DYRK1A kinase domain and HA3-TSC1, followed by immunoprecipitation using anti-FLAG antibodies (Figure 2D). Taken together, our results show that DYRK1A physically interacts with the TSC.

DYRK1A promotes mTORC1 activity

Next, we sought to test the implications of TSC and DYRK1A interaction on mTORC1 activity. mTORC1 is known to be induced in HEK293 cells by treatment with fetal bovine serum (FBS), insulin, and many growth factors following serum starvation (Ben-Sahra and Manning, 2017; Saxton and Sabatini, 2017; Inoki et al., 2003; Wu and Storey, 2021). We performed similar experiments, where we knocked down DYRK1A followed by serum starvation and tested for levels of pS6K, a reporter for mTOR activity. We did not observe a significant reduction in basal phosphorylation levels on S6K and S6. However, 10 and 20 min after FBS treatment, we observed significantly reduced levels of Phospho-S6K and Phospho-S6 in DYRK1A KD compared to control HEK293 cells (Figure 3A–C). Furthermore, we tested the levels of pS6K and pS6 in NIH3T3 after CRISPR-mediated targeting of Dyrk1a. Interestingly, we found significant reductions in pS6K and pS6 compared to controls (Figure 3D–F). Overall, our results indicate that DYRK1A is required to promote mTORC1 activity.

Figure 3
Download asset Open asset
Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) promotes the activation of mTORC1 pathway in human and mouse cells.

(A) HEK293 cells treated with DYRK1A short hairpin RNA (shRNA) or control shRNA were serum starved for 12 hr before being activated with serum for the indicated times. Cells were then harvested, lysates, and probed with the indicated antibodies. Actin was used as the loading control. (B, C) Quantification of proteins in (A), levels of pS6K (T389), S6K, pS6 (pS235/236), and S6 were quantified using Image J software and the ratio of pS6K/S6K and pS6/S6 were plotted (n=3 biological replicates). (D) NIH3T3 cells were treated with sgRNA-targeting Dyrk1a or non-targeting control and selected for four days with Puromycin before harvesting. Lysates were probed with indicated antibodies. (E, F) Quantification of proteins in (D), levels of pS6K (T389), S6K, pS6 (pS235/236), and S6 were quantified (as described for B and C) and ratios were plotted (n=3 biological replicates). Student’s t-tests were done to compare samples. p-value = *p<0.05.

Figure 3—source data 1

Uncropped blots for Figure 3A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig3-data1-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 2

Raw data showing phosphorylation status of S6k and S6 after knockdown of DYRK1A for Figure 3A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig3-data2-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 3

Uncropped blots for Figure 3D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig3-data3-v1.zip
Figure 3—source data 4

Raw data showing phosphorylation status of S6K and S6 after CRISPR knockout of Dyrk1a in NIH3T3 cells for Figure 3D.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig3-data4-v1.zip

DYRK1A phosphorylates TSC2 at T1462

Next, we investigated if DYRK1A phosphorylates TSC1/TSC2, which is known to regulate mTORC1 activity. For this, we first knocked down DYRK1A in HEK293 cells, co-expressed HA3-TSC1 and Flag-TSC2, and performed immunoprecipitation followed by LC/tandem MS (MS/MS) to identify the phosphorylation status of TSC1 and TSC2 in these cells. We observed that DYRK1A knockdown samples have reduced TSC2 phosphorylation at T1462 (T1462) compared to the control samples. T1462 has been previously identified as a site phosphorylated by various kinases that activate the mTORC1 pathway, including AKT (Potter et al., 2002), ERK (Ma et al., 2005), p90 RSK1 (Roux et al., 2004), IκB kinase β (IKKβ) (Manning et al., 2002), and MAPKAPK2 (MK2) (Li et al., 2003) in response to insulin and other growth factors. To ascertain that indeed, TSC2 T1462 is the site phosphorylated by DYRK1A, we performed in-vitro kinase assays using purified wild-type and kinase-dead DYRK1A. As TSC2 is about 200 KDa protein, we purified transiently overexpressed HA3-TSC1 and Flag-TSC2 from HEK293 cells and performed in vitro kinase assay on beads. Wild-type DYRK1A autophosphorylates and runs as fuzzy bands around 90–100 Kda in polyacrylamide gels, whereas kinase-dead DYRK1A runs only as a single sharp band (Figure 4A). In our assay, we did not observe an increase in phosphorylation at S1387 or Serine 939 in the presence of ATP and DYRK1A (Figure 4A). However, immunopurified TSC2 is heavily phosphorylated at Serine 1387 and Serine 939, which are two important sites that are phosphorylated by AKT (Potter et al., 2002; Inoki et al., 2003; Manning et al., 2002). Therefore, we cannot rule out if the immunopurified TSC2 was fully phosphorylated at S1387 and S939. However, it is important to note that we did not observe any differential loss of phosphorylation in TSC2 at S1387 in our mass spectrometry phosphorylation analysis. Interestingly, we found that T1462 was strongly phosphorylated by wild-type DYRK1A, not by kinase-dead DYRK1A (Figure 4A). Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that DYRK1A phosphorylates TSC2 on T1462. This phosphorylation is known to be an inhibitory modification and it is a key site that gets phosphorylated by various other key regulators of the mTORC1 pathway (Manning et al., 2002). We could not perform in-vitro tests to check if DYRK1A phosphorylates TSC1 or other sites on TSC2 due to the lack of appropriate antibodies. The overall data suggest that DYRK1A mediates TSC2 T1462 phosphorylation to inhibit TSC activity, promoting TORC1 activity.

