All forms of vertebrate locomotion rely on rhythmic activity in muscles operating as functional antagonists (Grillner, 1985). For instance, swimming in fishes relies on left–right alternation of axial muscles across the body, while walking in mammals relies on flexor–extensor alternation along it. A landmark hypothesis posed over a century ago argued for corresponding excitatory ‘half-centers’ within spinal cord (e.g., left–right or flexor–extensor), with reciprocal, feedforward inhibition between half-centers generating rhythmic output (Brown, 1911). Since then reciprocal inhibition has been relegated to patterning activity between so-called ‘unit burst generators’ capable of rhythmogenesis via recurrent, feedback excitatory connections (Grillner and Kozlov, 2021).

The idea of solitary unit burst generators reliant on recurrent connectivity disconnects rhythmogenesis from activity in other unit burst generators, which helps explain the flexible patterns of coordination necessary to effectively navigate through unpredictable environments. For example, simulations adjusting the synaptic coupling strength between segmental axial unit burst generators can explain changes in the speed and direction of swimming in lampreys (Kozlov et al., 2009). Likewise, simulations altering the synaptic coupling between segmental limb unit burst generators can replicate different speeds and gaits of locomotion in cats (Grillner, 1981).

Another theory explaining speed-dependent changes in coordination stratifies ‘rhythm’ and ‘pattern’ control (Perret and Cabelguen, 1980; Koshland and Smith, 1989; Kriellaars et al., 1994; Burke et al., 2001; Lafreniere-Roula and McCrea, 2005), where populations of interneurons generating higher- or lower-frequency rhythms feed into separate populations coordinating distinct patterns of motor output (McCrea and Rybak, 2008; Ausborn et al., 2019). In support, studies in zebrafish and mice suggest separate spinal populations are active at different locomotor speeds with distinct patterns of motor output (McLean et al., 2008; Talpalar et al., 2013; Satou et al., 2020; Picton et al., 2022). Critically, however, rhythmogenesis is presumed to originate from a common mechanism regardless of speed, reliant on cellular properties or synaptic drive or both (Guertin, 2009; Brocard et al., 2010; Ryczko et al., 2010; Ziskind-Conhaim and Hochman, 2017; El Manira, 2023).

Here, we have explored the origins of spinal rhythmogenesis at different speeds using the larval zebrafish model system, where it is possible to link the identity, physiology and connectivity of interneurons to their recruitment patterns at different speeds of locomotion. Like all fish, larval zebrafish generate two basic modes of forward swimming or ‘gaits’ (Di Santo et al., 2021). Anguilliform mode is typically reserved for escaping predators and uses higher-frequency/-amplitude oscillations of the trunk, while carangiform mode utilizes lower-frequency/-amplitude oscillations of the tail for exploration and pursuing prey (Budick and O’Malley, 2000; Müller and van Leeuwen, 2004; Thorsen et al., 2004; Patterson et al., 2013; Bhattacharyya et al., 2021).

Swimming at different speeds is generated by axial motor neurons organized into fast, slow, and intermediate units distinguished by birth order (Myers et al., 1986), size (McLean et al., 2007), relative innervation of fast and slow muscle fibers (Bello-Rojas et al., 2019), and molecular signatures (D’Elia et al., 2023; Pallucchi et al., 2024). Current- and voltage-clamp recordings from motor neurons have revealed differences in rhythmogenic cellular properties and synaptic drive between the different types (Menelaou and McLean, 2012; Kishore et al., 2014), suggesting different forms of rhythmogenesis could be responsible for different speeds of locomotion. To test this idea, we performed current- and voltage-clamp recordings from Chx10-labeled spinal V2a interneurons, which provide a major source of phasic premotor excitation during locomotion in zebrafish and mice (McLean and Dougherty, 2015).

We find that morphologically distinct V2a neurons sort into rhythm-generating and pattern-forming subtypes based on distinct cellular properties linked to distinct patterns of recruitment and synaptic drive. Critically, among descending V2a neurons that qualify as rhythm-generating, reciprocal inhibition originating from contralateral sources supports phasic firing patterns at fast speeds, while recurrent inhibition from ipsilateral sources supports phasic firing patterns at slow speeds. For bifurcating V2a neurons considered pattern-forming, the opposite is true – recurrent inhibition supports phasic firing at fast speeds and reciprocal inhibition at slow speeds. Ultimately, our findings reveal unexpected cell-type-specific and speed-dependent complexity in the mechanisms of spinal rhythmogenesis underlying locomotion.

Our work was motivated by the opaque origins of spinal rhythmicity at different locomotor speeds and the potential for zebrafish to clarify this fundamental issue. We focused on Chx10-labeled spinal V2a neurons given their conserved role in locomotion in zebrafish and mice (McLean and Dougherty, 2015). In mice, increases in speed involve graded increases in the cyclical frequency of rhythmic activity within limbs and abrupt changes in the coordination between them that define different gaits, like walking, trotting, and bounding (Bellardita and Kiehn, 2015). In larval zebrafish, there are two ‘gaits’ during forward swimming as defined by limb coordination – slow carangiform mode which involves cyclical abduction/adduction of pectoral fins that alternates across the body and fast anguilliform mode which involves bilateral fin adduction (Thorsen et al., 2004). The transition in fin coordination occurs abruptly between tail beat frequencies of 30–40 Hz in larvae, with graded increases in the cyclical frequency and intensity of body bends leading to increased yaw displacement of the head at faster speeds (Thorsen et al., 2004; McLean et al., 2008).

