Trans-Golgi Network: Sorting secretory proteins
Approximately 14% of all protein-coding genes in humans produce proteins secreted by tissues and cells (Uhlén et al., 2019). These proteins control various essential processes, including immunity, metabolism and cellular communication. Secretory proteins also play significant roles in numerous diseases, such as neurological disorders and cancer (Brown et al., 2013).
Once a secretory protein has been synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, it must travel to another cellular compartment known as the trans-Golgi network before it can be released. The trans-Golgi network acts like a mail distribution centre, sorting secretory proteins into vesicles that travel to specific destinations, such as the cell surface, various compartments inside the cell (such as endosomes and lysosomes), or distinct domains in the plasma membrane (Figure 1A; Ford et al., 2021). A fundamental question in cell biology is how secretory proteins are effectively separated from one another and sorted into vesicles that will take the protein to the correct location.
In the early 1980s, Stuart Kornfeld and colleagues provided the first mechanistic insight into protein sorting in the Golgi when they discovered a cargo receptor called M6P-R (short for mannose-6-phosphate receptor) within the membrane of the trans-Golgi network. This receptor can recognise and bind to a specific mannose-6-phosphate tag on lysosomal enzymes, and package them into vesicles destined for the lysosome (Dahms et al., 1989; Figure 1B).
This discovery raised the possibility that secretory proteins may be sorted by a similar receptor-ligand binding mechanism. However, the details of the sorting process remained a mystery. Now, in eLife, Felix Campelo (Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology) and colleagues – including Pablo Lujan as first author – report that a well-known protein called Transmembrane Network Protein 46 (TGN46) may be involved (Lujan et al., 2023).
TGN46 has long been hypothesized to carry out a sorting role in the trans-Golgi network as it displays many typical features for a cargo receptor. For instance, it rapidly cycles between the Golgi and plasma membrane, and the vesicles that transport it to the cell surface (known as CARTS) have been shown to carry secretory proteins, such as PAUF (short for pancreatic adenocarcinoma upregulated factor; Banting and Ponnambalam, 1997; McNamara et al., 2004). To investigate this hypothesis, Lujan et al. knocked out the gene for TGN46 from cells grown in a laboratory. This significantly reduced the amount of PAUF the cells secreted, suggesting that TGN46 acts as a cargo receptor for this secretory protein (Figure 1C).
Previous studies have shown that CARTS require an enzyme called protein kinase D in order to detach themselves from the membrane of the trans-Golgi network (Wakana et al., 2012). If this enzyme is inactivated and unable to perform this role, long tubules carrying cargo molecules will emerge from the Golgi membrane (Liljedahl et al., 2001). Lujan et al. found PAUF proteins in the tubules of wild-type cells but not in the tubules of the mutant cells lacking TGN46. This indicates that TGN46 is required to load PAUF into CART vesicles.
Next, Lujan et al. set out to find which parts of the TGN46 receptor were responsible for sorting and packaging secretory proteins. They found that the cytosolic domain of the receptor was not required for PAUF export, which is surprising given that adaptor proteins, which help to form vesicles, bind to other cargo receptors via this domain (Cross and Dodding, 2019). Changing the size of the transmembrane domain in TGN46 also did not impact the location of the receptor, as would be expected; instead it mildly affected how well PAUF was sorted into CARTS. Most importantly, Lujan et al. found that TGN46 only needs its luminal domain (the part of the receptor which faces the interior of the Golgi) in order to sufficiently sort PAUF proteins into CARTS.
This research sheds light on how secretory proteins are sorted into the correct vesicle at the trans-Golgi network. It also provides significant evidence that TGN46 acts as a cargo receptor, something which has been speculated in the field for over three decades. These exciting findings also raise new questions about how the luminal domain of TGN46 is able to recognize PAUF: is this recognition specific and based on ‘lock and key interactions’, or could it be based on the biophysical properties of the highly disordered luminal domain of TGN46?
It also remains to be seen which other secretory proteins TGN46 might be responsible for sorting. TGN46 is known to interact with another cell surface receptor called integrin beta 1, which is involved in cell adhesion at specific sites in the plasma membrane (Wang and Howell, 2000). This suggests that TGN46 may help to export proteins to specific domains at the cell surface. Future work investigating these questions, as well as others, will provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms of protein secretion.
References
-
TGN38 and its orthologues: roles in post-TGN vesicle formation and maintenance of TGN morphologyBiochimica et Biophysica Acta 1355:209–217.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4889(96)00146-2
-
The human secretome atlas initiative: implications in health and disease conditionsBiochimica et Biophysica Acta 1834:2454–2461.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.04.007
-
Motor-cargo adaptors at the organelle-cytoskeleton interfaceCurrent Opinion in Cell Biology 59:16–23.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2019.02.010
-
Mannose 6-phosphate receptors and lysosomal enzyme targetingThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 264:12115–12118.
-
Cargo sorting at the trans-Golgi network at a glanceJournal of Cell Science 134:jcs259110.https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.259110
-
Rapid dendritic transport of TGN38, a putative cargo receptorMolecular Brain Research 127:68–78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.05.013
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
- Version of Record published: November 24, 2023 (version 1)
Copyright
© 2023, Parchure and von Blume
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,163
- views
-
- 151
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cancer Biology
- Cell Biology
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma carries a dismal prognosis, with high rates of metastasis and few treatment options. Hyperactivation of KRAS in almost all tumours drives RAC1 activation, conferring enhanced migratory and proliferative capacity as well as macropinocytosis. Macropinocytosis is well understood as a nutrient scavenging mechanism, but little is known about its functions in trafficking of signaling receptors. We find that CYRI-B is highly expressed in pancreatic tumours in a mouse model of KRAS and p53-driven pancreatic cancer. Deletion of Cyrib (the gene encoding CYRI-B protein) accelerates tumourigenesis, leading to enhanced ERK and JNK-induced proliferation in precancerous lesions, indicating a potential role as a buffer of RAC1 hyperactivation in early stages. However, as disease progresses, loss of CYRI-B inhibits metastasis. CYRI-B depleted tumour cells show reduced chemotactic responses to lysophosphatidic acid, a major driver of tumour spread, due to impaired macropinocytic uptake of the lysophosphatidic acid receptor-1. Overall, we implicate CYRI-B as a mediator of growth and signaling in pancreatic cancer, providing new insights into pathways controlling metastasis.
-
- Cell Biology
- Neuroscience
The cytosolic proteins synucleins and synapsins are thought to play cooperative roles in regulating synaptic vesicle (SV) recycling, but mechanistic insight is lacking. Here, we identify the synapsin E-domain as an essential functional binding-partner of α-synuclein (α-syn). Synapsin E-domain allows α-syn functionality, binds to α-syn, and is necessary and sufficient for enabling effects of α-syn at synapses of cultured mouse hippocampal neurons. Together with previous studies implicating the E-domain in clustering SVs, our experiments advocate a cooperative role for these two proteins in maintaining physiologic SV clusters.