The parasite Toxoplasma gondii is one of the most common parasites worldwide and is known for its unusual life cycle. It reproduces sexually inside its primary host—the cat—and produces eggs that are released in faeces. Other animals, most often rodents, can then become infected when they unknowingly eat the eggs while foraging. Once inside its new host, the parasite reproduces asexually until the rodent’s immune system begins to fight back. It then becomes semi-dormant and forms cysts within the brain and muscle cells of its host. In an added twist, the parasite also causes rodents to lose their fear of cats. This increases their chances of being caught and eaten, thereby helping the parasite to return to its primary host and complete its life cycle.

Previous work has shown that virulent strains of T. gondii can evade the host immune system in mice by secreting enzymes that inactivate immune-related proteins called IRG proteins. This prevents the infection being cleared and leads to death of the host within a few days. The existence of these virulent strains is intriguing because parasites that kill their host, and thus prevent their own reproduction, should be eliminated from the population. The fact that they are fairly common suggests that there must be a hitherto unknown mechanism that allows rodents to survive these virulent strains.

Lilue et al. now report the existence of such a mechanism in strains of mice found in the wild. In contrast to laboratory mice, wild mice produce IRG proteins that inhibit the enzymes secreted by the virulent strains of T. gondii. Moreover, the IRG genes in wild mice are highly variable, whereas laboratory mice all have virtually identical IRG genes.

By uncovering the complexity and variability of IRG genes in wild mice—complexity that has been lost from laboratory strains—Lilue et al. solve the conundrum of how highly virulent T. gondii strains can persist in the mouse population, and offer an explanation for the evolution of parasitic strains with differing levels of virulence.

A virulent parasite that overcomes the immune system and kills its host may seem to have won the confrontation, but it is a Pyrrhic victory when the early death of the host reduces the probability of parasite transmission. Indeed it is in the interests of all hosts and most parasites to prolong the encounter. In this sense, virulence is a failure of co-adaptation. Haldane’s conjecture (Haldane, 1949) that intense and fluctuating selection imposed by parasites will generate host protein polymorphism is widely accepted (Woolhouse et al., 2002; Clark et al., 2007; Kosiol et al., 2008; Fumagalli et al., 2011). The presence in a population of multiple host resistance alleles confronting multiple parasite virulence alleles may reflect a dynamic equilibrium permissive for the persistence of both parties. However this equilibrium is achieved only at the expense of individual interactions fatal for either the parasite or the host, as a consequence of confrontations of inappropriate alleles. In mammals, however, the ability of the adaptive immune system to respond within the time scale of an individual infection and to remember for a lifetime, buffers individuals against dangerous genetic novelty arising from parasites. As a result, life or death outcomes for common infectious diseases in mammals are not generally determined by single, highly penetrant, polymorphic genes. We here report such a case, involving infection of the house mouse, Mus musculus, with the ubiquitous intracellular protozoan parasite, Toxoplasma gondii. T. gondii has a complex life cycle (Dubey, 1998) (Figure 1). The sexual process occurs in true cats (Felidae) and intermediate hosts become infected by ingesting oocysts spread in cat faeces. A phase of fast intracellular replication and spread (tachyzoite phase) stimulates immunity in the intermediate host, and this in turn induces parasite encystment in brain and muscle cells and lifelong persistence. Predation of the infected host by a cat completes the life cycle. If immunity fails, tachyzoite replication continues uninterrupted, killing the infected host within a few days (Deckert-Schlüter et al., 1996). Thus the probability that T. gondii completes its life cycle, which is roughly linear with duration of infection of the intermediate host, depends on early immune control.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Mus musculus is probably the evolutionarily most important intermediate host for T. gondii, because it is very abundant worldwide and sympatric with a uniquely abundant felid, the domestic cat. Early immune control of T. gondii in mice depends on a family of IFNγ-inducible cytoplasmic effector proteins, the 47 kDa immunity-related GTPases (IRG proteins; for nomenclature of IRG genes and proteins see Bekpen et al. (2005); Martens and Howard (2006) and ‘Materials and methods’) (Taylor et al., 2000; Collazo et al., 2001; Liesenfeld et al., 2011). These assemble on the cytosolic face of the parasitophorous vacuole membrane (PVM), causing its rupture and killing the included parasite (Martens et al., 2005; Zhao et al., 2009b). In the C57BL/6 (BL/6) laboratory mouse strain about 20 IRG genes occur in two adjacent clusters on chromosome 11 and one cluster on chromosome 18 (Bekpen et al., 2005) (Figure 2A). The whole 47 kDa sequences of IRG proteins are typically translated from a single exon. Exceptional are certain ‘tandem’ IRGB proteins with a molecular weight of about 94 kDa. These genes are transcribed across two chromosomally adjacent IRG coding units and the intergenic spacer is spliced out as an intron resulting in a single open reading frame (Bekpen et al., 2005. See also ‘Materials and methods’ for a note on nomenclature of the tandem genes and proteins). IRG proteins fall into two major functional and sequence sub-families, the GKS group (IRGA, IRGB and IRGD proteins) that are effector proteins at the PVM, and the GMS group (Irgm1, Irgm2 and Irgm3) that are negative regulators of the GKS proteins (Hunn et al., 2008). Many strains of T. gondii (e.g., the abundant Eurasian strains designated types II and III) are well controlled by the IRG system in laboratory mice, encyst, and are considered avirulent. But others (e.g., type I) are highly virulent (Sibley and Boothroyd, 1992), killing the mouse host during the tachyzoite phase of infection. It has very recently been shown that virulence differences between T. gondii strains are largely due to polymorphic variation in ROP18 and ROP5 (Saeij et al., 2006; Taylor et al., 2006; Khan et al., 2009; Behnke et al., 2011), members of a family of kinases and pseudokinases (El Hajj et al., 2006). These proteins are secreted during parasite entry and accumulate on the cytosolic face of the PVM (Boothroyd and Dubremetz, 2008). Virulent ROP allotypes inactivate IRG effector proteins by phosphorylating essential threonines in the nucleotide-binding domain (Fentress et al., 2010; Steinfeldt et al., 2010). In view of the unique importance of Mus musculus for the transmission of T. gondii, parasite strains acutely lethal for mice should be counterselected. Their presence at a significant frequency therefore demands an explanation. In this paper, we reveal that the IRG resistance system in mice has a scale of polymorphic complexity that rivals the MHC, and that a resistant IRG haplotype in the mouse can counter polymorphic virulence factors in the parasite, generating a host phenotype that is permissive for encystment, and thus for the propagation, of virulent strains.