Earlier studies of larval zebrafish found that V2a neurons active at slow speeds are inhibited as V2a neurons active at fast speeds are recruited (McLean et al., 2008). The idea that different gears or modules are responsible for different speeds of locomotion is easier to understand in the context of different gaits. For swimming, faster speeds require not only higher-frequency oscillations, but also larger amplitude body bends that propagate more quickly to generate reactive thrust against the water column for effective propulsion (Grillner, 1974). Among descending V2a neurons, those recruited at faster speeds have longer intersegmental axons (Menelaou et al., 2014) and form stronger connections with other V2a neurons (Menelaou and McLean, 2019). Among bifurcating V2a neurons, intersegmental axon projection distances are more homogeneous, membrane time constants and axon conduction velocities are faster, and connections to motor neurons are stronger and more reliable (Menelaou et al., 2014; Menelaou and McLean, 2019; Menelaou et al., 2022). Thus, as V2a-D neurons with longer axons and V2a-B neurons with stronger premotor connections are engaged at higher frequencies to achieve higher amplitude, faster propagating body bends, V2a neurons whose segmental output is temporally incompatible with fast whole-body coordination are disengaged.

While modular organization makes sense in terms of coordination, the origin of rhythmicity at different speeds was assumed to be the same, whether via cellular properties or synaptic drive or some combination of the two (Marder and Calabrese, 1996; Marder and Bucher, 2001). From our recordings of spinal motor neurons (Menelaou and McLean, 2012; Kishore et al., 2014), we were expecting that cellular properties are more important for rhythmogenesis at slow speeds, while synaptic drive dominates at fast speeds, which could also vary based on V2a type. Our recordings revealed that all V2a neurons demonstrate some form of rhythmicity in response to current steps. The idea that different types of V2a interneurons exhibit different firing properties is not unexpected (Dougherty and Kiehn, 2010; Zhong et al., 2010; Menelaou and McLean, 2019; Song et al., 2020). However, thanks to our ability to link cellular properties to natural recruitment patterns we reveal V2a-Ds alone would qualify as ‘pacemakers’ (Marder and Calabrese, 1996; Marder and Bucher, 2001), with speed-dependent differences in intrinsic firing mode within V2a-Ds. Specifically, V2a-D neurons recruited at swim frequencies below ~40 Hz during carangiform swimming generate intrinsic bursting at those frequencies, with higher-frequency spikes riding atop lower-frequency membrane oscillations. Intrinsic oscillations are more sensitive to levels of current injection than spike rates, so increases in tonic excitatory drive would lead to increased burst frequency and thus swim frequency. V2a-D neurons recruited at frequencies above ~40 Hz during anguilliform swimming generate tonic spiking at those frequencies, so increases in tonic excitatory drive would lead to increases in firing frequency and thus swim frequency. In V2a-B neurons, chattering and bursting properties in response to current steps do not reflect their natural firing patterns during swimming, and so we expected they would rely more on pacemaking inputs from V2a-Ds to shape their rhythmicity.

Surprisingly, however, despite clear differences in cellular properties appropriate to generate swimming rhythms, phasic firing in both V2a-Ds and V2a-Bs is best explained by phasic patterns of synaptic excitation and inhibition. Since phasic excitatory input is not tonic and already rhythmic by the time it arrives, this suggests rhythms are generated by more rostral V2a-Ds. Optogenetic stimulation of V2a neurons and spinal lesion studies support a rostral bias in spinal rhythmicity in larval zebrafish (Wiggin et al., 2012; Kimura et al., 2013), consistent with studies of spinal locomotor networks in lampreys and tadpoles, where neurons nearer the hindbrain/spinal cord boundary have a higher capacity for rhythmogenesis (Li et al., 2010; Buchanan, 2018). Our synaptic silencing of dI6 neurons also supports this idea. Previous work using diphtheria toxin to kill dI6 neurons employed an elegant Hox-based strategy to limit expression to the spinal cord (Satou et al., 2020). In contrast to our observations, zebrafish larvae with ablated spinal dI6 neurons can still generate fast swimming. Notwithstanding differences in cellular ablation versus synaptic silencing approaches and their relative sensitivity to potential compensatory mechanisms (Schnerwitzki et al., 2018; Del Pozo et al., 2020), our strategy also included dI6 neurons that extended into the hindbrain (Figure 7A, arrow). By subtractive reasoning, this argues that reciprocal inhibition nearer the hindbrain/spinal cord is essential for generating high-frequency rhythms.

