Deep-Sea Adaptation: Surviving under pressure
The world’s oceans are divided into five depth zones, with the hadal zone – which refers to depths of more than 6000 metres – being the deepest. Composed mainly of deep trenches, the hadal zone is among the most hostile environments on Earth because it is extremely cold and dark, there is very little food, the trenches are geographically isolated, and the hydrostatic pressure can reach values as high as 1000 times atmospheric pressure (Somero, 1992; Jamieson, 2015).
The most common vertebrate species in the hadal zone are fish called snailfishes, and hadal snailfishes can survive down to depths of about 8100 metres (Linley et al., 2016). Other species of snailfish live in coastal waters, which means that the snailfish (sometimes known as the sea snail) has the widest depth range of any marine fish species. Researchers have identified various ways in which hadal snailfish have adapted to their extreme environment (Wang et al., 2019; Mu et al., 2021), but we still do not fully understand how snailfish evolved and why they are among the few vertebrate species that have successfully adapted to the hadal zone.
Now, in eLife, Shunping He (Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Kun Wang (Northwestern Polytechnical University) and colleagues – including Wenjie Xu, Chenglong Zhu, Xueli Gao, Baosheng Wu, Han Xu, Mingliang Hu and Honghui Zeng as joint first authors – report the results of a genomic study that provides new insights into the origin and evolution of the hadal snailfish (Xu et al., 2023).
Xu et al. started by generating genomic data for four hadal snailfish that had been collected from the Mariana Trench in the Northwest Pacific Ocean, and four Tanaka’s snailfish that had been collected from the Southern Yellow Sea: Tanaka’s snailfish is a close relative of the hadal snailfish that lives in shallower waters. After a series of thorough bioinformatic analyses, they identified 33 genes that are only found in hadal snailfish, 19 unitary pseudogenes, and various other differences between hadal snailfish and related species. For instance, there are 21 genes for which the gene number in hadal snailfish is higher than the gene number in Tanaka’s snailfish. Strikingly, most of these genes and differences had not been observed before, probably due to the fragmented nature of early versions of the hadal snailfish genome. Xu et al. also observed that 51 genes present in other snailfish are not present in Hadal snailfish.
By comparing genomic and mitochondrial data belonging to snailfishes from different trenches – including the Kermadec Trench, which is about 6,400 kilometres from the Mariana Trench – they found that hadal snailfishes have successfully spread to multiple trenches in the Pacific Ocean over the course of a million years.
By associating gene variation, expression, and function, Xu et al. were able to yield several important insights into the ways the hadal snailfish has adapted to its extreme environment (Figure 1). First, the rh1 gene, which is critical for monochromatic vision in very dim light, is present and expressed in hadal snailfish, whereas other genes that are associated with seeing at different wavelengths (lws, rh2 and sws2) are lost or hardly expressed.
Second, the majority of the auditory genes were preserved in hadal snailfish and many of them were upregulated, probably to compensate for the loss of visual genes. Third, while many circadian rhythm genes have been lost, or have become pseudogenes, a small number of essential circadian clock control genes are present and expressed in the hadal snailfish, indicating that a rhythm cycle is retained, although it is probably not coupled to the day-night cycle.
Fourth, a gene called gpr27 that is involved in metabolism in other species is a pseudogene in the hadal snailfish, which probably helps it to reduce metabolism and store energy in order to survive periods when food is not available. Fifth, two genes that are involved in bone mineralization in other snailfish are not found in hadal snailfish: the fact that the skull of the hadal snailfish is not completely enclosed allows for the equalization of the internal and external pressure.
Finally, there are 14 copies of a gene called fthl27 in hadal snailfish, compared with just three copies in Tanaka’s snailfish. This gene encodes a protein called ferritin, and Xu et al. suggest that the overexpression of this gene may increase the tolerance of cells to the high levels of reactive oxygen species that are found at high hydrostatic pressures: these pressures can disrupt cellular processes and cause oxidative stress, resulting in the production of reactive oxygen species.
