Growth: Inside help from the microbiome
Elucidating the role of one of the proteins produced by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum reveals a new molecule that allows this gut bacterium to support the development of fruit fly larvae.
- Department of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, United States
Whether an animal can grow and put on weight as a juvenile not only depends on the nutrients it receives, but also on the microorganisms that live inside its gut (Schwarzer et al., 2016). In fruit flies, for example, a broad range of microbes can support the growth of malnourished larvae (Keebaugh et al., 2018). A closer look at the mechanisms involved in these interactions has shown that certain gut bacteria increase the protein and moisture content of the food the insect consumes; however, it has also revealed that cell wall components such as peptidoglycan can trigger intestinal cells to produce proteases that help flies make the most of their nutrients (Erkosar et al., 2015; Lesperance and Broderick, 2020). It therefore remains unclear whether the microbiome supports growth by altering the nutritional quality of food or by directly influencing certain biological processes in the flies.
Previous studies have shown that certain strains of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, a species of Gram-positive bacteria which colonize in the gut of fruit flies, can boost the growth of larvae raised with limited access to proteins (Shin et al., 2011; Storelli et al., 2011). This ability relies on a cluster of six co-regulated genes known as the pbpX2-dltXABCD operon; five of these genes (dltX, dltA, dltB, dltC and dltD) code for proteins that help to add the molecule D-alanine onto teichoic acids, the most abundant component in the cell wall of Gram-positive bacteria (Matos et al., 2017; Nikolopoulos et al., 2022).
Two types of teichoic acids exist: lipoteichoic acids, which are anchored in the cell membrane, and wall teichoic acids, which are attached to peptidoglycan. Together these complex polymers allow the bacteria to interact with their host in both beneficial and pathogenic ways (Atilano et al., 2010; Brown et al., 2013). In L. plantarum, the D-alanine esterification of the cell wall which is supported by the pbpX2-dltXABCD operon leads to intestinal cells producing peptidases that are important for growth (Matos et al., 2017). However, the role of the pbpX2 gene in the operon has remained unclear. Now, in eLife, Marie-Pierre Chapot-Chartier, Christophe Grangeasse, François Leulier and colleagues — including Nikos Nikolopoulos, Renata Matos, Stéphanie Ravaud and Pascal Courtin as joint first authors — report additional insights into the protein coded by pbpX2, and the role of teichoic acids in the growth of fruit fly larvae (Nikolopoulos et al., 2023).
The team (who are based in various institutes in France and Japan) found that the enzyme pbpX2 encodes does not participate in the maturation of peptidoglycan, as was previously expected. Instead, further analyses showed that it works alongside the Dlt proteins from the operon to add D-alanine onto the glycerol residues of lipoteichoic acids. These results led Nikolopoulos et al. to rename the protein ‘DltE’, and to consider D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids as a signal required for L. plantarum to support intestinal function and juvenile growth.
Experiments conducted on LpNC8, a strain of L. plantarum known to help larvae develop when nutrients are scarce, allowed Nikolopoulos et al. to better understand which cell wall components the bacteria need for their growth-boosting role. This showed that LpNC8 primarily produces glycerol residues for its lipoteichoic acids, but ribitol residues for its wall teichoic acids. In fact, unlike other L. plantarum strains, only lipoteichoic acids are D- alanylated in LpNC8 bacteria. This suggests a need to systematically analyze the composition of teichoic acids and their modifications across multiple L. plantarum strains to understand how these patterns correlate with the bacteria’s ability to support fly growth.
Finally, the team investigated the roles of different cell wall components in larval development by purifying them individually from LpNC8 bacteria or from a LpNC8 mutant strain lacking the operon. This demonstrated that, unlike wall teichoic acids or unaltered lipoteichoic acids, D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids are a necessary and sufficient cue for promoting larval growth and for inducing the production of proteases in the gut. However, the presence of both peptidoglycan fragments and D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids is needed for optimal growth, suggesting that the flies use independent, additive signals to boost the production of peptidases and overall juvenile development (Figure 1).
Figure 1
The recognition of certain bacterial cell wall components supports the growth of fruit fly larvae.
Certain strains of the bacteria Lactiplantibacillus plantarum, such as LpNC8, can help the fruit fly larvae (bottom) in which they live to grow when nutrients are scarce. Various components of the L. plantarum cell wall (top) help with this process. For instance, fragments of peptidoglycan (mDAP PG) can be recognized by peptidoglycan recognition receptors (PGRP-LE) present at the surface of the intestinal cells of the fly; this, in turns, triggers a molecular pathway (Imd/Dredd) which leads to the production of proteases that help the larva grow. Nikolopoulos et al. show that other cell wall components known as D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids (D-Ala-LTA; yellow) also support protease production and larval growth through an independent, additional mechanism that remains unknown. They demonstrate that the addition of D-alanine (pale blue circles) onto lipoteichoic acids is supported by the proteins generated by the pbpX2-dltXABCD (or dlt) operon; this includes the protein encoded by the pbpX2 gene, which they rename DltE. LpNC8 is unique in that D-alanine can only be added to its lipoteichoic acids, but not other similar polymers known as wall teichoic acids (green).
