Synaptic Plasticity: Hijacking translation in addiction
- University of California Los Angeles, United States
Exposure to drugs of abuse – such as nicotine and cocaine – changes the brain in ways that contribute to the downward spiral of addiction. Adolescents are especially vulnerable since their newly found independence is often associated with taking more risks (Spear, 2000). To make matters worse, adolescence is also characterized by an increased sensitivity to natural rewards and drugs of abuse (Badanich et al., 2006; Brenhouse and Andersen, 2008; Stolyarova and Izquierdo, 2015). Experiences with illicit substances alter the genes that are expressed in the brain, and lead to increased consumption of these substances. To date much of the work that has characterized this insidious cycle has focused on changes in gene activation, or modifications to proteins that have already been produced (Robison and Nestler, 2011). By comparison, much less is known about how changes in protein synthesis might contribute to addiction.
Exposure to cocaine leads to persistent changes in the part of the brain that releases the chemical dopamine. Specifically, alterations to a part of the midbrain called the ventral tegmental area (VTA), along with its connections to other regions of the brain, are thought to mediate the transition from recreational to compulsive drug use and subsequently to addiction (Luscher and Malenka, 2011). Drugs of abuse make the neurons in the VTA more excitable overall. The drugs do this by altering two opposing processes – both of which involve the translation of messenger RNAs to produce new proteins – in ways that ultimately strengthen the connections between neurons (Ungless et al., 2001; Lüscher and Huber, 2010).
Now, in two papers in eLife, Mauro Costa-Mattioli from the Baylor College of Medicine and colleagues report that a protein that regulates translation is also responsible for much of the increased risk of addiction seen in adolescent mice and humans. The protein of interest is a translation initiation factor called eIF2α.
In the first paper, Wei Huang, Andon Placzek, Gonzalo Viana Di Prisco and Sanjeev Khatiwada – who are all joint first authors – and other colleagues report that adolescent mice are more vulnerable to the effects of cocaine compared to adult mice (Huang et al., 2016). They could measure this effect as changes in both the behavior of the mice and in the two opposing processes that affect the strength of the connections between neurons.
Cocaine greatly reduced the levels of the phosphorylated form of eIF2α in the VTA of adolescent mice, while adult mice were less affected. Phosphorylation of eIF2α changes its activity, and Huang et al. next explored if this difference might explain why adolescents are more sensitive to cocaine. In support of the idea, they found that adult mice could be made more sensitive to cocaine if the levels of phosphorylated eIF2α were reduced. Similarly, in other experiments, adolescent mice could be rendered more adult-like if their levels of phosphorylated eIF2α were increased.
Huang et al. also report that phosphorylated eIF2α promotes the synthesis of a protein called OPHN1; this protein is known to reduce the strengthening of neural connections that is also typically linked to an increased sensitivity to drugs of abuse. So, Huang et al. showed that decreases in phosphorylated eIF2α during adolescence lead to lower levels of OPHN1, which could explain adolescents’ increased risk of drug addiction.
Huang et al. also demonstrated that other abused drugs that act quite differently in the brain from cocaine (i.e. methamphetamine, nicotine and alcohol) also decrease the levels of phosphorylated eIF2α in the VTA of adult mice. Thus, they appear to have uncovered a general mechanism by which exposure to drugs affects protein synthesis, changes the connections between neurons, and leads to behaviors associated with addiction.
In the second paper, Placzek, Khatiwada, fellow co-first author David Molfese, and other colleagues probed nicotine’s effects on the phosphorylation levels of eIF2α (Placzek et al., 2016). Similar to the cocaine results, a low-dose of nicotine in adolescent mice triggered increased signs of addiction in the VTA. Furthermore, reducing the level of phosphorylated eIF2α in adult mice made the neurons in the VTA more sensitive to nicotine’s effects.
Placzek et al. then used functional magnetic resonance imaging with a group of human volunteers, and found a variation in the gene for eIF2α that was related to how much cigarette smokers in the group responded to a reward. The variant reduces the expression of the eIF2α protein, and this finding suggests that the same translation-based mechanism underlies addiction in different species (i.e. in both mice and humans). Further work is now needed to explain how these changes in the expression of eIF2α lead to the changes in brain activity seen in addiction. Since mice with reduced phosphorylated eIF2α levels are more susceptible to nicotine-induced changes in the brain that underlie addiction, individuals with the genetic variant may also be more likely to show addictive behaviors.
