Abstract

Restriction factors and pattern recognition receptors are important components of intrinsic cellular defenses against viral infection. Mammalian TRIM5α proteins are restriction factors and receptors that target the capsid cores of retroviruses and activate ubiquitin-dependent antiviral responses upon capsid recognition. Here, we report crystallographic and functional studies of the TRIM5α B-box 2 domain, which mediates higher-order assembly of TRIM5 proteins. The B-box can form both dimers and trimers, and the trimers can link multiple TRIM5α proteins into a hexagonal net that matches the lattice arrangement of capsid subunits and enables avid capsid binding. Two modes of conformational flexibility allow TRIM5α to accommodate the variable curvature of retroviral capsids. B-box mediated interactions also modulate TRIM5α's E3 ubiquitin ligase activity, by stereochemically restricting how the N-terminal RING domain can dimerize. Overall, these studies define important molecular details of cellular recognition of retroviruses, and how recognition links to downstream processes to disable the virus.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jonathan M Wagner

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Marcin D Roganowicz

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Katarzyna Skorupka

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Steven L Alam

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Devin E Christensen

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Ginna L Doss

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Yueping Wan

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Gabriel A Frank

    Department of Life Sciences and National Institute for Biotechnology in the Negev, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheeva, Israel
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Barbie K Ganser-Pornillos

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Wesley I Sundquist

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
    Competing interests
    Wesley I Sundquist, Reviewing editor, eLife.
  11. Owen Pornillos

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    For correspondence
    owp3a@eservices.virginia.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Reviewing Editor

  1. Stephen P Goff, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, United States

Version history

  1. Received: March 23, 2016
  2. Accepted: May 20, 2016
  3. Accepted Manuscript published: June 2, 2016 (version 1)
  4. Version of Record published: July 7, 2016 (version 2)

Copyright

© 2016, Wagner et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,802
    views
  • 591
    downloads
  • 80
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jonathan M Wagner
  2. Marcin D Roganowicz
  3. Katarzyna Skorupka
  4. Steven L Alam
  5. Devin E Christensen
  6. Ginna L Doss
  7. Yueping Wan
  8. Gabriel A Frank
  9. Barbie K Ganser-Pornillos
  10. Wesley I Sundquist
  11. Owen Pornillos
(2016)
Mechanism of B-box 2 domain-mediated higher-order assembly of the retroviral restriction factor TRIM5α
eLife 5:e16309.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16309

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16309

Further reading

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Jeremy Luban
    Insight

    Structural studies reveal how an antiviral factor forms a molecular net to restrict retroviruses including HIV-1.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Plant Biology
    Henning Mühlenbeck, Yuko Tsutsui ... Cyril Zipfel
    Research Article

    Transmembrane signaling by plant receptor kinases (RKs) has long been thought to involve reciprocal trans-phosphorylation of their intracellular kinase domains. The fact that many of these are pseudokinase domains, however, suggests that additional mechanisms must govern RK signaling activation. Non-catalytic signaling mechanisms of protein kinase domains have been described in metazoans, but information is scarce for plants. Recently, a non-catalytic function was reported for the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RK subfamily XIIa member EFR (elongation factor Tu receptor) and phosphorylation-dependent conformational changes were proposed to regulate signaling of RKs with non-RD kinase domains. Here, using EFR as a model, we describe a non-catalytic activation mechanism for LRR-RKs with non-RD kinase domains. EFR is an active kinase, but a kinase-dead variant retains the ability to enhance catalytic activity of its co-receptor kinase BAK1/SERK3 (brassinosteroid insensitive 1-associated kinase 1/somatic embryogenesis receptor kinase 3). Applying hydrogen-deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX-MS) analysis and designing homology-based intragenic suppressor mutations, we provide evidence that the EFR kinase domain must adopt its active conformation in order to activate BAK1 allosterically, likely by supporting αC-helix positioning in BAK1. Our results suggest a conformational toggle model for signaling, in which BAK1 first phosphorylates EFR in the activation loop to stabilize its active conformation, allowing EFR in turn to allosterically activate BAK1.