Regardless, while all midbody V2a neurons rely on synaptic drive to fire rhythmically at all speeds, the patterns of synaptic excitation and inhibition responsible for rhythmogenesis varies in a cell-type- and speed-dependent manner. Our results combined with prior work allow us to put together a potential model explaining the cellular and synaptic origins of rhythmogenesis at different speeds of swimming. In zebrafish and mice (Hayashi et al., 2018; Menelaou and McLean, 2019), V2a neurons have been categorized into descending (I) and bifurcating (II) subtypes (Figure 8A, top). Our data only strengthen cross-species links by demonstrating that type I and II V2a neurons in larval zebrafish not only differ in axon trajectories, rostro-caudal distribution, size, Chx10 levels, and connectivity, but also in their ML distribution in the spinal cord (Figure 1C).

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Since both V2a subtypes project ipsilaterally, recurrent (or feedback) inhibition must originate from ipsilateral sources, while reciprocal (or feedforward) inhibition originates from commissural sources. In zebrafish, as in mice, there are at least two potential sources of ipsilateral inhibition, V1 neurons (Higashijima et al., 2004) and V2b neurons (Callahan et al., 2019), and two potential sources of commissural inhibition (Satou et al., 2020), dI6 neurons and V0d neurons (Figure 8A, bottom). In our model, we include the two specific types of V2a neurons and single generic sources of recurrent and reciprocal inhibition, each of which has the potential to form connections with the other types (Sengupta and Bagnall, 2023). We do not include conserved sources of commissural excitation here (e.g., V0v and V3 neurons), but these will be important to include in any future models exploring intersegmental coordination and signal amplification (Böhm et al., 2022; Kawano et al., 2022; Wiggin et al., 2022). Notably, the operational definition of reciprocal versus recurrent inhibition would be flipped for commissural excitatory populations, with feedforward inhibition via ipsilateral interneurons and feedback inhibition via commissural interneurons.

The simplest scenario is that the wiring diagrams for slow and fast modules are mirror duplications distinguished only by the inclusion of slow or fast motor pools (Figure 8B). Consistent with this idea, our cell-attached and voltage-clamp data support distinct slow and fast type I V2a-Ds defined by selective within module connectivity. These neurons in turn converge on slow and fast type II V2a-Bs, which relay integrated frequency information to their respective motor pools (Figure 8C). In the fast module, rhythmogenesis orchestrated by type I V2a neurons relies on reciprocal inhibition. This is consistent with cell-type-specific optical ablation and silencing studies in adult lampreys (Buchanan and McPherson, 1995) and embryonic frogs (Moult et al., 2013) that suggest reciprocal inhibition is essential for rhythmogenesis during anguilliform swimming. Rhythmic activity can also be generated in surgically isolated hemi-cords and surgically divided spinal cords of lampreys and frog embryos (Kahn and Roberts, 1982; Soffe, 1989; Cangiano and Grillner, 2003; Cangiano and Grillner, 2005; Li et al., 2010). However, the functional relevance of these rhythms and the impact of lesion-induced plasticity on excitability and connectivity are still debated (Cangiano et al., 2012; Messina et al., 2017; Parker, 2017; Cangiano and Grillner, 2018; McClellan, 2018).

In the fast module, recurrent inhibition helps limit motor output via type II V2a-Bs. Type II V2a-Bs have relatively strong connections to motor neurons (Menelaou and McLean, 2019), so limiting their firing would ensure that motor output does not exceed 50% of the duty cycle and risk bilateral co-contraction as the interval between cyclical bursts decreases with increased speed (Grillner, 1974). On the other hand, the cell-type-dependent dominance of reciprocal versus recurrent inhibition is flipped when considering the slow module. Instead, recurrent inhibition is more obvious in type I V2a-D neurons, while type II V2a-B neurons rely exclusively on reciprocal inhibition to pattern their activity (Figure 8C). Until now recurrent inhibition was linked to limiting motor output (Hultborn et al., 1979), not to rhythmogenesis (see, however, Lindén and Berg, 2021).

It remains to be seen why reciprocal inhibition would be favored for rhythmogenesis at fast speeds and recurrent inhibition at slow speeds. One possibility is that feedforward inhibition is necessary to properly coordinate bilateral rhythmogenesis among type I V2a-D neurons with longer-range intersegmental connectivity. On the other hand, feedback inhibition among shorter-range type I V2a-D neurons provides an opportunity for local segmental rhythms that rely less on contralateral activity. Since slow type II V2a-B neurons lack feedback inhibition, their recruitment patterns rely exclusively on feedforward inhibition from the opposite side. This means stronger activity on one side should limit output on the other side without impacting timing and vice versa. In support, we recently explored the contribution of spinal V2a neurons to biased swimming during optomotor responses (Jay et al., 2023). We found that type I V2a-D neurons are direction-agnostic, but type II V2a-B neurons are direction-sensitive, with higher recruitment probabilities on the turning side associated with weaker motor output on the opposite side.