Our understanding of the genetic basis of adaptation to the hadal zone continues to improve, thanks to the work of Xu et al. and other researchers. However, many questions remain unanswered. An important next step will be to perform experiments in the lab – as Xu et al. have done – in order to validate (or otherwise) what comparative genomics studies are suggesting. We just have to look.
References
-
BookThe Hadal Zone: Life in the Deepest OceansCambridge University Press.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139061384
-
Fishes of the hadal zone including new species, in situ observations and depth records of LiparidaeDeep Sea Research Part I 114:99–110.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2016.05.003
-
Adaptations to high hydrostatic pressureAnnual Review of Physiology 54:557–577.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.54.030192.003013
-
Morphology and genome of a snailfish from the Mariana Trench provide insights into deep-sea adaptationNature Ecology & Evolution 3:823–833.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-019-0864-8
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: July 12, 2023 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2023, Wang and Yang
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 998
- views
-
- 83
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Evolutionary Biology
The circadian clock enables anticipation of the day/night cycle in animals ranging from cnidarians to mammals. Circadian rhythms are generated through a transcription-translation feedback loop (TTFL or pacemaker) with CLOCK as a conserved positive factor in animals. However, CLOCK’s functional evolutionary origin and mechanism of action in basal animals are unknown. In the cnidarian Nematostella vectensis, pacemaker gene transcript levels, including NvClk (the Clock ortholog), appear arrhythmic under constant darkness, questioning the role of NvCLK. Utilizing CRISPR/Cas9, we generated a NvClk allele mutant (NvClkΔ), revealing circadian behavior loss under constant dark (DD) or light (LL), while maintaining a 24 hr rhythm under light-dark condition (LD). Transcriptomics analysis revealed distinct rhythmic genes in wild-type (WT) polypsunder LD compared to DD conditions. In LD, NvClkΔ/Δ polyps exhibited comparable numbers of rhythmic genes, but were reduced in DD. Furthermore, under LD, the NvClkΔ/Δ polyps showed alterations in temporal pacemaker gene expression, impacting their potential interactions. Additionally, differential expression of non-rhythmic genes associated with cell division and neuronal differentiation was observed. These findings revealed that a light-responsive pathway can partially compensate for circadian clock disruption, and that the Clock gene has evolved in cnidarians to synchronize rhythmic physiology and behavior with the diel rhythm of the earth’s biosphere.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Evolutionary Biology
A comprehensive census of McrBC systems, among the most common forms of prokaryotic Type IV restriction systems, followed by phylogenetic analysis, reveals their enormous abundance in diverse prokaryotes and a plethora of genomic associations. We focus on a previously uncharacterized branch, which we denote coiled-coil nuclease tandems (CoCoNuTs) for their salient features: the presence of extensive coiled-coil structures and tandem nucleases. The CoCoNuTs alone show extraordinary variety, with three distinct types and multiple subtypes. All CoCoNuTs contain domains predicted to interact with translation system components, such as OB-folds resembling the SmpB protein that binds bacterial transfer-messenger RNA (tmRNA), YTH-like domains that might recognize methylated tmRNA, tRNA, or rRNA, and RNA-binding Hsp70 chaperone homologs, along with RNases, such as HEPN domains, all suggesting that the CoCoNuTs target RNA. Many CoCoNuTs might additionally target DNA, via McrC nuclease homologs. Additional restriction systems, such as Type I RM, BREX, and Druantia Type III, are frequently encoded in the same predicted superoperons. In many of these superoperons, CoCoNuTs are likely regulated by cyclic nucleotides, possibly, RNA fragments with cyclic termini, that bind associated CARF (CRISPR-Associated Rossmann Fold) domains. We hypothesize that the CoCoNuTs, together with the ancillary restriction factors, employ an echeloned defense strategy analogous to that of Type III CRISPR-Cas systems, in which an immune response eliminating virus DNA and/or RNA is launched first, but then, if it fails, an abortive infection response leading to PCD/dormancy via host RNA cleavage takes over.