Figure 4 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) phosphorylates TSC2 at T1462 in vitro, and Ras Homolog Enriched in Brain (RHEB) overexpression rescues mTORC1 activity in cells.

(A) An in-vitro kinase assay was performed using DYRK1A and kinase-dead DYRK1A (K188R) that were purified from bacteria. Flag-TSC2 and HA3-TSC1 were co-expressed in HEK293 cells and purified using a combination of (1:1) of HA and Flag beads. Beads were equilibrated with kinase assay buffer before the reactions were initiated on beads. After incubation for 30 min at 30°C, reactions were stopped by the addition of SDS loading buffer. Since bacterially purified DYRK1A is autophosphorylated, it exhibits a fuzzier signal, whereas kinase-dead DYRK1A is incapable of phosphorylation and appears as a sharp signal. (B, C) RHEB overexpression partially rescues the size of HEK293 cells. HEK293 cells were first transduced with short hairpin RNA (shRNA) lentivirus targeting DYRK1A or control and selected with 1 ug/ml Puromycin for three days, after which they were re-transduced with lentivirus expressing Flag-RHEB. The concentration of Puromycin was raised to 2 ug/ml for the next 48 hr in order to select for the second round of transduction. (B) Panel shows knockdown efficiency of DYRK1A and overexpression of RHEB. (C) Lower panel shows cell size analysis. Data represent the mean ± SD (n=3 biological replicates). Student’s t-test was done to compare samples. Significant difference in p-value = *p<0.05.

Figure 4—source data 1

Uncropped blots for Figure 4A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig4-data1-v1.zip
Figure 4—source data 2

Raw data showing in vitro kinase assay using recombinant DYRK1A and K188R for Figure 4A.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig4-data2-v1.zip
Figure 4—source data 3

Uncropped blots for Figure 4B.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig4-data3-v1.zip
Figure 4—source data 4

Raw data showing knockdown of DYRK1A and overexpression of Flag-RHEB for Figure 4B.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/88318/elife-88318-fig4-data4-v1.zip

RHEB overexpression can rescue cell growth phenotype of DYRK1A knockdown

TSC phosphorylation has been shown to inhibit TSC, and activate mTORC1 via RHEB, where the activation of TSC leads to the hydrolysis of GTP-bound RHEB, which in turn leads to mTORC1 inhibition (Rehbein et al., 2021). We hypothesized that DYRK1A-mediated phosphorylation of TSC2 may promote mTORC1 activation in a RHEB-mediated manner. Therefore, we reasoned that overexpression of RHEB will rescue the cell size phenotype caused by DYRK1A knockdown. We overexpressed RHEB in DYRK1A knockdown cells and found a partial rescue of cell size, suggesting that DYRK1A indeed plays a role in cell size regulation at least partly upstream to RHEB (Figure 4B and C). Furthermore, inhibition of mTOR with either Rapamycin or Torin1 rescued the increased cell size phenotype mediated by overexpression of DYRK1A in the inducible HEK293A-Flag-DYRK1A model (Figure 4—figure supplement 1). These data suggest that DYRK1A phosphorylates TSC2, which inhibits its action, leading to the activation of mTORC1 via RHEB.

Drosophila mnb mutants show reduced neuromuscular junctions, which can be rescued by RHEB overexpression

Since the TSC-TOR pathway is conserved in Drosophila (Takahara and Maeda, 2013), we sought to test if the DYRK1A-mediated regulation of the TSC-TOR pathway is also conserved. The TOR pathway is shown to promote NMJ development in flies (Dimitroff et al., 2012; Natarajan et al., 2013; Figure 5B and G). Similarly, mnb, the fly homolog of DYRK1A, is also required for NMJ growth (Chen et al., 2014); however, the mechanism of mnb-mediated NMJ growth is unknown. Based on our finding that DYRK1A promotes TOR activity, we hypothesized that mnb promotes larval NMJ growth through TOR. To test this hypothesis, we systematically compared the NMJ growth phenotype of mnb mutant with that of loss or gain of TOR activity at larval NMJ. Since TOR mutants are early larval lethal, we expressed dominant-negative TOR (TOR.Ted) in motor neurons using the UAS-Gal4 system (D42Gal4>UAS TOR.Ted) (Brand and Perrimon, 1993). To activate the TOR pathway, we overexpressed RHEB in motor neurons (D42Gal4>UAS RHEB) (Gustafson and Boulianne, 1996). We stained NMJ using anti-HRP (to mark neurons) and anti-DLG (to mark boutons where synaptic connections are formed). As shown in Figure 5A, B and G, the loss of mnb causes a reduction in the NMJ bouton numbers compared to the wild-type control (WT, Canton S)—similarly, the expression of TOR.TED in motor neurons (D42Gal4>UAS Tor.Ted) also causes a reduction in NMJ bouton numbers (Figure 5—figure supplement 1D-F). In contrast, overexpression of mnb in motor neurons increases the bouton numbers (Figure 4C, D and H). Similarly, the activation of the TOR pathway by overexpression of RHEB in motor neurons or mutations in gigas (gig, the fly homolog of TSC2) increases the number of boutons (Figure 5E, F, I, Figure 5—figure supplement 1C). The similarities in the TOR and mnb phenotypes suggest that Mnb may positively regulate TOR activity and promote NMJ growth. To test this hypothesis, we asked whether or not the NMJ phenotype of the mnb mutant is rescued by the activation of TOR. As shown in Figure 5L, overexpression of RHEB rescues the NMJ bouton numbers in mnb mutants. These results indicate that RHEB functions downstream to mnb to regulate the NMJ development. Taken together, the results in mammalian cells and flies suggest that the role of DYRK1A/Mnb in regulating the TOR pathway is conserved.

