HSF-1 activates the ubiquitin proteasome system to promote non-apoptotic developmental cell death in C. elegans

Abstract

Apoptosis is a prominent metazoan cell death form. Yet, mutations in apoptosis regulators cause only minor defects in vertebrate development, suggesting that another developmental cell death mechanism exists. While some non-apoptotic programs have been molecularly characterized, none appear to control developmental cell-culling. Linker-cell-type death (LCD) is a morphologically conserved non-apoptotic cell death process operating in C. elegans and vertebrate development, and is therefore a compelling candidate process complementing apoptosis. However, details of LCD execution are not known. Here we delineate a molecular-genetic pathway governing LCD in C. elegans. Redundant activities of antagonistic Wnt signals, a temporal-control pathway, and MAPKK signaling control HSF-1, a conserved stress-activated transcription factor. Rather than protecting cells, HSF-1 promotes their demise by activating components of the ubiquitin proteasome system, including the E2-ligase LET-70/UBE2D2 functioning with E3 components CUL-3, RBX-1, BTBD2, and SIAH-1. Our studies uncover design similarities between LCD and developmental apoptosis, and provide testable predictions for analyzing LCD in vertebrates.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maxime J Kinet

    Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Jennifer A Malin

    Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mary C Abraham

    Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Elyse S Blum

    Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Melanie R Silverman

    Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Yun Lu

    Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shai Shaham

    Laboratory of Developmental Genetics, The Rockefeller University, New York, United States
    For correspondence
    shaham@rockefeller.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Oliver Hobert, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: November 4, 2015
  2. Accepted: March 7, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: March 8, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: March 9, 2016 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: March 30, 2016 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2016, Kinet et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,451
    Page views
  • 782
    Downloads
  • 19
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Scopus, Crossref, PubMed Central.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maxime J Kinet
  2. Jennifer A Malin
  3. Mary C Abraham
  4. Elyse S Blum
  5. Melanie R Silverman
  6. Yun Lu
  7. Shai Shaham
(2016)
HSF-1 activates the ubiquitin proteasome system to promote non-apoptotic developmental cell death in C. elegans
eLife 5:e12821.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12821

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.12821

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Kazuki Hanaoka, Kensuke Nishikawa ... Kouichi Funato
    Research Article

    Membrane contact sites (MCSs) are junctures that perform important roles including coordinating lipid metabolism. Previous studies have indicated that vacuolar fission/fusion processes are coupled with modifications in the membrane lipid composition. However, it has been still unclear whether MCS-mediated lipid metabolism controls the vacuolar morphology. Here, we report that deletion of tricalbins (Tcb1, Tcb2, and Tcb3), tethering proteins at endoplasmic reticulum (ER)–plasma membrane (PM) and ER–Golgi contact sites, alters fusion/fission dynamics and causes vacuolar fragmentation in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In addition, we show that the sphingolipid precursor phytosphingosine (PHS) accumulates in tricalbin-deleted cells, triggering the vacuolar division. Detachment of the nucleus–vacuole junction (NVJ), an important contact site between the vacuole and the perinuclear ER, restored vacuolar morphology in both cells subjected to high exogenous PHS and Tcb3-deleted cells, supporting that PHS transport across the NVJ induces vacuole division. Thus, our results suggest that vacuolar morphology is maintained by MCSs through the metabolism of sphingolipids.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Monica Salinas-Pena, Elena Rebollo, Albert Jordan
    Research Article

    Histone H1 participates in chromatin condensation and regulates nuclear processes. Human somatic cells may contain up to seven histone H1 variants, although their functional heterogeneity is not fully understood. Here, we have profiled the differential nuclear distribution of the somatic H1 repertoire in human cells through imaging techniques including super-resolution microscopy. H1 variants exhibit characteristic distribution patterns in both interphase and mitosis. H1.2, H1.3, and H1.5 are universally enriched at the nuclear periphery in all cell lines analyzed and co-localize with compacted DNA. H1.0 shows a less pronounced peripheral localization, with apparent variability among different cell lines. On the other hand, H1.4 and H1X are distributed throughout the nucleus, being H1X universally enriched in high-GC regions and abundant in the nucleoli. Interestingly, H1.4 and H1.0 show a more peripheral distribution in cell lines lacking H1.3 and H1.5. The differential distribution patterns of H1 suggest specific functionalities in organizing lamina-associated domains or nucleolar activity, which is further supported by a distinct response of H1X or phosphorylated H1.4 to the inhibition of ribosomal DNA transcription. Moreover, H1 variants depletion affects chromatin structure in a variant-specific manner. Concretely, H1.2 knock-down, either alone or combined, triggers a global chromatin decompaction. Overall, imaging has allowed us to distinguish H1 variants distribution beyond the segregation in two groups denoted by previous ChIP-Seq determinations. Our results support H1 variants heterogeneity and suggest that variant-specific functionality can be shared between different cell types.