Figure 2 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

We compared the IRG genes from a number of mouse strains, mostly those re-sequenced in the Mouse Genomes Project (Keane et al., 2011) with the canonical BL/6 sequences (Figure 2B). The re-sequenced mice are largely from established laboratory strains. Others are recently derived from the wild and not admixed with laboratory mice. Mus spretus is a wild species distinct from Mus musculus with a divergent history of 1–3 million years (Suzuki et al., 2004). Within laboratory strains we found relatively little IRG protein polymorphism on Chr 11. In contrast, the wild-derived strains showed variation in IRG gene number and remarkable protein polymorphism. For example Irgb6, a protein of 406 residues, had an allele in the CAST/EiJ strain with 47 amino acid substitutions relative to BL/6. On Chr 18, IRG protein sequence variation between laboratory strains was more apparent, and again, wild-derived strains showed extensive sequence polymorphism and copy number variation. The IRG proteins of the outgroup, M. spretus, showed considerable protein divergence from M. musculus sequences. Pseudogenes occurred in every haplotype and some (e.g. Irga5 and Irgb7) were preserved between M. musculus and M. spretus. Other IRG sequences were pseudogenes in some haplotypes and apparently intact in others, for example Irga3 and Irga8. Even within this limited group of strains we can distinguish eleven distinct IRG gene haplotypes on Chr 11 and thirteen on Chr 18, already yielding a theoretical population diversity of several hundred IRG genotypes. Diagonal dot-plot comparisons between IRG gene clusters of wild-derived CAST/Ei and MSM/Ms with BL/6 showed IRG genes within tracts of duplication and deletion, associated with numerous repeats in both orientations, a genomic configuration that would be expected to be dynamic even on short time-scales, and doubtless responsible for the two very different dot-plots (Figure 2C and Figure 2—figure supplement 2).

We added sequences amplified from genomic DNA of wild mice from several Eurasian sites (Figure 3—figure supplement 1) to the data from inbred strains to generate nearest neighbour phylograms (Figure 3A). We analysed five IRG genes, namely Irgm1, a regulatory IRG protein of the GMS class (Hunn et al., 2008), and Irga6, Irgb2, Irgb6, and Irgb10, all effector GKS proteins localizing to the T. gondii PVM during infection (Khaminets et al., 2010). Irgb2 forms the N-terminal half of the tandem protein, Irgb2-b1. The nearest-neighbour phylograms of Irgm1, Irgb10 and Irga6 are shallow and the M. spretus sequences fall into outgroups. Thus most of the sparse polymorphic variation in these sequences has been acquired since the divergence of M. musculus from M. spretus. This conclusion is supported by a tendency for individual minor variants to be concentrated in one or other of the three recent, geographically separated and partially isolated subspecies, Mus musculus musculus, Mus musculus domesticus and Mus musculus castaneus (Figure 3A, Figure 3—figure supplements 2–4). In contrast, the phylograms for Irgb2 and Irgb6 have a depth similar to the mouse-rat divergence (about 20 million years) (Gibbs et al., 2004), the M. spretus sequences are embedded in the M. musculus trees, and any tendency to correlation with subspecies is seen only in the outermost branches. Thus the polymorphism in these two genes is ancient and has persisted through a number of speciation events. The scale of polymorphism in the IRG system estimated by Tajima’s π from 7 mouse strains resembles that of classical MHC genes (Figure 3B). That there is also considerable local polymorphism within geographic ranges was confirmed by the identification of numerous heterozygotes at all loci examined by PCR among the wild mouse captures.

Figure 3 with 4 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3—source data 1

Nucleotide diversities of 50 random genes in seven mouse strains.

Seven laboratory and wild-derived inbred mouse strains were analysed. The ORFs of 50 random genes were selected based on their position in the C57BL/6 genome (NCBI reference assembly build 37). In addition, selected IRG and MHC members were assembled, and Tajima's π values were calculated. Klra4 is closest to 130M in Chr 6, but lost in many mouse strains (Cutler and Kassner, 2008). The adjacent gene Klra5 was used instead.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01298.008

Download elife-01298-fig3-data1-v1.xls

Figure 3—source data 2

Alignment of Irgm1 alleles, in FASTA format.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01298.009

Download elife-01298-fig3-data2-v1.fas

Figure 3—source data 3

Alignment of Irga6 alleles, in FASTA format.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01298.010

Download elife-01298-fig3-data3-v1.fas

Figure 3—source data 4

Alignment of Irgb2 alleles, in FASTA format.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01298.011

Download elife-01298-fig3-data4-v1.fas

Figure 3—source data 5

Alignment of Irgb6 alleles, in FASTA format.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01298.012

Download elife-01298-fig3-data5-v1.fas

Figure 3—source data 6

Alignment of Irgb10 alleles, in FASTA format.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.01298.013