Figure 5 with 1 supplement see all
Download asset Open asset
mnb mutant phenotype can be rescued by TOR activation in flies.

(A–F and J–L) Third instar larval neuromuscular junction (NMJ) (muscles 6/7) were stained using anti-HRP (Green) and anti-Dlg (Red). Muscles are stained with phalloidin (Blue, A–F). HRP (green) stains the entire neuron and Dlg (red) stains only boutons (Red + Green). (G–I, M) Quantification of bouton numbers, normalized to muscle area (Bouton-NMA). Error bars represent standard deviation. Statistical significance (p-values: ***<0.001; **<0.01; *<0.05) is calculated by unpaired student’s t-test. (A, B, G) mnb1 alleles show fewer boutons numbers as compared to wild-type (WT, Canton S) control (B). Data are quantified in G. (C, D, H) mnb overexpression (D42-Gal4>UAS mnb, D) increases bouton numbers as compared with mCherry overexpression (D42-Gal4>UAS-mCherry, Control, C). D42-Gal4 is a motor-neuron-specific driver. Data are quantified in H. (E, F, I) Rheb overexpression (D42-Gal4>UAS Rheb, F) increases bouton numbers as compared with mCherry overexpression (D42-Gal4>UAS-mCherry, Control, E). Data are quantified in I. (J–M) Rheb overexpression in mnb mutant (mnb1/Y D42-Gal4>UASRheb, L) suppressed bouton phenotype as compared to mnb mutant (mnb1/Y D42-Gal4/+, K). Wild-type is heterozygous D42-Gal4 (+/Y; D42-Gal4/+, J). Data is quantified in (M).

Discussion

This work shows that DYRK1A promotes cell size as a reduction in DYRK1A levels in both human and mouse cells results in small cell size (Figure 1A–D). mTORC1 is a key energy sensor and a master regulator of cell growth (Ben-Sahra and Manning, 2017; Saxton and Sabatini, 2017). We found that reduced levels of DYRK1A in cells result in decreased S6K and S6 phosphorylation, suggesting that DYRK1A positively regulates mTORC1 (Figure 3). One of the key regulators of mTORC1 is the TSC complex, consisting of TSC1, TSC2, and TBC1D7 (TBC1 domain family member 7), which integrates various extracellular signals and negatively regulates mTORC1 complex activity (Rehbein et al., 2021; Dibble et al., 2012). DYRK1A physically interacts with the TSC complex through its kinase domain (Figure 2). TSC2 is a GTPase-activating protein (GAP) that promotes the conversion of GTP-bound RHEB to the GDP-bound state, thereby inhibiting it. When TSC2 is inhibited, the GTP-bound RHEB activates mTORC1 (Tee et al., 2003; Inoki et al., 2003). Phosphorylation at TSC2 at T1462 has been shown to inhibit TSC and promote TORC1 activity through RHEB (Manning et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2009). Our study, for the first time, shows that DYRK1A phosphorylates TSC2 at the T1462 site, thereby promoting the mTORC1 pathway. We also show that the overexpression of RHEB could partially rescue the cell growth phenotypes exhibited by DYRK1A knockdown cells, indicating that the DYRK1A works upstream to RHEB.

In DYRK1A syndrome, the loss of one copy of DYRK1A leads to stunted growth and microcephaly in humans (Møller et al., 2008). A recent report showing a reduction in mTOR signaling in mice cortex lacking Dyrk1a indicates that the DYRK1A-mTORC1 axis may regulate brain development (Levy et al., 2021). In Drosophila, mnb is widely expressed in the developing central nervous system and has been linked to post-differentiation roles in neurons. For example, in flies, mnb has been linked to long-term memory formation (Kacsoh et al., 2019). In humans and mice, DYRK1A has been linked to the neurite spine morphogenesis, and it has been suggested that the neurite spine phenotype may contribute to intellectual disability in Down syndrome (Haas et al., 2013; Martinez de Lagran et al., 2012; Park and Chung, 2013). The phenomenon of NMJ morphogenesis in fruit flies is analogous to neurite spine morphogenesis. The TOR pathway is shown to promote NMJ development in flies (Dimitroff et al., 2012; Natarajan et al., 2013; Figure 5B and G). Similarly, mnb is also required for NMJ growth (Chen et al., 2014); however, the mechanism of mnb-mediated NMJ growth was unknown. Our results show that the reduction in NMJ size in mnb mutants can be rescued by RHEB overexpression, suggesting that Mnb positively regulates mTORC1. Our results are also supported by a study in Arabidopsis that showed YAK1, a DYRK kinase, regulates meristem activity through the mTOR pathway (Barrada et al., 2019). Overall, our results suggest that the role of Mnb/DYRK1A in the regulation of the mTORC1 pathway is evolutionarily conserved, and the DYRK1A-mTORC1 axis plays a crucial role in neuronal morphogenesis and cellular growth.

Methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Strain (Drosophila melanogaster)Canton SBloomington Stock Center
Strain (D. melanogaster)mnb[1]Tejedor et al., 1995FBal0012364gift from Francisco J. Tejedor
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-mnbShaikh et al., 2016FBtp0114512gift from Francisco J. Tejedor
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-RHEBBloomington Stock CenterFBst0009688
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)D42-Gal4Bloomington Stock Center; Gustafson and Boulianne, 1996FBti0002759
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)P[(45)w[+mC]=UAS Tor.TED]IIBloomington Stock Center; Shaikh et al., 2016FBti0026636
Genetic reagent (D. melanogaster)UAS-mCherryBloomington Stock CenterFBti0147460
Chemical compound4% paraformaldehydeHimediaCat# TCL119
AntibodyMouse anti-DLGDSHB; Shaikh et al., 2016CatID# 4F3IF (1:500)
AntibodyRabbit anti-HRP conjugated with alexa488JacksonCatID# 123-545-021IF (1:500)
AntibodyGoat anti-mouse conjugated with Alexa 555InvitrogenCatID# A28180IF (1:500)
OtherMicrosocope: Leica Stellaris 5LeicaPL APO 40 X/1.30 oil objective
OtherMicrosocope: Olympus FV3000OlympusUPLFLN 40 X/1.30 oil objective
Cell line (Homo sapiens)HEK293ATCCCRL-1573
Cell line (H. sapiens)293TATCCCRL-3216
Cell line (Mus musculus)NIH3T3ATCCCRL-1658
Cell line (H. sapiens)SH-SY5YATCCCRL-2266
Transfected construct (H. sapiens)DYRK1A shRNAThermoFisher; Li et al., 2018Lentiviral construct to transduce and express the shRNA.
Transfected construct (M. musculus)Dyrk1a sgRNAThis paperLentiviral construct to transduce and
mediate Dyrk1a knockout
Antibodyanti-Actin (rabbit monoclonal)AbclonalCat# AC026WB (1:5000)
Antibodyanti-HA (mouse monoclonal)AbclonalCat# AE008WB (1:5000)
Antibodyanti-TSC1 (rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 4906WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti-TSC2 (rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 4308WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti- p70 S6 Kinase (rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2708WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti- Phospho-p70 S6 Kinase (Thr389) (rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 9205WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti- S6 Ribosomal Protein (mouse monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 2317WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti- Phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein (Ser235/236) (rabbit monoclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 4856WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti-Flag(mouse monoclonal)MBLCat# M185WB (1:5000)
Antibodyanti-Phospho-TSC2-T1462(rabbit polyclonal)AbclonalCat# AP0866WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti-Phospho-TSC2-S1387 (rabbit polyclonal)AbclonalCat# AP1117WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti-Phospho- TSC2-S939 (rabbit polyclonal)Cell Signaling TechnologyCat# 3615WB (1:1000)
Antibodyanti-DYRK1APMID:30137413WB (1:2000)
Recombinant DNA reagentpcDNA3-HA3-TSC1 (plasmid)AddgeneRRID:Addgene_19911
Recombinant DNA reagentpcDNA3 Flag TSC2 (plasmid)AddgeneRRID:Addgene_14129
Recombinant DNA reagentLentiCRISPR v2(plasmid)AddgeneRRID:Addgene_52961
Sequence-based reagentDYRK1A-RT-FThis paperRT-qPCR primersAAGCTCAGGTGGCTCATCGG
Sequence-based reagentDYRK1A-RT-RThis paperRT-qPCR primersTCTCGCAGTCCATGGCCTG
Sequence-based reagentGAPDH-RT-FThis paperRT-qPCR primersACAACTTTGGTATCGTGGAAGG
Sequence-based reagentGAPDH-RT-RThis paperRT-qPCR primersGCCATCACGCCACAGTTTC
Sequence-based reagentControl-sgRNAThis paperSgRNA target sequences for mouse cellsCGAGGTATTCGGCTCCGCG
Sequence-based reagentDyrk1a-sgRNAThis paperSgRNA target sequences for mouse cellsCGCTTTTATCGGTCTCCAG
Commercial assay or kitBCA Protein Quantification KitMeilunbioCat# MA0082
Commercial assay or kitHiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis KitVazymeCat# R212
Chemical compound, drugPuromycinSolarbioCat# P8230
Chemical compound, drugDoxycyclineMCECat# HY-N0565
Software, algorithmGraphPadPrism v.7.00RRID:SCR_002798
Software, algorithmImageJImageJ v.1.53RRID:SCR_003070
OtherAnti-Flag BeadsSmart-LifesciencesCat# SA042005
Otherr Protein A/G MagPoly BeadsSmart-LifesciencesCat# SM015001

Expression plasmids and cell culture

pcDNA3 -HA3-TSC1 (Yue Xiong; Addgene #19911), pcDNA3 Flag TSC2 (Brendan Manning: Addgene #14129), LentiCRISPR v2 (Feng Zhang; Addgene #52961) plasmids were procured from Addgene. For expressing cDNA using lentivirus, LentiCRISPR v2 was modified by removing the U6 promoter and tracer RNA, and cDNA were cloned in place of SpCas9, and named LentiExp vector. RHEB sequence from pRK7-RHEB (John Blenis; Addgene #15888) was cloned into the LentiExp vector by replacing SpCas9. Expression was confirmed by western blot analysis. DYRK1A expression vector, DYRK1A shRNA, and control shRNA have been previously described (Li et al., 2018). All constructs were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Expression of Flag-tagged proteins was induced with 250 ng/ml Doxycycline for 36–48 h. HEK293, HEK293T, and NIH3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% FBS. All cell lines were obtained from the American type culture collection (ATCC). Initially, frozen stocks were tested for mycoplasma after thawing. Cell lines were maintained at 37 °C under 5% CO2.

