Trans-Golgi Network: Sorting secretory proteins
Approximately 14% of all protein-coding genes in humans produce proteins secreted by tissues and cells (Uhlén et al., 2019). These proteins control various essential processes, including immunity, metabolism and cellular communication. Secretory proteins also play significant roles in numerous diseases, such as neurological disorders and cancer (Brown et al., 2013).
Once a secretory protein has been synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum, it must travel to another cellular compartment known as the trans-Golgi network before it can be released. The trans-Golgi network acts like a mail distribution centre, sorting secretory proteins into vesicles that travel to specific destinations, such as the cell surface, various compartments inside the cell (such as endosomes and lysosomes), or distinct domains in the plasma membrane (Figure 1A; Ford et al., 2021). A fundamental question in cell biology is how secretory proteins are effectively separated from one another and sorted into vesicles that will take the protein to the correct location.
In the early 1980s, Stuart Kornfeld and colleagues provided the first mechanistic insight into protein sorting in the Golgi when they discovered a cargo receptor called M6P-R (short for mannose-6-phosphate receptor) within the membrane of the trans-Golgi network. This receptor can recognise and bind to a specific mannose-6-phosphate tag on lysosomal enzymes, and package them into vesicles destined for the lysosome (Dahms et al., 1989; Figure 1B).
This discovery raised the possibility that secretory proteins may be sorted by a similar receptor-ligand binding mechanism. However, the details of the sorting process remained a mystery. Now, in eLife, Felix Campelo (Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology) and colleagues – including Pablo Lujan as first author – report that a well-known protein called Transmembrane Network Protein 46 (TGN46) may be involved (Lujan et al., 2023).
TGN46 has long been hypothesized to carry out a sorting role in the trans-Golgi network as it displays many typical features for a cargo receptor. For instance, it rapidly cycles between the Golgi and plasma membrane, and the vesicles that transport it to the cell surface (known as CARTS) have been shown to carry secretory proteins, such as PAUF (short for pancreatic adenocarcinoma upregulated factor; Banting and Ponnambalam, 1997; McNamara et al., 2004). To investigate this hypothesis, Lujan et al. knocked out the gene for TGN46 from cells grown in a laboratory. This significantly reduced the amount of PAUF the cells secreted, suggesting that TGN46 acts as a cargo receptor for this secretory protein (Figure 1C).
Previous studies have shown that CARTS require an enzyme called protein kinase D in order to detach themselves from the membrane of the trans-Golgi network (Wakana et al., 2012). If this enzyme is inactivated and unable to perform this role, long tubules carrying cargo molecules will emerge from the Golgi membrane (Liljedahl et al., 2001). Lujan et al. found PAUF proteins in the tubules of wild-type cells but not in the tubules of the mutant cells lacking TGN46. This indicates that TGN46 is required to load PAUF into CART vesicles.
Next, Lujan et al. set out to find which parts of the TGN46 receptor were responsible for sorting and packaging secretory proteins. They found that the cytosolic domain of the receptor was not required for PAUF export, which is surprising given that adaptor proteins, which help to form vesicles, bind to other cargo receptors via this domain (Cross and Dodding, 2019). Changing the size of the transmembrane domain in TGN46 also did not impact the location of the receptor, as would be expected; instead it mildly affected how well PAUF was sorted into CARTS. Most importantly, Lujan et al. found that TGN46 only needs its luminal domain (the part of the receptor which faces the interior of the Golgi) in order to sufficiently sort PAUF proteins into CARTS.
This research sheds light on how secretory proteins are sorted into the correct vesicle at the trans-Golgi network. It also provides significant evidence that TGN46 acts as a cargo receptor, something which has been speculated in the field for over three decades. These exciting findings also raise new questions about how the luminal domain of TGN46 is able to recognize PAUF: is this recognition specific and based on ‘lock and key interactions’, or could it be based on the biophysical properties of the highly disordered luminal domain of TGN46?