Download elife-01298-fig3-data6-v1.fas

With such striking polymorphic diversity in the sequences of proteins known to be involved in resistance against T. gondii, it was appropriate to assay the ability of different IRG genotypes to resist virulent T. gondii. The wild-derived Indian strain CIM, which has a number of divergent IRG alleles (Figure 2B), proved to be remarkably resistant to the type I virulent T. gondii strain, GT-1 (Figure 4A). All CIM mice survived intraperitoneal infection with GT-1 tachyzoites while all laboratory mice (NMRI strain) died within 15 days. In vitro, tachyzoite proliferation of avirulent strains in mouse cells is inhibited by induction of IRG proteins with IFNγ (Könen-Waisman and Howard, 2007). In contrast, proliferation of type I virulent strains is not inhibited (Zhao et al., 2009c). By this assay, IFNγ-induced CIM diaphragm-derived cells (DDC see ‘Materials and methods’) inhibited proliferation of type I virulent RH-YFP strain tachyzoites as efficiently as they inhibited the proliferation of avirulent strains, while BL/6 DDC inhibited only the avirulent strains (Figure 4B). Cells from two other M. m. castaneus strains, CAST/EiJ and CTP were almost as resistant as CIM. Additionally, IFNγ-induced CIM cells died by reactive cell death after infection with both virulent RH-YFP and avirulent ME49, while BL/6 cells died only after infection with avirulent strains (Figure 4C). Reactive death of T. gondii-infected mouse cells after induction with IFNγ is associated with IRG protein-mediated host resistance, as previously reported (Zhao et al., 2009b).

Figure 4

Download asset Open asset

Resistance of CIM mice to the type I virulent RH-YFP strain in vivo was exploited to test linkage of resistance to the IRG system in a (CIM×BL/6)F₁×BL/6 backcross. For typing purposes the IRG gene clusters from CIM and BL/6 were differentiated by RFLPs in Irga1 (Chr 18) and Irgb6 (Chr 11). Fluorescent-tagged tachyzoites (RH-YFP) were injected intraperitoneally into mice and the frequency of infected peritoneal cells measured by FACS after 5 days. In five independent experiments involving a total of 65 typed animals (Figure 5A), resistance by this assay was almost completely dominant and was tightly linked to the IRG_CIM gene cluster on Chr 11 (p<<10⁻⁶). There was no detectable association of virulence with the IRG_CIM cluster on Chr 18. In a similar analysis of 53 F₂ progeny, mice typed as homozygous IRG_CIM at the Chr 11 gene cluster were as resistant as wild-type CIM mice. Thus the reduced resistance of some mice heterozygous for IRG_CIM on Chr 11 may be due to a gene dosage effect at the IRG locus. Assayed directly by survival, 51 backcross and F₂ mice infected with RH-YFP followed the same pattern as in the peritoneal cell assay (Figure 5B), with the Chr 11 IRG_CIM homozygotes (cc in Figure 5B) showing complete resistance, the heterozygotes (bc) substantial but incomplete resistance and the IRG_BL/6 homozygotes (bb) complete and acute susceptibility.

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Recent results have implicated the inflammasome core component Nlrp1 (NLR family, pyrin domain containing 1) in resistance to T. gondii in human (Witola et al., 2011) and rat (Sergent et al., 2005; Cavailles et al., 2006). Since the Nlrp1 complex locus is about 20 Mb telomeric to the IRG system on Chr 11 it was possible that polymorphism at this locus (Boyden and Dietrich, 2006) was responsible for the differential resistance apparently linked to the IRG complex. We therefore typed all the backcross progeny shown in Figure 5A by PCR designed to distinguish the BL/6 and CIM allotypes of the Nlrp1b locus (see ‘Materials and methods’). We obtained 17% recombinants between Irgb6 and Nlrp1. There was no correlation between Nlrp1 genotype and the ability to clear virulent T. gondii (Figure 5A). It is anyway unlikely that Nlrp1 plays a role in the resistance polymorphism we describe since it is not detectably expressed in the IFNγ-induced DDC transcriptomes (data not shown).

The existence of mouse genotypes resistant to virulent T. gondii strains is consistent with a co-evolutionary explanation for the evolution of virulence. To sustain the argument, however, it would be necessary to show that T. gondii strains that are lethal in laboratory mice, and thereby suffer a major cost, can form functional cysts in resistant CIM mice, permitting their propagation. We therefore searched for brain cysts in CIM mice infected 6–8 weeks earlier with virulent type I or avirulent type III strains of T. gondii. Two type I virulent strains, GT-1 and BK, formed cysts in CIM mice (Figure 5C, Table 1). Thus the resistance of the CIM mouse provides an adaptive niche for highly virulent T. gondii strains. The avirulent type III strain, NED, encysted in the laboratory mice >20× more efficiently than in CIM mice (Table 1).

The IRG resistance mechanism operates cell-autonomously, and in BL/6 cells the loading of IRG proteins onto the parasitophorous vacuole occurs only with avirulent strains even in cells infected simultaneously with virulent and avirulent strains (Zhao et al., 2009a; Khaminets et al., 2010). Consistently, the resistance of the CIM strain against virulent T. gondii was reflected in the behaviour of IRG proteins in IFNγ-induced CIM-derived cells infected with virulent RH-YFP strain T. gondii. In BL/6 cells Irgb6_BL/6 loaded onto only about 8% of vacuoles, while in CIM cells the highly divergent Irgb6_CIM protein loaded onto more than 50% of vacuoles (Figure 6A). Even more extreme, the tandem protein, Irgb2-b1_BL/6, which is poorly expressed in BL/6 cells (Figure 6B), was not detectable on the RH-YFP PVM, while the highly divergent Irgb2-b1_CIM was well-expressed in CIM cells and loaded onto over 95% of vacuoles (Figure 6A).