Antibodies

Antibodies against Actin (AC026) and HA (AE008) were from Abclonal, anti-DDDDK from MBL (M185-3L), TSC1 (4906), TSC2 (4308), S6K (2708), pS6K (9205), S6 (2317), pS6 (4856) were from CST. DYRK1A antibody was generated in-house and has been described before (Li et al., 2018).

Cell extracts and immunoblotting

For immunoblotting, total cell extracts were prepared. Briefly, collected cells were washed once with cold PBS and lysed in cold NP-40 lysis buffer (40 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 120 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40 [Igepal CA-630], 5% glycerol, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM glycerol 2-phosphate, 50 mM NaF, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate and 1:100 protease inhibitors [Solarbio, P6730]) for 15 min on ice. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation, and protein concentration was measured using a BCA kit. Western blot signals were quantified using ImageJ.

shRNA mediated knockdown and overexpression of RHEB

Short hairpin RNA (shRNA) targeting DYRK1A have been previously described (Li et al., 2018). Lentiviral particle preparation and infection were performed as previously described (Li et al., 2018). Lentivirus-infected HEK293 and SH-SY5Y cells were selected with 1 μg/mL(HEK293) or 2 μg/mL (SH-SY5Y) Puromycin, respectively for 4 days.

For RHEB overexpression rescue of DYKR1A shRNA-mediated knockdown HEK293 cells, cells were first infected with lentivirus expressing shRNAs targeting control and DYRK1A, and then selected with 1 μg/mL Puromycin for 48 hr. After selection cells were transduced with lentivirus expressing Flag-RHEB. These cells were further selected with 2 μg/mL Puromycin for 48 hr before harvesting.

Serum starvation

shRNA-treated HEK293 cells selected for 4 days with 1 ug/ml puromycin were washed once with PBS and then DMEM without serum added. Serum starvation was performed for 12 hr. For stimulation with FBS (10%), pre-warmed FBS was directly added to the serum-free media for the time periods indicated.

CRISPR/Cas9 mediated Dyrk1a knockdown

NIH3T3 cells were transduced with lentiCRISPR v2 (Addgene plasmid #52961) containing either no sgRNA (control) or sgRNA targeting Dyrk1a (Sanjana et al., 2014). Transduced cells were selected with 3 μg/mL Puromycin for 4 days before harvesting. sgRNA targeting mouse Dyrk1a is provided in .

Cell size measurements

Cell size was measured and analyzed with a JIMBIO FIL electronic cell counter following the manufacturer’s protocol. In short, 2.5×105 cells were seeded in six-well plates. After 24 hr of culture, cells were trypsinized and taken up in full DMEM. Each cell line was measured three times; each measurement comprised three cycles of cell counts with intervals of 1 μm ranging from 4–30 μm. The sum of counts of viable cells in the range of 12–30 μm was plotted and quantified. Three biological replicates were performed per cell type (i.e. HEK293, SH-SY5Y, and NIH3T3 cells [KD/KO and corresponding Control]). Control and corresponding KD/KO were compared with multiple unpaired t-tests. p-values are presented as stars above the corresponding bar graphs; *p<0.05. HEK293 Flag-DYRK1A cell size was measured as above, except cells were induced with 40 ng/mL Doxycycline for 48 hr.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (q-RT-PCR) assays

2.5×105 cells were seeded in six-well plates. After 48 hr of 40 ng/mL Doxycycline induction, total RNA from fresh cells were extracted using RNA-easy Isolation Reagent (Vazyme) as per the manufacturer’s instructions. After determining the total RNA concentration and quality using a Nanodrop (Thermo Fisher), 1 μg RNA was used in 20 μL reaction mixture to reverse transcribe RNA using HiScript II 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme R212) and stored at –20°C. 2 μL was used to perform qPCR using ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Q711) with 10 μM forward and reverse gene-specific primers. The cycling consisted of 2 min at 95°C, followed by 40 cycles of 5 s at 95°C and 10 s at 60℃. Following the completion of the final cycle, a melting curve analysis was performed to monitor the purity of the PCR products. Each sample was analyzed in triplicate. Quantification was performed by means of the comparative Ct method (2−ΔCT). The mRNA expression of target genes was normalized to that of GAPDH, and the data are represented as the mean ± SEM of biological replicates.

Mass spectrometry analysis for identification of phosphorylated peptides of TSC1/TSC2

Protein precipitation and digestion: Proteins were precipitated with TCA (trichloroacetic acid). The protein pellet was dried in Speedvac. The pellet was subsequently dissolved with 8 M urea in 100 mM Tris-Cl (pH 8.5). TCEP (final concentration is 5 mM; Thermo Scientific) and Iodoacetamide (final concentration is 10 mM; Sigma) were added to the solution and incubated at room temperature for 20 and 15 min for reduction and alkylation, respectively. The solution was diluted four times and digested with Trypsin at 1:50 (w/w; Promega).