Interestingly, in contrast to low recruitment probabilities observed for type I V2a-D neurons during swimming evoked by somatosensory stimulation here (<50%; Figure 5E, F), for swimming during optomotor responses V2a-D neurons are recruited with much higher probabilities (>75%). This is not speed related since swim frequencies during optomotor responses rarely exceeded 35 Hz. Notably, the phase distribution of V2a-D spikes during optomotor responses (Figure 5H in Jay et al., 2023) better aligns with the phase distribution of EPSCs reported here (Figure 6C, bottom), meaning that type I V2a-Ds fire well in advance of type II V2a-Bs during optomotor responses. Thus, it appears that during somatosensory-evoked swimming, where intensity and frequency are coupled over a broad range of speeds, type I and II V2a neurons fire more synchronously than during visually evoked swimming, where intensity and frequency are uncoupled over a more narrow speed range. While this highlights the modular nature of timing (rhythm) and intensity (pattern) control within the spinal V2a population, future experiments testing this idea will rely on identifying molecular markers that distinguish slow and fast type I and II V2a neurons. Fortunately, recent work has identified promising candidates (Pallucchi et al., 2024).

Another open question is what role differences in cellular properties play during rhythmogenesis. First, our recordings were performed at midbody. It could be that rhythmogenic bursting and spiking properties are a general feature of type I V2a-D neurons, so more rostral neurons have identical cellular properties and rely less on phasic synaptic drive for fast and slow rhythmogenesis. Future recordings from V2a neurons in rostral spinal cord should help resolve this issue, however our dI6 synaptic silencing experiments suggest that reciprocal inhibition will be critical for rostral rhythmogenesis, at least at fast speeds. On the other hand, bursting properties could serve as a source of amplification for synaptic inputs to ensure reliable recruitment of rhythmogenic neurons or provide redundant sources of rhythmogenesis in cases where synaptic drive fails or the spinal cord is damaged. In this sense, cellular properties and synaptic drive would provide synergistic roles amplifying and sharpening rhythmic signals as they propagate segmentally.

In juvenile/adult zebrafish, V2a and motor neurons have been grouped into slow, intermediate, fast, and escape modules based on patterns of recruitment and phasic synaptic drive during fictive swimming (El Manira, 2023). In larvae, we also observe recruitment patterns among V2a neurons that would qualify as slow, intermediate, fast and escape based on their criteria (cf., Figure 2G). However, we also find that recruitment probability varies based on morphological type, with V2a-D neurons always firing more sparsely than V2a-B neurons, regardless of speed. Thus, low firing probability recorded at slow speeds does not necessarily predict high firing probability at fast speeds. Collectively, these observations suggest that increases in speed in juveniles/adults and larvae are initially accomplished via more reliable V2a neuron recruitment, as also reported in mice (Zhong et al., 2011). This fits studies of motor neurons, where relatively low initial forces rely on recruitment (Enoka and Duchateau, 2017; Jay et al., 2023), while higher forces are achieved by increasing firing rates (Bhatt et al., 2007; Enoka and Duchateau, 2017), in addition to silencing more easily recruited neurons (Smith et al., 1980; Kyriakatos et al., 2011; Menelaou and McLean, 2012).

In sum, our findings suggest that cell-type-specific modes of spinal rhythmogenesis are responsible for different speeds, which means a common mechanism of rhythmogenesis is insufficient to explain the full operational range of locomotion. Experiments combining computational modeling with acute segmental perturbations of distinct interneuron types are now needed to explore the functional impact of stratified spinal locomotor circuits with cell-type-specific feedforward and feedback inhibitory motifs.

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Mean and median values and sample variability are listed in the manuscript as appropriate. Individual data points are represented on the plots/graphs. Source data have been deposited in Dryad (https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xksn02vqx).

1. 1. McLean et al.

   (2024) Dryad Digital Repository

   Cell-type-specific origins of locomotor rhythmicity at different speeds in larval zebrafish.

   https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.xksn02vqx

1. 1. Ausborn J
   2. Shevtsova NA
   3. Caggiano V
   4. Danner SM
   5. Rybak IA

   (2019) Computational modeling of brainstem circuits controlling locomotor frequency and gait

   eLife 8:e43587.

   https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.43587

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Bellardita C
   2. Kiehn O

   (2015) Phenotypic characterization of speed-associated gait changes in mice reveals modular organization of locomotor networks

   Current Biology 25:1426–1436.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.005

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Bello-Rojas S
   2. Istrate AE
   3. Kishore S
   4. McLean DL

   (2019) Central and peripheral innervation patterns of defined axial motor units in larval zebrafish

   The Journal of Comparative Neurology 527:2557–2572.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.24689

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Bhatt DH
   2. McLean DL
   3. Hale ME
   4. Fetcho JR

   (2007) Grading movement strength by changes in firing intensity versus recruitment of spinal interneurons

   Neuron 53:91–102.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.11.011

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bhattacharyya K
   2. McLean DL
   3. MacIver MA

   (2021) Intersection of motor volumes predicts the outcome of ambush predation of larval zebrafish

   The Journal of Experimental Biology 224:jeb235481.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.235481

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Böhm UL
   2. Kimura Y
   3. Kawashima T
   4. Ahrens MB
   5. Higashijima S-I
   6. Engert F
   7. Cohen AE

   (2022) Voltage imaging identifies spinal circuits that modulate locomotor adaptation in zebrafish

   Neuron 110:1211–1222.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.01.001

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Brocard F
   2. Tazerart S
   3. Vinay L

   (2010) Do pacemakers drive the central pattern generator for locomotion in mammals?