It remains unclear how D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids in L. plantarum manage to reach cells lining the midgut of Drosophila. Nikolopoulos et al. propose that the molecules may be released inside micro-vesicles that the intestinal cells then capture through endocytosis. The signaling pathways by which D-alanylated lipoteichoic acids induce intestinal proteases also remains to be identified, but they are probably separate from the molecular cascade elicited by peptidoglycans and other cell wall components. Overall, these results add to increasing evidence demonstrating the breadth and diversity of the bacterial components that underlie fly-microbiome interactions. As L. plantarum also supports growth in mice, this study opens new, exciting avenues of research into the role of host bacteria in the development of mammals and other animals.
References
-
Wall teichoic acids of gram-positive bacteriaAnnual Review of Microbiology 67:313–336.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155620
-
Gut bacteria mediate nutrient availability in Drosophila dietsApplied and Environmental Microbiology 87:e01401-20.https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01401-20
Article and author information
Author details
Nichole A Broderick
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Agrawal and Broderick
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 583
- views
-
- 43
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Growth: Inside help from the microbiome
eLife 12:e88873.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.88873
Further reading
-
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Saprolegnia parasitica is one of the most virulent oomycete species in freshwater aquatic environments, causing severe saprolegniasis and leading to significant economic losses in the aquaculture industry. Thus far, the prevention and control of saprolegniasis face a shortage of medications. Linalool, a natural antibiotic alternative found in various essential oils, exhibits promising antimicrobial activity against a wide range of pathogens. In this study, the specific role of linalool in protecting S. parasitica infection at both in vitro and in vivo levels was investigated. Linalool showed multifaceted anti-oomycetes potential by both of antimicrobial efficacy and immunomodulatory efficacy. For in vitro test, linalool exhibited strong anti-oomycetes activity and mode of action included: (1) Linalool disrupted the cell membrane of the mycelium, causing the intracellular components leak out; (2) Linalool prohibited ribosome function, thereby inhibiting protein synthesis and ultimately affecting mycelium growth. Surprisingly, meanwhile we found the potential immune protective mechanism of linalool in the in vivo test: (1) Linalool enhanced the complement and coagulation system which in turn activated host immune defense and lysate S. parasitica cells; (2) Linalool promoted wound healing, tissue repair, and phagocytosis to cope with S. parasitica infection; (3) Linalool positively modulated the immune response by increasing the abundance of beneficial Actinobacteriota; (4) Linalool stimulated the production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines to lyse S. parasitica cells. In all, our findings showed that linalool possessed multifaceted anti-oomycetes potential which would be a promising natural antibiotic alternative to cope with S. parasitica infection in the aquaculture industry.
-
- Genetics and Genomics
- Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Polyamines are biologically ubiquitous cations that bind to nucleic acids, ribosomes, and phospholipids and, thereby, modulate numerous processes, including surface motility in Escherichia coli. We characterized the metabolic pathways that contribute to polyamine-dependent control of surface motility in the commonly used strain W3110 and the transcriptome of a mutant lacking a putrescine synthetic pathway that was required for surface motility. Genetic analysis showed that surface motility required type 1 pili, the simultaneous presence of two independent putrescine anabolic pathways, and modulation by putrescine transport and catabolism. An immunological assay for FimA—the major pili subunit, reverse transcription quantitative PCR of fimA, and transmission electron microscopy confirmed that pili synthesis required putrescine. Comparative RNAseq analysis of a wild type and ΔspeB mutant which exhibits impaired pili synthesis showed that the latter had fewer transcripts for pili structural genes and for fimB which codes for the phase variation recombinase that orients the fim operon promoter in the ON phase, although loss of speB did not affect the promoter orientation. Results from the RNAseq analysis also suggested (a) changes in transcripts for several transcription factor genes that affect fim operon expression, (b) compensatory mechanisms for low putrescine which implies a putrescine homeostatic network, and (c) decreased transcripts of genes for oxidative energy metabolism and iron transport which a previous genetic analysis suggests may be sufficient to account for the pili defect in putrescine synthesis mutants. We conclude that pili synthesis requires putrescine and putrescine concentration is controlled by a complex homeostatic network that includes the genes of oxidative energy metabolism.