Figure 6

Download asset Open asset

The loading of the effector IRG protein Irga6 onto the parasitophorous vacuole of virulent T. gondii strains is prevented by a parasite-derived kinase complex (ROP5/ROP18) that phosphorylates two threonines that are essential for IRG protein function (Steinfeldt et al., 2010). Remarkably, in CIM cells infected with RH-YFP, phosphorylated Irga6_CIM was barely detectable with an antiserum specific for Irga6_BL/6 phosphorylated at T108 (Figure 6C). Irga6_CIM differs from Irga6_BL/6 at only two residues, both distant from the phosphorylation sites and was phosphorylated normally when transfected into IFNγ-induced L929 cells infected with virulent RH-YFP (Figure 6D). Thus Irga6_CIM apparently remains unphosphorylated in CIM cells as a result of active inhibition of the parasite kinase complex. The following experiment showed that the highly polymorphic tandem protein, Irgb2-b1_CIM, is largely responsible. Irgb2-b1_CIM was transfected into IFNγ-induced BL/6 mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) infected with RH-YFP virulent strain T. gondii. Phosphorylated Irga6 was measured at the PVs in transfected cells expressing Irgb2-b1_CIM and in untransfected cells. Figure 6E,F show that the amount of phosphorylated Irga6 was strikingly reduced on vacuoles loaded with Irgb2-b1_CIM while the amount of total Irga6 loaded onto Irgb2-b1_CIM positive vacuoles was increased (Figure 6G). Thus the decreased signal of phosphorylated Irga6 on the PVM was not caused by competition for loading between Irga6 and Irgb2-b1, but rather by inhibition of phosphorylation. Transfected Irgb2-b1_CIM also stimulated the loading of endogenous Irgb6_BL/6 onto RH-YFP vacuoles (Figure 6H). Transfected Irgb2-b1_BL/6, which is well expressed unlike the endogenous protein, had little or no effect on the loading of Irgb6_BL/6 (Figure 6H). Thus the essential difference between Irgb2-b1_BL/6 and Irgb2-b1_CIM in determining resistance lies in the amino acid sequence polymorphism rather than in the protein expression level.

Preliminary results suggest that Irgb2-b1_CIM may bind directly to the protein product of the virulent allele of ROP5. Thus loading of Irgb2-b1_CIM onto the PVM of ROP5-deficient RH strain parasites in CIM cells was greatly reduced, and consistently, the amount of loading on to different RH-related strains correlated with strain-specific variation in the amount of ROP5 (Figure 7A). Irgb2-b1_CIM itself becomes phosphorylated during infection with virulent T. gondii (Figure 7B), thus is also a target for the active ROP5-ROP18 kinase complex, suggesting that Irgb2-b1_CIM may block phosphorylation of Irga6 by binding ROP5 pseudokinase at the vacuole, thereby distracting rather than inhibiting ROP18 kinase. ROP5 binds to Irga6 via helix 4 (H4) of the Irga6 nucleotide binding domain (Fleckenstein et al., 2012), so a homologous structure on Irgb2-b1 may be involved in ROP5 interaction. Indeed the putative H4 and αD structural domains of the Irgb2 subunit are highly polymorphic and show recent divergent selection (Figure 7C), indicating possible co-evolution with ROP kinases and pseudokinases. The high polymorphism of H4 in Irgb2-b1 is also consistent with a direct interaction with a polymorphic component of the pathogen. If Irgb2-b1 interacts with a host protein to bridge to ROP5 the interaction surface between the two host proteins would not be expected to evolve rapidly under divergent selection.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

We have shown that the IRG protein system essential for resistance against T. gondii infection in the mouse has a complex polymorphism on the scale of the MHC, and that at least one IRG haplotype, found in the wild-derived CIM strain mouse, is strikingly resistant to T. gondii strains that are highly virulent for laboratory mice. We also provide a mechanistic explanation for the resistance of the CIM mouse against type I virulent T. gondii strains. Resistance is determined by the presence of the polymorphic tandem IRG protein, Irgb2-b1_CIM encoded on Chr 11, which blocks the ROP5/ROP18 kinase complex of the virulent parasite, preventing phosphorylation and consequent inactivation of IRG effector proteins. Taken together, our results suggest a selective explanation for the evolution of T. gondii strains that are highly virulent for certain mice. If the mouse is an evolutionarily significant host for T. gondii the parasite must balance its virulence against mouse resistance, in order to allow encystment. To minimise the cost of infection, selection on the mouse favours the evolution of strong resistance alleles. This in turn leads to the selection of parasite strains able to counteract heightened resistance sufficiently to allow encystment in these mouse genotypes, as type I T. gondii strains in CIM mice. However such virulent T. gondii strains are counterselected by acute lethality in less resistant mice, while less resistant mice are better hosts for less virulent T. gondii strains.

Why, however, are not all mice highly resistant? Loss of the entire IRG system in several vertebrate groups, for example higher primates and birds (Bekpen et al., 2005), suggests that possession of the IRG system may be costly. Highly resistant genotypes may be more costly than less resistant ones. Alternatively, molecular specificity in interactions between polymorphic parasite virulence factors and mouse IRG proteins may favour IRG genotypes that are highly resistant to some T. gondii genotypes but more susceptible to others. Such an allele-specific system is familiar from polymorphic plant disease resistance (R) genes and strain-specific pathogen virulence and avirulence (Flor 1971; Dodds et al., 2006), where exact molecular matches or mismatches determine the outcome of a given infection. These alternative models can now be analysed formally and tested experimentally.