   The Neuroscientist 16:139–155.

   https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858409346339

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Brown TG

   (1911) The intrinsic factors in the act of progression in the mammal

   Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character 84:308–319.

   https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1911.0077

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Buchanan JT
   2. McPherson DR

   (1995) The neuronal network for locomotion in the lamprey spinal cord: evidence for the involvement of commissural interneurons

   Journal of Physiology, Paris 89:221–233.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/0928-4257(96)83638-2

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Buchanan JT

    (2018) Swimming rhythm generation in the caudal hindbrain of the lamprey

    Journal of Neurophysiology 119:1681–1692.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00851.2017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Budick SA
    2. O’Malley DM

    (2000) Locomotor repertoire of the larval zebrafish: swimming, turning and prey capture

    The Journal of Experimental Biology 203:2565–2579.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.203.17.2565

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Burke RE
    2. Degtyarenko AM
    3. Simon ES

    (2001) Patterns of locomotor drive to motoneurons and last-order interneurons: clues to the structure of the CPG

    Journal of Neurophysiology 86:447–462.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.1.447

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Callahan RA
    2. Roberts R
    3. Sengupta M
    4. Kimura Y
    5. Higashijima SI
    6. Bagnall MW

    (2019) Spinal V2b neurons reveal a role for ipsilateral inhibition in speed control

    eLife 8:e47837.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.47837

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Cangiano L
    2. Grillner S

    (2003) Fast and slow locomotor burst generation in the hemispinal cord of the lamprey

    Journal of Neurophysiology 89:2931–2942.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01100.2002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Cangiano L
    2. Grillner S

    (2005) Mechanisms of rhythm generation in a spinal locomotor network deprived of crossed connections: the lamprey hemicord

    The Journal of Neuroscience 25:923–935.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2301-04.2005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Cangiano L
    2. Hill RH
    3. Grillner S

    (2012) The hemisegmental locomotor network revisited

    Neuroscience 210:33–37.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.03.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Cangiano L
    2. Grillner S

    (2018) Commentary: Elimination of left-right reciprocal coupling in the adult lamprey spinal cord abolishes the generation of locomotor activity

    Frontiers in Neural Circuits 12:34.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2018.00034

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. D’Elia KP
    2. Hameedy H
    3. Goldblatt D
    4. Frazel P
    5. Kriese M
    6. Zhu Y
    7. Hamling KR
    8. Kawakami K
    9. Liddelow SA
    10. Schoppik D
    11. Dasen JS

    (2023) Determinants of motor neuron functional subtypes important for locomotor speed

    Cell Reports 42:113049.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Del Pozo A
    2. Manuel R
    3. Iglesias Gonzalez AB
    4. Koning HK
    5. Habicher J
    6. Zhang H
    7. Allalou A
    8. Kullander K
    9. Boije H

    (2020) Behavioral characterization of dmrt3a mutant zebrafish reveals crucial aspects of vertebrate locomotion through phenotypes related to acceleration

    eNeuro 7:ENEURO.0047-20.2020.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0047-20.2020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Di Santo V
    2. Goerig E
    3. Wainwright DK
    4. Akanyeti O
    5. Liao JC
    6. Castro-Santos T
    7. Lauder GV

    (2021) Convergence of undulatory swimming kinematics across a diversity of fishes

    PNAS 118:e2113206118.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2113206118

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Dougherty KJ
    2. Kiehn O

    (2010) Firing and cellular properties of V2a interneurons in the rodent spinal cord

    The Journal of Neuroscience 30:24–37.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4821-09.2010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. El Manira A

    (2023) Modular circuit organization for speed control of locomotor movements

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 82:102760.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2023.102760

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Enoka RM
    2. Duchateau J

    (2017) Rate coding and the control of muscle force

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 7:a029702.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a029702

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Grillner S

    (1974) On the generation of locomotion in the spinal dogfish

    Experimental Brain Research 20:459–470.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00238013

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. Book

    1. Grillner S

    (1981) Control of locomotion in bipeds, tetrapods, and fish

    In: Terjung R, editors. Handbook of Physiology, The Nervous System, Motor Control. Wiley. pp. 1–255.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.cp010226

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Grillner S

    (1985) Neurobiological bases of rhythmic motor acts in vertebrates

    Science 228:143–149.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3975635

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Grillner S
    2. Kozlov A

    (2021) The CPGs for limbed locomotion-facts and fiction

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:5882.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22115882

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Guertin PA

    (2009) The mammalian central pattern generator for locomotion

    Brain Research Reviews 62:45–56.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.08.002

