Synapses: Changing the size of dendritic spines
Interactions between an enzyme kinase, an ion channel and cytoskeletal proteins maintain the structure of synapses involved in memory formation.
- Department of Pharmacology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
Neurons connect to one another at sites called synapses, which are essential for creating and storing memories. Synapses are also dynamic and can undergo structural changes, such as increasing in size, that modify their strength. Structures called dendritic spines – which protrude from the dendrites that extend from the cell body of a neuron – have an important role in synapses as they contain an actin cytoskeleton that allows them to change shape and size.
An enzyme called CaMKII (which is short for Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II) also has a central role in the functional and structural changes that take place in dendritic spines during memory formation. During synapse strengthening, an influx of calcium ions through a receptor known as NMDAR, triggers the activation of CaMKII: the calcium ions form a complex with a messenger protein called calmodulin, and this complex binds to the regulatory segment of CaMKII. This influences the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton and hence determines the size of the synapses. However, the details of this process – especially the link between CaMKII and the actin cytoskeleton at the molecular level – are not fully understood.
One candidate for linking CaMKII to the actin cytoskeleton is alpha-actinin-2, a structural protein that crosslinks actin filaments (Walikonis et al., 2001). This protein can anchor and organize other proteins in the dendritic spine, such as CaMKII (Robison et al., 2005), the receptor NMDAR (Wyszynski et al., 1997), and certain channel proteins that allow calcium ions to enter cells (Hall et al., 2013). Now, in eLife, Matthew Gold from University College London and colleagues – including Ashton Curtis and Jian Zhu as joint first authors – report new insights into the molecular interactions between CaMKII, alpha-actinin-2, and a subunit of NMDAR called GluN2B (Curtis et al., 2023; Figure 1).
Figure 1
Molecular interactions and synapses.
(A) In the naïve synapse, the only protein interactions are between actin filaments (blue) and alpha-actinin-2, a structural protein that crosslinks actin filaments. In particular, the enzyme CaMKII (hexagon shape) is inactive, and a messenger protein called calmodulin (CaM) does not interact with anything else. (B) When the NMDAR receptor in the cell membrane is activated by the neurotransmitter glutamate, calcium ions (Ca2+; solid pink circles) enter the cell. The ions form a complex with CaM, and this complex activates the enzyme CaMKII, which subsequently interacts with the GluN2B subunits in the intracellular region of the NMDAR receptor. Crosslinking of the actin filaments also causes the dendritic spine to increase in size. (C) In the enlarged synapse, the interaction between GluN2B, CaMKII and alpha-actinin-2 continues, even in the absence of Ca2+/CaM, and the enzymatic activity of CaMKII is maintained by binding to GluN2B. The complex formed by GluN2B, CaMKII and alpha-actinin-2 also associates with actin filaments to maintain the synaptic structure.
Using a proximity labeling assay method – which enables molecular interactions to be detected in situ – the researchers showed that CaMKII interacts with alpha-actinin-2 when the NMDAR receptor is stimulated, leading to an enlargement of the dendritic spine. The interaction takes place at a domain in alpha-actinin-2 called EF hands 1–4, which is known to bind calcium ions. Furthermore, when this domain was overexpressed, stimulation of the NMDAR receptor did not result in dendritic spine enlargement, suggesting that interaction via the EF1-4 domain has a critical role in structural changes to the dendritic spine.
Affinity and structural experiments showed that alpha-actinin-2 binds to the CaMKII enzyme at the same regulatory domain segment as calmodulin (which also contains EF hands) does. However, Curtis et al. found that the EF hands of alpha-actinin-2 clashed with one of the domains in the enzyme. Consistent with this, the inactive form of the enzyme cannot bind to alpha-actinin-2 via its regulatory domain segment. However, the interaction between the CaMKII enzyme and alpha-actinin-2 in the dendritic spine increased four hours after stimulation of the NMDAR receptor: this led Curtis et al. to hypothesize that, following stimulation, the configuration of the enzyme changes when it interacts with a subunit of the NMDAR receptor called GluN2B, and these changes enable alpha-actinin-2 to fully access the enzyme.
A pull-down assay – which detects interactions between proteins – revealed that GluN2B enhances the interaction between the CaMKII enzyme and alpha-actinin-2, independently of the concentration of calcium ions (Ca2+). This indicates that GluN2B enhances the binding of CaMKII with alpha-actinin-2 even in the presence of Ca2+/calmodulin, although the EF hands of alpha-actinin-2 have a lower affinity for CaMKII than the EF hands of Ca2+/calmodulin. This provides important insights into a reorganization process for the molecular architecture of synapses.
Taken together, the findings suggest that the tripartite interactions of CaMKII, GluN2B, and alpha-actinin-2 crosslink a membrane channel to the cytoskeleton beneath the synapse, and there are plenty of empty binding sites that other proteins can bind to. Moreover, the fact that certain interactions would generate autonomous enzymatic activity in CaMKII (Bayer et al., 2001; Saneyoshi et al., 2019) suggest a possible role in biochemical signalling for synaptic memory.
Recent evidence indicates that the CaMKII and GluN2B in synapses can undergo liquid–liquid phase separation, a process that involves biomolecules separating into distinct components within a cell (Hosokawa et al., 2021; Yasuda et al., 2022). Actin bundling can also be modulated by liquid–liquid phase separation in synapses (Chen et al., 2023), so it would be interesting to explore if this process has a role in changing and/or maintaining the structure of dendritic spines.
References
-
Multivalent interactions of calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II with the postsynaptic density proteins NR2B, densin-180, and alpha-actinin-2The Journal of Biological Chemistry 280:35329–35336.https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M502191200
-
CaMKII: a central molecular organizer of synaptic plasticity, learning and memoryNature Reviews Neuroscience 23:666–682.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00624-2
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Saneyoshi
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 934
- views
-
- 86
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Synapses: Changing the size of dendritic spines
eLife 12:e91566.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91566
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (eight total) in a conditioned suppression setting using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. These shock-paired visual cues further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.
-
- Ecology
- Neuroscience
Prey must balance predator avoidance with feeding, a central dilemma in prey refuge theory. Additionally, prey must assess predatory imminence—how close threats are in space and time. Predatory imminence theory classifies defensive behaviors into three defense modes: pre-encounter, post-encounter, and circa-strike, corresponding to increasing levels of threat—–suspecting, detecting, and contacting a predator. Although predatory risk often varies in spatial distribution and imminence, how these factors intersect to influence defensive behaviors is poorly understood. Integrating these factors into a naturalistic environment enables comprehensive analysis of multiple defense modes in consistent conditions. Here, we combine prey refuge and predatory imminence theories to develop a model system of nematode defensive behaviors, with Caenorhabditis elegans as prey and Pristionchus pacificus as predator. In a foraging environment comprised of a food-rich, high-risk patch and a food-poor, low-risk refuge, C. elegans innately exhibits circa-strike behaviors. With experience, it learns post- and pre-encounter behaviors that proactively anticipate threats. These defense modes intensify with predator lethality, with only life-threatening predators capable of eliciting all three modes. SEB-3 receptors and NLP-49 peptides, key stress regulators, vary in their impact and interdependence across defense modes. Overall, our model system reveals fine-grained insights into how stress-related signaling regulates defensive behaviors.
