Sleep: Up all night on a redeye flight

  1. Leslie C Griffith  Is a corresponding author
  1. Brandeis University, United States

Experiments on invertebrate model organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster and C. elegans have provided a roadmap for exploring the molecular bases of a range of complex behaviours in humans. In the last decade, investigators have begun to point the power of genetics at one of the most important and mysterious behaviours of all: sleep. Behavioural studies in organisms from flies to humans imply the existence of a mechanism that ensures we get adequate amounts of sleep, but the molecular and cellular nature of this ‘sleep homeostat’ has remained elusive. Now, in eLife, Amita Sehgal and co-workers at the University of Pennsylvania—including Mi Shi as first author—have identified a gene that may help researchers get traction on this problem (Shi et al., 2014).

The neural mechanisms that control sleep are understood in only a very general way. In humans and other mammals, it is clear that there are a large number of brain regions that influence the normal daily sleep/wake transition and form the core of a ‘sleep switch’ that quickly moves the brain between wake and sleep states (Saper et al., 2010). This sleep switch is controlled by two mechanisms (Borbely, 1982). The first is the circadian clock, which schedules sleep to the part of the 24 hour day that is normal for that species. The second is the sleep homeostat, which measures how long the organism has been awake and adjusts the sleep switch to keep the organism asleep for an adequate length of time. The sleep homeostat therefore ensures that the total amount of sleep, when averaged over several days, is normal. Our understanding of the clock mechanism has been facilitated by the relatively simple nature of the circuits that control circadian rhythms in both vertebrates and invertebrates. The sleep homeostat is another matter: both its cellular and molecular nature are completely obscure.

Genetic screens in several fly labs have identified genes that alter the amount of time that animals spend asleep, but few if any genes that might be involved in the sleep homeostat have been discovered (Sehgal and Mignot, 2011). Shi et al. have now found that a certain point mutation in a gene called redeye (rye) reduces sleep time by over 50% due to a drastic decrease in the ability of the flies to remain asleep. This gene encodes a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, and Shi et al. show that rye interacts with another gene, called sleepless, that was isolated by Sehgal and co-workers several years ago (Koh et al., 2008). Other experiments suggested that the rye mutation may be a dominant negative. Interestingly, expression of rye on a wild type genetic background did not increase sleep: this indicates that rye plays a necessary, but not sufficient, role in generation of sleep.

So far the rye story is pretty standard: rye is a broadly expressed gene that affects neuronal activity and has a sleep phenotype. Since the sleep state involves alterations in the activity of almost the whole brain, it is not surprising that generalized changes in neuronal activity are associated with changes in sleep. Consistent with this, genetics in invertebrate model organisms has largely (with a few notable exceptions) led to the identification of genes and signalling pathways that are very broadly active, and not the ‘sleep genes’ that one might hope to find.

However, the story got more interesting and sleep-specific when Shi et al. tracked the levels of rye messenger RNA and the RYE protein over time. RYE levels had a very pronounced and interesting daily pattern with two peaks—one at midday and one in the middle of the night. The levels of messenger RNA, on the other hand, were constant over the day. This means that RYE levels are being regulated after the gene has been transcribed to produce the messenger RNA. Significantly, RYE cycling was not necessary for the circadian clock to work properly because rhythmic behaviour was also observed in in rye mutants. Moreover, RYE cycling did not depend on the circadian clock because it was also observed in mutant flies that did not have a circadian clock. What did appear to affect RYE levels was the amount of prior sleep. A variety of short sleeping mutants—sleepless (Koh et al., 2008), fumin (Kume et al., 2005), and insomniac (Stavropoulos and Young, 2011)—displayed elevated RYE levels that cycled during the day, which implied that the inability of these mutants to sleep stimulated the accumulation of RYE. But more importantly, six hours of sleep deprivation in wild-type flies caused an elevation of early morning RYE that coincided with increases in sleep generated by the homeostat. These data suggest that RYE is a marker of sleep drive (the increased desire to sleep after wakefulness), with the levels of RYE being controlled by the homeostat.

Does the identification of rye have implications for how sleep is generated? Probably, but this will rest on determining where RYE is required for sleep. If RYE regulates activity in many brain circuits, it may not be informative vis-à-vis the control of the sleep switch, but it might provide insight into how the switch is implemented. Will rye provide a tool to help us understand homeostasis? This seems the most exciting possibility. Having a molecular marker of the output of the homeostat provides a way into the homeostat. Working backward from how and where RYE levels cycle is a first step to revealing the mechanisms underlying this mysterious process.


    1. Borbely AA
    A two process model of sleep regulation
    Human Neurobiology 1:195–204.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Leslie C Griffith, Reviewing Editor

    Department of Biology, Volen Center for Complex Systems, National Center for Behavioral Genomics, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    For correspondence
    Competing interests
    The author declares that no competing interests exist.

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: February 4, 2014 (version 1)


© 2014, Griffith

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.


  • 377
  • 22
  • 0

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Leslie C Griffith
Sleep: Up all night on a redeye flight
eLife 3:e02087.

Further reading

  1. A protein called RYE –€“ short for Redeye – has a central role in the regulation of sleep.

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    2. Neuroscience
    Donghui Yan, Bowen Hu ... Qiongshi Lu
    Research Article

    Rich data from large biobanks, coupled with increasingly accessible association statistics from genome-wide association studies (GWAS), provide great opportunities to dissect the complex relationships among human traits and diseases. We introduce BADGERS, a powerful method to perform polygenic score-based biobank-wide association scans. Compared to traditional approaches, BADGERS uses GWAS summary statistics as input and does not require multiple traits to be measured in the same cohort. We applied BADGERS to two independent datasets for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease (AD; n=61,212). Among 1738 traits in the UK biobank, we identified 48 significant associations for AD. Family history, high cholesterol, and numerous traits related to intelligence and education showed strong and independent associations with AD. Furthermore, we identified 41 significant associations for a variety of AD endophenotypes. While family history and high cholesterol were strongly associated with AD subgroups and pathologies, only intelligence and education-related traits predicted pre-clinical cognitive phenotypes. These results provide novel insights into the distinct biological processes underlying various risk factors for AD.