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Hayashi M
    2. Hinckley CA
    3. Driscoll SP
    4. Moore NJ
    5. Levine AJ
    6. Hilde KL
    7. Sharma K
    8. Pfaff SL

    (2018) Graded arrays of spinal and supraspinal V2a interneuron subtypes underlie forelimb and hindlimb motor control

    Neuron 97:869–884.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.023

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Higashijima S
    2. Masino MA
    3. Mandel G
    4. Fetcho JR

    (2004) Engrailed-1 expression marks a primitive class of inhibitory spinal interneuron

    The Journal of Neuroscience 24:5827–5839.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5342-03.2004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Hultborn H
    2. Lindström S
    3. Wigström H

    (1979) On the function of recurrent inhibition in the spinal cord

    Experimental Brain Research 37:399–403.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00237722

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Jay M
    2. MacIver MA
    3. McLean DL

    (2023) Spinal basis of direction control during locomotion in larval zebrafish

    The Journal of Neuroscience 43:4062–4074.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0703-22.2023

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Kahn JA
    2. Roberts A

    (1982) Experiments on the central pattern generator for swimming in amphibian embryos

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 296:229–243.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1982.0004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Kawano K
    2. Kato K
    3. Sugioka T
    4. Kimura Y
    5. Tanimoto M
    6. Higashijima SI

    (2022) Long descending commissural V0v neurons ensure coordinated swimming movements along the body axis in larval zebrafish

    Scientific Reports 12:4348.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08283-0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Kimura Y
    2. Okamura Y
    3. Higashijima S

    (2006) alx, a zebrafish homolog of Chx10, marks ipsilateral descending excitatory interneurons that participate in the regulation of spinal locomotor circuits

    The Journal of Neuroscience 26:5684–5697.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4993-05.2006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Kimura Y
    2. Satou C
    3. Fujioka S
    4. Shoji W
    5. Umeda K
    6. Ishizuka T
    7. Yawo H
    8. Higashijima S

    (2013) Hindbrain V2a neurons in the excitation of spinal locomotor circuits during zebrafish swimming

    Current Biology 23:843–849.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.03.066

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Kishore S
    2. Bagnall MW
    3. McLean DL

    (2014) Systematic shifts in the balance of excitation and inhibition coordinate the activity of axial motor pools at different speeds of locomotion

    The Journal of Neuroscience 34:14046–14054.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0514-14.2014

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Kishore S
    2. Cadoff EB
    3. Agha MA
    4. McLean DL

    (2020) Orderly compartmental mapping of premotor inhibition in the developing zebrafish spinal cord

    Science 370:431–436.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4608

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Koshland GF
    2. Smith JL

    (1989) Mutable and immutable features of paw-shake responses after hindlimb deafferentation in the cat

    Journal of Neurophysiology 62:162–173.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1989.62.1.162

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Kozlov A
    2. Huss M
    3. Lansner A
    4. Kotaleski JH
    5. Grillner S

    (2009) Simple cellular and network control principles govern complex patterns of motor behavior

    PNAS 106:20027–20032.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906722106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Kriellaars DJ
    2. Brownstone RM
    3. Noga BR
    4. Jordan LM

    (1994) Mechanical entrainment of fictive locomotion in the decerebrate cat

    Journal of Neurophysiology 71:2074–2086.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1994.71.6.2074

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Kyriakatos A
    2. Mahmood R
    3. Ausborn J
    4. Porres CP
    5. Büschges A
    6. El Manira A

    (2011) Initiation of locomotion in adult zebrafish

    The Journal of Neuroscience 31:8422–8431.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1012-11.2011

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Lafreniere-Roula M
    2. McCrea DA

    (2005) Deletions of rhythmic motoneuron activity during fictive locomotion and scratch provide clues to the organization of the mammalian central pattern generator

    Journal of Neurophysiology 94:1120–1132.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00216.2005

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Li WC
    2. Roberts A
    3. Soffe SR

    (2010) Specific brainstem neurons switch each other into pacemaker mode to drive movement by activating NMDA receptors

    The Journal of Neuroscience 30:16609–16620.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3695-10.2010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Lindén H
    2. Berg RW

    (2021) Why firing rate distributions are important for understanding spinal central pattern generators

    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 15:719388.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.719388

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Marder E
    2. Calabrese RL

    (1996) Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation

    Physiological Reviews 76:687–717.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1996.76.3.687

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Marder E
    2. Bucher D

    (2001) Central pattern generators and the control of rhythmic movements

    Current Biology 11:R986–R996.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/s0960-9822(01)00581-4

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. McClellan AD

    (2018) Response: Commentary: Elimination of left-right reciprocal coupling in the adult lamprey spinal cord abolishes the generation of locomotor activity

    Frontiers in Neural Circuits 12:62.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2018.00062

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. McCrea DA
    2. Rybak IA

    (2008) Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation

    Brain Research Reviews 57:134–146.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.08.006

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. McHenry MJ
    2. Lauder GV

    (2006) Ontogeny of form and function: locomotor morphology and drag in zebrafish (Danio rerio)

