Brain Activity: Unifying networks of a rhythm
Our brains constantly receive and respond to information from the world around us. This ability largely relies on communication between different areas of the brain via networks of neurons, as well as the release of molecules known as neurotransmitters. The interplay between neural networks and neurotransmitters manifests in waxing and waning patterns of electrical activity, known as brain rhythms, which oscillate at different frequencies.
However, understanding how areas of the brain communicate with one another has remained a major challenge in neuroscience, partly because directly measuring the activity of neurons in the cortex requires invasive procedures. This means that such measurements are typically only possible in animals or in patients undergoing surgery, and are usually limited to a few localized sites in the cortex (Frauscher et al., 2018).
Additionally, mapping how different brain regions connect and communicate requires various imaging techniques. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is needed to track how regions are anatomically and functionally linked, while positron emission tomography (PET) is required to observe the uptake of neurotransmitters. However, integrating these brain imaging data has proven challenging (Hansen et al., 2022). Now, in eLife, Wolf-Julian Neumann and colleagues from Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Humboldt University – including Meera Chikermane as first author – report an integrative approach that provides insights into an important rhythmic pattern of neural activity known as the beta rhythm (Chikermane et al., 2024).
Beta patterns of neural activity oscillate within a frequency band between 13–35 Hz, and are critical for controlling movements, making decisions, and regulating emotions (Spitzer and Haegens, 2017; Lundqvist et al., 2024). In Parkinson’s disease, aberrant beta activity has been associated with less neurons deep in the brain releasing dopamine, a key neurotransmitter involved in synaptic plasticity (and therefore learning), as well as regulating movement and emotions (Cavallo and Neumann, 2024). This led Chikermane et al. to hypothesize that beta-band brain networks would align with the distribution of dopamine-sensitive receptors.
To test their hypothesis, the team adopted an innovative approach (based on multimodal lesion network mapping [Fox, 2018]) that integrates different types of imaging data and maps within a shared standard brain mapping framework. This allows the different types of data to be compared with one another. First, they used electrophysiological recordings taken from healthy cortical areas in 106 epileptic patients to identify brain regions that exhibited strong beta oscillations (Figure 1, yellow node).
Chikermane et al. designated these sites as target regions, and then employed open access MRI data to build network maps, which were derived from two types of MRI data: functional MRI (fMRI), which measures blood oxygen level and can be used to determine which parts of the brain are synchronously activated (Figure 1, dashed connections), and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), which shows how different regions of the brain are structurally connected by bundles of nerve tissues known as white matter tracts (Figure 1, solid connections). Additionally, PET imaging data, which relies on intravenous injections of a radioactively labelled molecule, were used to map which areas of the brain have a high uptake of dopamine, suggesting there is a high density of dopamine receptors (Figure 1, red shading). The three network maps – constructed using the fMRI, DW-MRI and PET data – were then integrated using a software known as the Lead-DBS toolbox.
The results revealed that beta activity is widespread throughout the brain. In fact, out of 1,772 surface electrodes placed in the cortex of the patients studied, only 21 did not exhibit beta oscillations. Among these cortical sites, beta signals were strongest across the frontal, cingulate, and insular regions of the brain. Importantly, all three of these areas map onto regions that were shown to be both functionally and structurally connected. This shared network also positively correlated with sites in the cortex and basal ganglia where high levels of dopamine receptor binding were observed. Collectivity, these findings help unify networks associated with beta rhythms in the human brain.
Chikermane et al. have circumvented the limitations of each electrophysiology and brain imaging technique in a synergistic way. Their results represent a significant step forward in mapping the organization of brain regions that display beta activity. The findings have important implications for understanding the circuit-level pathophysiology associated with altered beta activity, and how dopamine contributes to movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, the findings suggests that improvements to deep brain stimulation, a technique that uses electrical pulses to stimulate structures deep in the brain, could potentially enhance motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. However, whether and how the brain mapping technique developed by Chikermane et al. can be used to characterize and alleviate individual patient symptoms, or predict responsiveness to interventions, remains an open question for future research.
References
-
Dopaminergic reinforcement in the motor system: Implications for Parkinson’s disease and deep brain stimulationThe European Journal of Neuroscience 59:457–472.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16222
-
Mapping symptoms to brain networks with the human connectomeThe New England Journal of Medicine 379:2237–2245.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1706158
-
Beta: bursts of cognitionTrends in Cognitive Sciences 28:662–676.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.03.010
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Alavash
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,105
- views
-
- 87
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Phantom perceptions like tinnitus occur without any identifiable environmental or bodily source. The mechanisms and key drivers behind tinnitus are poorly understood. The dominant framework, suggesting that tinnitus results from neural hyperactivity in the auditory pathway following hearing damage, has been difficult to investigate in humans and has reached explanatory limits. As a result, researchers have tried to explain perceptual and potential neural aberrations in tinnitus within a more parsimonious predictive-coding framework. In two independent magnetoencephalography studies, participants passively listened to sequences of pure tones with varying levels of regularity (i.e. predictability) ranging from random to ordered. Aside from being a replication of the first study, the pre-registered second study, including 80 participants, ensured rigorous matching of hearing status, as well as age, sex, and hearing loss, between individuals with and without tinnitus. Despite some changes in the details of the paradigm, both studies equivalently reveal a group difference in neural representation, based on multivariate pattern analysis, of upcoming stimuli before their onset. These data strongly suggest that individuals with tinnitus engage anticipatory auditory predictions differently to controls. While the observation of different predictive processes is robust and replicable, the precise neurocognitive mechanism underlying it calls for further, ideally longitudinal, studies to establish its role as a potential contributor to, and/or consequence of, tinnitus.
-
- Neuroscience
Multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization (MERFISH) allows genome-scale imaging of RNAs in individual cells in intact tissues. To date, MERFISH has been applied to image thin-tissue samples of ~10 µm thickness. Here, we present a thick-tissue three-dimensional (3D) MERFISH imaging method, which uses confocal microscopy for optical sectioning, deep learning for increasing imaging speed and quality, as well as sample preparation and imaging protocol optimized for thick samples. We demonstrated 3D MERFISH on mouse brain tissue sections of up to 200 µm thickness with high detection efficiency and accuracy. We anticipate that 3D thick-tissue MERFISH imaging will broaden the scope of questions that can be addressed by spatial genomics.