LC/tandem MS (MS/MS) analysis of peptide: The peptide mixture was loaded on a home-made 15 cm-long pulled-tip analytical column (75 µm i.d.) packed with 3 µm reverse-phase beads (Aqua C18, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) connected to an Easy-nLC 1000 nano HPLC (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA) for mass spectrometry analysis. Data-dependent tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis was performed with a Q Exactive Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA). Peptides eluted from the LC system were directly electrosprayed into the mass spectrometer with a distal 1.8-kV spray voltage. One acquisition cycle includes one full-scan MS spectrum (m/z 300–1800) followed by the top 20 MS/MS events, sequentially generated on the first to the twentieth most intense ions selected from the full MS spectrum at a 27% normalized collision energy. MS scan functions and LC solvent gradients were controlled by the Xcalibur data system (Thermo Scientific).

Data analysis

The acquired MS/MS data were analyzed using previously published pipeline (McCormack et al., 1997; Eng et al., 1994). In order to accurately estimate peptide probabilities and false discovery rates, we used a decoy database containing the reversed sequences of all the proteins appended to the target database. Carbamidomethylation (+57.02146) of cysteine was considered as a static modification and lysine phosphorylation (+79.9663) of STY as a variable modification.

Flag immunoprecipitation

With detergent: 1×106 cells were seeded in 10 cm plates. After 24 hr of culture, cells were co-transfected with 5 μg pcDNA-Flag-DYRK1A/deletion and 5 μg HA-TSC1 using PEI. After 48 hr, collected cells were washed once with cold PBS, and lysed in cold NP-40 lysis buffer (40 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 120 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40 [Igepal CA-630], 5% glycerol, 10 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 10 mM glycerol 2-phosphate, 50 mM NaF, 0.5 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 1:100 protease inhibitors [Solarbio, P6730]) for 15 min on ice. Lysates were cleared by centrifugation, and protein concentration was measured using a BCA kit. The supernatant was then incubated with Flag beads (Smart-Lifesciences, SA042005) for ~4 hr at 4℃. Finally, beads were washed with a lysis buffer without NP-40 three times and resuspended in a 1X SDS loading buffer. Samples were heated for 10 min at 95℃ and separated by SDS-PAGE.

Overexpressed DYRK1A immunoprecipitation without detergent

Approximately 108 HEK293-Flag-DYRK1A (with 250 ng/ml Doxycycline treatment), and parental cells were induced for 48 hr were collected and washed with PBS. Cells were swollen for 15 min in hypotonic buffer (Buffer A: 10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT supplemented with freshly prepared protease inhibitors, Solarbio, P6730). Swollen cells were dounced 20 times in a Wheaton Dounce homogenizer till about 90% of cells were lysed (as observed in a microscope). Lysates were then centrifuged at 5000–6000 g for 10 min at 4℃. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube, and 0.11 volume of Buffer B (0.3 M HEPES pH 7.9, 1.4 M KCl, 0.03 M MgCl2) was added; the supernatant was then centrifuged at 12,000 g for 30 min. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube and incubated with Flag-beads (Smart-Lifesciences; SA042005) for ~4 hr at 4℃. Finally, beads were washed three times with wash buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, and 0.2% Triton X-100 and resuspended in a 1×SDS loading buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

Endogenous DYRK1A immunoprecipitation without detergent

Approximately 108 HEK293 cells were swollen for 15 min in hypotonic buffer (Buffer A: 10 mM HEPES pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT supplemented with freshly prepared protease inhibitors, Solarbio, P6730). Swollen cells were dounced 20 times in a Wheaton Dounce homogenizer and centrifuged at 16,000 g for 30 min. Supernatant was transferred to a new tube, and 0.11 volume of Buffer B (0.3 M HEPES pH 7.9, 1.4 M KCl, 0.03 M MgCl2) was added and incubated with Protein A/G magnetic beads (Smart-Lifesciences, SM015001) for ~4 hr at 4℃. Finally, beads were washed three times with a wash buffer containing 150 mM NaCl and 0.2% Triton X-100 and resuspended in a 1X SDS loading buffer and analyzed by SDS-PAGE.

Kinase assay

GST-DYRK1A and GST-DYRK1A K188R were cloned in pGEX-6p1vector, and proteins were expressed in BL21 strain and purified using GST beads. FLAG-TSC2 and HA3-TSC1 were co-expressed in HEK293 cells, and Flag-Affinity purified. After wash, beads were rinsed with 1X kinase assay buffer (25 mM HEPES, pH 7.0, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM DTT), and kinase assay was performed on beads bound with FLAG-TSC2 and HA-TSC1. Equal amounts of GST-DYRK1A or GST-K188R were added to the Flag beads in the presence/absence of ATP (100 µM), and incubated at 30 °C for 30 min. Reactions were stopped by the addition of 5X SDS loading dye and analyzed by SDS PAGE.

Drosophila culture

Flies were grown in standard fly food at 25 °C. Following genotypes were used in this study: Canton S (Bloomington Stock Center), mnb[1] (FBal0012364, [Tejedor et al., 1995], gift from Francisco J. Tejedor), UAS-mnb (FBtp0114512, [Shaikh et al., 2016], gift from Francisco J. Tejedor), UAS-RHEB (FBst0009688, Bloomington Stock Center), D42-Gal4 (FBti0002759, Bloomington Stock Center [Gustafson and Boulianne, 1996], P[(45) w[+mC]=UAS Tor.TED]II FBti0026636, [Hennig and Neufeld, 2002] similarities in the TOR and, Bloomington Stock Center), UAS-mCherry (FBti0147460, Bloomington Stock Center).