    Journal of Morphology 267:1099–1109.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10462

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. McLean DL
    2. Fan J
    3. Higashijima S
    4. Hale ME
    5. Fetcho JR

    (2007) A topographic map of recruitment in spinal cord

    Nature 446:71–75.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05588

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
52. 1. McLean DL
    2. Masino MA
    3. Koh IYY
    4. Lindquist WB
    5. Fetcho JR

    (2008) Continuous shifts in the active set of spinal interneurons during changes in locomotor speed

    Nature Neuroscience 11:1419–1429.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2225

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. McLean DL
    2. Fetcho JR

    (2009) Spinal interneurons differentiate sequentially from those driving the fastest swimming movements in larval zebrafish to those driving the slowest ones

    The Journal of Neuroscience 29:13566–13577.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3277-09.2009

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. McLean DL
    2. Dougherty KJ

    (2015) Peeling back the layers of locomotor control in the spinal cord

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 33:63–70.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2015.03.001

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Menelaou E
    2. McLean DL

    (2012) A gradient in endogenous rhythmicity and oscillatory drive matches recruitment order in an axial motor pool

    The Journal of Neuroscience 32:10925–10939.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1809-12.2012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Menelaou E
    2. VanDunk C
    3. McLean DL

    (2014) Differences in the morphology of spinal V2a neurons reflect their recruitment order during swimming in larval zebrafish

    The Journal of Comparative Neurology 522:1232–1248.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23465

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Menelaou E
    2. McLean DL

    (2019) Hierarchical control of locomotion by distinct types of spinal V2a interneurons in zebrafish

    Nature Communications 10:4197.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12240-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Menelaou E
    2. Kishore S
    3. McLean DL

    (2022) Mixed synapses reconcile violations of the size principle in zebrafish spinal cord

    eLife 11:e64063.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64063

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Messina JA
    2. St Paul A
    3. Hargis S
    4. Thompson WE
    5. McClellan AD

    (2017) Elimination of left-right reciprocal coupling in the adult lamprey spinal cord abolishes the generation of locomotor activity

    Frontiers in Neural Circuits 11:89.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2017.00089

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Moult PR
    2. Cottrell GA
    3. Li WC

    (2013) Fast silencing reveals a lost role for reciprocal inhibition in locomotion

    Neuron 77:129–140.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.040

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Müller UK
    2. van Leeuwen JL

    (2004) Swimming of larval zebrafish: ontogeny of body waves and implications for locomotory development

    The Journal of Experimental Biology 207:853–868.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00821

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Myers PZ
    2. Eisen JS
    3. Westerfield M

    (1986) Development and axonal outgrowth of identified motoneurons in the zebrafish

    The Journal of Neuroscience 6:2278–2289.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-08-02278.1986

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Pallucchi I
    2. Bertuzzi M
    3. Madrid D
    4. Fontanel P
    5. Higashijima SI
    6. El Manira A

    (2024) Molecular blueprints for spinal circuit modules controlling locomotor speed in zebrafish

    Nature Neuroscience 27:78–89.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-023-01479-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Parker D

    (2017) The lesioned spinal cord is a “new” spinal cord: Evidence from functional changes after spinal injury in lamprey

    Frontiers in Neural Circuits 11:84.

    https://doi.org/10.3389/fncir.2017.00084

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Patterson BW
    2. Abraham AO
    3. MacIver MA
    4. McLean DL

    (2013) Visually guided gradation of prey capture movements in larval zebrafish

    The Journal of Experimental Biology 216:3071–3083.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.087742

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Perret C
    2. Cabelguen JM

    (1980) Main characteristics of the hindlimb locomotor cycle in the decorticate cat with special reference to bifunctional muscles

    Brain Research 187:333–352.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(80)90207-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Picton LD
    2. Björnfors ER
    3. Fontanel P
    4. Pallucchi I
    5. Bertuzzi M
    6. El Manira A

    (2022) Developmental switch in the function of inhibitory commissural V0d interneurons in zebrafish

    Current Biology 32:3515–3528.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.06.059

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Russell DF
    2. Wallén P

    (1983) On the control of myotomal motoneurones during “fictive swimming” in the lamprey spinal cord in vitro

    Acta Physiologica Scandinavica 117:161–170.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-1716.1983.tb07193.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Ryczko D
    2. Dubuc R
    3. Cabelguen JM

    (2010) Rhythmogenesis in axial locomotor networks: an interspecies comparison

    Progress in Brain Research 187:189–211.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53613-6.00013-7

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Satou C
    2. Kimura Y
    3. Hirata H
    4. Suster ML
    5. Kawakami K
    6. Higashijima S

    (2013) Transgenic tools to characterize neuronal properties of discrete populations of zebrafish neurons

    Development 140:3927–3931.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.099531

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Satou C
    2. Sugioka T
    3. Uemura Y
    4. Shimazaki T
    5. Zmarz P
    6. Kimura Y
    7. Higashijima SI

    (2020) Functional diversity of glycinergic commissural inhibitory neurons in larval zebrafish

