Rapid cell-free forward engineering of novel genetic ring oscillators

  1. Henrike Niederholtmeyer
  2. Zachary Z Sun
  3. Yutaka Hori
  4. Enoch Yeung
  5. Amanda Verpoorte
  6. Richard M Murray
  7. Sebastian J Maerkl  Is a corresponding author
  1. École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. California Institute of Technology, United States

Abstract

While complex dynamic biological networks control gene expression in all living organisms, the forward engineering of comparable synthetic networks remains challenging. The current paradigm of characterizing synthetic networks in cells results in lengthy design-build-test cycles, minimal data collection, and poor quantitative characterization. Cell-free systems are appealing alternative environments, but it remains questionable whether biological networks behave similarly in cell-free systems and in cells. We characterized in a cell-free system the 'repressilator,' a three-node synthetic oscillator. We then engineered novel three, four, and five-gene ring architectures, from characterization of circuit components to rapid analysis of complete networks. When implemented in cells, our novel 3-node networks produced population-wide oscillations and 95% of 5-node oscillator cells oscillated for up to 72 hours. Oscillation periods in cells matched the cell-free system results for all networks tested. An alternate forward engineering paradigm using cell-free systems can thus accurately capture cellular behavior.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Henrike Niederholtmeyer

    Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Zachary Z Sun

    Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    Zachary Z Sun, ZZS has ownership in a company that commercializes the cell-free technology utilized in this paper..
  3. Yutaka Hori

    Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Enoch Yeung

    Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Amanda Verpoorte

    Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Richard M Murray

    Division of Biology and Bioengineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
    Competing interests
    Richard M Murray, RMM has ownership in a company that commercializes the cell-free technology utilized in this paper..
  7. Sebastian J Maerkl

    Institute of Bioengineering, School of Engineering, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    sebastian.maerkl@epfl.ch
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Friedrich Simmel, Technische Universität München, Germany

Version history

  1. Received: June 29, 2015
  2. Accepted: October 1, 2015
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: October 2, 2015 (version 1)
  4. Accepted Manuscript updated: October 5, 2015 (version 2)
  5. Version of Record published: December 9, 2015 (version 3)

Copyright

© 2015, Niederholtmeyer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 7,317
    views
  • 1,643
    downloads
  • 164
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Henrike Niederholtmeyer
  2. Zachary Z Sun
  3. Yutaka Hori
  4. Enoch Yeung
  5. Amanda Verpoorte
  6. Richard M Murray
  7. Sebastian J Maerkl
(2015)
Rapid cell-free forward engineering of novel genetic ring oscillators
eLife 4:e09771.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09771

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09771

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Natalia Dolgova, Eva-Maria E Uhlemann ... Oleg Y Dmitriev
    Research Article

    Mediator of ERBB2-driven Cell Motility 1 (MEMO1) is an evolutionary conserved protein implicated in many biological processes; however, its primary molecular function remains unknown. Importantly, MEMO1 is overexpressed in many types of cancer and was shown to modulate breast cancer metastasis through altered cell motility. To better understand the function of MEMO1 in cancer cells, we analyzed genetic interactions of MEMO1 using gene essentiality data from 1028 cancer cell lines and found multiple iron-related genes exhibiting genetic relationships with MEMO1. We experimentally confirmed several interactions between MEMO1 and iron-related proteins in living cells, most notably, transferrin receptor 2 (TFR2), mitoferrin-2 (SLC25A28), and the global iron response regulator IRP1 (ACO1). These interactions indicate that cells with high MEMO1 expression levels are hypersensitive to the disruptions in iron distribution. Our data also indicate that MEMO1 is involved in ferroptosis and is linked to iron supply to mitochondria. We have found that purified MEMO1 binds iron with high affinity under redox conditions mimicking intracellular environment and solved MEMO1 structures in complex with iron and copper. Our work reveals that the iron coordination mode in MEMO1 is very similar to that of iron-containing extradiol dioxygenases, which also display a similar structural fold. We conclude that MEMO1 is an iron-binding protein that modulates iron homeostasis in cancer cells.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Isabelle Petit-Hartlein, Annelise Vermot ... Franck Fieschi
    Research Article

    NADPH oxidases (NOX) are transmembrane proteins, widely spread in eukaryotes and prokaryotes, that produce reactive oxygen species (ROS). Eukaryotes use the ROS products for innate immune defense and signaling in critical (patho)physiological processes. Despite the recent structures of human NOX isoforms, the activation of electron transfer remains incompletely understood. SpNOX, a homolog from Streptococcus pneumoniae, can serves as a robust model for exploring electron transfers in the NOX family thanks to its constitutive activity. Crystal structures of SpNOX full-length and dehydrogenase (DH) domain constructs are revealed here. The isolated DH domain acts as a flavin reductase, and both constructs use either NADPH or NADH as substrate. Our findings suggest that hydride transfer from NAD(P)H to FAD is the rate-limiting step in electron transfer. We identify significance of F397 in nicotinamide access to flavin isoalloxazine and confirm flavin binding contributions from both DH and Transmembrane (TM) domains. Comparison with related enzymes suggests that distal access to heme may influence the final electron acceptor, while the relative position of DH and TM does not necessarily correlate with activity, contrary to previous suggestions. It rather suggests requirement of an internal rearrangement, within the DH domain, to switch from a resting to an active state. Thus, SpNOX appears to be a good model of active NOX2, which allows us to propose an explanation for NOX2’s requirement for activation.