Drosophila NMJ immunofluorescence staining and quantification

For Immunofluorescence staining of NMJ the third instar larvae were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Himedia Cat#TCL119) for 20 min at room temperature and washed in 1 X PBST (0.2% Triton X-100). Antibodies were used at the following dilutions: Mouse anti-DLG 1:500 (DSHB 4F3, Shaikh et al., 2016), Rabbit anti-HRP conjugated with alexa488 (dilution 1:500, Jackson 123-545-021), Goat anti-mouse conjugated with Alexa 555 (Dilution 1:500, Invitrogen A28180). Samples were imaged with a confocal microscope (Leica Stellaris 5 PL APO 40 X/1.30 oil objective) or Olympus FV3000 (UPLFLN 40 X/1.30 oil objective). Images were documented and quantified using ImageJ. We marked the HRP-labeled boutons to quantify NMJ phenotypes and manually counted the number. The number of boutons was then normalized to the muscle area (muscle 6/7), and the normalized data were compared between genotypes.

Statistical analysis

GraphPad Prism version 7.00 was used for statistical and statistical presentation of quantitation. p-values are presented in the figures above or below the compared conditions. Two-way ANOVA followed by a Sidak’s multiple comparisons test was applied to cell size data, p-S6, and p-S6k. Unpaired two-tailed Student’s t-test was applied to DYRK1A protein expression. The data are represented as the mean ± SEM of three biological replicates.

Data availability

Mass spectrometry data files for FLAG-DYRK1A affinity purifications and negative controls are available from MassIVE (MSV000085815) and ProteomeXchange (PXD020533). Original mass spectrometry data underlying this manuscript can be accessed from the Stowers Original Data Repository.

The following data sets were generated
    1. Florens L
    (2024) MassIVE
    ID MSV000085815. MudPIT analyses of FLAG-DYRK1A and FLAG-Controls affinity-purified from cytoplasmic extracts of HEK293 cells.
    https://massive.ucsd.edu/ProteoSAFe/dataset.jsp?accession=MSV000085815

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Pinhua Wang

    State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Sunayana Sarkar and Menghuan Zhang
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  2. Sunayana Sarkar

    Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Hyderabad, India
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    Contributed equally with
    Pinhua Wang and Menghuan Zhang
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  3. Menghuan Zhang

    State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Contributed equally with
    Pinhua Wang and Sunayana Sarkar
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  4. Tingting Xiao

    State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  5. Fenhua Kong

    State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  6. Zhe Zhang

    State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  7. Deepa Balasubramanian

    Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Hyderabad, India
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  8. Nandan Jayaram

    1. CSIR–Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    2. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  9. Sayantan Datta

    Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Hyderabad, India
    Present address
    Centre for Writing and Pedagogy, School of Interwoven Arts and Sciences, Krea University, Sri City, India
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  10. Ruyu He

    State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  11. Ping Wu

    National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai, Zhangjiang Lab, Shanghai, China
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  12. Peng Chao

    National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai, Zhangjiang Lab, Shanghai, China
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  13. Ying Zhang

    Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared

  14. Michael Washburn

    1. Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    2. Department of Cancer Biology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Supervision
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7568-2585

  15. Laurence A Florens

    Stowers Institute for Medical Research, Kansas City, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review and editing
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9310-6650

  16. Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal

    1. CSIR–Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India
    2. Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, India
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Supervision
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2369-3714

  17. Manish Jaiswal

    Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Hyderabad, India
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    manish@tifrh.res.in
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8360-8289

  18. Man Mohan

    1. State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedical Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, China
    2. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tumor Microenvironment and Inflammation, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
    Contribution
    Conceptualization, Resources, Data curation, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Project administration, Writing – review and editing
    For correspondence
    manmohan2100@outlook.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8811-8542

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471206)

  • Man Mohan

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India (CRG/2020/003275)

  • Manish Jaiswal

Department of Atomic Energy, Government of India (RTI 4007)

  • Manish Jaiswal

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, India (BT/PR32873/BRB/10/1850/2020)

  • Manish Jaiswal

Stowers Institute for Medical Research

  • Ying Zhang
  • Michael Washburn
  • Laurence A Florens

Wellcome Trust/DBT India Alliance (IA/I/18/1/503629)

  • Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology, India (BT/RLF/Re-entry/06/2016)

  • Manish Jaiswal

CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology

  • Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

We thank Yue Xiong, Brendan Manning, Feng Zhang, and John Blenis for plasmids and Francisco J Tejedor for mnb fly strains. Liang Hu and Meng Huan Zhang for technical help in cloning. Fly strains obtained from the Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center (NIH P40OD018537) were used in this study. Funding: This work was supported in part by Yunnan High-end Foreign Experts program to MM, National Natural Science Foundation of China (31471206) to MM. Major Basic Research Project of Science and Technology of Yunnan (202001BC070001) to LPBR. YZH, MPW and LF are supported by The Stowers Institute for Medical Research. MJ is supported by the Department of Atomic Energy (Project Identification No. RTI 4007), Department of Science and Technology, SERB (CRG/2020/003275), Department of Biotechnology (BT/PR32873/BRB/10/1850/2020), Government of India. MJ is a Ramalingaswami fellow, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, under project number BT/RLF/Re-entry/06/2016. SNJ is supported by DBT/Wellcome trust India Alliance (grant no IA/I/18/1/503629) and intramural funding of CSIR-Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hyderabad, India.