    Cell Reports 30:3036–3050.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.02.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Schnerwitzki D
    2. Perry S
    3. Ivanova A
    4. Caixeta FV
    5. Cramer P
    6. Günther S
    7. Weber K
    8. Tafreshiha A
    9. Becker L
    10. Vargas Panesso IL
    11. Klopstock T
    12. Hrabe de Angelis M
    13. Schmidt M
    14. Kullander K
    15. Englert C

    (2018) Neuron-specific inactivation of Wt1 alters locomotion in mice and changes interneuron composition in the spinal cord

    Life Science Alliance 1:e201800106.

    https://doi.org/10.26508/lsa.201800106

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Sengupta M
    2. Bagnall MW

    (2023) Spinal interneurons: Diversity and connectivity in motor control

    Annual Review of Neuroscience 46:79–99.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-083122-025325

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Smith JL
    2. Betts B
    3. Edgerton VR
    4. Zernicke RF

    (1980) Rapid ankle extension during paw shakes: selective recruitment of fast ankle extensors

    Journal of Neurophysiology 43:612–620.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1980.43.3.612

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Soffe SR
    2. Roberts A

    (1982) Tonic and phasic synaptic input to spinal cord motoneurons during fictive locomotion in frog embryos

    Journal of Neurophysiology 48:1279–1288.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1982.48.6.1279

    • Google Scholar
76. 1. Soffe SR

    (1989) Roles of glycinergic inhibition and N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor mediated excitation in the locomotor rhythmicity of one half of the Xenopus embryo central nervous system

    The European Journal of Neuroscience 1:561–571.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.1989.tb00363.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. Song J
    2. Pallucchi I
    3. Ausborn J
    4. Ampatzis K
    5. Bertuzzi M
    6. Fontanel P
    7. Picton LD
    8. El Manira A

    (2020) Multiple rhythm-generating circuits act in tandem with pacemaker properties to control the start and speed of locomotion

    Neuron 105:1048–1061.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.12.030

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Soto AP
    2. McHenry MJ

    (2020) Pursuit predation with intermittent locomotion in zebrafish

    The Journal of Experimental Biology 223:jeb230623.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.230623

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Sternberg JR
    2. Severi KE
    3. Fidelin K
    4. Gomez J
    5. Ihara H
    6. Alcheikh Y
    7. Hubbard JM
    8. Kawakami K
    9. Suster M
    10. Wyart C

    (2016) Optimization of a neurotoxin to investigate the contribution of excitatory interneurons to speed modulation in vivo

    Current Biology 26:2319–2328.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.037

    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Talpalar AE
    2. Bouvier J
    3. Borgius L
    4. Fortin G
    5. Pierani A
    6. Kiehn O

    (2013) Dual-mode operation of neuronal networks involved in left-right alternation

    Nature 500:85–88.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12286

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Thorsen DH
    2. Cassidy JJ
    3. Hale ME

    (2004) Swimming of larval zebrafish: fin-axis coordination and implications for function and neural control

    The Journal of Experimental Biology 207:4175–4183.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01285

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Wiggin TD
    2. Anderson TM
    3. Eian J
    4. Peck JH
    5. Masino MA

    (2012) Episodic swimming in the larval zebrafish is generated by a spatially distributed spinal network with modular functional organization

    Journal of Neurophysiology 108:925–934.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00233.2012

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Wiggin TD
    2. Montgomery JE
    3. Brunick AJ
    4. Peck JH
    5. Masino MA

    (2022) V3 interneurons are active and recruit spinal motor neurons during in vivo fictive swimming in larval zebrafish

    eNeuro 9:ENEURO.0476-21.2022.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0476-21.2022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Zhong G
    2. Droho S
    3. Crone SA
    4. Dietz S
    5. Kwan AC
    6. Webb WW
    7. Sharma K
    8. Harris-Warrick RM

    (2010) Electrophysiological characterization of V2a interneurons and their locomotor-related activity in the neonatal mouse spinal cord

    The Journal of Neuroscience 30:170–182.

    https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4849-09.2010

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Zhong G
    2. Sharma K
    3. Harris-Warrick RM

    (2011) Frequency-dependent recruitment of V2a interneurons during fictive locomotion in the mouse spinal cord

    Nature Communications 2:274.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1276

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Ziskind-Conhaim L
    2. Hochman S

    (2017) Diversity of molecularly defined spinal interneurons engaged in mammalian locomotor pattern generation

    Journal of Neurophysiology 118:2956–2974.

    https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00322.2017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Moneeza A Agha

   1. Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
   2. Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences Graduate Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review and editing

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7868-8325

2. Sandeep Kishore

   Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States

   Contribution

   Investigation

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. David L McLean

   1. Department of Neurobiology, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States
   2. Interdisciplinary Biological Sciences Graduate Program, Northwestern University, Evanston, United States

   Present address

   Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing

   For correspondence

   dmclean3@ed.ac.uk

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6337-2301

• 880

  views

• 68

  downloads

• 1

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.