Deep-Sea Adaptation: Surviving under pressure
The world’s oceans are divided into five depth zones, with the hadal zone – which refers to depths of more than 6000 metres – being the deepest. Composed mainly of deep trenches, the hadal zone is among the most hostile environments on Earth because it is extremely cold and dark, there is very little food, the trenches are geographically isolated, and the hydrostatic pressure can reach values as high as 1000 times atmospheric pressure (Somero, 1992; Jamieson, 2015).
The most common vertebrate species in the hadal zone are fish called snailfishes, and hadal snailfishes can survive down to depths of about 8100 metres (Linley et al., 2016). Other species of snailfish live in coastal waters, which means that the snailfish (sometimes known as the sea snail) has the widest depth range of any marine fish species. Researchers have identified various ways in which hadal snailfish have adapted to their extreme environment (Wang et al., 2019; Mu et al., 2021), but we still do not fully understand how snailfish evolved and why they are among the few vertebrate species that have successfully adapted to the hadal zone.
Now, in eLife, Shunping He (Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Kun Wang (Northwestern Polytechnical University) and colleagues – including Wenjie Xu, Chenglong Zhu, Xueli Gao, Baosheng Wu, Han Xu, Mingliang Hu and Honghui Zeng as joint first authors – report the results of a genomic study that provides new insights into the origin and evolution of the hadal snailfish (Xu et al., 2023).
Xu et al. started by generating genomic data for four hadal snailfish that had been collected from the Mariana Trench in the Northwest Pacific Ocean, and four Tanaka’s snailfish that had been collected from the Southern Yellow Sea: Tanaka’s snailfish is a close relative of the hadal snailfish that lives in shallower waters. After a series of thorough bioinformatic analyses, they identified 33 genes that are only found in hadal snailfish, 19 unitary pseudogenes, and various other differences between hadal snailfish and related species. For instance, there are 21 genes for which the gene number in hadal snailfish is higher than the gene number in Tanaka’s snailfish. Strikingly, most of these genes and differences had not been observed before, probably due to the fragmented nature of early versions of the hadal snailfish genome. Xu et al. also observed that 51 genes present in other snailfish are not present in Hadal snailfish.
By comparing genomic and mitochondrial data belonging to snailfishes from different trenches – including the Kermadec Trench, which is about 6,400 kilometres from the Mariana Trench – they found that hadal snailfishes have successfully spread to multiple trenches in the Pacific Ocean over the course of a million years.
By associating gene variation, expression, and function, Xu et al. were able to yield several important insights into the ways the hadal snailfish has adapted to its extreme environment (Figure 1). First, the rh1 gene, which is critical for monochromatic vision in very dim light, is present and expressed in hadal snailfish, whereas other genes that are associated with seeing at different wavelengths (lws, rh2 and sws2) are lost or hardly expressed.
Second, the majority of the auditory genes were preserved in hadal snailfish and many of them were upregulated, probably to compensate for the loss of visual genes. Third, while many circadian rhythm genes have been lost, or have become pseudogenes, a small number of essential circadian clock control genes are present and expressed in the hadal snailfish, indicating that a rhythm cycle is retained, although it is probably not coupled to the day-night cycle.
Fourth, a gene called gpr27 that is involved in metabolism in other species is a pseudogene in the hadal snailfish, which probably helps it to reduce metabolism and store energy in order to survive periods when food is not available. Fifth, two genes that are involved in bone mineralization in other snailfish are not found in hadal snailfish: the fact that the skull of the hadal snailfish is not completely enclosed allows for the equalization of the internal and external pressure.
Finally, there are 14 copies of a gene called fthl27 in hadal snailfish, compared with just three copies in Tanaka’s snailfish. This gene encodes a protein called ferritin, and Xu et al. suggest that the overexpression of this gene may increase the tolerance of cells to the high levels of reactive oxygen species that are found at high hydrostatic pressures: these pressures can disrupt cellular processes and cause oxidative stress, resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species.
Our understanding of the genetic basis of adaptation to the hadal zone continues to improve, thanks to the work of Xu et al. and other researchers. However, many questions remain unanswered. An important next step will be to perform experiments in the lab – as Xu et al. have done – in order to validate (or otherwise) what comparative genomics studies are suggesting. We just have to look.
References
-
BookThe Hadal Zone: Life in the Deepest OceansCambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061384
-
Fishes of the hadal zone including new species, in situ observations and depth records of LiparidaeDeep Sea Research Part I 114:99–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.05.003
-
Adaptations to high hydrostatic pressureAnnual Review of Physiology 54:557–577.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.54.030192.003013
-
Morphology and genome of a snailfish from the Mariana Trench provide insights into deep-sea adaptationNature Ecology & Evolution 3:823–833.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0864-8
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Wang and Yang
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,460
- views
-
- 117
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
The rise of angiosperms to ecological dominance and the breakup of Gondwana during the Mesozoic marked major transitions in the evolutionary history of insect-plant interactions. To elucidate how contemporary trophic interactions were influenced by host plant shifts and palaeogeographical events, we integrated molecular data with information from the fossil record to construct a time tree for ancient phytophagous weevils of the beetle family Belidae. Our analyses indicate that crown-group Belidae originated approximately 138 Ma ago in Gondwana, associated with Pinopsida (conifer) host plants, with larvae likely developing in dead/decaying branches. Belids tracked their host plants as major plate movements occurred during Gondwana’s breakup, surviving on distant, disjunct landmasses. Some belids shifted to Angiospermae and Cycadopsida when and where conifers declined, evolving new trophic interactions, including brood-pollination mutualisms with cycads and associations with achlorophyllous parasitic angiosperms. Extant radiations of belids in the genera Rhinotia (Australian region) and Proterhinus (Hawaiian Islands) have relatively recent origins.
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Eyespot patterns have evolved in many prey species. These patterns were traditionally explained by the eye mimicry hypothesis, which proposes that eyespots resembling vertebrate eyes function as predator avoidance. However, it is possible that eyespots do not mimic eyes: according to the conspicuousness hypothesis, eyespots are just one form of vivid signals where only conspicuousness matters. They might work simply through neophobia or unfamiliarity, without necessarily implying aposematism or the unprofitability to potential predators. To test these hypotheses and explore factors influencing predators’ responses, we conducted a meta-analysis with 33 empirical papers that focused on bird responses to both real lepidopterans and artificial targets with conspicuous patterns (i.e. eyespots and non-eyespots). Supporting the latter hypothesis, the results showed no clear difference in predator avoidance efficacy between eyespots and non-eyespots. When comparing geometric pattern characteristics, bigger pattern sizes and smaller numbers of patterns were more effective in preventing avian predation. This finding indicates that single concentric patterns have stronger deterring effects than paired ones. Taken together, our study supports the conspicuousness hypothesis more than the eye mimicry hypothesis. Due to the number and species coverage of published studies so far, the generalisability of our conclusion may be limited. The findings highlight that pattern conspicuousness is key to eliciting avian avoidance responses, shedding a different light on this classic example of signal evolution.