The two papers by Costa-Mattioli and colleagues demonstrate that eIF2α is a promising new target for the treatment of addiction. Its role in nicotine addiction is highly relevant given that e-cigarettes are a widely used tobacco product amongst adolescents (Miech et al., 2015). As with all important discoveries, these new findings raise a number of questions. For example, are the effects of eIF2α in addiction specific to the VTA, or are other regions of the brain involved (Jian et al., 2014)? Does eIF2α also affect other aspects of addiction such as relapse? Further work could probe if phosphorylated eIF2α regulates the synthesis of other proteins, beyond OPHN1, that may also have a role in the addiction process.
Finally, increased concentrations of phosphorylated eIF2α have been found in patients suffering from neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease (Ma et al., 2013; Moreno et al., 2012; Leitman et al., 2014). Is there evidence for changes in addiction behaviors in the very early stages of these diseases? Protein synthesis is important for memory, and the VTA also plays a central role in learning and memory. As such, could changes in phosphorylated eIF2α in the VTA affect memory processes? This might suggest that the hijacking of phosphorylated eIF2α by substances of abuse goes well beyond addiction and affects fundamental cognitive processes such as memory.
References
-
Adolescents differ from adults in cocaine conditioned place preference and cocaine-induced dopamine in the nucleus accumbens septiEuropean Journal of Pharmacology 550:95–106.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2006.08.034
-
eIF2 Dephosphorylation in Basolateral Amygdala Mediates Reconsolidation of Drug MemoryJournal of Neuroscience 34:10010–10021.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0934-14.2014
-
Suppression of eIF2α kinases alleviates Alzheimer's disease–related plasticity and memory deficitsNature Neuroscience 16:1299–1305.https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3486
-
E-Cigarettes and the Drug Use Patterns of AdolescentsNicotine & Tobacco Research ntv217.https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv217
-
Transcriptional and epigenetic mechanisms of addictionNature Reviews Neuroscience 12:623–637.https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3111
-
The adolescent brain and age-related behavioral manifestationsNeuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 24:417–463.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7634(00)00014-2
-
Distinct patterns of outcome valuation and amygdala-prefrontal cortex synaptic remodeling in adolescence and adulthoodFrontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 9:115.https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00115
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2016, Izquierdo et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,544
- views
-
- 174
- downloads
-
- 1
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Synaptic Plasticity: Hijacking translation in addiction
eLife 5:e14576.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14576
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Adolescents are particularly vulnerable to nicotine, the principal addictive component driving tobacco smoking. In a companion study, we found that reduced activity of the translation initiation factor eIF2α underlies the hypersensitivity of adolescent mice to the effects of cocaine. Here we report that nicotine potentiates excitatory synaptic transmission in ventral tegmental area dopaminergic neurons more readily in adolescent mice compared to adults. Adult mice with genetic or pharmacological reduction in p-eIF2α-mediated translation are more susceptible to nicotine’s synaptic effects, like adolescents. When we investigated the influence of allelic variability of the Eif2s1 gene (encoding eIF2α) on reward-related neuronal responses in human smokers, we found that a single nucleotide polymorphism in the Eif2s1 gene modulates mesolimbic neuronal reward responses in human smokers. These findings suggest that p-eIF2α regulates synaptic actions of nicotine in both mice and humans, and that reduced p-eIF2α may enhance susceptibility to nicotine (and other drugs of abuse) during adolescence.
-
- Neuroscience
Granule cells of the cerebellum make up to 175,000 excitatory synapses on a single Purkinje cell, encoding the wide variety of information from the mossy fibre inputs into the cerebellar cortex. The granule cell axon is made of an ascending portion and a long parallel fibre extending at right angles, an architecture suggesting that synapses formed by the two segments of the axon could encode different information. There are controversial indications that ascending axon (AA) and parallel fibre (PF) synapse properties and modalities of plasticity are different. We tested the hypothesis that AA and PF synapses encode different information, and that the association of these distinct inputs to Purkinje cells might be relevant to the circuit and trigger plasticity, similar to the coincident activation of PF and climbing fibre inputs. Here, by recording synaptic currents in Purkinje cells from either proximal or distal granule cells (mostly AA and PF synapses, respectively), we describe a new form of associative plasticity between these two distinct granule cell inputs. We show for the first time that synchronous AA and PF repetitive train stimulation, with inhibition intact, triggers long-term potentiation (LTP) at AA synapses specifically. Furthermore, the timing of the presentation of the two inputs controls the outcome of plasticity and induction requires NMDAR and mGluR1 activation. The long length of the PFs allows us to preferentially activate the two inputs independently, and despite a lack of morphological reconstruction of the connections, these observations reinforce the suggestion that AA and PF synapses have different coding capabilities and plasticity that is associative, enabling effective association of information transmitted via granule cells.