Much of the argument in this paper has focused on the importance of the house mouse as an intermediate host and vector for T. gondii, resting on the global abundance of the species and its sympatry with the cat, and obviously supported by the intimate antagonistic relationship between T. gondii virulence factors and mouse resistance factors. However, although many bacteria and protozoal parasites are not resisted by the IRG system, T. gondii is not the only organism that is. At least two members of the Chlamydia species complex are resisted by the IRG system in mice, and polymorphic variation on Chr 11, possibly associated with Irgb10, affects the level of resistance (Bernstein-Hanley et al., 2006; Miyairi et al., 2007). There will surely be other organisms that may contribute to the genomic complexity and polymorphism of the IRG system. For example, the massive and ancient polymorphism of Irgb6 is not directly accounted for by our experiments. In in vitro experiments in BL/6 cells transfected Irgb2-b1_CIM protects Irga6 from phosphorylation in the absence of the CIM allotypes of the other IRG proteins including Irgb6 (Figure 6) and in the CAST/Ei strain, which is almost as resistant as CIM against T. gondii, Irgb6 is barely expressed (unpublished results). It may be that Irgb6 polymorphism reflects a pattern of resistance against another abundant mouse pathogen. However it is also not excluded that Irgb6 polymorphisms relate to further virulence polymorphism in T. gondii not expressed in the limited range of strains used in the present study. Likewise, mice are not the only intermediate hosts for T. gondii. The parasite infects all known mammals and birds, and many other species than M. musculus are prey for domestic cats. Furthermore, individuals of other species, for example rats (Jacobs and Jones, 1950) and American deer mice (Peromyscus) (Frenkel, 1953) have been shown to resist infection with strains virulent for laboratory mice. Thus some of the genomic complexity of the ROP system and other virulence-associated T. gondii secretory proteins may be relevant to immunity modification in other host species. Nevertheless, despite these distractions, mice and T. gondii have clearly had a large selective impact on each other.

The close association of cat and mouse with humans has led to large-scale transformations in the ecology of the parasite over the last 10,000 years. The impact of the dramatic narrowing of the parasite’s effective host range on the genetics of the virulence-resistance relationship may help to understand better the co-evolutionary forces at work in this system. The patterns of genetic resistance against T. gondii in its most important intermediate hosts will determine the relative abundance of strains contaminating the environment, and thereby the strains available for human infection.

1. 1. Lilue J
   2. Müller UB
   3. Steinfeldt T
   4. Howard JC

   (2013) Mus musculus molossinus clone MSMg01-329H21

   ID KF705682. Publicly available at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=KF705682
2. 1. Lilue J
   2. Müller UB
   3. Steinfeldt T
   4. Howard JC

   (2013) Mus musculus molossinus clone MSMg01-362F04

   ID KF705684. Publicly available at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=KF705684
3. 1. Lilue J
   2. Müller UB
   3. Steinfeldt T
   4. Howard JC

   (2013) Mus musculus molossinus clone MSMg01-544P17

   ID KF705686. Publicly available at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=KF705686
4. 1. Lilue J
   2. Müller UB
   3. Steinfeldt T
   4. Howard JC

   (2013) Mus musculus molossinus clone MSMg01-494M12

   ID KF705680. Publicly available at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=KF705680
5. 1. Lilue J
   2. Müller UB
   3. Steinfeldt T
   4. Howard JC

   (2013) Mus musculus molossinus clone MSMg01-419B05

   ID KF705685. Publicly available at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=KF705685
6. 1. Lilue J
   2. Müller UB
   3. Steinfeldt T
   4. Howard JC

   (2013) Mus musculus molossinus strain MSM/Ms clone MSMg01-148E20

   ID KF705681. Publicly available at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=KF705681
7. 1. Lilue J
   2. Müller UB
   3. Steinfeldt T
   4. Howard JC

   (2013) Mus musculus molossinus clone MSMg01-355D01

   ID KF705683. Publicly available at GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/?term=KF705683

1. 1. Yalcin B
   2. Adams DJ
   3. Flint J
   4. Keane TM

   (2012) Mouse Genomes Project

   These data are released in accordance with the Fort Lauderdale agreement and Toronto agreements.

   http://www.sanger.ac.uk/resources/mouse/genomes/
2. 1. Abe K
   2. Noguchi H
   3. Tagawa K
   4. Yuzuriha M
   5. Toyoda A
   6. Kojima T
   7. Ezawa K
   8. Saitou N
   9. Hattori M
   10. Sakaki Y
   11. Moriwaki K
   12. Shiroishi T

   (2004) NIG Mouse Genome Database

   Available at NIG Mammalian Genetics Laboratory, Japan.

   http://molossinus.lab.nig.ac.jp/msmdb/
3. 1. Holt K

   (2008) Mus musculus castaneus strain CAST/Ei clone CH26-332A4

   ID CU695228. Publicly available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CU695228
4. 1. Holt K

   (2008) Mus musculus castaneus strain CAST/Ei clone CH26-226N16

   ID CU695224. Publicly available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CU695224
5. 1. Holt K

   (2008) Mouse DNA sequence from clone CH26-243M20 on chromosome 11, complete sequence

   ID CU695226. Publicly available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CU695226
6. 1. Holt K

   (2008) Mouse DNA sequence from clone CH26-455J9 on chromosome 11, complete sequence

   ID CU695230. Publicly available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CU695230
7. 1. Holt K

   (2008) Mouse DNA sequence from clone CH26-333C17 on chromosome 11, complete sequence

   ID CU695229. Publicly available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CU695229
8. 1. Holt K

   (2008) Mus musculus castaneus strain CAST/Ei clone CH26-240F21

   ID CU695225. Publicly available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CU695225
9. 1. Holt K

   (2008) Mouse DNA sequence from clone CH26-316B17 on chromosome 18, complete sequence

   ID CU695227. Publicly available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

   http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CU695227
10. 1. Holt K

    (2008) Mouse DNA sequence from clone CH26-76B7 on chromosome 18, complete sequence

    ID CU695231. Publicly available at the NCBI Nucleotide database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore).

