Hearing: Letting the calcium flow
Two calcium-binding proteins, CaBP1 and CaBP2, cooperate to keep calcium channels in the hair cells of the inner ear open.
- Institute for Neurosciences of Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Inserm, CNRS, France
Hearing the voice of your lover, the symphonies of Beethoven or a fire alarm, all rely on acoustic information being translated into messages that can be understood by the brain. This process depends on sensory cells known as hair cells which are housed in a hollow within the inner ear known as the cochlea. When sound waves enter the ear, their vibrations cause fluid in the cochlea to move and bend protrusions at the top of hair cells known as stereocilia (Fettiplace, 2017). This activates hair cells and triggers calcium to enter, leading to secretion of the neurotransmitter glutamate which then activates auditory nerve fibers that convey signals to the brain (Moser et al., 2020).
The calcium influx that drives glutamate release is a critical step in the process of hearing (Pangrsic et al., 2018). In most cell types, calcium enters via channels which open upon cell activation and then inactivate themselves by closing. However, the calcium channels in hair cells (known as Cav1.3) show an interesting property: they do not inactivate and remain open for as long as the hair cell is stimulated. When the Cav1.3 channel is expressed in other cell types, the calcium channel closes itself like other calcium channels (Cui et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2006), suggesting that there is something in hair cells that stops Cav1.3 from inactivating.
Calcium channels can be inactivated in a voltage-dependent or calcium-dependent manner. Previous work found that deletion of a calcium-binding protein known as CaBP2 prevented voltage-dependent inactivation (Picher et al., 2017); a mutation in the gene encoding this protein was also shown to cause human deafness (Schrauwen et al., 2012). However, calcium-dependent inactivation was mostly unaffected by the disruption of CaBP2. Moreover, deletion of another calcium-binding protein, CaBP1, did not affect calcium-mediated inactivation, nor the voltage-dependent mechanism (Yang et al., 2018). Now, in eLife, Tina Pangrsic and colleagues from the University Medical Centre Göttingen and Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Science – including David Oestreicher as first author – report that CaBP1 and CaBP2 work together to prevent calcium channels from closing during hair cell stimulation (Figure 1; Oestreicher et al., 2024).
Figure 1
Transmitting sound from the ear to the brain.
The apical region of a hair cell (left) contains bundles of stereocilia (top) that move in response to sound waves. This movement activates the hair cell, causing calcium ions to enter the cell via calcium channels (red; right hand side inset) in the basolateral region. The calcium binding proteins CaBP1 (orange) and CaBP2 (pink) both contribute to keeping the calcium channel open for as long as the hair cell is stimulated. This leads to an influx of calcium ions (Ca2+), which trigger the release of the neurotransmitter glutamate (blue circles), which is stored in synaptic vesicles. Once secreted, glutamate travels across a synapse (white gap) to an auditory fiber (gray) that conveys the signal to the brain, enabling the perception of sound.
The team found that deleting the genes for CaBP1 and CaBP2 simultaneously led to greater inactivation of calcium channels than deleting either gene alone. As a result of the calcium channels not staying fully open, calcium influx and glutamate release were depressed, leading to reduced activation of auditory fibers. Consequently, the neural message conveyed along the auditory pathway was degraded, resulting in severe hearing loss in the genetically modified mice. Notably, even when there was a small amount of calcium influx through the temporarily open calcium channels, glutamate secretion was still almost completely abolished. This suggests that CaBP1 and CaBP2 may affect the release of glutamate independently from their role on calcium channels.
To strengthen the data, Oestreicher et al. re-expressed the gene for CaBP2 in the mice. This led to a substantial – but not complete – rescue of calcium channel activity, glutamate secretion, auditory fiber activation and hearing. Taken together, the experiments demonstrate that both CaBP1 and CaBP2 contribute to calcium-triggered glutamate release in hair cells of the inner ear, suggesting they have partially overlapping roles.
These findings also raise exciting questions for future studies. For instance, how do CaBP1 and CaBP2 work together to control calcium channel activity? Additionally, how do these calcium-binding proteins directly influence the secretion of glutamate in addition to controlling calcium channels? Further experiments that help to answer these questions, and others, could provide more insights into how hair cells transmit sound to the brain, which could potentially help identify therapeutic targets for hearing impairments.
References
-
Ca2+-binding proteins tune Ca2+-feedback to Cav1.3 channels in mouse auditory hair cellsThe Journal of Physiology 585:791–803.https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.142307
-
Hair cell transduction, tuning, and synaptic transmission in the mammalian cochleaComprehensive Physiology 7:1197–1227.https://doi.org/10.1002/cphy.c160049
-
Sensory processing at ribbon synapses in the retina and the cochleaPhysiological Reviews 100:103–144.https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00026.2018
-
Voltage-gated calcium channels: Key players in sensory coding in the retina and the inner earPhysiological Reviews 98:2063–2096.https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00030.2017
-
A mutation in CABP2, expressed in cochlear hair cells, causes autosomal-recessive hearing impairmentAmerican Journal of Human Genetics 91:636–645.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.018
-
Switching of Ca2+-dependent inactivation of Ca(v)1.3 channels by calcium binding proteins of auditory hair cellsThe Journal of Neuroscience 26:10677–10689.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3236-06.2006
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Nouvian
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 796
- views
-
- 48
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Hearing: Letting the calcium flow
eLife 13:e96139.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.96139
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
This work proposes µGUIDE: a general Bayesian framework to estimate posterior distributions of tissue microstructure parameters from any given biophysical model or signal representation, with exemplar demonstration in diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Harnessing a new deep learning architecture for automatic signal feature selection combined with simulation-based inference and efficient sampling of the posterior distributions, µGUIDE bypasses the high computational and time cost of conventional Bayesian approaches and does not rely on acquisition constraints to define model-specific summary statistics. The obtained posterior distributions allow to highlight degeneracies present in the model definition and quantify the uncertainty and ambiguity of the estimated parameters.
-
- Computational and Systems Biology
- Neuroscience
The basolateral amygdala (BLA) is a key site where fear learning takes place through synaptic plasticity. Rodent research shows prominent low theta (~3–6 Hz), high theta (~6–12 Hz), and gamma (>30 Hz) rhythms in the BLA local field potential recordings. However, it is not understood what role these rhythms play in supporting the plasticity. Here, we create a biophysically detailed model of the BLA circuit to show that several classes of interneurons (PV, SOM, and VIP) in the BLA can be critically involved in producing the rhythms; these rhythms promote the formation of a dedicated fear circuit shaped through spike-timing-dependent plasticity. Each class of interneurons is necessary for the plasticity. We find that the low theta rhythm is a biomarker of successful fear conditioning. The model makes use of interneurons commonly found in the cortex and, hence, may apply to a wide variety of associative learning situations.
