Fertilization: Switching on lysosomes
The formation of large endolysosomal structures in unfertilized eggs ensures that lysosomes remain dormant before fertilization, and then shift into clean-up mode after the egg-to-embryo transition.
- Development and Stem Cell Program and the Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Australia
Unfertilized eggs, known as oocytes, contain proteins and other macromolecules that are essential for the early development of embryos. These macromolecules are swiftly degraded after fertilization occurs, and then recycled so that their building blocks can be used by the developing embryo, but the process by which they avoid being degraded before fertilization has long puzzled scientists.
Degradation relies on a process called autophagy, which also removes defective or unwanted components from cells (Mizushima and Komatsu, 2011). Autophagy begins with materials in the cytoplasm of the cell being enclosed within membrane-bound vesicles called autophagosomes, which then fuse with endosomes, and subsequently with lysosomes. The materials are ultimately broken down by a combination of enzymes that are activated by the acidic environment within the lysosomes.
Previous work has shown that autophagy is only triggered upon fertilization, and that it is essential for early embryo development in mice (Tsukamoto et al., 2008). The timing of the lysosomal activity in autophagy is also important: if it happens too soon, the oocyte’s reservices will be depleted, but if it happens too late, the embryo will be starved of the basic building blocks it needs to develop. Now, in eLife, Yuhkoh Satouh, Ken Sato and colleagues at Gunma University and Juntendo University report the discovery of giant multi-organelle structures in oocytes, which might hold the key to explaining how oocytes are able to get the timing of lysosomal activity just right (Satouh et al., 2024).
First, the team stained mouse oocytes and used a combination of microscopy techniques (including correlative light and electron microscopy) to reveal the distribution of endosomes and lysosomes within the cells. This showed that these organelles had aggregated to form giant structures in immature oocytes. Moreover, these structures – which were not confined inside a membrane – then migrated to the periphery of the cell in mature oocytes, before falling apart after fertilization (Figure 1). Satouh et al. called these short-lived structures ELYSAs (which is short for endosomal-lysosomal organellar assemblies). Some ELYSAs also expressed the autophagosome marker LC3, which suggests that all of the molecular machinery needed for degradation is present in the structure.
Figure 1
The formation of ELYSAs prevents the acidification of lysosomes in oocytes.
In immature oocytes at the germinal vesicle (GV) stage (grey, left), endosomes (white) and lysosomes (blue) assemble in large spherical structures called ELYSAs. The formation of an ELYSA prevents the assembly of v-ATPase (green; top left inset) on the surface of the lysosomes it contains by blocking the recruitment of the V1 subunit (red), and this in turn prevents acidification of the lysosomes. As the GV oocyte matures into an MII oocyte (middle), ELYSAs fuse with one another to form even bigger structures that can measure 7–8 microns across, and these move towards the periphery of the cell. After the MII oocyte has been fertilized, ELYSAs begin to disassemble in the 2 cell stage embryo (right). This allows V1 to bind to v-ATPase (top right inset), which leads to an influx of protons into the lysosomes (red), creating an acidic environment that increases degradation within the lysosomes. ELYSA: endosomal-lysosomal organellar assembly.
© 2024, BioRender Inc. Figure 1 was created using BioRender, and is published under a CC BY-NC-ND license. Further reproductions must adhere to the terms of this license.
However, despite containing lysosomes, the ELYSAs appeared unable to degrade macromolecules, mostly because they were not acidic. The process of acidification is regulated by enzymes known as V-ATPases that actively pump protons into the lumen of lysosomes to maintain an acidic environment. The V1 subunit of the enzyme is particularly important for this process. Satouh et al. found that V1 was not present on lysosomes within the ELYSAs in oocytes, but that the recruitment of V1 to lysosomes began after fertilization (Figure 1). Experiments that measured the acidity of lysosomes also showed that the acidity increased when the ELYSAs started to fall apart in an embryo. This suggests that oocytes assemble structures like ELYSAs to prevent premature acidification of the lysosomes, thus preserving the macromolecules that support the early development of the embryo. Such precise temporal regulation of acidification in oocytes and early embryos is remarkable.
These findings are reinforced by another recent study that independently described similar structures in mouse oocytes (Zaffagnini et al., 2024). These structures – called ELVAs by their discoverers – are involved in sequestering protein aggregates in eggs and facilitating the breakdown of proteins after fertilization.