Version history

  1. Preprint posted:
  2. Sent for peer review:
  3. Reviewed Preprint version 1:
  4. Reviewed Preprint version 2:
  5. Version of Record published:

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88318. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

© 2023, Wang, Sarkar, Zhang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,549
    views
  • 128
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Pinhua Wang
  2. Sunayana Sarkar
  3. Menghuan Zhang
  4. Tingting Xiao
  5. Fenhua Kong
  6. Zhe Zhang
  7. Deepa Balasubramanian
  8. Nandan Jayaram
  9. Sayantan Datta
  10. Ruyu He
  11. Ping Wu
  12. Peng Chao
  13. Ying Zhang
  14. Michael Washburn
  15. Laurence A Florens
  16. Sonal Nagarkar-Jaiswal
  17. Manish Jaiswal
  18. Man Mohan
(2024)
DYRK1A interacts with the tuberous sclerosis complex and promotes mTORC1 activity
eLife 12:RP88318.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88318.3

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88318

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology

    Intramolecular feedback regulation of the LRRK2 Roc G domain by a LRRK2 kinase-dependent mechanism

    Bernd K Gilsbach, Franz Y Ho ... Christian Johannes Gloeckner
    Research Article

    The Parkinson’s disease (PD)-linked protein Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) consists of seven domains, including a kinase and a Roc G domain. Despite the availability of several high-resolution structures, the dynamic regulation of its unique intramolecular domain stack is nevertheless still not well understood. By in-depth biochemical analysis, assessing the Michaelis–Menten kinetics of the Roc G domain, we have confirmed that LRRK2 has, similar to other Roco protein family members, a KM value of LRRK2 that lies within the range of the physiological GTP concentrations within the cell. Furthermore, the R1441G PD variant located within a mutational hotspot in the Roc domain showed an increased catalytic efficiency. In contrast, the most common PD variant G2019S, located in the kinase domain, showed an increased KM and reduced catalytic efficiency, suggesting a negative feedback mechanism from the kinase domain to the G domain. Autophosphorylation of the G1+2 residue (T1343) in the Roc P-loop motif is critical for this phosphoregulation of both the KM and the kcat values of the Roc-catalyzed GTP hydrolysis, most likely by changing the monomer–dimer equilibrium. The LRRK2 T1343A variant has a similar increased kinase activity in cells compared to G2019S and the double mutant T1343A/G2019S has no further increased activity, suggesting that T1343 is crucial for the negative feedback in the LRRK2 signaling cascade. Together, our data reveal a novel intramolecular feedback regulation of the LRRK2 Roc G domain by a LRRK2 kinase-dependent mechanism. Interestingly, PD mutants differently change the kinetics of the GTPase cycle, which might in part explain the difference in penetrance of these mutations in PD patients.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics

    Control of 3′ splice site selection by the yeast splicing factor Fyv6

    Katherine A Senn, Karli A Lipinski ... Aaron A Hoskins
    Research Article

    Pre-mRNA splicing is catalyzed in two steps: 5ʹ splice site (SS) cleavage and exon ligation. A number of proteins transiently associate with spliceosomes to specifically impact these steps (first and second step factors). We recently identified Fyv6 (FAM192A in humans) as a second step factor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae; however, we did not determine how widespread Fyv6’s impact is on the transcriptome. To answer this question, we have used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to analyze changes in splicing. These results show that loss of Fyv6 results in activation of non-consensus, branch point (BP) proximal 3ʹ SS transcriptome-wide. To identify the molecular basis of these observations, we determined a high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of a yeast product complex spliceosome containing Fyv6 at 2.3 Å. The structure reveals that Fyv6 is the only second step factor that contacts the Prp22 ATPase and that Fyv6 binding is mutually exclusive with that of the first step factor Yju2. We then use this structure to dissect Fyv6 functional domains and interpret results of a genetic screen for fyv6Δ suppressor mutations. The combined transcriptomic, structural, and genetic studies allow us to propose a model in which Yju2/Fyv6 exchange facilitates exon ligation and Fyv6 promotes usage of consensus, BP distal 3ʹ SS.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Neuroscience

    Biochemical and neurophysiological effects of deficiency of the mitochondrial import protein TIMM50

    Eyal Paz, Sahil Jain ... Abdussalam Azem
    Research Article

    TIMM50, an essential TIM23 complex subunit, is suggested to facilitate the import of ~60% of the mitochondrial proteome. In this study, we characterized a TIMM50 disease-causing mutation in human fibroblasts and noted significant decreases in TIM23 core protein levels (TIMM50, TIMM17A/B, and TIMM23). Strikingly, TIMM50 deficiency had no impact on the steady-state levels of most of its putative substrates, suggesting that even low levels of a functional TIM23 complex are sufficient to maintain the majority of TIM23 complex-dependent mitochondrial proteome. As TIMM50 mutations have been linked to severe neurological phenotypes, we aimed to characterize TIMM50 defects in manipulated mammalian neurons. TIMM50 knockdown in mouse neurons had a minor effect on the steady state level of most of the mitochondrial proteome, supporting the results observed in patient fibroblasts. Amongst the few affected TIM23 substrates, a decrease in the steady state level of components of the intricate oxidative phosphorylation and mitochondrial ribosome complexes was evident. This led to declined respiration rates in fibroblasts and neurons, reduced cellular ATP levels, and defective mitochondrial trafficking in neuronal processes, possibly contributing to the developmental defects observed in patients with TIMM50 disease. Finally, increased electrical activity was observed in TIMM50 deficient mice neuronal cells, which correlated with reduced levels of KCNJ10 and KCNA2 plasma membrane potassium channels, likely underlying the patients’ epileptic phenotype.