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/CU695231

1. 1. Abe K
   2. Noguchi H
   3. Tagawa K
   4. Yuzuriha M
   5. Toyoda A
   6. Kojima T

   et al. (2004) Contribution of Asian mouse subspecies Mus musculus molossinus to genomic constitution of strain C57BL/6J, as defined by BAC-end sequence-SKIP analysis

   Genome Res 14:2439–2447.

   https://doi.org/10.1101/Gr.2899304

   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Albert B
   2. Sabin MD

   (1941) Toxoplasmic encephalitis in children

   JAMA 116:.

   https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1941.02820090001001

   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Antony VB
   2. Owen CL
   3. Hadley KJ

   (1989) Pleural mesothelial cells stimulated by asbestos release chemotactic activity for neutrophils in vitro

   Am Rev Respir Dis 139:199–206.

   https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/139.1.199

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Behnke MS
   2. Khan A
   3. Wootton JC
   4. Dubey JP
   5. Tang KL
   6. Sibley LD

   (2011) Virulence differences in Toxoplasma mediated by amplification of a family of polymorphic pseudokinases

   Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:9631–9636.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015338108

   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Bekpen C
   2. Hunn JP
   3. Rohde C
   4. Parvanova I
   5. Guethlein L
   6. Dunn DM

   et al. (2005) The interferon-inducible p47 (IRG) GTPases in vertebrates: loss of the cell autonomous resistance mechanism in the human lineage

   Genome Biol 6:R92.

   https://doi.org/10.1186/Gb-2005-6-11-R92

   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bernstein-Hanley I
   2. Coers J
   3. Balsara ZR
   4. Taylor GA
   5. Starnbach MN
   6. Dietrich WF

   (2006) The p47 GTPases Igtp and Irgb10 map to the Chlamydia trachomatis susceptibility locus Ctrq-3 and mediate cellular resistance in mice

   Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14092–14097.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603338103

   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Boothroyd JC
   2. Dubremetz JF

   (2008) Kiss and spit: the dual roles of Toxoplasma rhoptries

   Nat Rev Microbiol 6:79–88.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/Nrmicro1800

   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Boyden ED
   2. Dietrich WF

   (2006) Nalp1b controls mouse macrophage susceptibility to anthrax lethal toxin

   Nat Genet 38:240–244.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1724

   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Cavailles P
   2. Sergent V
   3. Bisanz C
   4. Papapietro O
   5. Colacios C
   6. Mas M

   et al. (2006) The rat Toxo1 locus directs toxoplasmosis outcome and controls parasite proliferation and spreading by macrophage-dependent mechanisms

   Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:744–749.

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0506643103

   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Clark RM
    2. Schweikert G
    3. Toomajian C
    4. Ossowski S
    5. Zeller G
    6. Shinn P

    et al. (2007) Common sequence polymorphisms shaping genetic diversity in Arabidopsis thaliana

    Science 317:338–342.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1138632

    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Collazo CM
    2. Yap GS
    3. Sempowski GD
    4. Lusby KC
    5. Tessarollo L
    6. GFV Woude

    et al. (2001) Inactivation of LRG-47 and IRG-47 reveals a family of interferon gamma-inducible genes with essential, pathogen-specific roles in resistance to infection

    J Exp Med 194:181–187.

    https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.194.2.181

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Cutler G
    2. Kassner PD

    (2008) Copy number variation in the mouse genome: implications for the mouse as a model organism for human disease

    Cytogenet Genome Res 123:297–306.

    https://doi.org/10.1159/000184721

    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Darde ML
    2. Bouteille B
    3. Pestre-Alexandre M

    (1992) Isoenzyme analysis of 35 Toxoplasma gondii isolates and the biological and epidemiological implications

    J Parasitol 78:786–794.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/3283305

    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Deckert-Schlüter M
    2. Rang A
    3. Weiner D
    4. Huang S
    5. Wiestler OD
    6. Hof H

    et al. (1996)

    Interferon-gamma receptor-deficiency renders mice highly susceptible to toxoplasmosis by decreased macrophage activation

    Lab Invest 75:827–841.

    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Din W
    2. Anand R
    3. Boursot P
    4. Darviche D
    5. Dod B
    6. Jouvin-Marche E

    et al. (1996) Origin and radiation of the house mouse: clues from nuclear genes

    J Evol Biol 9:519–539.

    https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.1996.9050519.x

    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Dodds PN
    2. Lawrence GJ
    3. Catanzariti AM
    4. Teh T
    5. Wang CI
    6. Ayliffe MA

    et al. (2006) Direct protein interaction underlies gene-for-gene specificity and coevolution of the flax resistance genes and flax rust avirulence genes

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:8888–8893.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0602577103

    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Dubey JP

    (1980)

    Mouse pathogenicity of Toxoplasma gondii isolated from a goat

    Am J Vet Res 41:427–429.