Interestingly, oocytes appear to employ different strategies for storing proteins with different functions. For example, ELYSAs are used to store proteins that are destined for degradation upon fertilization, whereas structures called cytoplasmic lattices are used to store maternal proteins that persist in the early embryos (Morency et al., 2011; Jentoft et al., 2023; Bomba-Warczak et al., 2024) and are essential for normal embryo development (Li et al., 2008).
The findings of Satouh et al. begin to characterize ELYSAs in late-stage oocytes. However, it remains unknown whether ELYSAs are present from the onset of oogenesis, or if they emerge at a specific point during oocyte growth. It is also unclear if the process of disassembly is initiated by sperm-derived signals, as seen in Caenorhabditis elegans (Bohnert and Kenyon, 2017), or by some other process. This could be explored by experimentally activating oocytes through parthenogenesis, thus bypassing fertilization.
In the future, it will be fascinating to explore whether a failure to assemble ELYSAs in oocytes, or an untimely disaggregation of ELYSAs in embryos, affects oocyte and embryo health. The processes discussed above – notably autophagy and maintaining the proton gradient needed for acidification – require energy in the form of ATP. Since mitochondria are crucial for ATP generation in oocytes, and suboptimal mitochondrial fitness is often observed during maternal aging and obesity (Adhikari et al., 2022), studying the impact of these conditions on lysosomal activity during fertilization could be insightful. If so, this research might open new avenues for pharmacological modulation of autophagy pathways, potentially improving embryo quality.
References
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Adhikari and Carroll
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 604
- views
-
- 62
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Fertilization: Switching on lysosomes
eLife 13:e102430.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.102430
Further reading
-
- Cell Biology
- Genetics and Genomics
Progression through the G1 phase of the cell cycle is the most highly regulated step in cellular division. We employed a chemogenetic approach to discover novel cellular networks that regulate cell cycle progression. This approach uncovered functional clusters of genes that altered sensitivity of cells to inhibitors of the G1/S transition. Mutation of components of the Polycomb Repressor Complex 2 rescued proliferation inhibition caused by the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, but not to inhibitors of S phase or mitosis. In addition to its core catalytic subunits, mutation of the PRC2.1 accessory protein MTF2, but not the PRC2.2 protein JARID2, rendered cells resistant to palbociclib treatment. We found that PRC2.1 (MTF2), but not PRC2.2 (JARID2), was critical for promoting H3K27me3 deposition at CpG islands genome-wide and in promoters. This included the CpG islands in the promoter of the CDK4/6 cyclins CCND1 and CCND2, and loss of MTF2 lead to upregulation of both CCND1 and CCND2. Our results demonstrate a role for PRC2.1, but not PRC2.2, in antagonizing G1 progression in a diversity of cell linages, including chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), breast cancer, and immortalized cell lines.
-
- Cell Biology
The primary cilium is a microtubule-based organelle that cycles through assembly and disassembly. In many cell types, formation of the cilium is initiated by recruitment of ciliary vesicles to the distal appendage of the mother centriole. However, the distal appendage mechanism that directly captures ciliary vesicles is yet to be identified. In an accompanying paper, we show that the distal appendage protein, CEP89, is important for the ciliary vesicle recruitment, but not for other steps of cilium formation (Tomoharu Kanie, Love, Fisher, Gustavsson, & Jackson, 2023). The lack of a membrane binding motif in CEP89 suggests that it may indirectly recruit ciliary vesicles via another binding partner. Here, we identify Neuronal Calcium Sensor-1 (NCS1) as a stoichiometric interactor of CEP89. NCS1 localizes to the position between CEP89 and a ciliary vesicle marker, RAB34, at the distal appendage. This localization was completely abolished in CEP89 knockouts, suggesting that CEP89 recruits NCS1 to the distal appendage. Similarly to CEP89 knockouts, ciliary vesicle recruitment as well as subsequent cilium formation was perturbed in NCS1 knockout cells. The ability of NCS1 to recruit the ciliary vesicle is dependent on its myristoylation motif and NCS1 knockout cells expressing a myristoylation defective mutant failed to rescue the vesicle recruitment defect despite localizing properly to the centriole. In sum, our analysis reveals the first known mechanism for how the distal appendage recruits the ciliary vesicles.