It also remains to be seen which other secretory proteins TGN46 might be responsible for sorting. TGN46 is known to interact with another cell surface receptor called integrin beta 1, which is involved in cell adhesion at specific sites in the plasma membrane (Wang and Howell, 2000). This suggests that TGN46 may help to export proteins to specific domains at the cell surface. Future work investigating these questions, as well as others, will provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms of protein secretion.
References
-
TGN38 and its orthologues: roles in post-TGN vesicle formation and maintenance of TGN morphologyBiochimica et Biophysica Acta 1355:209–217.https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-4889(96)00146-2
-
The human secretome atlas initiative: implications in health and disease conditionsBiochimica et Biophysica Acta 1834:2454–2461.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.04.007
-
Motor-cargo adaptors at the organelle-cytoskeleton interfaceCurrent Opinion in Cell Biology 59:16–23.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2019.02.010
-
Mannose 6-phosphate receptors and lysosomal enzyme targetingThe Journal of Biological Chemistry 264:12115–12118.
-
Cargo sorting at the trans-Golgi network at a glanceJournal of Cell Science 134:jcs259110.https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.259110
-
Rapid dendritic transport of TGN38, a putative cargo receptorMolecular Brain Research 127:68–78.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molbrainres.2004.05.013
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2023, Parchure and von Blume
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,525
- views
-
- 181
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
Aggregation of mutant forms of Huntingtin is the underlying feature of neurodegeneration observed in Huntington’s disorder. In addition to neurons, cellular processes in non-neuronal cell types are also shown to be affected. Cells expressing neurodegeneration–associated mutant proteins show altered uptake of ligands, suggestive of impaired endocytosis, in a manner as yet unknown. Using live cell imaging, we show that clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is affected in Drosophila hemocytes and mammalian cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. This is also accompanied by alterations in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton resulting in increased cellular stiffness. Further, we find that Huntingtin aggregates sequester actin and actin-modifying proteins. Overexpression of Hip1 or Arp3 (actin-interacting proteins) could restore CME and cellular stiffness in cells containing Huntingtin aggregates. Neurodegeneration driven by pathogenic Huntingtin was also rescued upon overexpression of either Hip1 or Arp3 in Drosophila. Examination of other pathogenic aggregates revealed that TDP-43 also displayed defective CME, altered actin organization and increased stiffness, similar to pathogenic Huntingtin. Together, our results point to an intimate connection between dysfunctional CME, actin misorganization and increased cellular stiffness caused by alteration in the local intracellular environment by pathogenic aggregates.
-
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
How cells regulate the size of their organelles remains a fundamental question in cell biology. Cilia, with their simple structure and surface localization, provide an ideal model for investigating organelle size control. However, most studies on cilia length regulation are primarily performed on several single-celled organisms. In contrast, the mechanism of length regulation in cilia across diverse cell types within multicellular organisms remains a mystery. Similar to humans, zebrafish contain diverse types of cilia with variable lengths. Taking advantage of the transparency of zebrafish embryos, we conducted a comprehensive investigation into intraflagellar transport (IFT), an essential process for ciliogenesis. By generating a transgenic line carrying Ift88-GFP transgene, we observed IFT in multiple types of cilia with varying lengths. Remarkably, cilia exhibited variable IFT speeds in different cell types, with longer cilia exhibiting faster IFT speeds. This increased IFT speed in longer cilia is likely not due to changes in common factors that regulate IFT, such as motor selection, BBSome proteins, or tubulin modification. Interestingly, longer cilia in the ear cristae tend to form larger IFT compared to shorter spinal cord cilia. Reducing the size of IFT particles by knocking down Ift88 slowed IFT speed and resulted in the formation of shorter cilia. Our study proposes an intriguing model of cilia length regulation via controlling IFT speed through the modulation of the size of the IFT complex. This discovery may provide further insights into our understanding of how organelle size is regulated in higher vertebrates.