Autoimmune Disorders: Thinking differently about lupus

  1. Arthur Wuster
  2. Timothy W Behrens  Is a corresponding author
  1. Genentech Inc., United States

It is always exciting when a new study opens up a whole new way of thinking about a scientific problem. This is especially true if the problem is a health condition that is both poorly understood and incurable. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks healthy tissue – including the skin, joints and many internal organs – by mistake. Moreover, the underlying causes of the disease are not fully understood, so available treatments only tackle its symptoms. Now, in eLife, Patrick Gaffney, Edward Wakeland and colleagues – who include Prithvi Raj and Ekta Rai as joint first authors – report an extensive sequencing study of over 1,000 people with SLE that provides many new insights into the genetics of lupus (Raj et al., 2016).

The researchers – who are based at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, the Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation and other centers in the United States, Belgium and India – focused on 16 regions of the human genome that are known to influence a person’s risk of SLE. Their findings highlight the complexity of the changes in the genome that can predispose someone to develop SLE. Amongst the treasure-trove of data is one gold nugget that stands apart: the discovery that the expression level of the so-called Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class II genes contributes to risk of the disease. This is an entirely new twist on an old story.

The HLA genes are found in a long stretch of DNA on chromosome 6 that contains more than 140 protein-coding genes, many of which are important for immune responses (MHC Sequencing Consortium, 1999; de Bakker et al., 2006). The class I genes encode proteins that are found on the outer membrane of all cells, whereas the class II genes encode proteins found only on specialized immune cells called antigen-presenting cells. In both cases, these proteins bind to small fragments of other proteins and then display them to the immune system. Class I proteins display fragments from within our own cells and protect us from cancer, viral infections and certain bacteria that can live within our cells. Class II proteins, on the other hand, display fragments from foreign invaders and are important for instructing the immune system to mount neutralizing responses to parasites and bacteria that live outside of cells.

The HLA class I and II genes are amongst the most variable DNA sequences in the human genome. There are more than 8,000 different variants, or alleles, of class I genes and more than 2,500 class II alleles (Robinson et al., 2015). These alleles encode slightly different proteins, each with the potential to bind to, and display, different protein fragments.

Hundreds of studies have previously linked class I and II variants with the risk of specific diseases and, without exception, these studies have emphasized the sequence diversity of class I and II genes as the important factor (Welter et al., 2014. For example, individuals who carry the class I allele known as B27 are strongly predisposed to developing a type of arthritis called ankylosing spondylitis, whereas people without the B27 allele appear to be protected against the disease (Caffrey and James, 1973).

The new findings show that the HLA class II alleles conferring risk for SLE encode proteins that are found in greater numbers on the surface of antigen-presenting cells than those encoded by alleles that do not increase the risk (Raj et al., 2016). These data suggest, for the first time, that the abundance of class II proteins on antigen-presenting cells could strongly influence risk of certain diseases.

It remains to be determined how differences in the abundance of class II molecules translate to increased disease risk. Higher levels of class II molecules on antigen-presenting cells could increase the chances that circulating immune cells bind to these molecules, and lead to more efficient immune and autoimmune responses. Another possibility is that the extra class II proteins on antigen-presenting cells could adversely affect a developmental process that would normally eliminate those immune cells that have the potential to cause autoimmune disorders.

Further studies now need to extend the analysis of Raj, Rai et al. to the other major class II alleles that are associated with disease in humans. It will also be important to see if this paradigm extends to the class I alleles. These studies will improve our understanding of the earliest events in autoimmunity and hopefully lead to new treatment options for autoimmune disorders.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Arthur Wuster

    Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, United States
    Competing interests
    AW, TWB are full-time employees of Genentech, Inc.
  2. Timothy W Behrens

    Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, United States
    For correspondence
    behrens.tim@gene.com
    Competing interests
    AW, TWB are full-time employees of Genentech, Inc.

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published: March 29, 2016 (version 1)

Copyright

© 2016, Wuster et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,192
    Page views
  • 164
    Downloads
  • 0
    Citations

Article citation count generated by polling the highest count across the following sources: Crossref, PubMed Central, Scopus.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Arthur Wuster
  2. Timothy W Behrens
(2016)
Autoimmune Disorders: Thinking differently about lupus
eLife 5:e15352.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.15352

Further reading

    1. Genetics and Genomics
    Reese Richardson, Heliodoro Tejedor Navarro ... Thomas Stoeger
    Research Article

    Present-day publications on human genes primarily feature genes that already appeared in many publications prior to completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003. These patterns persist despite the subsequent adoption of high-throughput technologies, which routinely identify novel genes associated with biological processes and disease. Although several hypotheses for bias in the selection of genes as research targets have been proposed, their explanatory powers have not yet been compared. Our analysis suggests that understudied genes are systematically abandoned in favor of better-studied genes between the completion of -omics experiments and the reporting of results. Understudied genes remain abandoned by studies that cite these -omics experiments. Conversely, we find that publications on understudied genes may even accrue a greater number of citations. Among 45 biological and experimental factors previously proposed to affect which genes are being studied, we find that 33 are significantly associated with the choice of hit genes presented in titles and abstracts of -omics studies. To promote the investigation of understudied genes, we condense our insights into a tool, find my understudied genes (FMUG), that allows scientists to engage with potential bias during the selection of hits. We demonstrate the utility of FMUG through the identification of genes that remain understudied in vertebrate aging. FMUG is developed in Flutter and is available for download at fmug.amaral.northwestern.edu as a MacOS/Windows app.

    1. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Erandi Velazquez-Miranda, Ming He
    Insight

    Endothelial cell subpopulations are characterized by unique gene expression profiles, epigenetic landscapes and functional properties.