    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Dubey JP

    (1998) Advances in the life cycle of Toxoplasma gondii

    Int J Parasitol 28:1019–1024.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00023-X

    • Google Scholar
19. 1. El Hajj H
    2. Demey E
    3. Poncet J
    4. Lebrun M
    5. Wu B
    6. Galeotti N

    et al. (2006) The ROP2 family of Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry proteins: proteomic and genomic characterization and molecular modeling

    Proteomics 6:5773–5784.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/pmic.200600187

    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Fentress SJ
    2. Behnke MS
    3. Dunay IR
    4. Mashayekhi M
    5. Rommereim LM
    6. Fox BA

    et al. (2010) Phosphorylation of immunity-related GTPases by a Toxoplasma gondii-secreted kinase promotes macrophage survival and virulence

    Cell Host Microbe 8:484–495.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2010.11.005

    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Fleckenstein MC
    2. Reese ML
    3. Konen-Waisman S
    4. Boothroyd JC
    5. Howard JC
    6. Steinfeldt T

    (2012) A Toxoplasma gondii pseudokinase inhibits host IRG resistance proteins

    PLOS Biol 10:e1001358.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001358

    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Flor HH

    (1971) Current status of the gene-for-gene concept

    Annu Rev Phytopathol 9:275–296.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.09.090171.001423

    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Frenkel JK

    (1953)

    Host, strain and treatment variation as factors in the pathogenesis of toxoplasmosis

    Am J Trop Med Hyg 2:390–414.

    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Fumagalli M
    2. Sironi M
    3. Pozzoli U
    4. Ferrer-Admettla A
    5. Pattini L
    6. Nielsen R

    (2011) Signatures of environmental genetic adaptation pinpoint pathogens as the main selective pressure through human evolution

    PLOS Genet 7:.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002355

    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Gibbs RA
    2. Weinstock GM
    3. Metzker ML
    4. Muzny DM
    5. Sodergren EJ
    6. Scherer S

    et al. (2004) Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution

    Nature 428:493–521.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature02426

    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Gubbels MJ
    2. Li C
    3. Striepen B

    (2003) High-throughput growth assay for Toxoplasma gondii using yellow fluorescent protein

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:309–316.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.47.1.309-316.2003

    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Guenet JL
    2. Bonhomme F

    (2003) Wild mice: an ever-increasing contribution to a popular mammalian model

    Trends Genet 19:24–31.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9525(02)00007-0

    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Haldane JBS

    (1949)

    Disease and evolution

    Ric Sci Suppl A 19:68–76.

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Hunn JP
    2. Koenen-Waisman S
    3. Papic N
    4. Schroeder N
    5. Pawlowski N
    6. Lange R

    et al. (2008) Regulatory interactions between IRG resistance GTPases in the cellular response to Toxoplasma gondii

    EMBO J 27:2495–2509.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2008.176

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Jacobs L
    2. Jones FE

    (1950) The parasitemia in experimental toxoplasmosis

    J Infect Dis 87:78–89.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/87.1.78

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Keane TM
    2. Goodstadt L
    3. Danecek P
    4. White MA
    5. Wong K
    6. Yalcin B

    et al. (2011) Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulation

    Nature 477:289–294.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature10413

    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Khaminets A
    2. Hunn JP
    3. Konen-Waisman S
    4. Zhao YO
    5. Preukschat D
    6. Coers J

    et al. (2010) Coordinated loading of IRG resistance GTPases on to the Toxoplasma gondii parasitophorous vacuole

    Cell Microbiol 12:939–961.

    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01443.x

    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Khan A
    2. Taylor S
    3. Ajioka JW
    4. Rosenthal BM
    5. Sibley LD

    (2009) Selection at a single locus leads to widespread expansion of Toxoplasma gondii lineages that are virulent in mice

    PLOS Genet 5:e1000404.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000404

    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Könen-Waisman S
    2. Howard JC

    (2007) Cell-autonomous immunity to Toxoplasma gondii in mouse and man

    Microbes Infect 9:1652–1661.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2007.09.005

    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Kosiol C
    2. Vinar T
    3. da Fonseca RR
    4. Hubisz MJ
    5. Bustamante CD
    6. Nielsen R

    et al. (2008) Patterns of positive selection in six mammalian genomes

    PLOS Genet 4:e1000144.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1000144

    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Librado P
    2. Rozas J

    (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data

    Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187

    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Liesenfeld O
    2. Parvanova I
    3. Zerrahn J
    4. Han SJ
    5. Heinrich F
    6. Munoz M

    et al. (2011) The IFN-gamma-inducible GTPase, Irga6, protects mice against Toxoplasma gondii but not against Plasmodium berghei and some other intracellular pathogens

    PLOS ONE 6:e20568.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020568

    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Lunde MN
    2. Jacobs L

    (1983) Antigenic differences between endozoites and cystozoites of Toxoplasma gondii

    J Parasitol 69:806–808.

    https://doi.org/10.2307/3281034

    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Martens S
    2. Howard JC

    (2006) The interferon-inducible GTPases

    Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22:559–589.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.cellbio.22.010305.104619

    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Martens S
    2. Parvanova I
    3. Zerrahn J
    4. Griffiths G
    5. Schell G
    6. Reichmann G

    et al. (2005) Disruption of Toxoplasma gondii parasitophorous vacuoles by the mouse p47-resistance GTPases

    PLOS Pathog 1:e24.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0010024

    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Martens S
    2. Sabel K
    3. Lange R
    4. Uthaiah R
    5. Wolf E
    6. Howard JC

    (2004)

    Mechanisms regulating the positioning of mouse p47 resistance GTPases LRG-47 and IIGP1 on cellular membranes: retargeting to plasma membrane induced by phagocytosis

    J Immunol 173:2594–2606.

    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Miyairi I
    2. Tatireddigari VRRA
    3. Mahdi OS
    4. Rose LA
    5. Belland RJ
    6. Lu L

    et al. (2007)

    The p47 GTPases Iigp2 and Irgb10 regulate innate immunity and inflammation to murine Chlamydia psittaci infection

    J Immunol 179:1814–1824.

    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Pfefferkorn ER
    2. Guyre PM

    (1984)

    Inhibition of growth of Toxoplasma gondii in cultured fibroblasts by human recombinant gamma interferon

    Infect Immun 44:211–216.

    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Reese ML
    2. Zeiner GM
    3. Saeij JP
    4. Boothroyd JC
    5. Boyle JP

    (2011) Polymorphic family of injected pseudokinases is paramount in Toxoplasma virulence

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:9625–9630.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1015980108

    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Reischl U
    2. Bretagne S
    3. Kruger D
    4. Ernault P
    5. Costa JM

    (2003) Comparison of two DNA targets for the diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis by real-time PCR using fluorescence resonance energy transfer hybridization probes

    BMC Infect Dis 3:7.

    https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-3-7

    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Saeij JP
    2. Boyle JP
    3. Coller S
    4. Taylor S
    5. Sibley LD
    6. Brooke-Powell ET

    et al. (2006) Polymorphic secreted kinases are key virulence factors in toxoplasmosis

    Science 314:1780–1783.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133690

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Sergent V
    2. Cautain B
    3. Khalife J
    4. Deslee D
    5. Bastien P
    6. Dao A

    et al. (2005) Innate refractoriness of the Lewis rat to toxoplasmosis is a dominant trait that is intrinsic to bone marrow-derived cells

    Infect Immun 73:6990–6997.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.73.10.6990-6997.2005

    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Sibley LD
    2. Boothroyd JC

    (1992) Virulent-strains of Toxoplasma gondii comprise a single clonal lineage

    Nature 359:82–85.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/359082a0

    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Southern PJ
    2. Berg P

    (1982)

    Transformation of mammalian cells to antibiotic resistance with a bacterial gene under control of the SV40 early region promoter

    J Mol Appl Genet 1:327–341.

    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Steinfeldt T
    2. Konen-Waisman S
    3. Tong L
    4. Pawlowski N
    5. Lamkemeyer T
    6. Sibley LD

    et al. (2010) Phosphorylation of mouse immunity-related GTPase (IRG) resistance proteins is an evasion strategy for virulent Toxoplasma gondii

    PLOS Biol 8:e1000576.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000576

    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Suzuki H
    2. Shimada T
    3. Terashima M
    4. Tsuchiya K
    5. Aplin K

    (2004) Temporal, spatial, and ecological modes of evolution of Eurasian Mus based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences

    Mol Phylogenet Evol 33:626–646.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.08.003

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Tamura K
    2. Peterson D
    3. Peterson N
    4. Stecher G
    5. Nei M
    6. Kumar S

    (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods

    Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121

    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Taylor S
    2. Barragan A
    3. Su C
    4. Fux B
    5. Fentress SJ
    6. Tang K

    et al. (2006) A secreted serine-threonine kinase determines virulence in the eukaryotic pathogen Toxoplasma gondii

    Science 314:1776–1780.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133643

    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Taylor GA
    2. Collazo CM
    3. Yap GS
    4. Nguyen K
    5. Gregorio TA
    6. Taylor LS

    et al. (2000) Pathogen-specific loss of host resistance in mice lacking the IFN-gamma-inducible gene IGTP

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:751–755.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.2.751

    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Winsser J
    2. Verlinde JD
    3. Vanthiel PH
    4. Davel J
    5. Vanderelst P

    (1948) Isolation of Toxoplasma from cerebrospinal fluid of a living infant in Holland

    Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 67:292–294.

    https://doi.org/10.3181/00379727-67-16279

    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Witola WH
    2. Mui E
    3. Hargrave A
    4. Liu S
    5. Hypolite M
    6. Montpetit A

    et al. (2011) NALP1 influences susceptibility to human congenital toxoplasmosis, proinflammatory cytokine response, and fate of Toxoplasma gondii-infected monocytic cells

    Infect Immun 79:756–766.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00898-10

    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Woolhouse MEJ
    2. Webster JP
    3. Domingo E
    4. Charlesworth B
    5. Levin BR

    (2002) Biological and biomedical implications of the co-evolution of pathogens and their hosts

    Nat Genet 32:569–577.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/Ng1202-569

    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Zhao Y
    2. Ferguson DJ
    3. Wilson DC
    4. Howard JC
    5. Sibley LD
    6. Yap GS

    (2009a) Virulent Toxoplasma gondii evade immunity-related GTPase-mediated parasite vacuole disruption within primed macrophages

    J Immunol 182:3775–3781.

    https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0804190

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Zhao YO
    2. Khaminets A
    3. Hunn JP
    4. Howard JC

    (2009b) Disruption of the Toxoplasma gondii parasitophorous vacuole by IFN gamma-inducible immunity-related GTPases (IRG proteins) triggers necrotic cell death

    PLOS Pathog 5:e1000288.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000288

    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Zhao YO
    2. Rohde C
    3. Lilue JT
    4. Konen-Waisman S
    5. Khaminets A
    6. Hunn JP

    et al. (2009c) Toxoplasma gondii and the immunity-related GTPase (IRG) resistance system in mice: a review

    Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 104:234–240.

    https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762009000200016

    • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Jingtao Lilue

   Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

   Contribution

   JL, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Contributed equally with

   Urs Benedikt Müller

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

2. Urs Benedikt Müller

   Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

   Contribution

   UBM, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Contributed equally with

   Jingtao Lilue

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

3. Tobias Steinfeldt

   Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

   Contribution

   TS, Conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

4. Jonathan C Howard

   1. Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
   2. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal

   Contribution

   JCH, Conception and design, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting or revising the article

   For correspondence

   jhoward@igc.gulbenkian.pt

   Competing interests

   The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

• 3,520

  views

• 388

  downloads

• 93

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.